The Impact of Coronary Artery Disease and Statins on Survival After Liver Transplantation.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major contributor to longterm mortality after liver transplantation (LT) necessitating aggressive modification of CVD risk. However, it is unclear how coronary artery disease (CAD) and the development of dyslipidemia following LT impacts clinical outcomes and how management of these factors may impact survival. Patients undergoing LT at Virginia Commonwealth University from January 2007 to January 2017 were included (n = 495). CAD and risk factors in all potential liver transplantation recipients (LTRs) over the age of 50 years were evaluated via coronary angiography. The impact of pre-LT CAD after transplantation was evaluated via a survival analysis. Additionally, factors associated with new-onset dyslipidemia, statin use, and mortality were assessed using multiple logistic regression or Cox proportional hazards models. The mean age of the cohort was 55.3 ± 9.3 years at the time of LT, and median follow-up was 4.5 years. CAD was noted in 129 (26.1%) patients during the pre-LT evaluation. The presence or severity of pre-LT CAD did not impact post-LT survival. Dyslipidemia was present in 96 patients at LT, and 157 patients developed new-onset dyslipidemia after LT. Statins were underused as only 45.7% of patients with known CAD were on therapy. In patients with new-onset dyslipidemia, statin therapy was initiated in 111 (71.1%), and median time to initiation of statin therapy was 2.5 years. Statin use conferred survival benefit (hazard ratio, 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.49) and was well tolerated with only 12% of patients developing an adverse event requiring the cessation of therapy. In conclusion, pre-LT CAD did not impact survival after LT, potentially suggesting a role of accelerated atherosclerosis that may not be captured on pre-LT testing. Although statin therapy confers survival benefit, it is underused in LTRs.

Utilization of aspirin and statin in management of coronary artery disease in patients with cirrhosis undergoing liver transplant evaluation.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) assessment is a vital part of liver transplantation (LT) evaluation, as it allows for identification and medical optimization prior to transplantation. Although aspirin and statins are standard of care for CAD, they are not universally used in cirrhosis due to concerns about adverse events. Per protocol, coronary angiography was performed as part of the LT evaluation in all patients over the age of 50 years or with CAD risk factors, even if they were younger than 50. Optimal CAD medical management was defined as the use of both statin and aspirin, unless a contraindication was documented. Impact of these medications on hepatic decompensation, renal function, gastrointestinal bleeding, and need for transfusion was evaluated. CAD was detected in 84/228 (36.8%) patients. Lipid profile was similar in patients with and without CAD. In patients with CAD, statins were started in 19 (23%), while aspirin was used in 30 (36%) patients. In patients with obstructive or multivessel CAD, statin therapy was used only in 41% and 65%, respectively. Statins were more likely to be prescribed in patients with diabetes (32% versus 15%, P = 0.05) and history of dyslipidemia (38% versus 15%, P = 0.02). Use of statin therapy was not linked to hepatic decompensation, hospitalization, or rise in Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD). Similarly, use of aspirin therapy was not associated with increased risk acute variceal hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, or worsening anemia. In conclusion, in decompensated cirrhosis, lipid profile alone is unable to risk stratify patients with CAD. Statin and aspirin appear to be safe. However, they are significantly underutilized for the management of CAD in this patient population. Liver Transplantation 24 872-880 2018 AASLD.

Range of Normal Serum Aminotransferase Levels in Liver Transplant Recipients.

Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) are used to monitor liver transplant recipients (LTR) but the reference range and context of its use is not well defined. We aimed to determine the healthy ranges in LTR without chronic liver disease. METHODS: One hundred and three LTR without chronic liver disease based on serology, transient elastography with controlled attenuated parameter, and ultrasound were included. A healthy range of aminotransferases was set to 95th percentile. An updated normal aminotransferase range was used to detect recurrence in post-liver transplantation (LT) with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). RESULTS: The normal ALT and AST range was 0 to 57 and 0 to 54 IU/L, respectively, in LTR and was not affected by age, sex, obesity, or choice of immunosuppressant. The diagnostic performance of serum ALT and AST to detect recurrence of NAFLD by a controlled attenuated parameter was poor with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.573 (95% confidence interval 0.493, 0.655; P = .08) and 0.537 (0.456, 0.618; P = .4), respectively. In contrast, the diagnostic performance of ALT and AST to detect recurrence of HCV after LT was 0.906 (0.868, 0.944; P < .001) and 0.925 (0.890, 0.959; P < .001), respectively. CONCLUSION: The updated aminotransferase range in LTR is higher than the general population and accurate for detecting recurrent HCV, but not NAFLD.