RESUMO
BACKGROUND: It is unclear if hepatitis C virus (HCV) negatively impacts outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). The purpose of this study is to trend recent rTHA utilization in patients who have HCV and compare postoperative complication rates versus a matched cohort. METHODS: All patients who underwent rTHA were retrospectively identified in a national database. Patients who had HCV (n = 1,746) were matched 1:3 with a matching group (n = 5,238) for age, gender, and several comorbidities. Cochran-Armitage tests were used to analyze trends in the annual proportion of rTHA performed in patients who had HCV from 2010 to 2019. Rates of 90-day medical and prosthesis-related complications within 2 years postoperatively were compared with multivariable logistic regressions. RESULTS: The annual proportion of rTHA performed in patients who had HCV significantly increased from 2010 to 2019 (P < .001). Patients who had HCV exhibited significantly higher rates of acute kidney injuries (7.6% versus 4.4%; odds ratio [OR] 1.50), transfusions (20.6% versus 14.6%; OR 1.38), and re-revisions for prosthetic joint infection (10.9% versus 6.5%; OR 1.73). In subgroup analyses, rates of re-revision for prosthetic joint infection after initial aseptic rTHA (7.1% versus 3.8%; OR 1.82) and periprosthetic fracture after initial septic rTHA (4.5% versus 1.6%; OR 2.77) were significantly higher in the HCV cohort. CONCLUSION: Similar to primary THA, patients who have HCV exhibit significantly increased complication rates after rTHA. With growing utilization in recent years, these data suggest that this population will comprise an increasingly larger proportion of rTHA procedures performed in the coming years.
Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Hepatite C , Humanos , Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia de Quadril/métodos , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Hepacivirus , Hepatite C/complicações , Hepatite C/epidemiologia , ReoperaçãoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to examine whether previous lumbar spinal fusion (LSF) was an independent risk factor for complications in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) or hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An administrative database was queried from 2010 to Q2 of 2019 to analyze and compare complications in patients undergoing either THA or hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture with a history of LSF versus no history of LSF. Joint complications including periprosthetic fracture, prosthetic joint infection (PJI), prosthetic joint dislocation (PJD), aseptic loosening, and prosthetic revision were examined at 90 days and 1 year post-operatively. RESULTS: In the THA cohort, patients with prior LSF had significantly higher likelihood of aseptic loosening at 90 days and 1 year post-operatively in comparison to those without prior LSF (90-day: OR 2.22; 1-year: OR 1.95). Patients in the hemiarthroplasty cohort with prior LSF had significantly higher likelihood of PJI (90-day: OR 2.18; 1-year: OR 2.37), aseptic loosening (90-day: OR 3.42; 1-year: OR 4.68), and prosthetic revision (90-day: OR 2.27; 1-year: OR 2.25) in both the 90-day and 1-year postoperative period in comparison to those without prior LSF. Additionally, for the same cohort, periprosthetic fracture (1-year: OR 2.32) and PJD (1-year: OR 2.31) were significantly higher at 1-year postoperative. CONCLUSION: Presence of LSF was found to be an independent risk factor for increased joint complications in patients undergoing either a THA or hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures.
Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Fraturas do Colo Femoral , Hemiartroplastia , Luxações Articulares , Fraturas Periprotéticas , Fusão Vertebral , Humanos , Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia de Quadril/métodos , Fraturas Periprotéticas/cirurgia , Hemiartroplastia/efeitos adversos , Hemiartroplastia/métodos , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Luxações Articulares/cirurgia , Fraturas do Colo Femoral/complicações , Reoperação/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgiaRESUMO
This study highlights the persistent osteoporosis treatment gap following fragility fractures. Patients with multiple sclerosis sustained more primary hip fractures than controls and exhibited significantly higher rates of falls within three years post-fracture. However, multiple sclerosis (MS) patients were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with osteoporosis and treated with medications. INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare rates of osteoporosis management, falls, and secondary fractures following primary fragility fractures among patients with MS versus matched controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective matched cohort study was conducted using the PearlDiver database. Patients aged ≥ 50 years with primary fragility fractures were identified (n = 120,368). Within this population, patients with MS were matched 1:10 with controls across age, sex, and US region. Rates of osteoporosis diagnoses and pharmacologic treatment, low-energy falls, and secondary fragility fractures were compared at three years post-fracture via logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 1,232 patients with MS (mean age, 65.7 years) with primary fragility fractures were matched with 12,320 controls (mean age, 65.8 years). Primary hip fractures were significantly more common in the MS cohort (47.4% vs. 34.2%, p < 0.001). After the initial fracture, patients with MS were significantly more likely to receive a formal osteoporosis diagnosis (12.9% vs. 9.7%; OR 1.35; 95% CI, 1.13-1.61) and osteoporosis pharmacotherapy (14.4% vs. 11.9%; OR 1.24; 95% CI, 1.04-1.46). The MS cohort also exhibited significantly higher rates of falls (27.8% vs 22.7%; OR 1.15; 95% CI, 1.01-1.32). Rates of secondary fractures were comparable (6.3% vs. 5.0%; OR 1.10; 95% CI, 0.85-1.40). CONCLUSION: Primary hip fragility fractures were significantly more common in patients with MS compared to matched controls. Following an initial fracture, patients with MS exhibited a significantly higher rate of falls but were more likely to be diagnosed with osteoporosis and treated with medications.
