Prospective Comparison Between Shotgun Metagenomics and Sanger Sequencing of the 16S rRNA Gene for the Etiological Diagnosis of Infections.

Bacteriological diagnosis is traditionally based on culture. However, this method may be limited by the difficulty of cultivating certain species or by prior exposure to antibiotics, which justifies the resort to molecular methods, such as Sanger sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene (Sanger 16S). Recently, shotgun metagenomics (SMg) has emerged as a powerful tool to identify a wide range of pathogenic microorganisms in numerous clinical contexts. In this study, we compared the performance of SMg to Sanger 16S for bacterial detection and identification. All patients' samples for which Sanger 16S was requested between November 2019 and April 2020 in our institution were prospectively included. The corresponding samples were tested with a commercial 16S semi-automated method and a semi-quantitative pan-microorganism DNA- and RNA-based SMg method. Sixty-seven samples from 64 patients were analyzed. Overall, SMg was able to identify a bacterial etiology in 46.3% of cases (31/67) vs. 38.8% (26/67) with Sanger 16S. This difference reached significance when only the results obtained at the species level were compared (28/67 vs. 13/67). This study provides one of the first evidence of a significantly better performance of SMg than Sanger 16S for bacterial detection at the species level in patients with infectious diseases for whom culture-based methods have failed. This technology has the potential to replace Sanger 16S in routine practice for infectious disease diagnosis.

Rapid detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from positive blood cultures by quantitative PCR.

BACKGROUND: Pseudomonas aeruginosa is responsible for numerous bloodstream infections associated with severe adverse outcomes in case of inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy. The present study was aimed to develop a novel quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay, using ecfX as the specific target gene, for the rapid and accurate identification of P. aeruginosa from positive blood cultures (BCs). METHODS: Over the period August 2008 to June 2009, 100 BC bottles positive for gram-negative bacilli were tested in order to evaluate performances of the qPCR technique with conventional methods as gold standard (i.e. culture and phenotypic identification). RESULTS: Thirty-three strains of P. aeruginosa, 53 strains of Enterobactericaeae, nine strains of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and two other gram-negative species were isolated while 3 BCs were polymicrobial including one mixture containing P. aeruginosa. All P. aeruginosa clinical isolates were detected by qPCR except a single strain in mixed culture. Performances of the qPCR technique were: specificity, 100%; positive predictive value, 100%; negative predictive value, 98.5%; and sensitivity, 97%. CONCLUSIONS: This reliable technique may offer a rapid (<1.5 h) tool that would help clinicians to initiate an appropriate treatment earlier. Further investigations are needed to assess the clinical benefit of this novel strategy as compared to phenotypic methods.

Routine use of real-time PCR for detection of Helicobacter pylori and of clarithromycin resistance mutations.

OBJECTIVES: We previously showed that real-time PCR was a reliable technique for coupled detection of Helicobacter pylori and clarithromycin resistance mutations directly from biopsies. After one year of use, we compared its performances to those of histology, which remains the most employed method for H. pylori detection from gastric biopsies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 518 subjects underwent endoscopy during the year 2003 with biopsies taken for H. pylori detection by histology, PCR, and in case of discrepancy between the two techniques, by culture. RESULTS: The prevalence of infection, defined as positive PCR and histology, and in case of discrepancy as a positive culture, was 30% (163/518). The percentage of concordance between the two tests was 87.8% (455/518). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of PCR were 98.2%, 97.5%, 94.7%, and 99.1%, respectively. The corresponding performances of histology were 87.7%, 91.3%, 82.2%, and 94.2%, respectively (p<0.001). The prevalence of clarithromycin resistance was 30%. CONCLUSIONS: PCR is more accurate in routine than histology and permits easy determination of clarithromycin resistance, which is useful in countries like France where the prevalence of resistance is high.

Fast and accurate quantitative detection of Helicobacter pylori and identification of clarithromycin resistance mutations in H. pylori isolates from gastric biopsy specimens by real-time PCR.

Rapid identification of patients infected with clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori without the need for culture can help to avoid useless prescriptions of clarithromycin. We developed and tested a routine real-time quantitative PCR assay dedicated to that purpose. One hundred ninety-six consecutive gastric biopsy specimens were examined by culture, histology performed by a trained physician, and rapid PCR with the LightCycler apparatus. Infection was defined as (i) positivity of culture, (ii) positivity of histology, or (iii) positivity of PCR if confirmed by positivity of a concomitant indirect test (serology or urea breath test). Susceptibility to clarithromycin was tested by E-test and PCR. The prevalence of infection was 33.7% (66 of 196 samples). The sensitivities of culture, histology, and PCR were 90.9% (60 of 66 samples), 87.9% (58 of 66 samples), and 97.0% (64 of 66 samples), respectively. The specificity of PCR was 94.6% (123 of 130 samples). The linearity of the PCR results was achieved over a 6-log range of input DNA, and we were able to accurately quantify as few as 300 bacteria and to qualitatively detect as few as 30 bacteria per DNA sample. For clarithromycin susceptibility testing, there was 98.2% (55 of 56 samples) concordance between E-test and PCR. Forty-eight strains were clarithromycin susceptible, and 9 strains were clarithromycin resistant. The single discrepancy concerned a culture which was a mixture of mutant and wild type, with a susceptible-to-resistant ratio of 11.5: the resistant population was detected by E-test but not by PCR. Our PCR assay is accurate for fast detection of H. pylori as well as of clarithromycin resistance and is also able to objectively determine bacterial density.