Black Women Are Less Likely to Be Classified as High-Risk for Breast Cancer Using the Tyrer-Cuzick 8 Model.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer risk assessment is a powerful tool that guides recommendations for supplemental breast cancer screening and genetic counseling. The Tyrer-Cuzick 8 (TC8) model is widely used for calculating breast cancer risk and thus helps determine if women qualify for supplemental screening or genetic counseling. However, the TC8 model may underestimate breast cancer risk in Black women. This study sought to assess this disparity. METHODS: Data on race, breast density, body mass index (BMI), and TC8 scores were retrospectively extracted from the electronic medical record (EMR). Logistic regressions were run to evaluate racial differences in TC8 scores. Summary and correlation statistics determined relationships between BMI, breast density, and race. Rank biserial correlations were employed to explore the impact of breast density and BMI on TC8 scores. RESULTS: Of 15,356 patients, 5796 were White and 5813 were Black. Black patients had higher rates of BMI ≥ 27 compared with White women (79.2% vs. 45.7%), lower rates of breast density (35.1% vs. 56.2%), and lower rates of high-risk TC8 scores (10.7% vs. 17.5%, OR = 1.6646). There was an inverse relationship between TC8 score and BMI (rrb = - 0.04) and a direct relationship between TC8 score and breast density (rrb = 0.37). DISCUSSION: Black women are less likely to have high-risk TC8 scores despite having only marginally lower breast cancer incidence rates and higher breast cancer mortality rates than White women. This suggests that the TC8 model underestimates breast cancer risk in Black women, possibly due to lower rates of breast density and higher BMIs among Black women.

Breast Density Status Changes: Frequency, Sequence, and Practice Implications.

OBJECTIVE: Changes in a patient's reported breast density status (dense vs nondense) trigger modifications in their cancer risk profile and supplemental screening recommendations. This study tracked the frequency and longitudinal sequence of breast density status changes among patients who received serial mammograms. METHODS: This IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective cohort study tracked breast density changes among patients who received at least 2 mammograms over an 8-year study period. BI-RADS density assessment categories A through D, visually determined at the time of screening, were abstracted from electronic medical records and dichotomized into either nondense (categories A or B) or dense (categories C or D) status. A sequence analysis of longitudinal changes in density status was performed using Microsoft SQL. RESULTS: A total of 58 895 patients underwent 231 997 screening mammograms. Most patients maintained the same BI-RADS density category A through D (87.35% [51 444/58 895]) and density status (93.35% [54 978/58 859]) throughout the study period. Among patients whose density status changed, the majority (97% [3800/3917]) had either scattered or heterogeneously dense tissue, and over half (57% [2235/3917]) alternated between dense and nondense status multiple times. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that many cases of density status change may be attributable to intra- and interradiologist variability rather than to true underlying changes in density. These results lend support to consideration of automated density assessment because breast density status changes can significantly impact cancer risk assessment and supplemental screening recommendations.