A first-in-human, randomized, double-blind, single- and multiple-dose, phase I study of recombinant human thymosin ß4 in healthy Chinese volunteers.

The study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and anti-drug antibody (ADA) of the recombinant human thymosin ß4 (NL005) for single and multiple intravenous injections in healthy subjects. Seven cohorts, with 54 healthy subjects, were given a single intravenous dose of NL005 or placebo and were observed for 28 days. The cohorts received ascending doses of either 0.05, 0.25, 0.5, 2.0, 5.0, 12.5 or 25.0 µg/kg in the single-dose trial. A total of 30 healthy subjects were randomly enrolled in the multiple-dose trial, and 3 cohorts (0.5, 2.0 and 5.0 µg/kg) were administered once human thymosin ß4 daily for 10 days and observed for 28 days. The adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity. There were no dose-limiting toxicities or serious adverse events. The plasma concentration, maximum peak concentration (Cmax ) and AUC of each dose group increased with the increase in the dose. The tendency of terminal clearance in each dose group was consistent, and there was no obvious accumulation after continuous administration. Thus, the drug can be concluded to be well tolerated and safe in healthy people and suitable for use in a clinical study for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction.

Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Immunogenicity of a Monoclonal Antibody (SCTA01) Targeting SARS-CoV-2 in Healthy Adults: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase I Study.

SCTA01 is a novel monoclonal antibody with promising prophylactic and therapeutic potential for COVID-19. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and immunogenicity of SCTA01 in healthy adults. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose escalation phase I clinical trial. Healthy adults were randomly assigned to cohort 1 (n = 5; 3:2), cohort 2 (n = 8; 6:2), cohort 3, or cohort 4 (both n = 10; 8:2) to receive SCTA01 (5, 15, 30, and 50 mg/kg, respectively) versus placebo. All participants were followed up for clinical, laboratory, PK, and immunogenicity assessments for 84 days. The primary outcomes were the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximal tolerable dose (MTD), and the secondary outcomes included PK parameters, immunogenicity, and adverse events (AE). Of the 33 participants, 18 experienced treatment-related AEs; the frequency was 52.0% (13/25) in participants receiving SCTA01 and 62.5% (5/8) in those receiving placebo. All AEs were mild. There was no serious AE or death. No DLT was reported, and the MTD of SCTA01 was not reached. SCTA01 with a dose range of 5 to 50 mg/kg had nearly linear dose-proportional increases in Cmax and AUC parameters. An antidrug antibody response was detected in four (16.0%) participants receiving SCTA01, with low titers, between the baseline and day 28, but all became negative later. In conclusion, SCTA01 up to 50 mg/kg was safe and well-tolerated in healthy participants. Its PK parameters were nearly linear dose-proportional. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT04483375.).

Phase I, randomized, double-blind, single-dose study to assess the pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity of the proposed biosimilar SCT630 and adalimumab in healthy Chinese subjects.

We aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity of the adalimumab biosimilar SCT630 with those of its reference (adalimumab, Humira®). This study involved a randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled design; healthy subjects (N = 146) were randomly distributed into two groups to receive a single-dose subcutaneous injection of 40 mg SCT630 or 40 mg adalimumab, with a 71-day follow up. The bioequivalence of the primary pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC0-t) and maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax) between SCT630 and adalimumab were the primary endpoints; safety and immunogenicity of SCT630 compared with those of adalimumab were the secondary endpoints. The geometric mean Cmax ratio of SCT630 to adalimumab and its 90% confidence interval (CI) were 116.02% and 108.66%-123.88%, AUC0-t ratio and 90% CI were 109.47% and 99.80%-120.08%, and AUC0-∞ ratio and 90% CI were 109.24% and 99.80%-120.78%. These PK parameters fulfilled the equivalence criterion of 80.00%-125.00%. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 62 (84.9%) and 61 (83.6%) subjects; mild and moderate drug-related TEAEs were observed in 60 (82.2%) and 59 (80.8%) subjects in the adalimumab and SCT630 groups, respectively. On day 71, 69 (95.8%) subjects in the adalimumab group and 66 (93%) in the SCT630 group reported positive anti-drug antibodies. Among them, 15 (21.7%) and 11 (16.7%) subjects showed positive neutralizing antibodies, with no significant difference. SCT630 was well tolerated and demonstrated PK and safety profiles similar to adalimumab. The profiles support the initiation of further confirmatory study to demonstrate the clinical similarity of SCT630 to adalimumab.

A multicenter randomized trials to compare the bioequivalence and safety of a generic doxorubicin hydrochloride liposome injection with Caelyx ® in advanced breast cancer.