Assuntos
Fraturas do Quadril , Esclerose Múltipla , Osteoporose , Fraturas por Osteoporose , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Fraturas do Quadril/complicações , Fraturas do Quadril/etiologia , Humanos , Esclerose Múltipla/complicações , Esclerose Múltipla/tratamento farmacológico , Esclerose Múltipla/epidemiologia , Osteoporose/complicações , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/complicações , Fraturas por Osteoporose/etiologia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C (HCV) is undertreated and increasing in prevalence. Its influence on outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of HCV and prearthroplasty antiviral treatment on postoperative complications following TKA. METHODS: A retrospective matched cohort study was conducted using an administrative claims database to compare postoperative complication rates following TKA for (1) patients with vs without HCV and (2) among patients with HCV, patients with antiviral treatment before TKA vs no treatment. In total, 6971 patients with HCV were matched 1:4 with 27,884 controls without HCV, and 708 HCV patients with antiviral treatment before TKA were matched 1:2 with 1416 HCV patients without treatment. Rates of joint complications at 1 and 2 years postoperatively were compared via multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: The HCV cohort exhibited significantly higher risk of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) than controls at both 1 (4.1 vs 2.1%; odds ratio [OR] 1.58) and 2 years (5.0% vs 2.7%; OR 1.55) postoperatively. Rates of revision TKA were also significantly higher for HCV patients at 1 (2.8% vs 1.8%; OR 1.40) and 2 years (4.1% vs 2.9%; OR 1.30). HCV patients with prearthroplasty antiviral treatment exhibited significantly lower risk of PJI at 1 (2.1% vs 4.1%; OR 0.50) and 2 years (2.7% vs 5.1%, OR 0.51) compared to patients without treatment. CONCLUSION: Patients with HCV have significantly increased risk of PJI and revision arthroplasty following TKA. Antiviral treatment before TKA significantly decreases the risk of PJI postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Assuntos
Artrite Infecciosa , Artroplastia do Joelho , Hepatite C , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Artrite Infecciosa/etiologia , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Coortes , Hepatite C/complicações , Hepatite C/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Reoperação/efeitos adversos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is associated with increased complication risk after elective arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of HCV and prearthroplasty antiviral treatment on complications following total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: A retrospective matched cohort study was conducted using an administrative claims database. In total, 6,883 HCV patients were matched 1:3 with 20,694 noninfected controls, and 920 HCV patients with antiviral treatment before THA (treated HCV) were matched 1:4 with 3,820 HCV patients without treatment (untreated HCV). Rates of 90-day medical complications and joint complications within 2 years postoperatively were compared with multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: HCV patients exhibited significantly increased rates of medical complications within 90 days compared to noninfected controls (all P < .01). At 2 years postoperatively, HCV patients also exhibited significantly higher risk of revision THA (odds ratio [OR] 1.81), dislocation (OR 2.06), mechanical complications (OR 1.40), periprosthetic fracture (OR 1.76), and prosthetic joint infection (PJI) (OR 1.79). However, treated HCV patients exhibited statistically comparable risk of all joint complications at 2 years postoperatively relative to controls (all P > .05). Compared to untreated HCV patients, treated HCV patients exhibited significantly lower risk of inpatient readmission within 90 days (OR 0.58) and PJI at 2 years postoperatively (OR 0.62). CONCLUSION: HCV patients exhibit significantly increased risk of medical and joint complications following THA relative to controls, though prearthroplasty antiviral treatment mitigates complication risk. Treated HCV patients exhibited significantly lower risk of inpatient readmission and PJI compared to untreated HCV patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Assuntos
