Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of tofacitinib 5 mg in healthy Korean male subjects.

OBJECTIVE: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor marketed as an immunomodulator that can effectively treat rheumatoid arthritis. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics and evaluate the bioequivalence of tofacitinib free base (CKD-374) with those of tofacitinib citrate (Xeljanz). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-sequence, 2-period crossover study was conducted in healthy Korean male subjects. A total of 36 subjects were randomized into two sequence groups. At each period, subjects were administered the test formulation (tofacitinib free base, 5 mg) or the reference formulation (tofacitinib citrate, 8.078 mg; as tofacitinib, 5 mg). The plasma samples were collected up to 12 hours post dose and analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters, including maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve from dosing to the last measurable concentration (AUC0-t), were determined by non-compartmental analysis. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios for Cmax and AUC0-t were calculated to evaluate pharmacokinetic equivalence. RESULTS: The 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios of Cmax and AUC0-t for tofacitinib free base to tofacitinib citrate were 0.9144 - 1.1230 and 1.0245 - 1.0932, respectively. All reported adverse events were of mild intensity, and there were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: In healthy Korean male adult subjects, the pharmacokinetic parameters of tofacitinib free base and tofacitinib citrate were evaluated and met the pharmacokinetic bioequivalent criteria. Both formulations were safe and well-tolerated.

Dynamics of subcellular proteomes during brain development.

Many neurological disorders are caused by perturbations during brain development, but these perturbations cannot be readily identified until there is comprehensive description of the development process. In this study, we performed mass spectrometry analysis of the synaptosomal and mitochondrial fractions from three rat brain regions at four postnatal time points. To quantitate our analysis, we employed (15)N labeled rat brains using a technique called SILAM (stable isotope labeling in mammals). We quantified 167429 peptides and identified over 5000 statistically significant changes during development including known disease-associated proteins. Global analysis revealed distinct trends between the synaptic and nonsynaptic mitochondrial proteomes and common protein networks between regions each consisting of a unique array of expression patterns. Finally, we identified novel regulators of neurodevelopment that possess the identical temporal pattern of known regulators of neurodevelopment. Overall, this study is the most comprehensive quantitative analysis of the developing brain proteome to date, providing an important resource for neurobiologists.

The first step to the powers for clinical trials: a survey on the current and future Clinical Trial Management System.

A clinical trial management system (CTMS) is a comprehensive program that supports an efficient clinical trial. To improve the environment of clinical trials and to be competitive in the global clinical trials market, an advanced and integrated CTMS is necessary. However, there is little information about the status of CTMSs in Korea. To understand the utilization of current CTMSs and requirements for a future CTMS, we conducted a survey on the subjects related to clinical trials. The survey was conducted from July 27 to August 16, 2017. The total number of respondents was 596, and 531 of these responses were used. Almost half of the respondents were from hospitals (46%). The proportion of respondents who are currently using a CTMS was the highest for contract research organizations at 59%, whereas the proportion used by investigators was 39%. The main reason for not using a CTMS was that it is unnecessary and expensive, but it showed a difference between workplaces. Many respondents frequently used CTMSs to check the clinical trial schedule and progress status, which was needed regardless of workplace. While two-thirds of users tended to be satisfied with their current CTMS, there were many users who felt their CTMS was inconvenient. The most requested function for a future CTMS was one that could be used to manage the project schedule and subject enrollment status. Additionally, a systematic linkage to electronic medical records, including prescription and laboratory test results, and a function to confirm the participation history of subjects in other hospitals were requested.