Safety of two-hour intermittent intravenous infusions of tacrolimus in the allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation unit.

At our institution, tacrolimus is used as a second-line agent for the prevention and treatment of graft-versus-host-disease in the allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) unit after patients have experienced a serious or intolerable adverse event to cyclosporine. As per our standard practice, tacrolimus is administered via 2-h intermittent IV infusions (IIVs) every 12 h rather than continuous IV infusion. Shorter infusion times are cautioned due to concerns of higher rates of nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity and infusion-related reactions, although there is a paucity of data to support this claim. Our primary objective was to evaluate the safety of a 2-h IIV of tacrolimus in an adult HSCT population. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 104 patients who received tacrolimus by IIV (3574 doses; median = 22, range 1-158, IQR = 28) from 2002 to 2016. Primary outcomes collected include rates of nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity and infusion-related reactions. One (0.9%) grade 2 infusion-related reaction occurred and resolved without discontinuation of tacrolimus. Of 16 incidences (13.6%) of nephrotoxicity, all but 10 (8.5%) cases resolved. Precipitating factors for nephrotoxicity unrelated to tacrolimus were identified in all 10 cases. There were 41 incidences (35%) of neurotoxicity, of which, 8 (6.8%) were considered serious. All neurotoxicity reverted to baseline or resolved completely. We propose that a 2-h IIV of tacrolimus is a safe method of administration in the adult HSCT setting.

Outcomes of therapy-related acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Therapy-related acute lymphoblastic leukemia (t-ALL) is an increasingly recognized subset of therapy-related acute leukemia. There are limited data on the role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in t-ALL. Recent reports suggest comparable outcomes of t-ALL with de novo ALL after HSCT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients of t-ALL who underwent HSCT at our center. Patients were analyzed for prior malignancy, therapy, time to diagnosis of t-ALL, clinical, laboratory characteristics, transplant details, relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Eighteen patients (M:F ratio 1:1; Median age 44 years) underwent HSCT for t-ALL. Median latent period from primary malignancy to t-ALL was 44.8 months. 11q23 rearrangement and t(9;22) were present in 33.3% and 22.2% patients, respectively. Stem cell donors were matched related, matched unrelated, and haploidentical in 27.8% (n = 5), 55.6% (n = 10), and 16.7% (n = 3) patients, respectively. Five patients died before D+ 100 (27.8%). Estimated 2-year RFS and OS were 47.1% and 51.8%, respectively. We did not find any pretransplant and post-transplant risk factors that were predictive of improved OS or RFS after multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Allogeneic HSCT outcomes in t-ALL were comparable to HSCT outcomes in de novo ALL. Multicenter studies with more patients and longer follow-up may provide factors affecting outcome and survival.

Mobilization of Leukemic Cells Using Plerixafor as Part of a Myeloablative Preparative Regimen for Patients with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Undergoing Allografting: Assessment of Safety and Tolerability.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is potentially curative for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML); however, a major cause of treatment failure is disease relapse. The purpose of this single-center Phase I study was to determine the safety and tolerability of administration of the CXCR4 inhibitor plerixafor (Mozobil; Sanofi Genzyme) along with myeloablative conditioning in patients with AML undergoing allogeneic HCT. The rationale was that plerixafor may mobilize leukemic stem cells, making them more susceptible to the conditioning chemotherapy (registered at ClinicalTrials.gov; identifier NCT01141543). Three patients were enrolled into each of 4 sequential cohorts (12 patients total). Patients in the first cohort received 1 dose of plerixafor (240 µg/kg s.c.) before the first dose of fludarabine and busulfan, and subsequent cohorts received injections before 2, 3, and 4 days of conditioning chemotherapy. The median age at HCT was 49 years (range, 38 to 58 years). All patients engrafted following HCT, with an absolute neutrophil count ≥.5 × 109/L observed at a median of 14 days (range, 11 to 18 days). Adverse events possibly related to plerixafor were transient and not severe. Main adverse events following the injection were nausea and dizziness in 4 patients (33%) and fatigue in 4 patients (33%). Among the 12 patients, 2 patients (17%) relapsed post-HCT and 6 (50%) were alive at the last follow-up. The median follow-up of survivors was 67 months (range, 53 to 82 months). In conclusion, plerixafor administration is safe and well tolerated when included in a myeloablative conditioning regimen for allogeneic HCT for AML. Further study in a larger cohort is warranted for the investigation of the impact of plerixafor on post-allogeneic HCT outcomes.

Reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic transplant with dual T-cell depletion in myelofibrosis.

