Expression of G protein estrogen receptor (GPER) on membrane of mouse oocytes during maturation.

PURPOSE: To determine expression of G-protein estrogen receptor (GPER) in mouse oocyte membrane during maturation. METHODS: The expression of GPER from different maturation stages of oocytes, in vivo and in vitro matured oocytes as well as aging oocytes was examined by immune-fluorescence GPR30 antibody and the images were analyzed by laser scanning confocal microscope. Further confirmation was performed by Western blots for cell fractionation. RESULTS: Significant fluorescent signal was observed on the surface of mouse oocytes. The image expression was lower in germinal vesicle (GV) stage than mature metaphase-II (M-II) stage oocytes. There was high expression in in-vivo matured oocytes compared to in vitro matured oocytes. The highest expression was observed in aging oocytes compared with other oocytes. CONCLUSIONS: The changes of expression of GPER on mouse oocytes plasma membrane confirm oocyte membrane maturation, suggesting that those changes of GPER may be related to the functional role of oocyte maturation.

Comparative study on artificial intelligence systems for detecting early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma between narrow-band and white-light imaging.

BACKGROUND: Non-magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (NM-NBI) has been frequently used in routine screening of esophagus squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The performance of NBI for screening of early ESCC is, however, significantly affected by operator experience. Artificial intelligence may be a unique approach to compensate for the lack of operator experience. AIM: To construct a computer-aided detection (CAD) system for application in NM-NBI to identify early ESCC and to compare it with our previously reported CAD system with endoscopic white-light imaging (WLI). METHODS: A total of 2167 abnormal NM-NBI images of early ESCC and 2568 normal images were collected from three institutions (Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Xuhui Hospital, and Kiang Wu Hospital) as the training dataset, and 316 pairs of images, each pair including images obtained by WLI and NBI (same part), were collected for validation. Twenty endoscopists participated in this study to review the validation images with or without the assistance of the CAD systems. The diagnostic results of the two CAD systems and improvement in diagnostic efficacy of endoscopists were compared in terms of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. RESULTS: The area under receiver operating characteristic curve for CAD-NBI was 0.9761. For the validation dataset, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of CAD-NBI were 91.0%, 96.7%, 94.3%, 95.3%, and 93.6%, respectively, while those of CAD-WLI were 98.5%, 83.1%, 89.5%, 80.8%, and 98.7%, respectively. CAD-NBI showed superior accuracy and specificity than CAD-WLI (P = 0.028 and P ≤ 0.001, respectively), while CAD-WLI had higher sensitivity than CAD-NBI (P = 0.006). By using both CAD-WLI and CAD-NBI, the endoscopists could improve their diagnostic efficacy to the highest level, with accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 94.9%, 92.4%, and 96.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The CAD-NBI system for screening early ESCC has higher accuracy and specificity than CAD-WLI. Endoscopists can achieve the best diagnostic efficacy using both CAD-WLI and CAD-NBI.

Serum Chemerin Levels in relation to Osteoporosis and Bone Mineral Density: A Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate serum chemerin levels in patients with osteoporosis and healthy controls and to investigate the relationship between serum chemerin levels and bone mineral density (BMD). METHODS: An age- and gender-matched case-control study was conducted. Pearson's correlation test was performed to investigate the relationship between serum chemerin levels and BMD. RESULTS: There were 93 patients included in the osteoporosis group and 93 matched controls. Serum chemerin level was significantly higher in patients with osteoporosis (87.27 ± 5.80 ng/mL) than patients in control (71.13 ± 5.12 ng/mL) (P < 0.01). There was a negative correlation between femoral bone mineral density and chemerin in both groups (R = -0.395, P < 0.01 in osteoporosis group; R = -0.680, P < 0.01 in control) and also a negative correlation between lumbar bone mineral density with chemerin in both groups (R = -0.306, P < 0.01 in osteoporosis group; R = -0.362, P < 0.01 in control). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with osteoporosis presented a higher level of serum chemerin, which witnessed an inverse correlation with BMD. Further studies are needed to explore the role of chemerin in the pathophysiology of osteoporosis.