Evaluating Modern Spacer Options and Outcomes in Revision Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: A 2-stage revision continues to be the standard treatment for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in hip arthroplasty. The use of "functional" spacers may allow patients to return to daily living while optimizing their health for revision surgery. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of different spacer types regarding infection eradication, mechanical complications, and functional outcomes. METHODS: Patients who have complete Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria for diagnosis of PJI that underwent one-stage or 2-stage revision were queried in an institutional surgical database between 2002 and 2022. Out of 286 patients, 210 met our inclusion criteria and were retrospectively reviewed for demographics, laboratory values, functional and patient-reported outcomes, and subsequent revisions. The study population had 54.3% women, a mean age of 61 years old, and a mean follow-up of 3.7 ± 3.2 years. There was no difference between age, body mass index, or Charlson Comorbidity Index scores between each cohort. Spacers were categorized as nonfunctional static, nonfunctional articulating, or functional articulating. Functional spacers were defined as those that allowed full weight bearing with no restrictions. Delphi criteria were used to define revision success, and failure was defined as a recurrent or persistent infection following definitive surgery. RESULTS: There was a significantly lower reoperation rate after a definitive implant in the functional articulating cohort (P = .003), with a trending higher infection eradication rate and a lower rate of spacer failure compared to the nonfunctional spacer cohort. At 5 years, functional articulating spacers had a 94.1% survivorship rate, nonfunctional articulating spacers had an 81.2% survival rate, and nonfunctional static spacers had a 71.4% survival rate. In the functional articulating spacer cohort, 14.6% had yet to get reimplanted, with an average follow-up time of 1.4 years. CONCLUSIONS: Within this large cohort of similar demographics, functional articulating spacers may result in better clinical outcomes and infection eradication during 2-stage revision arthroplasty for PJI.

Revision Hip Arthroplasty Performed by Fellowship-Trained Versus Non-Fellowship-Trained Surgeons: A Comparison of Perioperative Management and Complications.

BACKGROUND: Successful revision hip arthroplasty (rTHA) requires major resource allocation and a surgical team adept at managing these complex cases. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of rTHA performed by fellowship-trained and non-fellowship-trained surgeons. METHODS: A national administrative database was utilized to identify 5,880 patients who underwent aseptic rTHA and 1,622 patients who underwent head-liner exchange for infection by fellowship-trained and non-fellowship-trained surgeons from 2010 to 2020 with a 5-year follow-up. Postoperative opioid and anticoagulant prescriptions were compared among surgeons. Patients treated by fellowship-trained and non-fellowship-trained surgeons had propensity scores matched based on age, sex, comorbidity index, and diagnosis. The 5-year surgical complications were compared using descriptive statistics. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine the odds of failure following head-liner exchange when performed by a fellowship-trained versus non-fellowship-trained surgeon. RESULTS: Aseptic rTHA patients treated by fellowship-trained surgeons received fewer opioids (132 versus 165 milligram morphine equivalents per patient) and nonaspirin anticoagulants (21.4 versus 32.0%, P < .001). Fellowship-training was associated with lower dislocation rates (9.9 versus 14.2%, P = .011), fewer postoperative infections, and fewer periprosthetic fractures and re-revisions (15.2 versus 21.3%, P < .001). Head-liner exchange for infection performed by fellowship-trained surgeons was associated with lower odds of failure (31.2 versus 45.7%, odds ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.62 to 0.91, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: rTHA performed by adult reconstruction fellowship-trained surgeons results in fewer re-revisions in aseptic cases and head-liner exchanges. Variations in resources, volumes, and perioperative protocols may account for some of the differences.

Highlights of the 2023 American Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report.

The 2023 report represents a full decade of published annual reports of the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR). The number of cases being captured continues to rapidly grow, as are over 3.2 million patients included in AJRR. Matched-pair primary and revision data is more robust with 10-year survivorship being available. Similarly, implant-specific survivorship has been included for common implants being used in the United States. The data mined from the AJRR have led to numerous publications and presentations. Numerous trends have emerged, and others have been reinforced with the most recent data. The authors encourage readers to more thoroughly review the full report at the following link: https://www.aaos.org/registries/publications/ajrr-annual-report/.

Validation of a Classification System for Optimal Application of Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention in Prosthetic Joint Infections following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Review.

INTRODUCTION: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a serious complication after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). While debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) are considered for acute PJI, success rates vary. This study aims to assess a new scoring system's accuracy in predicting DAIR success. METHODS: 119 TKA patients (2008-2019) diagnosed with PJI who underwent DAIR were included for analysis. Data were collected on demographics, laboratory values, and clinical outcomes. This was used for validation of the novel classification system consisting of PJI acuteness, microorganism classification, and host health for DAIR indication. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS programming. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 2.5 years with an average age of 65.5 ± 9.1 years, BMI of 31.9 ± 6.2 kg/m2, and CCI of 3.04 ± 1.8. Successful infection eradication occurred in 75.6% of patients. The classification system demonstrated 61.1% sensitivity, 72.4% specificity, and 87.3% positive predictive value (PPV) when the DAIR cutoff was a score less than 6. For a cutoff of less than 8, sensitivity was 100%, specificity was 37.9%, and PPV was 83.3%. CONCLUSIONS: To date, no consensus exists on a classification system predicting DAIR success. This novel scoring system, with high PPV, shows promise. Further refinement is essential for enhanced predictive accuracy.

Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Cerebral Palsy: A Large Database Analysis.

Cerebral palsy (CP) is a neurodevelopmental condition that can result in altered gait biomechanics, joint dysfunction, and imbalance. The complications associated with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with CP have not yet been well described. Therefore, our analysis sought to compare the 90-day and 2-year complications following TKA in patients with and without CP. The PearlDiver Mariner database was utilized to identify patients with CP undergoing primary TKA between 2010 and 2020. This cohort was matched 1:4 to a control cohort without neurodegenerative disorders based on age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI), tobacco use, obesity, and diabetes. A total of 3,257 patients (657 CP patients 2,600 controls) were included in our final analysis. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was utilized to determine the risk of CP on medical and surgical complications at 90 days and all-cause revision rates at 2 years. Patients with CP had an increased risk of acute kidney injury (odds ratio [OR]: 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-2.5; p = 0.019), pneumonia (OR: 5.63; 95% CI: 3.69-8.67; p < 0.001), urinary tract infection (OR: 5.01; 95% CI: 3.85-6.52; p < 0.001), and transfusion (OR: 2.21; 95% CI: 1.50-3.23; p < 0.001). CP patients additionally had a higher incidence of emergency department (ED) visits (OR: 5.24; 95% CI: 3.76-7.32; p < 0.001) and readmissions (OR: 5.24; 95% CI: 2.57-4.96; p < 0.001). There were no differences in rates of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI; OR: 1.23; 95% CI: 0.69-2.10; p = 0.463), surgical site infection (SSI; OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.12-1.46; p = 0.463), and reoperation (OR: 1.35; 95% CI: 0.71-2.43; p = 0.339) at 90 days postoperatively. The all-cause revision rates at 2 years were comparable (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.67-1.51; p = 0.927). In this database review, we found that CP patients have a higher risk of medical complications in the acute postoperative period following TKA. The 90-day surgical complication and 2-year revision rates in CP patients were comparable to matched controls.