BACKGROUND: There remains a significant mortality in recipients with MF who undergo allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT). The combination of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) provides good control of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) when peripheral blood stem cell grafts are used. METHODS: We report the outcome of 37 recipients with myelofibrosis who underwent reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allo-HSCT with ATG and PTCy. Median follow-up was 16.4 months. RESULTS: Nine (24.3%) recipients received 10/10 MRD grafts, 17 (45.9%) 10/10 MUD grafts, 4 (10.8%) 9/10 MUD grafts, and 7 (18.9%) haploidentical donor grafts. Six (16.3%) patients had graft failure. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV and grade III-IV aGVHD at day +100 and moderate/severe chronic GVHD at 1 year was as follows: 13.5%, 5.4%, and 17%. There were no deaths secondary to GVHD. One-year overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), and GVHD-free/RFS (GRFS) were respectively 74.4%, 71.3%, 23%, and 43.3%. Those recipients who had worse KPS ≤ 80% had worse OS and RFS. CONCLUSION: RIC allo-HSCT with ATG and PTCy results in high OS and RFS in patients with myelofibrosis and absence of mortality secondary to GVHD. Further investigations are required to reduce NRM and graft failure rates.

Low rates of acute and chronic GVHD with ATG and PTCy in matched and mismatched unrelated donor peripheral blood stem cell transplants.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the combination of ATG and PTCy for GVHD prophylaxis in matched and mismatched unrelated PBSCTs for high-risk hematological malignancies. METHODS: We treated 102 patients with reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) with fludarabine, busulfan, and TBI 200 cGy. GVHD prophylaxis included rabbit ATG (thymoglobulin at total dose of 4.5 mg/kg divided over days -3 to -1), PTCy (50 mg/kg/day on day +3 and on day +4), and cyclosporine. Clinical and outcome data were collected retrospectively. RESULTS: Among 102 patients, 76 patients received 10/10 MUD transplants and 26 patients received 9/10 mismatched transplants. The median age was 59 years. At a median follow-up of 15 months (range 0.6 to -33 months), the 1-year OS in MUD and MMUD cohort was 75% and 50%, respectively (P = 0.027). The corresponding one-year PFS was 67% and 35%, respectively (P = 0.0024). The incidence of grade 3-4 acute GVHD was 11.8% in MUD and 3.8% in MMUD group, and that of NIH stage moderate/severe chronic GVHD in the 2 groups was 10.5% and 7.6%, respectively. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation was seen in 49% patients. The cumulative incidence of relapse was 21.1% in the MUD group and 42.3% in the MMUD group. CONCLUSION: Our experience shows that PTCy and ATG can be combined for GVHD prophylaxis in matched unrelated donor PBSCTs with low rates of Gr3-4 acute GVHD and chronic GVHD, and acceptable relapse rates.

Reduced intensity allogeneic stem cell transplant with anti-thymocyte globulin and post-transplant cyclophosphamide in acute myeloid leukemia.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to study the efficacy of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) allo-HSCT combined with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in AML. METHODS: One hundred forty-seven patients were included. All patients underwent unmanipulated peripheral blood stem cell RIC allo-HSCT. Median follow-up was 12.8 months (range 0.5-39). RESULTS: Median age was 58 years. Twenty-nine (20%) recipients received 10/10 MRD grafts, 69 (47%) 10/10 MUD grafts, 20 (13.6%) 9/10 MMUD, and 29 (20%) haploidentical grafts. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD at day +100, and moderate/severe chronic GVHD at 1-year were as follow: 14.3%, 1.4%, and 8.3%. There were no significant differences according to donor type (P = .46) and cumulative incidence of GVHD. One-year overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), non-relapse mortality, and GVHD-free/Relapse-free survival were as follows: 66.9% (95% CI 58.4-74), 59.9%, and 18.7% and 53.7%. KPS ≤ 80 was predictive of worst OS (P = .04). Those recipients who received MUD transplants had better RFS (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: RIC allo-HSCT combined with ATG and PTCy is safe and a potentially curative strategy and it is associated with impressive GRFS in AML.

Long-Term Incidence of Secondary Malignancies after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience.

To review the emergence of secondary malignancies (SMs) in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), we documented the occurrence of SMs in 2415 allogeneic HCT recipients, ages 18 to 71, in a single center over 4 decades. SMs were seen in 209 patients, including 58 with nonmetastatic squamous cell (SCC) and basal cell carcinoma (BCC) of the skin. Cumulative incidence of SM was 6.3% at 10 years, 13.5% at 20 years, and 17.6% at 30 years post-HCT. Median age at diagnosis of SMs was 61 years (range, 21 to 85). By multivariable analysis, older age at HCT was the only independent prognostic factor for SM (HR, 1.39 for ages 41 to 55 and HR, 1.92 for age > 55 compared with age ≤ 40; P = .001). The rate of SM (excluding nonmetastatic SCC/BCC of skin) after HCT was 2.07 times higher (P = .01) compared with the general population. Overall survival (OS) after diagnosis of SM (excluding nonmetastatic SCC/BCC of skin) was 58% at 5 years and 50% at 10 years postdiagnosis. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score was the only independent predictor of OS on multivariable analysis, with over 2-fold increased risk of death for patients with an ECOG score of 1 and over 6-fold for ECOG scores of 2 to 4, compared with ECOG score 0 (P < .0001). Forty of 209 patients (19%) diagnosed with SMs subsequently developed another new malignancy. OS was 68% and 51% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. The survival of SM patients post-HCT is favorable, thus warranting diligent long-term cancer screening and standard of care treatment. ECOG status of these patients is a predominant prognostic factor.

