Comparing rates of mycobacterial clearance in sputum smear-negative and smear-positive adults living with HIV.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) in people living with HIV (PLH) frequently presents as sputum smear-negative. However, clinical trials of TB in adults often use smear-positive individuals to ensure measurable bacterial responses following initiation of treatment, thereby excluding HIV-infected patients from trials. METHODS: In this prospective case cohort study, 118 HIV-seropositive TB patients were assessed prior to initiation of standard four-drug TB therapy and at several time points through 35 days. Sputum bacillary load, as a marker of treatment response, was determined serially by: smear microscopy, Xpert MTB/RIF, liquid culture, and colony counts on agar medium. RESULTS: By all four measures, patients who were baseline smear-positive had higher bacterial loads than those presenting as smear-negative, until day 35. However, most smear-negative PLH had significant bacillary load at enrolment and their mycobacteria were cleared more rapidly than smear-positive patients. Smear-negative patients' decline in bacillary load, determined by colony counts, was linear to day 7 suggesting measurable bactericidal activity. Moreover, the decrease in bacterial counts was comparable to smear-positive individuals. Increasing cycle threshold values (Ct) on the Xpert assay in smear-positive patients to day 14 implied decreasing bacterial load. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that smear-negative PLH can be included in clinical trials of novel treatment regimens as they contain sufficient viable bacteria, but allowances for late exclusions would have to be made in sample size estimations. We also show that increases in Ct in smear-positive patients to day 14 reflect treatment responses and the Xpert MTB/RIF assay could be used as biomarker for early treatment response.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Isoniazid, Pyrazinamide, and Ethambutol in Pregnant South African Women with Tuberculosis and HIV.

Tuberculosis is an important cause of maternal morbidity, but little is known about the effects of pregnancy on antituberculosis drug concentrations. We developed population pharmacokinetic models to describe drug dispositions of isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol in pregnant women with tuberculosis and HIV. HIV-positive pregnant women with tuberculosis receiving standard first-line tuberculosis treatment and participating in Tshepiso, a prospective cohort study in Soweto, South Africa, underwent sparse pharmacokinetic sampling at >36 weeks of gestation and 7 weeks postpartum. The effects of pregnancy on the pharmacokinetics of isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol were investigated via population pharmacokinetic modeling. Isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol concentrations were available for 29, 18, and 18 women, respectively. Their median weight was 66 kg while pregnant and 64 kg postpartum. No significant differences were observed in drug clearance, volume of distribution, or bioavailability during and after pregnancy. The model-estimated isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24) medians were, respectively, 6.88, 419, and 16.5 mg · h/liter during pregnancy versus 5.01, 407, and 19.0 mg · h/liter postpartum. The model-estimated maximum concentration (Cmax) medians for isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol were, respectively, 1.39, 35.9, and 1.82 mg/liter during pregnancy versus 1.43, 34.5, and 2.11 mg/liter postpartum. A posteriori power calculations determined that our analysis was powered 91.8%, 59.2%, and 90.1% at a P of <0.01 to detect a 40% decrease in the AUCs of isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol, respectively. Pregnancy does not appear to cause relevant changes in the exposure to isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol. Additional studies of antituberculosis drugs in pregnancy are needed.

Differentially culturable tubercle bacteria as a measure of tuberculosis treatment response.

Introduction: Routine efficacy assessments of new tuberculosis (TB) treatments include quantitative solid culture or routine liquid culture, which likely miss quantification of drug tolerant bacteria. To improve these assessments, comparative analyses using additional measures such as quantification of differentially culturable tubercle bacteria (DCTB) are required. Essential for enabling this is a comparative measure of TB treatment responses using routine solid and liquid culture with liquid limiting dilutions (LLDs) that detect DCTB in sputum. Methods: We recruited treatment-naïve TB patients, with and without HIV-infection, and serially quantified their sputum for DCTB over the course of treatment. Results: Serial sputum sampling in 73 individuals during their first 14 days of treatment demonstrated that clearance of DCTB was slower compared to routine solid culture. Treatment response appeared to be characterized by four patterns: (1) Classic bi-phasic bacterial clearance; (2) early non-responders with slower clearance; (3) paradoxical worsening with an increase in bacterial count upon treatment initiation; and (4) non-responders with no change in bacterial load. During treatment, LLDs displayed greater bacterial yield when compared with quantitative solid culture. Upon treatment completion, 74% [46/62] of specimens displayed residual DCTB and within this group, two recurrences were diagnosed. Residual DCTB upon treatment completion was associated with a higher proportion of MGIT culture, GeneXpert, and smear positivity at two months post treatment. No recurrences occurred in the group without residual DCTB. Discussion: These data indicate that DCTB assays detect distinct subpopulations of organisms in sputum that are missed by routine solid and liquid culture, and offer important alternatives for efficacy assessments of new TB treatments. The residual DCTB observed upon treatment completion suggests that TB treatment does not always eliminate all bacterial populations, a finding that should be investigated in larger cohorts.