Artrite Infecciosa , Artroplastia de Quadril , Hepatite C , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Artrite Infecciosa/etiologia , Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Coortes , Hepacivirus , Hepatite C/complicações , Hepatite C/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: During a pandemic, it is paramount to understand volume changes in Level I trauma so that with appropriate planning and reallocation of resources, these facilities can maintain and even improve life-saving capabilities. Evaluating nonaccidental and accidental trauma can highlight potential areas of improvement in societal behavior and hospital preparedness. These critical questions were proposed to better understand how healthcare leaders might adjust surgeon and team coverage of trauma services as well as prepare from a system standpoint what resources will be needed during a pandemic or similar crisis to maintain services. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) How did the total observed number of trauma activations, defined as patients who meet mechanism of injury requirements which trigger the notification and aggregation of the trauma team upon entering the emergency department, change during a pandemic and stay-at-home order? (2) How did the proportion of major mechanisms of traumatic injury change during this time period? (3) How did the proportion and absolute numbers of accidental versus nonaccidental traumatic injury in children and adults change during this time period? METHODS: This was a retrospective study of trauma activations at a Level I trauma center in New Orleans, LA, USA, using trauma registry data of all patients presenting to the trauma center from 2017 to 2020. The number of trauma activations during a government mandated coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) stay-at-home order (from March 20, 2020 to May 14, 2020) was compared with the expected number of activations for the same time period from 2017 to 2019, called "predicted period". The expected number (predicted period) was assumed based on the linear trend of trauma activations seen in the prior 3 years (2017 to 2019) for the same date range (March 20, 2020 to May 14, 2020). To define the total number of traumatic injuries, account for proportion changes, and evaluate fluctuation in accidental verses nonaccidental trauma, variables including type of traumatic injury (blunt, penetrating, and thermal), and mechanism of injury (gunshot wound, fall, knife wound, motor vehicle collision, assault, burns) were collected for each patient. RESULTS: There were fewer total trauma activations during the stay-at-home period than during the predicted period (372 versus 532 [95% CI 77 to 122]; p = 0.016). The proportion of penetrating trauma among total activations was greater during the stay-at-home period than during the predicted period (35% [129 of 372] versus 26% [141 of 532]; p = 0.01), while the proportion of blunt trauma was lower during the stay-at-home period than during the predicted period (63 % [236 of 372] versus 71% [376 of 532]; p = 0.02). The proportion of gunshot wounds in relation to total activations was greater during the stay-at-home period than expected (26% [97 of 372] versus 18% [96 of 532]; p = 0.004). There were fewer motor vehicle collisions in relation to total activations during the stay-at-home period than expected (42% [156 of 372] versus 49% [263 of 532]; p = 0.03). Among total trauma activations, the stay-at-home period had a lower proportion of accidental injuries than the predicted period (55% [203 of 372] versus 61% [326 of 532]; p = 0.05), and there was a greater proportion of nonaccidental injuries than the predicted period (37% [137 of 372] versus 27% [143 of 532]; p < 0.001). In adults, the stay-at-home period had a greater proportion of nonaccidental injuries than the predicted period (38% [123 of 328] versus 26% [123 of 466]; p < 0.001). There was no difference between the stay-at-home period and predicted period in nonaccidental and accidental injuries among children. CONCLUSION: Data from the trauma registry at our region's only Level I trauma center indicate that a stay-at-home order during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a 70% reduction in the number of traumatic injuries, and the types of injuries shifted from more accidental blunt trauma to more nonaccidental penetrating trauma. Non-accidental trauma, including gunshot wounds, increased during this period, which suggest community awareness, crisis de-escalation strategies, and programs need to be created to address violence in the community. Understanding these changes allows for adjustments in staffing schedules. Surgeons and trauma teams could allow for longer shifts between changeover, decreasing viral exposure because the volume of work would be lower. Understanding the shift in injury could also lead to a change in specialists covering call. With the often limited availability of orthopaedic trauma-trained surgeons who can perform life-saving pelvis and acetabular surgery, this data may be used to mitigate exposure of these surgeons during pandemic situations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.
Assuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/tendências , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Controle de Infecções/tendências , Avaliação das Necessidades/tendências , Centros de Traumatologia/tendências , Ferimentos e Lesões/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/transmissão , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nova Orleans/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Ferimentos e Lesões/diagnóstico , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Obesity is a risk factor for complications after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). This study analyzed the impact of individual surgeon demographics, financial concerns, and other factors in determining patient candidacy for TJA based on body mass index (BMI). METHODS: A 21-question survey was approved by the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Research Committee for distribution to its membership. Objective questions asked about surgeon or hospital BMI thresholds for offering TJA. Subjective questions asked about physician comfort discussing topics including obesity, bariatric surgery, and weight loss before TJA, as well as insurance and age considerations. RESULTS: For TJA procedures, 49.9% of surgeons had a BMI cutoff at 40, 24.5% at 45, and 8.3% at 50. At a BMI cutoff of 40, 23.8% of surgeons felt their patient volume would be adversely affected, whereas at a BMI cutoff of 35, 50% of surgeons felt their patient volume would be adversely affected. Surgeons were more likely to not perform total hip arthroplasty on patients with morbid obesity than total knee arthroplasty (P = .037). Significantly more academic surgeons did not have cutoffs for total hip arthroplasty (P = .003) or total knee arthroplasty (P < .001) compared with all other practice settings. CONCLUSION: There are myriad factors that affect surgeon BMI thresholds for offering elective TJA including poor outcomes, hospital thresholds, financial considerations, and the well being of the patient. Further work should be performed to minimize the risks associated with TJA while providing the best possible care to patients with morbid obesity.
Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Artroplastia do Joelho , Cirurgia Bariátrica , Obesidade Mórbida , Cirurgiões , Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Self-reported penicillin allergies in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty often results in the use of second-line prophylactic antibiotics. A higher risk of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is associated with suboptimal antibiotics vs first generation cephalosporins, which have historically been grouped with other beta-lactam antibiotics such as penicillin for potential allergic reactions. This study evaluates the economic burden of self-reported penicillin allergies in total joint arthroplasty (TJA). METHODS: Data from studies reporting true incidence of IgE-mediated penicillin allergies, infection-free survivorship of TJA, and cost of PJI attributed to use of second-line antibiotics were obtained. Projected cost of preoperative penicillin allergy testing and potentially avoidable PJI associated with second-line antibiotic usage were calculated. This was compared with projected cost of PJI in the current state to estimate cost savings. RESULTS: Implementation of preoperative penicillin allergy testing leads to a potential savings of nearly $37 million to payors in the first year based on 1-year survivorship. This savings increases to $411.6 million over a 10-year span and $1.18 billion over a 20-year span. CONCLUSION: Preoperative penicillin allergy testing or risk stratification via thorough history should be implemented as standard of care for patients with self-reported penicillin allergies before TJA and would result in decreased cost of PJI.
Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Artroplastia do Joelho , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/epidemiologia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/etiologia , Humanos , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Penicilinas/efeitos adversos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Post-traumatic heterotopic ossification (HO) is the formation of ectopic bone in non-osseous structures following injury. The precise mechanism for bone development following trauma is unknown; however, early onset of HO may involve the production of pro-osteogenic serum factors. Here we evaluated serum from a cohort of civilian and military patients post trauma to determine early induction gene signatures in orthopaedic trauma induced HO. To test this, human adipose derived stromal/stem cells (hASCs) were stimulated with human serum from patients who developed HO following trauma and evaluated for a gene panel with qPCR. Pathway gene analysis ontology revealed that hASCs stimulated with serum from patients who developed HO had altered gene expression in the activator protein 1 (AP1) and AP1 transcriptional targets pathways. Notably, there was a significant repression in FOS gene expression in hASCs treated with serum from individuals with HO. Furthermore, the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway was activated in hASCs following serum exposure from individuals with HO. Serum from both military and civilian patients with trauma induced HO had elevated downstream genes associated with the MAPK pathways. Stimulation of hASCs with known regulators of osteogenesis (BMP2, IL6, Forskolin, and WNT3A) failed to recapitulate the gene signature observed in hASCs following serum stimulation, suggesting non-canonical mechanisms for gene regulation in trauma induced HO. These findings provide new insight for the development of HO and support ongoing work linking the systemic response to injury with wound specific outcomes.
