RESUMO
This study aimed to investigate the association between n-3 PUFA and lung function. First, a cross-sectional study was conducted based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2012 data. n-3 PUFA intake was obtained from 24-h dietary recalls. A multivariable linear regression model was used to assess the observational associations of n-3 PUFA intake with lung function. Subsequently, a two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) was performed to estimate the potential causal effect of n-3 PUFA on lung function. Genetic instrumental variables were extracted from published genome-wide association studies. Summary statistics about n-3 PUFA was from UK Biobank. Inverse variance weighted was the primary analysis approach. The observational study did not demonstrate a significant association between n-3 PUFA intake and most lung function measures; however, a notable exception was observed with significant findings in the highest quartile for forced vital capacity (FVC) and % predicted FVC. The MR results also showed no causal effect of circulating n-3 PUFA concentration on lung function (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), ß = 0·01301, se = 0·01932, P = 0·5006; FVC, ß = -0·001894, se = 0·01704, P = 0·9115; FEV1:FVC, ß = 0·03118, se = 0·01743, P = 0·07359). These findings indicate the need for further investigation into the impact of higher n-3 PUFA consumption on lung health.
Assuntos
Ácidos Graxos Ômega-3 , Pulmão , Análise da Randomização Mendeliana , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Humanos , Ácidos Graxos Ômega-3/administração & dosagem , Ácidos Graxos Ômega-3/sangue , Pulmão/fisiologia , Masculino , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Capacidade Vital , Adulto , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Dieta , Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla , Idoso , Testes de Função RespiratóriaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: While several traditional observational studies have suggested associations between gut microbiota and asthma, these studies are limited by factors such as participant selection bias, confounders, and reverse causality. Therefore, the causal relationship between gut microbiota and asthma remains uncertain. METHODS: We performed two-sample bi-directional Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to investigate the potential causal relationships between gut microbiota and asthma as well as its phenotypes. We also conducted MR analysis to evaluate the causal effect of gut metabolites on asthma. Genetic variants for gut microbiota were obtained from the MiBioGen consortium, GWAS summary statistics for metabolites from the TwinsUK study and KORA study, and GWAS summary statistics for asthma from the FinnGen consortium. The causal associations between gut microbiota, gut metabolites and asthma were examined using inverse variance weighted, maximum likelihood, MR-Egger, weighted median, and weighted model and further validated by MR-Egger intercept test, Cochran's Q test, and "leave-one-out" sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: We identified nine gut microbes whose genetically predicted relative abundance causally impacted asthma risk. After FDR correction, significant causal relationships were observed for two of these microbes, namely the class Bacilli (OR = 0.84, 95%CI = 0.76-0.94, p = 1.98 × 10-3) and the order Lactobacillales (OR = 0.83, 95%CI = 0.74-0.94, p = 1.92 × 10-3). Additionally, in a reverse MR analysis, we observed a causal effect of genetically predicted asthma risk on the abundance of nine gut microbes, but these associations were no longer significant after FDR correction. No significant causal effect of gut metabolites was found on asthma. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides insights into the development mechanism of microbiota-mediated asthma, as well as into the prevention and treatment of asthma through targeting specific gut microbiota.