Cerebral Venous Thrombosis in Patients with COVID-19 Infection: a Case Series and Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: There has been increasing reports associating the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with thromboembolic phenomenon including ischemic strokes and venous thromboembolism. Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare neurovascular emergency that has been observed in some COVID-19 patients, yet much remains to be learnt of its underlying pathophysiology. OBJECTIVE: We present a case series of local patients with concomitant COVID-19 infection and CVT; and aim to perform a systematic review of known cases in the current literature. METHODS: We describe two patients with concomitant COVID-19 infection and CVT from a nationwide registry in Singapore. We then conducted a literature search in PubMed and Embase using a suitable keyword search strategy from 1st December 2019 to 11th June 2020. All studies reporting CVT in COVID-19 patients were included. RESULTS: Nine studies and 14 COVID-19 patients with CVT were studied. The median age was 43 years (IQR=36-58) and majority had no significant past medical conditions (60.0%). The time taken from onset of COVID-19 symptoms to CVT diagnosis was a median of 7 days (IQR=6-14). CVT was commonly seen in the transverse (75.0%) and sigmoid sinus (50.0%); 33.3% had involvement of the deep venous sinus system. A significant proportion of patients had raised D-dimer (75.0%) and CRP levels (50.0%). Two patients reported presence of antiphospholipid antibodies. Most patients received anticoagulation (91.7%) while overall mortality rate was 45.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The high mortality rate of CVT in COVID-19 infection warrants a high index of suspicion from physicians, and early treatment with anticoagulation should be initiated.

Comparison of short-term outcomes between patients with extracranial carotid and/or intracranial atherosclerotic disease.

OBJECTIVE: To directly compare the 90-day outcomes of patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD), extracranial carotid atherosclerotic disease (ECAD), and ICAD with concomitant ECAD. METHODS: From 2017-2021, patients who had (1) a transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke within 30 days of admission as evaluated by a stroke neurologist and (2) ipsilateral ICAD and/or ECAD were prospectively enrolled. The cohort was divided into three groups: ICAD, ECAD, and ICAD with concomitant ECAD. The primary outcome assessed was 90-day ischemic stroke recurrence. Secondary outcomes included 90-day myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause mortality, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, including cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, and/or nonfatal ischemic stroke). RESULTS: Of 371 patients included in the analysis, 240 (64.7%) patients had ICAD only, 93 (25.0%) patients had ECAD only, and 38 (10.3%) patients had ICAD with concomitant ECAD. On multivariate time-to-event analysis adjusting for potential confounders and with ICAD as the reference comparator, the risk of 90-day clinical outcomes was highest among patients with ICAD and concomitant ECAD, with adjusted hazard ratios of 4.54 (95% CI=1.45, 14.2; p = 0.006), 9.32 (95% CI=1.58, 54.8; p = 0.014), and 8.52 (95% CI=3.54, 20.5; p < 0.001) for 90-day ischemic stroke, MI, and MACE, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ICAD and concomitant ECAD have a poorer prognosis and are at significantly higher risk for 90-day ischemic stroke, MI, and MACE. Further research should focus on the evaluation of coronary atherosclerotic disease and more intensive medical therapy in this population.

Impact of atrial fibrillation on the treatment effect of bridging thrombolysis in ischemic stroke patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy: a multicenter international cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The role of bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains debatable. Atrial fibrillation (AF) associated strokes may be associated with reduced treatment effect from IVT. This study compares the effect of bridging IVT in AF and non-AF patients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study comprised anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) AIS patients receiving EVT alone or bridging IVT plus EVT within 6 hours of symptom onset. Primary outcome was good functional outcome defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2 at 90 days. Secondary outcomes were successful reperfusion defined as expanded Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) grading ≥2b flow, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: We included 705 patients (314 AF and 391 non-AF patients). The mean age was 68.6 years and 53.9% were male. The odds of good functional outcomes with bridging IVT was higher in the non-AF (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.28, 95% CI 1.06 to 4.91, P=0.035) compared with the AF subgroups (aOR 1.89, 95% CI 0.89 to 4.01, P=0.097). However, this did not constitute a significant effect modification by the presence of AF on bridging IVT (interaction aOR 0.12, 95% CI -1.94 to 2.18, P=0.455). The rate of successful reperfusion, sICH, and mortality were similar between bridging IVT and EVT for both AF and non-AF patients. CONCLUSION: The presence of AF did not modify the treatment effect of bridging IVT. Further individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials may shed light on the comparative efficacy of bridging IVT in AF versus non-AF LVO strokes.

