TRAPing Ghrelin-Activated Circuits: A Novel Tool to Identify, Target and Control Hormone-Responsive Populations in TRAP2 Mice.

The availability of Cre-based mouse lines for visualizing and targeting populations of hormone-sensitive cells has helped identify the neural circuitry driving hormone effects. However, these mice have limitations and may not even be available. For instance, the development of the first ghrelin receptor (Ghsr)-IRES-Cre model paved the way for using the Cre-lox system to identify and selectively manipulate ghrelin-responsive populations. The insertion of the IRES-Cre cassette, however, interfered with Ghsr expression, resulting in defective GHSR signaling and a pronounced phenotype in the homozygotes. As an alternative strategy to target ghrelin-responsive cells, we hereby utilize TRAP2 (targeted recombination in active populations) mice in which it is possible to gain genetic access to ghrelin-activated populations. In TRAP2 mice crossed with a reporter strain, we visualized ghrelin-activated cells and found, as expected, much activation in the arcuate nucleus (Arc). We then stimulated this population using a chemogenetic approach and found that this was sufficient to induce an orexigenic response of similar magnitude to that induced by peripheral ghrelin injection. The stimulation of this population also impacted food choice. Thus, the TRAPing of hormone-activated neurons (here exemplified by ghrelin-activated pathways) provides a complimentary/alternative technique to visualize, access and control discrete pathways, linking hormone action to circuit function.

A skeleton in the cupboard in ghrelin research: Where are the skinny dwarfs?

Based on studies delivering ghrelin or ghrelin receptor agonists, we have learned a great deal about the importance of the brain ghrelin signalling system for a wide range of physiological processes that include feeding behaviours, growth hormone secretion and glucose homeostasis. Because these processes can be considered as essential to life, the question arises as to why mouse models of depleted ghrelin signalling are not all skinny dwarfs with a host of behavioural and metabolic problems. Here, we provide a systematic detailed review of the phenotype of mice with deficient ghrelin signalling to help better understand the relevance and importance of the brain ghrelin signalling system, with a particular emphasis on those questions that remain unanswered.

Genetic deletion of the ghrelin receptor (GHSR) impairs growth and blunts endocrine response to fasting in Ghsr-IRES-Cre mice.

OBJECTIVE: The orexigenic hormone ghrelin exerts its physiological effects by binding to and activating the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR). The recent development of a Ghsr-IRES-Cre knock-in mouse line has enabled to genetically access GHSR-expressing neurons. Inserting a Cre construct using a knock-in strategy, even when following an upstream internal ribosome entry site (IRES) can, however, interfere with expression of a targeted gene, with consequences for the phenotype emerging. This study aimed to phenotype, both physically and metabolically, heterozygous and homozygous Ghsr-IRES-Cre mice, with a view to discovering the extent to which the ghrelin signalling system remains functional in these mice. METHODS: We assessed feeding and arcuate nucleus (Arc) Fos activation in wild-type, heterozygous and homozygous Ghsr-IRES-Cre mice in response to peripherally-administered ghrelin. We also characterised their developmental and growth phenotypes, as well as their metabolic responses upon an overnight fast. RESULTS: Insertion of the IRES-Cre cassette into the 3'-untranslated region of the Ghsr gene led to a gene-dosage GHSR depletion in the Arc. Whereas heterozygotes remained ghrelin-responsive and more closely resembled wild-types, ghrelin had reduced orexigenic efficacy and failed to induce Arc Fos expression in homozygous littermates. Homozygotes had a lower body weight accompanied by a shorter body length, less fat tissue content, altered bone parameters, and lower insulin-like growth factor-1 levels compared to wild-type and heterozygous littermates. Moreover, both heterozygous and homozygous Ghsr-IRES-Cre mice lacked the usual fasting-induced rise in growth hormone (GH) and displayed an exaggerated drop in blood glucose and insulin compared to wild-types. Unexpectedly, fasting acyl-ghrelin levels were allele-dependently increased. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that (i) heterozygous but not homozygous Ghsr-IRES-Cre mice retain the usual responsiveness to administered ghrelin, (ii) the impact of fasting on GH release and glucose homeostasis is altered even when only one copy of the Ghsr gene is non-functional (as in heterozygous Ghsr-IRES-Cre mice) and (iii) homozygous Ghsr-IRES-Cre mice exhibit growth retardation. Of the many transgenic models of suppressed ghrelin signalling, Ghsr-IRES-Cre mice emerge as best representing the full breadth of the expected phenotype with respect to body weight, growth, and metabolic parameters.

The Orexigenic Force of Olfactory Palatable Food Cues in Rats.

Environmental cues recalling palatable foods motivate eating beyond metabolic need, yet the timing of this response and whether it can develop towards a less palatable but readily available food remain elusive. Increasing evidence indicates that external stimuli in the olfactory modality communicate with the major hub in the feeding neurocircuitry, namely the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus (Arc), but the neural substrates involved have been only partially uncovered. By means of a home-cage hidden palatable food paradigm, aiming to mimic ubiquitous exposure to olfactory food cues in Western societies, we investigated whether the latter could drive the overeating of plain chow in non-food-deprived male rats and explored the neural mechanisms involved, including the possible engagement of the orexigenic ghrelin system. The olfactory detection of a familiar, palatable food impacted upon meal patterns, by increasing meal frequency, to cause the persistent overconsumption of chow. In line with the orexigenic response observed, sensing the palatable food in the environment stimulated food-seeking and risk-taking behavior, which are intrinsic components of food acquisition, and caused active ghrelin release. Our results suggest that olfactory food cues recruited intermingled populations of cells embedded within the feeding circuitry within the Arc, including, notably, those containing the ghrelin receptor. These data demonstrate the leverage of ubiquitous food cues, not only for palatable food searching, but also to powerfully drive food consumption in ways that resonate with heightened hunger, for which the orexigenic ghrelin system is implicated.