Purpose: To compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) bioequivalence (BE) and safety of a generic pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) formulation with the reference product Caelyx®. Methods: A multicenter, single-dose, open-label, randomized, two-way crossover study was conducted in patients with breast cancer. For each period, the patients were administered with the test or the reference PLD intravenously at a dose of 50 mg/m2. Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ for free, and encapsulated doxorubicin (doxorubicin) and partial AUC (AUC0-48h, AUC48h-t) for encapsulated doxorubicin were evaluated in 17 blood samples taken predose, and increasing time intervals over the following 14 days in each period. A washout period of 28-35 days was observed before crossing over. Results: 48 patients were enrolled and randomised, of which 44 were included and analysed in bioequivalence set (BES). The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ for free doxorubicin and encapsulated doxorubicin all fall within the bioequivalent range of 80% to 125%. The 90% CIs of GMR of partial AUC (AUC0-48h, AUC48h-t) for encapsulated doxorubicin also fall within the bioequivalent range. 48 patients were all included in the safety set (SS). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to T and R was 95.8% (46/48) and 97.8% (45/46) respectively. The highest incidence of TEAEs was various laboratory abnormalities. 2 patients withdrew due to T-drug-related AEs. Only one patient experienced serious adverse events and no death occurred in this study. There were no significant differences between the safety profiles of the generic formulation and Caelyx®. Conclusions: Bioequivalence between the test and the reference products was established for free and encapsulated doxorubicin. Clinical trial registration: http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn, identifier [CTR20210375].

A Phase I, Randomized, Single-Dose Study Evaluating the Biosimilarity of TAB008 to Bevacizumab in Healthy Volunteers.

Objective: This study compared the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and immunogenicity of the biosimilar TAB008 monoclonal antibody to bevacizumab (Avastin®) in normal healthy Chinese male volunteers. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, parallel controlled study, a total of 100 healthy Chinese male subjects were randomized (1:1) to receive a single 1 mg/kg intravenous dose of TAB008 or Avastin® over a 90-min infusion. The subjects were followed for 99 days after drug administration. Primary endpoints were bioequivalence of major pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC0-t and AUC0-∞) and maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax). Secondary endpoints included safety and immunogenicity parameters. Results: The two groups of test subjects (49 subjects in the TAB008 group and 50 subjects in the Avastin® group) were well matched in regards to all demographic and baseline characteristics. The treatment group ratios of LS geometric means for the three primary PK parameters were fully contained within the bioequivalence limits of 80.00-125.00% (90% CI was 103.66-118.33% for Cmax, 94.32-111.72% for AUC0-t, and 94.69-112.23% for AUC0-∞). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported for 24 (49.0%) subjects in the TAB008 group and 22 (44.0%) subjects in the Avastin® group. TEAEs related to the study drug were reported for 19 (38.8%) subjects in the TAB008 group and 19 (38.0%) subjects in the Avastin® group. National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Grade 3 TEAEs were reported for 1 (2.0%) subject in the TAB008 group and 3 (6.0%) subjects in the Avastin® group. There were no Grade 4 or 5 TEAEs or serious adverse events (SAEs) during the study. Anti-drug antibody generation was reported once only in each group, and neutralizing antibody (Nab) analysis was negative upon follow-up. Conclusion: TAB008 attained pharmacokinetic similarity to bevacizumab, and was safe and well tolerated.

Bioequivalence study of single-dose lenalidomide capsule vs. Revlimid® capsule in healthy Chinese males.

OBJECTIVE: Lenalidomide is a 4-amino-glutaryl derivative of thalidomide and belongs to a new generation of immunomodulatory agents for the treatment of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and multiple myeloma. The aim of this study is to evaluate the bioequivalence and safety of a capsule containing 25 mg of a test formulation of lenalidomide and a 25 mg Revlimid® capsule in healthy, Chinese adult males for good quality anti-cancer medicine with lower costs. METHODS: This was a single-center, randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-period, crossover pharmacokinetic study. Forty-eight healthy, adult Chinese males were administered a test lenalidomide or Revlimid® capsule, 24 in a fasted and 24 in a fed state, followed by crossover to the other capsule. RESULTS: Twenty-four subjects in the fasting group and 23 in the postprandial group completed the clinical trial. Subjects administered test lenalidomide and Revlimid® capsules in the fasting state had a Cmax of 564 ± 153 and 609 ± 121 ng/mL, respectively; an AUC0-t of 1660 ± 211 and 1660 ± 235 h ng/mL, respectively; and an AUC0-∞ of 1670 ± 210 and 1670 ± 237 h ng/mL, respectively. In the fed state, the subjects had a Cmax of 389 ± 105 and 383 ± 101 ng/mL, respectively; an AUC0-t of 1770 ± 314 and 1740 ± 360 h ng/mL, respectively; and an AUC0-∞ of 1800 ± 316 and 1760 ± 362 h ng/mL, respectively. Both capsules were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events observed. CONCLUSION: According to the criteria for bioequivalence, the test formulation of lenalidomide and Revlimid® was determined to be bioequivalent.