Assuntos
Tecido Adiposo/citologia , Sistema de Sinalização das MAP Quinases , Ossificação Heterotópica/sangue , Ossificação Heterotópica/etiologia , Células-Tronco/enzimologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/complicações , Adulto , Diferenciação Celular , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Biológicos , Osteogênese , Fator de Transcrição AP-1/metabolismo , Adulto JovemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Firearms are the leading cause of death in the pediatric population, and the incidence of firearm injury is on the rise in the United States. The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence of pediatric gunshot wounds (GSWs) in New Orleans from 2012 to 2023 and evaluate factors that contribute to mortality. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of pediatric GSWs was conducted using the trauma database at a Level I trauma center in New Orleans, Louisiana. All patients aged 0 to 18 years with a GSW between January 1, 2012, and January 1, 2023, were evaluated. Demographic data, Injury Severity Score (ISS), hospital length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, intent of injury, mortality, firearm type, orthopaedic injuries, and related surgical procedures were extracted from the database. Linear regression was used to assess the trend of GSWs over time, and logistic regression was used to identify variables that predicted mortality. Statistical significance was defined as α = 0.05. Geographic information system (GIS) mapping was conducted using the ZIP code location of injury to identify geographic areas with the greatest number of GSWs. RESULTS: A significant increasing trend was observed in the number of pediatric GSWs when adjusted for changes in population ( P = 0.014), and the number of GSWs increased 43.2% over the duration of the study. Higher ISS, shorter length of stay, and self-inflicted intent of injury were notable predictors of mortality. Three hundred fifty-four patients (31.4%) had at least one orthopaedic injury, and of the survivors, 365 patients (35.6%) required at least one surgical procedure in the operating room during their admission. DISCUSSION: The number of GSWs in the pediatric population in New Orleans presenting at a large level 1 trauma center demonstrated a statistically significant increasing trend over the past 11 years. ISS and self-inflicted intent were predictive of mortality within this pediatric patient population.
Assuntos
Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo , Humanos , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/mortalidade , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Criança , Masculino , Feminino , Pré-Escolar , Lactente , Incidência , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros de Traumatologia , Nova Orleans/epidemiologia , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Recém-NascidoRESUMO
Background: Smoking is a known risk factor for complications after open tibia fractures, but it is unclear if smokeless tobacco confers a similar risk. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rates of postoperative complications after surgical fixation of open tibia fractures in smokeless tobacco users as compared to matched tobacco naïve controls. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the national PearlDiver database. For patients who had a unilateral open tibia fracture, smokeless tobacco users (n=121) and tobacco-naïve controls (n=242) were matched at a 1:2 ratio. Rates of bone complications within 1 year were compared using multivariable logistic regression. Results: Compared to controls, the smokeless tobacco user cohort demonstrated significantly higher rates of nonunion (OR: 3.42, 95% CI: 1.05 - 11.12), infection / inflammatory reaction of implant (OR: 12.45, 95% CI: 2.67 - 58.93), and osteomyelitis of the leg (OR: 6.15, 95% CI: 1.90 - 19.93) within 1 year of open tibia fracture. Compared to the most recent population figures, smokeless tobacco use was significantly under-reported in both males and females. Conclusions: Smokeless tobacco use confers an increased risk of fracture nonunion, infection or inflammatory response to implant, and osteomyelitis of the leg in patients with open tibia fractures. Surgeons should consider this risk when counseling patients and deciding on treatment plans for patients with tibia fractures.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the risk of developing a new mental disorder diagnosis within 2 years of lower extremity fracture. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: National insurance claims database. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Patients between 18 and 65 years with lower extremity, pelvis, and acetabular fractures without prior mental disorders as defined using International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th revision diagnosis codes were included. Mental disorders evaluated included alcohol use disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, drug use disorder, panic disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, and suicide attempt. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: The individual lower extremity fracture cohorts were matched 1:4 with nonfracture controls. The specific groups of interest were pelvis fractures, acetabulum fractures, proximal femur fractures, femoral shaft fractures, distal femur fractures, patella fractures, tibia plateau fractures, tibia shaft fractures, ankle fractures, pilon fractures, calcaneus fractures, and Lisfranc fractures. Rates of mental disorders after primary lower extremity fractures within 2 years were compared using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall, the 263,988 patient-fracture group was 57.2% female with an average age of 46.6 years. Compared with controls with no fracture, patients who sustained pelvis, acetabulum, proximal femur, femoral shaft, distal femur, patella, tibia plateau, tibia shaft, pilon, calcaneus, or Lisfranc fracture had a statistically significantly increased risk of being diagnosed with a queried mental disorder within 2 years of fracture. When comparing all fracture patients by location, those suffering from fractures proximal to the knee joint, including pelvis fractures [OR: 1.51, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.39-1.64] and proximal femur fractures [odds ratio (OR): 1.36, 95% CI: 1.26-1.47], demonstrated greater risk of developing any of the queried mental disorders compared with fractures distal to the knee, including ankle fractures (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.95-1.03) and pilon fractures (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.81-1.36). When comparing specific fracture patients with patients without fracture by mental disorder, patients demonstrated an increased risk of suicide attempt following fracture of the pelvis, acetabulum, femoral shaft, distal femur, and calcaneus, as well as patients sustaining a Lisfranc fracture. CONCLUSIONS: There is an increased risk of being diagnosed with a new mental disorder following lower extremity trauma in patients without prior mental disorder diagnosis compared with matched individuals without a lower extremity fracture. Among the fractures studied, those that were more proximal, such as pelvis and proximal femur fractures, carried greater risk compared with more distal fracture sites, including ankle and pilon fractures. Patients who experienced certain lower extremity fractures had a significantly higher rate of suicide attempt compared with patients without fracture. Physicians should consider increased mental health screening and potential referral for mental health evaluation for patients following lower extremity trauma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Assuntos
