The Role of Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Expression in Pituitary Tumours: Lessons from the Current Literature.

BACKGROUND: Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and PD ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression predict the biological behaviour, aggressiveness, and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in different cancers. We reviewed the published data on PD-L1 expression in pituitary tumours from the perspective of its biological role and prognostic usefulness. SUMMARY: A literature review focused on PD-L1 expression in pituitary tumours was performed. Six immunohistochemistry-based studies which assessed PD-L1 positivity in pituitary tumours were included, encompassing 704 patients. The cohort consisted of 384 (54.5%) nonfunctioning tumours and 320 (43.5%) functioning pituitary tumours. PD-L1 expression was positive in 248 cases (35.2%). PD-L1 positivity rate was higher in functioning than in nonfunctioning tumours (46.3% vs. 26.0%; p < 0.001) but also higher in growth hormone-secreting tumours (56.7%) and prolactinomas (53.6%) than in thyrotroph (33.3%) or corticotroph tumours (20.6%). While proliferative pituitary tumours showed higher rate of PD-L1 positivity than non-proliferative tumours (p < 0.001), no association with invasion or recurrence was found. KEY MESSAGES: PD-L1 is expressed in a substantial number of pituitary tumours, predominantly in the functioning ones. PD-L1 positivity rates were significantly higher in proliferative pituitary tumours in comparison to non-proliferative tumours, but no differences were found concerning invasive or recurrent pituitary tumours. More studies following homogeneous and standardised methodologies are needed to fully elucidate the role and usefulness of PD-L1 expression in pituitary tumours.

Acromegaly in humans and cats: Pathophysiological, clinical and management resemblances and differences.

OBJECTIVE: Acromegaly is a disorder associated with excessive levels of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1). In general, GH/IGF-1 excess leads to morphologic craniofacial and acral changes as well as cardiometabolic complications, but the phenotypic changes and clinical presentation of acromegaly differ across species. Here, we review the pathophysiology, clinical presentation and management of acromegaly in humans and cats, and we provide a systematic comparison between this disease across these different species. DESIGN: A comprehensive literature review of pathophysiology, clinical features, diagnosis and management of acromegaly in humans and in cats was performed. RESULTS: Acromegaly is associated with prominent craniofacial changes in both species: frontal bossing, enlarged nose, ears and lips, and protuberant cheekbones are typically encountered in humans, whereas increased width of the head and skull enlargement are commonly found in cats. Malocclusion, prognathism, dental diastema and upper airway obstruction by soft tissue enlargement are reported in both species, as well as continuous growth and widening of extremities resulting in osteoarticular compromise. Increase of articular joint cartilage thickness, vertebral fractures and spine malalignment is more evident in humans, while arthropathy and spondylosis deformans may also occur in cats. Generalized organomegaly is equally observed in both species. Other similarities between humans and cats with acromegaly include heart failure, ventricular hypertrophy, diabetes mellitus, and an overall increased cardiometabolic risk. In GH-secreting pituitary tumours, local compressive effects and behavioral changes are mostly observed in humans, but also present in cats. Cutis verticis gyrata and skin tags are exclusively found in humans, while palmigrade/plantigrade stance may occur in some acromegalic cats. Serum IGF-1 is used for acromegaly diagnosis in both species, but an oral glucose tolerance test with GH measurement is only useful in humans, as glucose load does not inhibit GH secretion in cats. Imaging studies are regularly performed in both species after biochemical diagnosis of acromegaly. Hypophysectomy is the first line treatment for humans and cats, although not always available in veterinary medicine. CONCLUSION: Acromegaly in humans and cats has substantial similarities, as a result of common pathophysiological mechanisms, however species-specific features may be found.

In Search of the Hyperglycemic Threshold Required to Induce Growth Hormone (GH) Suppression.

Introduction According to the 2014 Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline on acromegaly, the confirmation of acromegaly diagnosis is established by finding a lack of suppression of growth hormone (GH) to < 1 ug/L following documented hyperglycemia during an oral glucose tolerance test. However, in this setting, the concept of hyperglycemia has never been clearly defined. Objective This study aimed to define the hyperglycemic threshold required to induce GH suppression. Methods We retrieved the glycemia profile of 44 individuals after a standard 2-h 75g oral glucose tolerance test prescribed to assess GH suppression and performed a comprehensive analysis of two subgroups of individuals (28 reaching GH suppression and 16 in whom GH suppression was not observed). All of the data were analyzed with the program Graph Pad Prism. Differences between means were assessed by Student's unpaired t-test or Mann-Whitney U test as deemed appropriate. Fisher's exact test was used for categorical variables. Results Individuals in G1 and G2 were different only for the median basal GH and median IGF-1. No significant differences in terms of the prevalence of diabetes and prediabetes were found. The glucose peak was achieved earlier in the group that reached GH suppression. The median of the highest glucose values of both subgroups was not different. A correlation between peak and baseline glucose value was found only among those in whom GH suppression was reached. Among these, the median glucose peak (P50) was 177 mg/dl, whereas the 75th percentile (P75) and 25th percentile (P25) were 199 mg/dl and 120 mg/dl, respectively. Conclusion Considering that 75% of those in whom GH suppression was observed after an oral glucose overload test reached blood glucose values above 120 mg/dl, we propose to use this value as the blood glucose threshold for inducing GH suppression. In light of our results, whenever GH suppression is not observed; and the highest glycemic value is below 120 mg/dl, it might be useful to repeat the test prior to any conclusion.