Fecal Urgency in Ulcerative Colitis: Impact on Quality of Life and Psychological Well-Being in Active and Inactive Disease States.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic, relapsing-and-remitting, potentially progressive form of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with multidimensional and often negative effects on patients' lives. Fecal urgency, the sudden and compelling desire to defecate, often accompanied by impaired bowel control leading to frequent and urgent trips to the bathroom, is a distressing symptom, experienced by more than 50% of patients with UC.1 Physicians frequently underestimate the burden of fecal urgency on patients' lives, with ramifications ranging from disruption in daily activities, social interactions, and emotional distress with resultant impairment in quality of life (QoL).2,3.

Management of acute severe ulcerative colitis-an update for generalist and specialist clinicians.

BACKGROUND: Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a potentially life-threatening medical emergency that occurs in up to 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis. Although intravenous corticosteroids remain the cornerstone of therapy, 30-40% of patients will not respond and need timely consideration of rescue therapy with (currently) either infliximab or ciclosporin or indeed colectomy, underscoring the importance of multidisciplinary care to ensure favourable outcomes for patients. We discuss the current evidence and present an approach to the management of ASUC for general and specialist clinicians caring for patients with ASUC. SOURCES OF DATA: The information in this review is derived from data published in peer- reviewed academic journals and registered clinical trials. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: Management of acute severe colitis requires a multidisciplinary approach with early initiation with steroids and timely escalation of treatment to either medical rescue therapy or surgery. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: Balancing the risks of delayed surgery vs. optimizing medical therapy, including accelerated dosing schedules for biologics, remains ambiguous. GROWING POINTS: The position on newer molecules like Janus Kinase inhibitors, such as tofacitinib, is a growing area with early real-world data showing promise for steroid refractory ASUC. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: Developing predictive biomarkers and clinical risk scores for personalized rescue therapy selection is an evolving area of research.

Conception, pregnancy and inflammatory bowel disease-Current concepts for the practising clinician.

The peak incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) coincides with a woman's prime reproductive years. The management of IBD during pregnancy can be challenging for healthcare professionals, underpinning the need for a multi-disciplinary approach with shared decision-making with the patient. Pre-conception counselling can address patient concerns, improve pregnancy specific IBD patient knowledge and provide a personalized risk assessment, to ensure optimal maternal and fetal outcomes. Most women with IBD have fertility rates comparable with the general population, although voluntary childlessness is common among women with IBD. IBD disease activity at conception and during pregnancy is a key determinant of the course of IBD during pregnancy. Active IBD during pregnancy is associated with adverse pregnancy-related outcomes, including spontaneous abortion, small for gestational age baby and preterm birth, emphasizing the importance of ensuring disease remission prior to conception. Most IBD medications (5-aminosalicylates, thiopurines if already initiated pre-conception, corticosteroids and biologic medications) are considered safe and low risk during pregnancy and breastfeeding, except for methotrexate, JAK-inhibitors, ozanimod and allopurinol and maintaining remission throughout gestation should be the priority. Most women with IBD can have a vaginal delivery, but cesarean section should be considered in active perianal disease and history of ileal pouch surgery. This narrative review outlines the current evidence for the management of IBD in pregnancy, as well as considering the pre-conceptual and post-partum period.

Attitudes, perceptions and barriers in implementing therapeutic drug monitoring for anti-TNFs in inflammatory bowel disease: a survey from the Middle East.

Background: A growing body of evidence underscores the beneficial impact of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Objectives: We surveyed clinician attitudes, perceptions and barriers related to TDM in IBD in the Middle East. Design: A 15-question survey was distributed through national gastroenterological societies in five Middle Eastern countries (UAE, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Lebanon and Egypt). Methods: Data on clinician characteristics, demographics, utilization patterns and obstacles related to the adoption of TDM with anti-TNFs were gathered. Logistic regression analysis was used to predict factors influencing the utilization of TDM. Results: Among 211 respondents (82% male), 82% were consultants, 8% were physicians with an interest in gastroenterology (GI), and 6% were GI trainees. Of these, 152 met inclusion criteria, treating >5 IBD patients per month and ⩾1 with an anti-TNF per month. TDM was used in clinical practice by 78% (95% CI: 71-85) of respondents. TDM was utilized following the loss of response (LOR) in 93%, for primary non-response (PNR) in 40% and before restarting anti-TNF therapy after a drug holiday in 33% of respondents, while 34% used TDM proactively. No specific factors were associated with the use of TDM. Barriers to TDM use included cost (85%), time lag to results (71%) and lack of insurance reimbursement (65%). Overall knowledge of TDM (70%), interpretation and actioning of results (76%) or awareness of clinical guidelines (57%) were not perceived as barriers. If barriers were removed, 95% would use TDM more frequently; 93% for LOR, 60% for PNR, 50% when restarting after a drug holiday, and 54% would use TDM proactively. Conclusion: Most gastroenterologists use TDM for LOR, with cost, time lag and insurance reimbursement being significant barriers. Addressing these barriers would increase the judicious use of reactive and proactive TDM to optimize anti-TNF therapy in IBD.

Attitudes, perceptions, and barriers in implementing therapeutic drug monitoring for anti-TNFs in inflammatory bowel disease: a survey from Middle East Anti-TNF therapies are perhaps the most widely used and available biological therapies for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease globally even though other agents have been licensed in recent years. The role of therapeutic drug monitoring to optimise outcomes and mitigate against immunogenicity with anti-TNF agents are now being appreciated. Our study investigates clinician attitudes, perceptions, and barriers related to therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in the context of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) through a comprehensive survey distributed from five Middle Eastern countries. Among 211 respondents (82% male), 82% were consultants, 8% physicians with an interest in gastroenterology (GI), and 6% GI trainees. TDM was utilised following loss of response (LOR) in 93%, for primary non-response (PNR) in 40%, and before restarting anti-TNF therapy after a drug holiday by 33% of respondents, while 34% used TDM proactively. No specific factors were associated with the use of TDM. Barriers to TDM use included cost (85%), time lag to result (71%), and lack of insurance reimbursement (65%). Overall knowledge of TDM (70%), interpretation and actioning of results (76%), or awareness of clinical guidelines (57%) were not perceived as barriers. If barriers were removed, 95% would use TDM more frequently; 93% for LOR, 60% for PNR, 50% when restarting after a drug holiday and 54% would use TDM proactively. Most gastroenterologists use TDM for LOR, with cost, time lag, and insurance reimbursement being significant barriers. Addressing these barriers would increase judicious use of reactive and proactive TDM to optimise anti-TNF therapy in IBD.

Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Ustekinumab and Anti-TNF in Elderly Crohn's Disease Patients.

BACKGROUND: Biologic therapies are associated with increased infection risk among elderly patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, there are few data on the safety and effectiveness of ustekinumab compared with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents in the elderly. METHODS: The study sought to compare the safety and effectiveness of ustekinumab and anti-TNF agents in elderly Crohn's disease (CD) patients. Patients ≥60 years of age who commenced ustekinumab or an anti-TNF agent for CD were included in this retrospective multicenter cohort. The primary outcome was incidence of serious infections requiring hospitalization. Effectiveness was assessed by clinical remission, clinical response, and treatment persistence rates at 6 months. We adjusted for confounders using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and performed a logistic regression analysis to assess factors associated with serious infections, clinical remission, and treatment persistence. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients commencing ustekinumab and 124 commencing anti-TNF therapy were included. There was no difference in serious infection rates between anti-TNF agents (2.8%) and ustekinumab (3.1%) (P = .924) after propensity adjustment. Clinical remission rates were comparable at 6 months for ustekinumab (55.9%) and anti-TNF agents (52.4%) (P = .762). There was a significant reduction in HBI at 6 months in both groups. Treatment persistence was comparable between ustekinumab (90.6%) and anti-TNF agents (90.0%) at 6 months. Cox regression analysis did not show differences in treatment persistence (hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-2.61; P = .594) and serious infection incidence (hazard ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-7.57; P = .709) by 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: We observed comparable safety and effectiveness for ustekinumab and anti-TNF agents in treating elderly CD patients.

In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, we report equal safety and effectiveness for ustekinumab and anti-tumor necrosis factor agents in treating older adults with Crohn's disease over a 6-month period.