Benefit of allogeneic transplantation in patients age ≥ 60 years with acute myeloid leukemia is limited to those in first complete remission at time of transplant.

We evaluated the impact of age and remission status on 242 consecutive patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in our program between 1999 and 2011. Median age of all patients was 48 years (range, 18 to 71). Based on age and remission status, patients were divided into 4 groups: first complete remission (CR1) age <60 years (n = 116), second complete remission (CR2) age <60 years (n = 78), CR1 age ≥60 years (n = 32), and CR2 age ≥60 years (n = 16). Donors were matched related (n = 155, 64%) or matched unrelated (n = 87, 36%). Median follow-up of survivors was 65 months (range, 12 to 145). In a univariate analysis, 3-year overall survival rates of the 4 groups were 57%, 43%, 39%, and 16% (P = .003), respectively. In a multivariable analysis, hazard ratios of nonrelapse mortality and survival were 2.08 (P = .06) and 1.52 (P = .23), respectively, in patients ≥60 years in CR2 compared with ≥ 60 years in CR1. Although a plateau in survival was observed for patients ≥60 years in CR1 similar to those <60 years in CR1 and CR2, no long-term survivors were seen in patients ≥60 years in CR2. Our data suggest disappointing outcomes in AML patients ≥60 years of age transplanted in CR2. Therefore, if a transplant is indicated, early referral is recommended in patients ≥60 years with AML.

Early lymphocyte recovery at 28 d post-transplant is predictive of reduced risk of relapse in patients with acute myeloid leukemia transplanted with peripheral blood stem cell grafts.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is potentially curative for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Impact of lymphocyte recovery on post-transplant outcomes has been suggested but reports are conflicting. We evaluated the impact of lymphocyte recovery at 28 d post-HCT in 191 AML patients using peripheral blood stem cells as graft. Patients were divided into those with absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) ≥ 0.5 × 10(9) /L (n = 111, 58%; high ALC group) and those with ALC < 0.5 × 10(9) /L (n = 80, 42%; low ALC group), at day 28 post-transplant. With a median follow-up of 49 months, overall survival (OS) was significantly improved in the high ALC group (59% at 3 yr) vs. patients with low ALC (40% at 3 yr, P = 0.03). Cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was significantly lower in the high ALC group (16% at 3 yr) vs. low ALC group (36% at 3 yr, P = 0.001). Multivariable analysis for CIR demonstrated high ALC group as an independent factor decreasing relapse risk (P = 0.03, HR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.26-0.92). Multivariable analysis for OS and non-relapse mortality did not demonstrate ALC ≥ 0.5 × 10(9) /L at 28 d post-transplant to be predictive. We conclude that lymphocyte recovery with ALC ≥ 0.5 × 10(9) /L at day 28 post-transplant is associated with less relapse in AML patients undergoing allogeneic peripheral blood HCT, but without survival benefit.

Predictors of Outcomes of Therapy-Related Acute Myeloid Leukemia After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Existing literature on allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) is confounded by the inclusion of patients with secondary AML and t-MDS. We aim to report our 20-year experience of HSCT in t-AML. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with t-AML who underwent HSCT. Patients were analyzed for prior malignancy, therapy, time to diagnosis of t-AML, transplant details, relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and predictors of outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 68 patients (59.9% female; median age, 56.5 years) underwent HSCT. Acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurred in 39 (57.4%) and 23 (33.8%) patients, respectively. Cumulative incidence of relapse, nonrelapse mortality, RFS, and OS at 2 years were 17.9%, 34.5%, 47.6%, and 49.3%, respectively. Significant predictors of reduced OS were presence of 11q23 rearrangement (hazard ratio [HR], 3.24), using induction regimens other than FLAGI-da or 7 + 3 (HR, 3.65), haploidentical donors (HR, 3.48), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 2 or higher (HR, 5.83), and using cyclosporine A-methotrexate as GVHD prophylaxis (HR, 2.41). A significant decrement in survival was seen with an increasing number of any of these prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Outcomes of t-AML are satisfactory after allo-HSCT. Patients with t-AML with good-risk karyotypes, good performance status, having HLA-matched donors, and receiving intensive induction regimens have better outcomes after HSCT.

