RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Depression commonly occurs after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) which can negatively impact patients and their caregivers. Identification and validation of depression screening instruments specifically for patients with aSAH and their caregivers has not been performed. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to identify the common depression screening tools in patients with aSAH and their caregivers and to determine if they are validated for use in these populations. METHODS: Medical Subject Headings and keyword search terms were used in five electronic databases to identify randomised controlled, quasi-experimental and observational studies published between 1 January 2010 and 26 June 2022. Screening, data extraction and study quality assessments were conducted by two independent reviewers. RESULTS: Of the 3440 identified studies, 61 met inclusion, with 2 of 61 (3%) RCTs, 2 of 61 (3%) quasi-experimental, and 57 of 61 (93%) observational studies included. The majority of studies (58/61 [95%]) reported patient-only depression screening, 1 of 61 (2%) reported both patients' and caregivers' depression screening, and 2 of 61 (3%) reported caregiver-only depression screening. Nine depression screening instruments were identified. The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) was the most commonly used (13/59; 22%), followed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (12/59; 20%). In the ischaemic stroke population, the BDI-II was reported to have excellent sensitivity (0.85) and specificity (0.75); the HADS was also found to have good sensitivity (0.62) and specificity (0.83) in the ischaemic stroke population. Only two depression screening instruments for caregivers were identified: HADS and Goldberg Depression Scale. Both were found to have good sensitivity (>0.80) and specificity (>0.80) in the general population. CONCLUSION: The BDI-II and HADS were the most commonly used depression screening instruments in patients with aSAH. Neither of these instruments has been specifically validated in an aSAH population. None of the nine depression instruments were validated for patients with aSAH. Due to an insufficient number of studies in caregivers' population, validity was unable to be determined.