RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: With no specific overview on simulation-based training for educational purposes among residents in ophthalmology, this narrative review attempts to highlight the current literature on modern educational simulation-based tools used to educate residents in ophthalmology. METHODS: We searched databases Web of Science and PubMed between March 15 and July 21, 2022. Relevant and accessible articles and abstracts published after 2006 and in English only were included. RESULTS: Simulation-based cataract surgery is associated with better outcomes in the operating room and faster surgeries. Construct validity has been established across different procedures and levels in simulation-based cataract surgery and simulation-based vitreoretinal surgery. Other simulation-based procedures indicate promising results but in general lack evidence-based validity. DISCUSSION: This narrative review highlights and evaluates the current and relevant literature of modern educational simulation-based tools to train ophthalmology residents in different fundamental skills like simulation-based ophthalmoscopy and complex surgical procedures like simulation-based cataract surgery and vitreoretinal surgery. Some studies attempt to develop simulators for the use in education of ophthalmology residents. Other studies strive to establish validity of the respective procedures or modern education tools and some studies investigate the effect of simulation-based training. The most validated modern educational simulation-based tool is the Eyesi Surgical Simulator (VRmagic, Germany). However, other modern educational simulation-based tools have also been evaluated, including the HelpMeSee Eye Surgery Simulator (HelpMeSee Inc., New York, USA) and the MicroVisTouch Surgical Simulator (ImmersiveTouch, USA). CONCLUSION: Simulation-based training has already been established for residents in ophthalmology to benefit the most from skill-demanding procedures resulting in better learning and better patient handling. Future studies should aim to validate more simulation-based procedures for the teaching of ophthalmology residents so that the evidence is kept at a high standard.
RESUMO
Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a potential sight-threatening disease. Although it is associated with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), visual loss is not common in PMR. A retinal oximeter can be used to conduct a direct, non-invasive, in vivo assessment of the vascular system. In a cross-sectional study, we measured the retinal oxygen saturation and retinal vessel calibers in GCA patients, PMR patients, and control participants. Twenty GCA patients (38 eyes), 19 PMR patients (33 eyes), and 12 controls (20 eyes) were investigated. Images were analyzed using Oxymap Analyzer software 2.5.0 (Oxymap ehf., Reykjavik, Iceland). Groups were compared using an age- and sex-adjusted linear mixed model regression. The median (IQR) age for GCA patients was 69.0 (66.5-76.5) years, for PMR 69.0 (67.0-72.0) years, and for the controls 75.5 (71.5-81.0) years, respectively. As compared to the controls (115.3 µm), the retinal arterioles were significantly wider in patients with GCA (124.4 µm; p = 0.023) and PMR (124.8 µm; p = 0.049). No difference was found in the retinal venular caliber or vascular oxygen saturation. These results indicate that GCA and PMR patients differ similarly in the retinal arteriolar diameter compared to controls. Further studies are needed in order to clarify the underlying inflammatory mechanisms in retinal arteriolar vessels and if these parameters can be used to predict clinical outcomes.