Fraturas Ósseas , Transtornos Mentais , Tentativa de Suicídio , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Fraturas Ósseas/epidemiologia , Fraturas Ósseas/psicologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Transtornos Mentais/diagnóstico , Tentativa de Suicídio/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Idoso , Traumatismos da Perna/epidemiologia , Traumatismos da Perna/psicologia , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Estudos de CoortesRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether intrawound vancomycin changes the bacteriology of surgical site infection pathogens and investigate the emergence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of phase III, prospective, randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Thirty-six US trauma centers. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Patients who became infected after fixation of tibial plateau or pilon fracture. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Pathogen types and bacterial susceptibilities as determined from routine clinical culture in the operating room. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were studied who were 67.5% male with a mean age of 48.6 years. A lower proportion of gram-positive cocci was observed in the vancomycin powder compared with the standard-of-care group (3.7% vs. 8.0%, P = 0.01). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection incidence was comparable in both the vancomycin powder and the standard-of-care groups, but rates of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus infections were lower in the treatment group (1.4% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.01). The incidence of coagulase-negative Staphylococci and gram-negative rod infections were similar in both groups. There was no significant difference in susceptibilities between groups in rates of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus. CONCLUSIONS: Topical vancomycin powder decreases the likelihood of gram-positive infections consistent with the biologic activity of vancomycin. Fewer methicillin-susceptible S. aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococci infections were observed in the group treated with vancomycin powder. An effect of vancomycin powder on methicillin-resistant S. aureus infection risk was not detected given the low incidence in both the intrawound vancomycin and the standard-of-care groups. There was no emergence of gram-negative rod infections or increased resistance patterns observed. Use of topical vancomycin powder does not seem to produce infections in these patients with greater antibiotic resistance than would have occurred without its use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Assuntos
Bacteriologia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Antibacterianos , Coagulase/farmacologia , Coagulase/uso terapêutico , Meticilina/farmacologia , Meticilina/uso terapêutico , Pós/farmacologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , VancomicinaRESUMO
Background: It was estimated that up to 30,000 primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures would be cancelled each week during the moratorium on elective surgeries in the United States. The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on elective total joint arthroplasty utilization in the United States. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using the PearlDiver database. Patients who underwent primary elective THAs and TKAs were identified and filtered by state and month from January through September of both 2019 and 2020. The volume of these procedures immediately following the moratorium on elective surgeries was compared to that of the same months the previous year. Results: For THA, overall, there was a 27.39% reduction in volume from 2019 to 2020 in March and an 88.94% reduction in April. For TKA, overall, there was a 31.28% reduction in volume in March and a 96.61% reduction in April. When the states were separated into 2 cohorts by the 2020 presidential election vote, there was a significantly larger decrease in THA and TKA volume observed in the 25 states and Washington DC that voted democrat than that in the 25 states that voted republican in both March (P < .05) and April (P < .05). Both THA (118.29%) and TKA (101.02%) volume returned to prepandemic levels by June. Conclusions: Overall, this study demonstrated that elective total joint arthroplasty utilization did reduce as anticipated following the CMS moratorium on elective surgeries but quickly returned to prepandemic levels by June. Level of Evidence: Level III.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: From 1999 to 2011, studies demonstrated an increasing trend toward surgical management of adolescent clavicle fractures. The purpose of this study was to examine more recent trends of surgical management of closed clavicle fractures in adolescent patients over the past decade. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the PearlDiver database. Patients with clavicle fractures from 2011 to 2021 were identified and stratified by age, sex, and year of their fracture. Categorical variables were compared with a chi square test, and continuous variables were compared with the Welch t test or Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Overall, there was a significant increase in the percentage of patients surgically treated by open reduction and internal fixation from 2016 to 2021 compared with 2011 to 2015 (8.58% vs. 7.34%, P < 0.001). When stratified by age, both the 10 to 14-year group (3.80% vs. 3.10%, P < 0.001) and the 15 to 18-year group (15.41% vs. 12.84%, P < 0.001) demonstrated significant increases in the percentage of patients surgically treated. CONCLUSION: Despite increasing literature demonstrating high revision surgery rates for surgical treatment of adolescent clavicle fractures with no difference in functional outcomes, this study demonstrated a notable increase in the rate of surgical treatment of adolescent clavicle fractures from 2011 to 2021 in the United States.
