Comparison of rRNA-based and DNA-based nucleic acid amplifications for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Ureaplasma urealyticum in urogenital swabs.

BACKGROUND: Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) are well-accepted in diagnosis and surveillance of sexually infectious pathogens worldwide. However, performance differences between a RNA-based NAAT and DNA-based NAAT are rarely reported. This study compares the performances of the RNA-based SAT (simultaneous amplification and testing) assay and the DNA-based quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay. METHODS: A total of 123 urogenital swabs were collected from outpatients with suspected genital infections in our hospital. Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), and Ureaplasma urealyticum (UU) in these swabs were simultaneously tested by SAT and qPCR. Any swabs were positive in the qPCR assay were further verified by following cloning and sequencing. All statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS software. RESULTS: When the concentrations of CT, NG, or UU were more than 1 × 103 copies/ml, 100% agreements between SAT and qPCR were observed regardless of the pathogen. No discrepancy was found. However, the sensitivity of SAT is significantly higher than qPCR in samples with concentration less than 1 × 103 copies/ml. When tested by SAT and qPCR, 57.14 and 28.57% were positive for CT, 46.15% and 0 were positive for NG, 80% and 0 were positive for UU, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The SAT assay has better agreements and higher sensitivities when compared with the qPCR assay, and thus could be a better choice for screening, diagnosis, and surveillance of sexually transmitted diseases, especially for CT and NG.

Prevalence and risk factors of human pegivirus type 1 infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the prevalence, risk factors, and genotypes of human pegivirus type 1 (HPgV-1) in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients. METHODS: One hundred and eighty-eight HSCT patients and 694 healthy blood donors were investigated retrospectively, including their demographic information and HPgV-1 infection status. RESULTS: When compared with healthy blood donors, a significantly higher HPgV-1 prevalence (18.6% vs. 2.3%) and a high risk of HPgV-1 infection (odds ratio 9.7) were observed in HSCT patients (p<0.05). The number of transfusions in patients with RNA test conversions (negative to positive) was significantly higher than the number in patients without conversions (negative to negative) (median 10 vs. 1) (p<0.05). Although HPgV-1 infection is independent of age, sex, blood type, hepatitis B virus infection, hepatitis C virus infection, marriage status, and type of hematological malignancy (p>0.05), race might be a risk factor for infection (p<0.05). The great majority (95.7%) of HPgV-1-positive patients were infected with genotype 3. CONCLUSIONS: HPgV-1 is highly prevalent in HSCT patients, and blood transfusions can significantly increase the risk of HPgV-1 infection. Thus, HPgV-1 screening is recommended in HSCT patients to reduce the potential impact of infection on survival, as well as in their blood and stem cell donors to reduce the risk of infection after transfusions, unless the beneficial effects of HPgV-1 infection in immunocompromised patients are clearly confirmed.