RESUMO
Social restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic had a major impact on the mental health of youth. We analyzed a sample of 274 adolescents and young adults that participated in an online survey. We used the Brief Symptom Inventory 18 (BSI 18) and the Perceived Stress Scale to assess mental health status. Furthermore, we assessed the frequency and intensity of social media use in all participants. More than 50 % of the adolescents and young adults reported clinically relevant scores for somatization, depression, anxiety, and perceived stress. Females had significantly higher mental health burdens than males. Although adolescents used social media more frequently and intensely than young adults, the results showed no correlation with psychopathology. Young adults had significantly higher scores compared to adolescents in somatization, depression, and perceived stress the more time they spent on social media. Our results emphasise that frequency and intensity of social media use alone were not associated with worsemental health.However, the adverse effects of socialmedia use have to be considered carefully.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Mídias Sociais , Feminino , Masculino , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Saúde Mental , Pandemias , AnsiedadeRESUMO
Background: While there are well-established treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), these interventions appear to be less effective for individuals with comorbid borderline personality disorder (BPD) symptoms. Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) for PTSD and DBT Prolonged Exposure (PE) are both effective interventions for treating these patients, but a comprehensive analysis evaluating the efficacy of these two interventions is lacking.Objective: To determine the effect sizes of PTSD-specific DBT treatments.Methods: We conducted a systematic review and pre-registered meta-analysis of the DBT literature for treating PTSD (osf.io/62rfq). Eligible trials and treatment evaluations published before September 2023 were searched in SCOPUS, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library databases. Thirteen articles were identified, and data were extracted for primary (PTSD symptoms) and secondary outcomes (BPD, depression, dissociation, non-suicidal self-injury [NSSI]). Treatment effects were calculated for randomised controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, and pre-post evaluations.Results: Overall, the studies involved 663 participants. Compared with control groups, PTSD-specific DBT treatments showed moderate effects in reducing PTSD symptom severity g = -0.69 (95% CI -1.03 to -0.34, p < .001) and depression g = -0.62 (95% CI -1.13 to -0.12, p = .016). Moreover, the pre-post changes showed an overall effect size for dissociative symptoms of g = -0.72 (95% CI -1.05 to -0.40, p < .001), for BPD-associated symptoms of g = -0.82 (95% CI -1.06 to -0.59, p < .001), and for NSSI frequency (g = -0.70, 95% CI -1.12 to -0.28, p = .001).Conclusions: Based on the results of our meta-analysis, DBT-PTSD and DBT PE were effective in reducing PTSD symptom severity and comorbid depressive symptoms. Further research on stage-based treatments should focus on systematically assessing NSSI, BPD symptoms, and suicidality.
We conducted the first meta-analysis assessing the efficacy of Dialectical Behavior Therapy for PTSD (DBT-PTSD) and Dialectical Behavior Therapy Prolonged Exposure (DBT PE) for individuals with comorbid PTSD and BPD symptoms.Based on RCTs/CCTs, we found moderately beneficial effects on PTSD symptoms, and depression for both stage-based interventions and large effects on non-suicidal self-injury frequency for DBT PE.DBT-PTSD and DBT PE resulted in pre-post improvements in dissociative symptoms, BPD-associated symptoms, and non-suicidal self-injury frequency.