Functional and Neurochemical Identification of Ghrelin Receptor (GHSR)-Expressing Cells of the Lateral Parabrachial Nucleus in Mice.

The lateral parabrachial nucleus (lPBN), located in the pons, is a well-recognized anorexigenic center harboring, amongst others, the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-expressing neurons that play a key role. The receptor for the orexigenic hormone ghrelin (the growth hormone secretagogue receptor, GHSR) is also abundantly expressed in the lPBN and ghrelin delivery to this site has recently been shown to increase food intake and alter food choice. Here we sought to explore whether GHSR-expressing cells in the lPBN (GHSR lPBN cells) contribute to feeding control, food choice and body weight gain in mice offered an obesogenic diet, involving studies in which GHSR lPBN cells were silenced. We also explored the neurochemical identity of GHSR lPBN cells. To silence GHSR lPBN cells, Ghsr-IRES-Cre male mice were bilaterally injected intra-lPBN with a Cre-dependent viral vector expressing tetanus toxin-light chain. Unlike control wild-type littermates that significantly increased in body weight on the obesogenic diet (i.e., high-fat high-sugar free choice diet comprising chow, lard and 9% sucrose solution), the heterozygous mice with silenced GHSR lPBN cells were resistant to diet-induced weight gain with significantly lower food intake and fat weight. The lean phenotype appeared to result from a decreased food intake compared to controls and caloric efficiency was unaltered. Additionally, silencing the GHSR lPBN cells altered food choice, significantly reducing palatable food consumption. RNAscope and immunohistochemical studies of the lPBN revealed considerable co-expression of GHSR with glutamate and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP), and much less with neurotensin, substance P and CGRP. Thus, the GHSR lPBN cells are important for diet-induced weight gain and adiposity, as well as in the regulation of food intake and food choice. Most GHSR lPBN cells were found to be glutamatergic and the majority (76%) do not belong to the well-characterized anorexigenic CGRP cell population.

Ghrelin Receptor Stimulation of the Lateral Parabrachial Nucleus in Rats Increases Food Intake but not Food Motivation.

OBJECTIVE: The lateral parabrachial nucleus (lPBN) in the brainstem has emerged as a key area involved in feeding control that is targeted by several circulating anorexigenic hormones. Here, the objective was to determine whether the lPBN is also a relevant site for the orexigenic hormone ghrelin, inspired by studies in mice and rats showing that there is an abundance of ghrelin receptors in this area. METHODS: This study first explored whether iPBN cells respond to ghrelin involving Fos mapping and electrophysiological studies in rats. Next, rats were injected acutely with ghrelin, a ghrelin receptor antagonist, or vehicle into the lPBN to investigate feeding-linked behaviors. RESULTS: Curiously, ghrelin injection (intracerebroventricular or intravenous) increased Fos protein expression in the lPBN yet the predominant electrophysiological response was inhibitory. Intra-lPBN ghrelin injection increased chow or high-fat diet intake, whereas the antagonist decreased chow intake only. In a choice paradigm, intra-lPBN ghrelin increased intake of chow but not lard or sucrose. Intra-lPBN ghrelin did not alter progressive ratio lever pressing for sucrose or conditioned place preference for chocolate. CONCLUSIONS: The lPBN is a novel locus from which ghrelin can alter consummatory behaviors (food intake and choice) but not appetitive behaviors (food reward and motivation).

Activation of the rat hypothalamic supramammillary nucleus by food anticipation, food restriction or ghrelin administration.

The circulating orexigenic hormone ghrelin targets many brain areas involved in feeding control and signals via a dedicated receptor, the growth hormone secretagogue receptor 1A. One unexplored target area for ghrelin is the supramammillary nucleus (SuM), a hypothalamic area involved in motivation and reinforcement and also recently linked to metabolic control. Given that ghrelin binds to the SuM, we explored whether SuM cells respond to ghrelin and/or are activated when endogenous ghrelin levels are elevated. We found that peripheral ghrelin injection activates SuM cells in rats, reflected by an increase in the number of cells expressing c-Fos protein in this area, as welll as by the predominantly excitatory response of single SuM cells recorded in in vivo electrophysiological studies. Further c-Fos mapping studies reveal that this area is also activated in rats in situations when circulating ghrelin levels are known to be elevated: in food-restricted rats anticipating the consumption of food and in fed rats anticipating the consumption of an energy-dense food. We also show that intra-SuM injection of ghrelin induces a feeding response in rats suggesting that, if peripheral ghrelin is able to access the SuM, it may have direct effects on this brain region. Collectively, our data demonstrate that the SuM is activated when peripheral ghrelin levels are high, further supporting the emerging role for this brain area in metabolic and feeding control.