RESUMO
Transcriptional coregulators and transcription factors (TFs) contain intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) that are critical for their association and function in gene regulation. More recently, IDRs have been shown to promote multivalent protein-protein interactions between coregulators and TFs to drive their association into condensates. By contrast, here we demonstrate how the IDR of the corepressor LSD1 excludes TF association, acting as a dynamic conformational switch that tunes repression of active cis-regulatory elements. Hydrogen-deuterium exchange shows that the LSD1 IDR interconverts between transient open and closed conformational states, the latter of which inhibits partitioning of the protein's structured domains with TF condensates. This autoinhibitory switch controls leukemic differentiation by modulating repression of active cis-regulatory elements bound by LSD1 and master hematopoietic TFs. Together, these studies unveil alternative mechanisms by which disordered regions and their dynamic crosstalk with structured regions can shape coregulator-TF interactions to control cis-regulatory landscapes and cell fate.
Assuntos
Elementos Facilitadores Genéticos , Histona Desmetilases , Histona Desmetilases/metabolismo , Histona Desmetilases/genética , Humanos , Proteínas Intrinsicamente Desordenadas/metabolismo , Proteínas Intrinsicamente Desordenadas/genética , Proteínas Intrinsicamente Desordenadas/química , Fatores de Transcrição/metabolismo , Fatores de Transcrição/genética , Animais , Ligação Proteica , Camundongos , Diferenciação Celular , Inativação GênicaRESUMO
DNA methylation is critical for regulating gene expression, necessitating its accurate placement by enzymes such as the DNA methyltransferase DNMT3A. Dysregulation of this process is known to cause aberrant development and oncogenesis, yet how DNMT3A is regulated holistically by its three domains remains challenging to study. Here, we integrate base editing with a DNA methylation reporter to perform in situ mutational scanning of DNMT3A in cells. We identify mutations throughout the protein that perturb function, including ones at an interdomain interface that block allosteric activation. Unexpectedly, we also find mutations in the PWWP domain, a histone reader, that modulate enzyme activity despite preserving histone recognition and protein stability. These effects arise from altered PWWP domain DNA affinity, which we show is a noncanonical function required for full activity in cells. Our findings highlight mechanisms of interdomain crosstalk and demonstrate a generalizable strategy to probe sequence-activity relationships of nonessential chromatin regulators.
Assuntos
DNA (Citosina-5-)-Metiltransferases , Histonas , Histonas/genética , Histonas/metabolismo , DNA (Citosina-5-)-Metiltransferases/genética , DNA (Citosina-5-)-Metiltransferases/metabolismo , DNA Metiltransferase 3A , Ligação Proteica/genética , DNA/genética , DNA/metabolismo , Metilação de DNARESUMO
Cancer mutations can create neomorphic protein-protein interactions to drive aberrant function 1 . As a substrate receptor of the CULLIN3-RBX1 E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, KBTBD4 is recurrently mutated in medulloblastoma (MB) 2 , the most common embryonal brain tumor in children, and pineoblastoma 3 . These mutations impart gain-of-function to KBTBD4 to induce aberrant degradation of the transcriptional corepressor CoREST 4 . However, their mechanism of action remains unresolved. Here, we elucidate the mechanistic basis by which KBTBD4 mutations promote CoREST degradation through engaging HDAC1/2, the direct neomorphic target of the substrate receptor. Using deep mutational scanning, we systematically map the mutational landscape of the KBTBD4 cancer hotspot, revealing distinct preferences by which insertions and substitutions can promote gain-of-function and the critical residues involved in the hotspot interaction. Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) analysis of two distinct KBTBD4 cancer mutants bound to LSD1-HDAC1-CoREST reveals that a KBTBD4 homodimer asymmetrically engages HDAC1 with two KELCH-repeat propeller domains. The interface between HDAC1 and one of the KBTBD4 propellers is stabilized by the MB mutations, which directly insert a bulky side chain into the active site pocket of HDAC1. Our structural and mutational analyses inform how this hotspot E3-neo-substrate interface can be chemically modulated. First, our results unveil a converging shape complementarity-based mechanism between gain-of-function E3 mutations and a molecular glue degrader, UM171. Second, we demonstrate that HDAC1/2 inhibitors can block the mutant KBTBD4-HDAC1 interface, the aberrant degradation of CoREST, and the growth of KBTBD4-mutant MB models. Altogether, our work reveals the structural and mechanistic basis of cancer mutation-driven neomorphic protein-protein interactions and pharmacological strategies to modulate their action for therapeutic applications.