Clinical characteristics, treatment and long-term outcomes of patients with right-sided cardiac thrombus.

OBJECTIVE: Right-sided cardiac thrombus is rare and may be caused by venous thromboembolism, in association with medical devices or stasis of blood in atrial fibrillation (AF) and cardiomyopathies. Complications include pulmonary embolism (PE) and paradoxical stroke. Current data are limited and mostly from case series and PE registries. We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics, echocardiographic features, treatments, and outcomes of right-sided cardiac thrombus patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study of 97 consecutive patients with right-sided cardiac thrombus detected on echocardiography. We studied co-morbidities, predisposing factors, thrombus characteristics, and therapeutic interventions and assessed their associations with the development of PE, paradoxical stroke, circulatory collapse, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: The mean age was 58.7 years, and 55/97 (56.7%) of the participants were female. Ischemic heart disease (IHD), heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and malignancy were common co-morbidities. Right atrial (RA) thrombus was often associated with medical devices, while right ventricular (RV) thrombus was more commonly associated with cardiomyopathy. Thrombus mobility did not affect embolic events but was associated with greater short-term mortality. On multivariable analysis, anticoagulation (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.09-0.68) and thrombus resolution (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.13-0.62) were associated with greater survival. CONCLUSION: Right-sided cardiac thrombus is rare but may have potentially life-threatening complications such as PE and paradoxical stroke. Further research is needed to determine the optimal therapeutic strategies for this poorly studied population.

Cilostazol for secondary stroke prevention: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Stroke is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Cilostazol, an antiplatelet and phosphodiesterase 3 inhibitor, has not been clearly established for ischaemic stroke use. We aim to determine the efficacy and safety of cilostazol for secondary stroke prevention. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to 25 September 2020, for randomised trials comparing the efficacy and safety of cilostazol monotherapy or dual therapy with another antiplatelet regimen or placebo, in patients with ischaemic stroke. Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2) was used to assess study quality. This meta-analysis was reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. RESULTS: Eighteen randomised trials comprising 11 429 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Most trials possessed low risk of bias and were of low heterogeneity. Cilostazol significantly reduced the rate of ischaemic stroke recurrence (risk ratio, RR=0.69, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.81), any stroke recurrence (RR=0.64, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.74) and major adverse cardiovascular events (RR=0.67, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.81). Cilostazol did not significantly decrease mortality (RR=0.90, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.25) or increase the rate of good functional outcome (Modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1; RR=1.07, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.19). Cilostazol demonstrated favourable safety profile, significantly reducing the risk of intracranial haemorrhage (RR=0.46, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.68) and major haemorrhagic events (RR=0.49, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.70). CONCLUSIONS: Cilostazol demonstrated superior efficacy and safety profiles compared with traditional antiplatelet regimens such as aspirin and clopidogrel for secondary stroke prevention but does not appear to affect functional outcomes. Future randomised trials can be conducted outside East Asia, or compare cilostazol with a wider range of antiplatelet agents.

Left ventricular systolic dysfunction is associated with poor functional outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular thrombectomy (ET) has transformed acute ischemic stroke (AIS) therapy in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO). Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) decreases global cerebral blood flow and predisposes to hypoperfusion. We evaluated the relationship between LVSD, as measured by LV ejection fraction (LVEF), and clinical outcomes in patients with anterior cerebral circulation LVO who underwent ET. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort study examined anterior circulation LVO AIS patients from six international stroke centers. LVSD was measured by assessment of the echocardiographic LVEF using Simpson's biplane method of discs according to international guidelines. LVSD was defined as LVEF <50%. The primary outcome was defined as a good functional outcome using a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0-2 at 3 months. RESULTS: We included 440 AIS patients with LVO who underwent ET. On multivariate analyses, pre-existing diabetes mellitus (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.24 to 3.39;p=0.005), unsuccessful reperfusion (Treatment in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) grade 0-2a) status (OR 4.21, 95% CI 2.04 to 8.66; p<0.001) and LVSD (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.18 to 3.68; p=0.011) were independent predictors of poor functional outcomes at 3 months. On ordinal (shift) analyses, LVSD was associated with an unfavorable shift in the mRS outcomes (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.52 to 3.53; p<0.001) after adjusting for age and ischemic heart disease. CONCLUSION: Anterior circulation LVO AIS patients with LVSD have poorer outcomes after ET, suggesting the need to consider cardiac factors for ET, the degree of monitoring and prognostication post-procedure.