Assuntos
Clavícula , Fraturas Ósseas , Humanos , Adolescente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Clavícula/cirurgia , Fraturas Ósseas/epidemiologia , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Fraturas Ósseas/etiologia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Redução AbertaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Smoking has been demonstrated to be a risk factor for nonunion of scaphoid fractures, but it is unclear if chewing tobacco confers similar risk. The purpose of this study was to evaluate rates of bone-related complications after nonsurgical management of scaphoid fractures in smokeless tobacco users compared with matched control subjects and compared with smokers. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the PearlDiver database. For patients who underwent nonsurgical management of scaphoid fractures, 212 smokeless tobacco users and 6,048 smokers were matched 1:4 with control subjects (n = 848 and 24,192, respectively) and 212 smokeless tobacco users were matched 1:4 with 848 smokers. Rates of bone-related complications within 2 years of initial injury were compared using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: From weeks 12 through 104 after initial injury, compared with control subjects who do not use tobacco, the smokeless tobacco cohort demonstrated markedly higher rates of nonunion (5.7% vs 2.7%, OR: 2.07). Compared with control subjects who do not use tobacco, the smoking cohort demonstrated markedly higher rates of nonunion (4.3% vs 2.6%, OR: 1.91), repair of nonunion (1.5% vs 0.9%, OR: 1.87), and four corner fusion and proximal row carpectomy (0.3% vs 0.1%, OR: 3.17). Smokeless tobacco use was markedly underdiagnosed in the adult male cohort of unilateral scaphoid fractures with 2 years of follow-up found in the database (372 of 25,704, 1.45%) relative to Centers for Disease Control estimates for adult male smokeless tobacco use (4.5%) ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Given the higher rates of nonunion diagnoses after nonsurgical management in this cohort, surgeons should consider asking all patients with scaphoid fractures if they use smokeless tobacco or smoke and consider adding this to the patient's intake history to further identify patients at risk for nonunions. Tobacco cessation counseling is indicated for all tobacco users, including smokeless with scaphoid fractures.
Assuntos
Fraturas Ósseas , Fraturas não Consolidadas , Traumatismos da Mão , Osso Escafoide , Tabaco sem Fumaça , Traumatismos do Punho , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Fraturas Ósseas/epidemiologia , Fraturas Ósseas/etiologia , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Osso Escafoide/cirurgia , Osso Escafoide/lesões , Consolidação da Fratura , Tabaco sem Fumaça/efeitos adversos , Fraturas não Consolidadas/cirurgia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: With emerging evidence supporting functional rehabilitation for Achilles tendon ruptures (ATRs), this study sought to evaluate the treatment trends for patients sustaining an acute ATR and whether gender and age may influence the rates of operative repair. METHODS: A retrospective database review identified ATRs from 2010 through 2019. Patients were then stratified into three cohorts based on age (18-30, 30-45, and 46 and older), separated by gender, and then assessed whether patients were treated operatively or not. Cochran-Armitage Trend test was performed to analyze the trends of operative management. Chi-square analyses were performed to assess whether the proportion of patients who received operative management in each age cohort differed from 2010 to 2019. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess whether gender influenced treatment. RESULTS: Over the previous decade, the total rates of operative treatment for ATR significantly decreased (18.3%-12.3%, P < .0001). Each individual age cohort experienced a proportional decrease in operative management when comparing 2010 with 2019 (all P < .0001). Within all age cohorts, males were significantly more likely to receive operative treatment for an ATR over the previous decade (odds ratios: 2.63-3.22). Conclusion. Overall rates of operative management for ATR decreased across all cohorts likely due to previous studies providing evidence of similar results between operative and nonoperative managements. Over the previous decade, males were demonstrated to be far more likely than females to undergo operative management. Why females are less likely to receive an operation for ATR is likely multi-factorial and requires further exploration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III: Retrospective comparative study.
