A 6-year experience of Zephyr endobronchial valves for severe emphysema in an Australian single-centre cohort.

BACKGROUND: Endobronchial valve (EBV) insertion for lung volume reduction is a management option for patients with severe emphysema. One-way valves cause lobar deflation and improve lung function, exercise capacity and quality of life. AIMS: To retrospectively analyse and compare the outcomes of the first 57 patients treated with EBVs between 2015 and 2021 at the Royal Adelaide Hospital to international standards. METHODS: Clinical outcomes of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), residual volume (RV), treated lobe volume reduction (TLVR) and 6-min walk distance (6MWD) at 3, 6 and 12 months after valve insertion were reviewed against established minimally clinically important differences (MCIDs). Complications and subjective breathlessness measured by Borg scores were also reviewed. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were included. At 12 months, 77.2% achieved TLVR. FEV1 improved by 170 mL (95% confidence interval (CI): 100-250, P < 0.001), 80 mL (95% CI: 10-150, P = 0.019) and 40 mL (95% CI: -60 to 130, P 0.66) at 3, 6 and 12 months respectively. RV improved by -610 mL (95% CI: -330 to -900, P < 0.0001) at 3 months, -640 mL (95% CI: -360 to -920, P < 0.0001) at 6 months and -360 mL (95% CI: -60 to -680, P = 0.017) at 12 months. 6MWD improved by 57.34 m (95% CI: 36.23-78.45, P < 0.0001) and 44.93 m (95% CI: 7.19-82.67, P = 0.02) at 3 and 6 months. Borg score improved by -0.53 (95% CI: 0.11 to -1.2, P = 0.11) and -0.49 (95% CI: 0.17 to -1.15, P = 0.16) at 3 and 6 months. Complication rates aligned with international standards with mucous/infection (26.3%) and pneumothorax (17.5%) as the most common. Subgroup analysis signalled improved outcomes in patients with heterogeneous emphysema. CONCLUSION: Our study represents the first publicly funded Australian analysis of EBVs. The results align with international prospective trials demonstrating improved lung function and exercise capacity. Australians with severe emphysema and gas trapping should be referred to a multidisciplinary centre for consideration of EBVs.

Use of Ventilation-Perfusion Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography to Select the Target Lobe for Endobronchial Valve Lung Volume Reduction.

BACKGROUND: Quantitative planar ventilation-perfusion (VQ) has a complementary role in target lobe selection for endobronchial valve lung volume reduction (EBV-LVR), especially in homogenous disease. We investigated a novel method of lung lobar quantitation using VQ single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with computed tomography (CT) to generate a parameter called the ventilation-perfusion differential index (VQDI). AIM: The aim of this study was to validate VQDI as a parameter for target lobe selection in EBV-LVR against the gold standard test of quantitative computed tomography (qCT). METHODS: This study was a prospective, multi-centre, single-blinded, observational study of EBV-LVR patients. Baseline and 3-month post intervention VQ SPECT and qCT were performed. The target lobe was chosen using qCT and planar VQ report (CTTL) whilst blinded to VQDI. Post EBV-LVR, our nuclear physician, blinded to CTTL, selected a target lobe using deidentified VQDI (VQDITL). Inter-rater agreement between CTTL and VQDITL was calculated by Kappa statistic. Treatment outcomes were analysed with a linear mixed-effects model. RESULTS: There was a high concordance between CTTL and VQDITL in 16 patients (89%, Kappa statistic = 0.85). Post EBV-LVR, our subjects showed significant changes in FEV1 (mean difference [MD] +150 mL, p < 0.001), target lobe volume reduction (MD -973 mL, p < 0.001), residual volume (MD -800 mL, p < 0.001), and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire score (MD -11, p = 0.001). Improvements in 6-minute walk distances did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: In this study of treatment responders, EBV-LVR target lobe selection using VQDI concurs with qCT and thus supports its value for this purpose. It complements qCT and may potentially be of synergistic value especially in homogenous emphysema.

Aortic annulus dimension assessment by computed tomography for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: differences between systole and diastole.

Accurate assessment of aortic annular dimensions is essential for successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Annular dimensions are conventionally measured in mid-systole by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), echocardiography and angiography. Significant differences in systolic and diastolic aortic annular dimensions have been demonstrated in cohorts without aortic stenosis (AS), but it is unknown whether similar dynamic variation in annular dimensions exists in patients with severe calcific AS in whom aortic compliance is likely to be substantially reduced. We investigated the variation in aortic annular dimensions between systole and diastole in patients with severe calcific AS. Patients with severe calcific AS referred for TAVI were evaluated by 128-slice MDCT. Aortic annular diameter was measured during diastole and systole in the modified coronal, modified sagittal, and basal ring planes (maximal, minimal and mean diameters). Differences between systole and diastole were analysed by paired t test. Fifty-nine patients were included in the analysis. Three of the five aortic dimensions measured increased significantly during systole. The largest change was a 0.75 mm (3.4%) mean increase in the minimal diameter of the basal ring during systole (p = 0.004). This corresponds closely to the modified sagittal view, which also increased by mean 0.42 mm (1.9%) during systole (p = 0.008). There was no significant change in the maximal diameter of the basal ring or the modified coronal view during systole (p > 0.05). There is a small magnitude but statistically significant difference in aortic annulus dimensions of patients with severe AS referred for TAVI when measured in diastole and systole. This small difference is unlikely to alter clinical decisions regarding prosthesis size or suitability for TAVI.