Dual T-cell depletion with ATG and PTCy for peripheral blood reduced intensity conditioning allo-HSCT results in very low rates of GVHD.

The efficacy of posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and antithymocyte globulin (ATG) in controlling GVHD has been previously reported. We aim to study the safety and efficacy of the use of dual T-cell depletion with ATG and PTCy for peripheral blood reduced intensity conditioning regimen allo-HSCT in 270 patients with hematological malignancies. Median follow-up was 12.7 months. Nineteen percent of patients received grafts from a matched related donor, 46% from 10/10 matched unrelated donors (MUD), 16% from 9/10 MUD and 19% from haploidentical donors. Graft failure rate was 9%. CMV and EBV reactivation rates were 58 and 64%. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD at day + 100 was 20.1% and 4.6%, respectively. The CI of moderate/severe chronic GVHD at 1 year was 12.4%. There were no differences in the incidence of GVHD according to donor type. One-year OS, RFS, NRM, CIR, and GVHD-free/RFS respectively were 65.2%, 56.9%, 22.7%, 20.3%, and 47.6%. Higher disease-risk index and worse Karnofsky performance status were significant factors for poor outcomes. In conclusion, the use of T-cell dual depletion with ATG and PTCy results in very low rates of acute and chronic GVHD and acceptable relapse rates and NRM.

Safety and Efficacy of Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation for Myeloid Malignancies Using Post-transplantation Cyclophosphamide and Anti-thymocyte Globulin as Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis.

Haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haploSCT) has greatly improved access to curative treatment for myeloid malignancies in patients without suitable matched sibling/unrelated donors. We investigated the safety and efficacy of haploSCT after reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG), post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy), and cyclosporine to prevent rejection and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). In this study, 47 patients received RIC using fludarabine, busulfan, and total body irradiation (200 cGy). Unmanipulated peripheral blood grafts were used. GVHD prophylaxis included ATG (4.5 mg/kg day-3 to -1), PTCy (50 mg/kg/day day +3, +4), and cyclosporine from day +5. The median follow-up was 15 months (range 3-27). Thirty one (66%) patients had acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 10 (21%) had high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome, and 6 (13%) had a myeloproliferative neoplasia. Median age was 60 years (range 22-73). The d+100 cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD were 17% (95% confidence interval (CI) 7.9-29.1) and 6.4% (1.6-15.9), respectively. The cumulative incidence of moderate-severe chronic GVHD at 1 year was 15.2% (95% CI 6.5-27.1). Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were 55.2% (95% CI 39.5-68.4) and 49.5% (95% CI 34.2-63), respectively. Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) for all patients at 1 year was 37.1% (95% CI 23.2-51.1). Infection was the main cause of death (26%). For AML, 1-year OS, RFS, and NRM were 64.1% (95% CI 43.3-78.9), 54.5 (95% CI 34.6-70.7), and 26.8% (95% CI 12.3-43.6), respectively. In conclusion, unmanipulated haploidentical peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) transplantation following RIC and dual in vivo T-cell depletion results in a low incidence of acute and chronic GVHD for patients diagnosed with myeloid malignancies.

Similar outcomes of cryopreserved allogeneic peripheral stem cell transplants (PBSCT) compared to fresh allografts.

The BMT program at Princess Margaret Hospital performed 105 transplants using cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) from related allogeneic donors. The outcomes were compared with those of a historic control of 106 patients transplanted with freshly procured PBSC. The infusions were tolerated with limited toxicity related to nausea/vomiting or bradycardia, correlated with the total amount of DMSO infused. The average viability of the total nucleated cell (TNC) population after thawing was 71%. The survival of clonogenic progenitors amounted to 75% for colony-forming unit-granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM), 69% for burst-forming units erythroid (BFU-E), and 78% for colony-forming units granulocyte-erythrocyte-monocyte-megakaryocyte (CFU-GEMM). In contrast, colony-forming units megakaryocyte (CFU-MEG) was significantly more cryosensitive with recovery rates of 39%. The number of viable CD34(+) cells transplanted was correlated with the number of transplanted viable CFU-GM (P < .001), BFU-E (P < .001), CFU-MEG (P < .001), and CFU-GEMM (P = .049), but not with the TNC dose. The number of transplanted CD34(+) cells was correlated with engraftment of neutrophils (P = .012) and platelets (P = .013). The outcomes of cryopreseved or fresh PBSC transplants (PBSCT) with respect to engraftment of neutrophils (P = .178) and platelets (P = .785), lymphocyte recovery (P = .926), acute (P = .113), and chronic graft-versus-host disease (P = .673), recurrence (P = .295), nonrelapse mortality (P = .340), and overall survival (P = .668) were not significantly different. It is therefore reasonable to consider the option of cryopreserved allografts.