Assuntos
Tendão do Calcâneo , Traumatismos dos Tendões , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Tendão do Calcâneo/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ruptura/cirurgia , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Traumatismos dos Tendões/epidemiologia , Traumatismos dos Tendões/cirurgia , Traumatismos dos Tendões/reabilitação , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Humeral shaft fractures account for an estimated 3% of all adult fractures. When operative treatment is indicated, intramedullary (IM) nailing and open reduction and internal fixation with plating are the 2 most common techniques. Early IM nails were associated with poor outcomes, but with advancements in nail design, patient outcomes have been improving with this technique. This study used a nationwide database to quantify and compare the rates of postoperative complications between IM nails and plating for humeral shaft fractures in a national population. An administrative database was queried from the beginning of 2010 to the second quarter of 2017 for patients undergoing IM nailing vs open reduction and internal fixation with a plate for humeral shaft fractures. Systemic complications, fracture complications, and mean prescribed morphine milligram equivalents were collected and compared with statistical analysis. The overall rate of complications was high for both IM nailing (30.8%) and plating (34.2%). Patients were at greater risk for radial nerve palsy and infection at 90 days, 6 months, and 1 year if they received plate fixation (P<.05). The plate cohort had a lower risk of rotator cuff repair for all periods (P<.05). Patients in the IM nail cohort had higher rates of hardware removal for all periods (P<.05). Both IM nails and plates have overall similar rates of complications, and either can be used for humeral shaft fractures, based on surgeon preference, skill, and consideration of minor differences in complications between these 2 treatments. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(3):156-162.].
Assuntos
Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas , Fraturas do Úmero , Adulto , Pinos Ortopédicos/efeitos adversos , Placas Ósseas/efeitos adversos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/métodos , Humanos , Fraturas do Úmero/etiologia , Fraturas do Úmero/cirurgia , Úmero , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of instituting a dedicated orthopaedic trauma operating room (DOTOR) at a Level I trauma center on diaphyseal femur fracture management. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Regional, university-based Level I trauma center. PATIENTS: Trauma patients 18-65 years of age who presented between October 2016 and December 2018 (approximately 1 year before and after implementation of the DOTOR) and underwent surgery for diaphyseal femur fractures. One hundred twenty-eight patients met eligibility criteria for inclusion: 60 were treated before and 68 after implementation of the DOTOR. INTERVENTION: Implementation of a DOTOR in October 2017. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of external fixation versus intramedullary nailing, time from emergency department visit to definitive fixation, duration of surgery, and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: The only significant difference in patient demographics between the before and after groups was mechanism of injury (P = 0.003). Percentage of external fixators as an initial procedure decreased from 15% to 2.9% (P = 0.024). Time to definitive fixation with intramedullary nail decreased from 1083 minutes to 659 minutes (P = 0.002). There was no significant change in median operative time of intramedullary nailing (P = 0.573). Although not statistically significant, hospital length of stay decreased from 7 days to 5.5 days after implementation (P = 0.158). Cost analysis revealed annual cost savings of more than $261,678 for diaphyseal femur fractures alone by implementing a DOTOR. CONCLUSIONS: For diaphyseal femur fractures, instituting a DOTOR at a Level I trauma center reduced the percentage of patients requiring a 2-stage fixation, reduced the time to definitive fixation, and yielded cost savings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Assuntos
Fraturas do Fêmur , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas , Ortopedia , Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Fêmur , Humanos , Salas Cirúrgicas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
In response to increasing rates of self-reported latex allergies, changes have been made to prevent anaphylaxis in the operating room, including the use of latex-free gloves. However, the impact of these changes on the risk of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after arthroplasty is unclear. This study evaluated whether documented latex allergy is an independent risk factor for PJI and aseptic revision surgery after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A retrospective matched cohort study was conducted with an administrative claims database. A total of 17,501 patients who underwent TKA and had documented latex allergy were matched 1:4 with 70,004 control subjects, and 8221 patients who underwent THA and had documented latex allergy were matched 1:4 with 32,884 control subjects. Multivariable logistic regression showed that patients who had TKA and had a latex allergy showed significantly higher risk of PJI at both 90 days (odds ratio [OR], 1.26) and 1 year (OR, 1.22) and significantly higher risk of aseptic revision TKA at 1 year (OR, 1.21) after surgery compared with control subjects. Patients who had THA and had a latex allergy had significantly higher risk of PJI at 1 year (OR, 1.19) compared with control subjects. Rates of aseptic revision THA were higher in the latex allergy cohort but statistically comparable (P>.05). Latex allergy was associated with significantly increased risk of PJI and aseptic revision after TKA and significantly increased risk of PJI after THA. More work is needed to determine whether these risks can be mitigated or if latex allergy is an inherent, nonmodifiable risk factor requiring modification to typical arthroplasty pathways. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(4):244-250.].