RESUMO
UM171 is a potent small molecule agonist of ex vivo human hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) self-renewal, a process that is tightly controlled by epigenetic regulation. By co-opting KBTBD4, a substrate receptor of the CULLIN3-RING E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, UM171 promotes the degradation of members of the CoREST transcriptional corepressor complex, thereby limiting HSC attrition. However, the direct target and mechanism of action of UM171 remain unclear. Here, we reveal that UM171 acts as a molecular glue to induce high-affinity interactions between KBTBD4 and HDAC1 to promote the degradation of select HDAC1/2 corepressor complexes. Through proteomics and chemical inhibitor studies, we discover that the principal target of UM171 is HDAC1/2. Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) analysis of dimeric KBTBD4 bound to UM171 and the LSD1-HDAC1-CoREST complex unveils an unexpected asymmetric assembly, in which a single UM171 molecule enables a pair of KBTBD4 KELCH-repeat propeller domains to recruit HDAC1 by clamping on its catalytic domain. One of the KBTBD4 propellers partially masks the rim of the HDAC1 active site pocket, which is exploited by UM171 to extend the E3-neo-substrate interface. The other propeller cooperatively strengthens HDAC1 binding via a separate and distinct interface. The overall neomorphic interaction is further buttressed by an endogenous cofactor of HDAC1-CoREST, inositol hexakisphosphate, which makes direct contacts with KBTBD4 and acts as a second molecular glue. The functional relevance of the quaternary complex interaction surfaces defined by cryo-EM is demonstrated by in situ base editor scanning of KBTBD4 and HDAC1. By delineating the direct target of UM171 and its mechanism of action, our results reveal how the cooperativity offered by a large dimeric CRL E3 family can be leveraged by a small molecule degrader and establish for the first time a dual molecular glue paradigm.
RESUMO
Allostery enables dynamic control of protein function. A paradigmatic example is the tightly orchestrated process of DNA methylation maintenance. Despite the fundamental importance of allosteric sites, their identification remains highly challenging. Here, we perform CRISPR scanning on the essential maintenance methylation machinery-DNMT1 and its partner UHRF1-with the activity-based inhibitor decitabine to uncover allosteric mechanisms regulating DNMT1. In contrast to non-covalent DNMT1 inhibition, activity-based selection implicates numerous regions outside the catalytic domain in DNMT1 function. Through computational analyses, we identify putative mutational hotspots in DNMT1 distal from the active site that encompass mutations spanning a multi-domain autoinhibitory interface and the uncharacterized BAH2 domain. We biochemically characterize these mutations as gain-of-function, exhibiting increased DNMT1 activity. Extrapolating our analysis to UHRF1, we discern putative gain-of-function mutations in multiple domains, including key residues across the autoinhibitory TTD-PBR interface. Collectively, our study highlights the utility of activity-based CRISPR scanning for nominating candidate allosteric sites, and more broadly, introduces new analytical tools that further refine the CRISPR scanning framework.
Assuntos
DNA (Citosina-5-)-Metiltransferases , Metilação de DNA , DNA (Citosina-5-)-Metiltransferases/genética , Repetições Palindrômicas Curtas Agrupadas e Regularmente Espaçadas , Proteínas Estimuladoras de Ligação a CCAAT/genética , Ubiquitina-Proteína Ligases/metabolismo , DNA (Citosina-5-)-Metiltransferase 1/genéticaRESUMO
CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing technologies have enabled complex genetic manipulations in situ, including large-scale, pooled screening approaches to probe and uncover mechanistic insights across various biological processes. The RNA-programmable nature of CRISPR-Cas9 greatly empowers tiling mutagenesis approaches to elucidate molecular details of protein function, in particular the interrogation of mechanisms of resistance to small molecules, an approach termed CRISPR-suppressor scanning. In a typical CRISPR-suppressor scanning experiment, a pooled library of single-guide RNAs is designed to target across the coding sequence(s) of one or more genes, enabling the Cas9 nuclease to systematically mutate the targeted proteins and generate large numbers of diverse protein variants in situ. This cellular pool of protein variants is then challenged with drug treatment to identify mutations conferring a fitness advantage. Drug-resistance mutations identified with this approach can not only elucidate drug mechanism of action but also reveal deeper mechanistic insights into protein structure-function relationships. In this article, we outline the framework for a standard CRISPR-suppressor scanning experiment. Specifically, we provide instructions for the design and construction of a pooled sgRNA library, execution of a CRISPR-suppressor scanning screen, and basic computational analysis of the resulting data. © 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Design and generation of a pooled sgRNA library Support Protocol 1: sgRNA library design using command-line CRISPOR Support Protocol 2: Production and titering of pooled sgRNA library lentivirus Basic Protocol 2: Execution and analysis of a CRISPR-suppressor scanning experiment.