Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 55(3): 286-294, 2017 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28079517

RESUMO

CONTEXT: A fixed-dose combination (FDC) of candesartan and rosuvastatin was recently developed for the treatment of cardiovascular disease and expected to enhance patient compliance. OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to compare the single-dose pharmacokinetic properties and tolerability of DP-R208 (candesartan and rosuvastatin FDC) to those of each component administered alone in healthy Korean male volunteers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 healthy Korean volunteers were enrolled in this randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-treatment, two-way crossover study. During each treatment period, subjects received the test formulation (FDC tablet containing candesartan and rosuvastatin) or reference formulation (co-administration of candesartan and rosuvastatin). Plasma samples were collected pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours post-dose. Safety and tolerability were assessed by the evaluation of adverse events (AEs), physical examinations, laboratory assessments, 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs), and vital sign measurements. RESULTS: The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric least-square mean ratios of Cmax, AUClast, and AUCinf were 0.86 - 1.00, 0.92 - 1.04, and 0.92 - 1.03 for candesartan, and 0.88 - 1.06, 0.91 - 1.08, and 0.91 - 1.03 for rosuvastatin, respectively. All of the AEs were mild, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of AEs between the formulations. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetic properties of the test and reference formulations met the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence. Discussion and conclusion: Both formulations were safe and well tolerated, and no significant difference was observed in the safety assessments of the treatments.
.


Assuntos
Bloqueadores do Receptor Tipo 1 de Angiotensina II/farmacocinética , Anti-Hipertensivos/farmacocinética , Benzimidazóis/farmacocinética , Compostos de Bifenilo/farmacocinética , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/farmacocinética , Rosuvastatina Cálcica/farmacocinética , Tetrazóis/farmacocinética , Administração Oral , Adulto , Bloqueadores do Receptor Tipo 1 de Angiotensina II/administração & dosagem , Bloqueadores do Receptor Tipo 1 de Angiotensina II/efeitos adversos , Bloqueadores do Receptor Tipo 1 de Angiotensina II/sangue , Anti-Hipertensivos/administração & dosagem , Anti-Hipertensivos/efeitos adversos , Anti-Hipertensivos/sangue , Área Sob a Curva , Povo Asiático , Benzimidazóis/administração & dosagem , Benzimidazóis/efeitos adversos , Benzimidazóis/sangue , Compostos de Bifenilo/administração & dosagem , Compostos de Bifenilo/efeitos adversos , Compostos de Bifenilo/sangue , Estudos Cross-Over , Combinação de Medicamentos , Meia-Vida , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/sangue , Masculino , Taxa de Depuração Metabólica , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , República da Coreia , Rosuvastatina Cálcica/administração & dosagem , Rosuvastatina Cálcica/efeitos adversos , Rosuvastatina Cálcica/sangue , Comprimidos , Tetrazóis/administração & dosagem , Tetrazóis/efeitos adversos , Tetrazóis/sangue , Equivalência Terapêutica , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA