Entropy-driven charge-transfer complexation yields thermally activated delayed fluorescence and highly efficient OLEDs.

Exciplex-forming systems that display thermally activated delayed fluorescence are widely used for fabricating organic light-emitting diodes. However, their further development can be hindered through a lack of structural and thermodynamic characterization. Here we report the generation of inclusion complexes between a cage-like, macrocyclic, electron-accepting host (A) and various N-methyl-indolocarbazole-based electron-donating guests (D), which exhibit exciplex-like thermally activated delayed fluorescence via a through-space electron-transfer process. The D/A cocrystals are fully resolved by X-ray analyses, and UV-visible titration data show their formation to be an endothermic and entropy-driven process. Moreover, their emission can be fine-tuned through the molecular orbitals of the donor. Organic light-emitting diodes were fabricated using one of the D/A systems, and the maximum external quantum efficiency measured was 15.2%. An external quantum efficiency of 10.3% was maintained under a luminance of 1,000 cd m-2. The results show the potential of adopting inclusion complexation to better understand the relationships between the structure, formation thermodynamics and properties of exciplexes.

Mortality outcomes with hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in COVID-19 from an international collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Substantial COVID-19 research investment has been allocated to randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine, which currently face recruitment challenges or early discontinuation. We aim to estimate the effects of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine on survival in COVID-19 from all currently available RCT evidence, published and unpublished. We present a rapid meta-analysis of ongoing, completed, or discontinued RCTs on hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine treatment for any COVID-19 patients (protocol: https://osf.io/QESV4/ ). We systematically identified unpublished RCTs (ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Cochrane COVID-registry up to June 11, 2020), and published RCTs (PubMed, medRxiv and bioRxiv up to October 16, 2020). All-cause mortality has been extracted (publications/preprints) or requested from investigators and combined in random-effects meta-analyses, calculating odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), separately for hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine. Prespecified subgroup analyses include patient setting, diagnostic confirmation, control type, and publication status. Sixty-three trials were potentially eligible. We included 14 unpublished trials (1308 patients) and 14 publications/preprints (9011 patients). Results for hydroxychloroquine are dominated by RECOVERY and WHO SOLIDARITY, two highly pragmatic trials, which employed relatively high doses and included 4716 and 1853 patients, respectively (67% of the total sample size). The combined OR on all-cause mortality for hydroxychloroquine is 1.11 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.20; I² = 0%; 26 trials; 10,012 patients) and for chloroquine 1.77 (95%CI: 0.15, 21.13, I² = 0%; 4 trials; 307 patients). We identified no subgroup effects. We found that treatment with hydroxychloroquine is associated with increased mortality in COVID-19 patients, and there is no benefit of chloroquine. Findings have unclear generalizability to outpatients, children, pregnant women, and people with comorbidities.

A multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of hydroxychloroquine and a retrospective study in adult patients with mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) via a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and a retrospective study. METHODS: Subjects admitted to 11 designated public hospitals in Taiwan between April 1 and May 31, 2020, with COVID-19 diagnosis confirmed by pharyngeal real-time RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2, were randomized at a 2:1 ratio and stratified by mild or moderate illness. HCQ (400 mg twice for 1 d or HCQ 200 mg twice daily for 6 days) was administered. Both the study and control group received standard of care (SOC). Pharyngeal swabs and sputum were collected every other day. The proportion and time to negative viral PCR were assessed on day 14. In the retrospective study, medical records were reviewed for patients admitted before March 31, 2020. RESULTS: There were 33 and 37 cases in the RCT and retrospective study, respectively. In the RCT, the median times to negative rRT-PCR from randomization to hospital day 14 were 5 days (95% CI; 1, 9 days) and 10 days (95% CI; 2, 12 days) for the HCQ and SOC groups, respectively (p = 0.40). On day 14, 81.0% (17/21) and 75.0% (9/12) of the subjects in the HCQ and SOC groups, respectively, had undetected virus (p = 0.36). In the retrospective study, 12 (42.9%) in the HCQ group and 5 (55.6%) in the control group had negative rRT-PCR results on hospital day 14 (p = 0.70). CONCLUSIONS: Neither study demonstrated that HCQ shortened viral shedding in mild to moderate COVID-19 subjects.

Mortality outcomes with hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in COVID-19 from an international collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials

Investimento substancial em pesquisa COVID-19 foi alocado para ensaios clínicos randomizados (ECRs) sobre hidroxicloroquina/cloroquina, que atualmente enfrentam desafios de recrutamento ou descontinuação precoce. Nosso objetivo é estimar os efeitos da hidroxicloroquina e da cloroquina sobre a sobrevivência em COVID-19 de todas as evidências de RCT atualmente disponíveis, publicadas e não publicadas. Apresentamos uma rápida meta-análise de ECRs em andamento, concluídos ou descontinuados em tratamento com hidroxicloroquina ou cloroquina para qualquer paciente com COVID-19 (protocolo: : https://osf.io/QESV4/). Identificamos sistematicamente ECRs não publicados (ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO Plataforma Internacional de Registro de Ensaios Clínicos, registro Cochrane COVID até 11 de junho de 2020), e ECRs publicados (PubMed, medRxiv e bioRxiv até 16 de outubro de 2020). Todas as causas mortalidade foi extraída (publicações/pré-impressões) ou solicitada aos investigadores e combinados em meta-análises de efeitos aleatórios, calculando odds ratio (ORs) com intervalos de confiança de 95% (ICs), separadamente para hidroxicloroquina e cloroquina. Pré-especificado as análises de subgrupo incluem configuração do paciente, confirmação de diagnóstico, tipo de controle e status de publicação. Sessenta e três estudos eram potencialmente elegíveis. Incluímos 14 ensaios não publicados (1308 pacientes) e 14 publicações/preprints (9011 pacientes). Resultados para hidroxicloroquina são dominados por RECOVERY e WHO SOLIDARITY, dois ensaios altamente pragmáticos, que empregaram doses relativamente altas e incluíram 4.716 e 1.853 pacientes, respectivamente (67% dos o tamanho total da amostra). O OR combinado na mortalidade por todas as causas para hidroxicloroquina é 1,11 (IC 95%: 1,02, 1,20; I² = 0%; 26 ensaios; 10.012 pacientes) e para cloroquina 1,77 (IC 95%: 0,15, 21,13, I² = 0%; 4 ensaios; 307 pacientes). Não identificamos efeitos de subgrupo. Nós achamos isso tratamento com hidroxicloroquina está associado ao aumento da mortalidade na COVID-19 pacientes, e não há benefício da cloroquina. Os achados não têm generalização clara para ambulatorial, crianças, gestantes e pessoas com comorbidades.