Video Modeling and Video Feedback to Reduce Time to Perform Intravenous Cannulation in Medical Students: A Randomized-Controlled Mixed-Methods Study.

PURPOSE: Combined video modeling (VM) and video feedback (VF) may be more beneficial than traditional feedback when teaching procedural skills. This study examined whether repeated VM and VF compared with VM alone reduced the time required for medical students to perform peripheral intravenous (IV) cannulation. METHODS: Twenty-five novice medical students were randomly assigned to groups in a one-way blinded embedded mixed-methods study to perform IV cannulation. Participants received standardized instruction and performed IV cannulation on each other while being audio-video recorded. They were assigned to review a video of an expert performing IV cannulation (VM alone), or both the expert video and a video of their own most recent IV cannulation (VM+VF), before returning to perform another IV cannulation. This was repeated for a total of four IV cannulation encounters and three video reviews. A post-test interview was also conducted and analyzed qualitatively using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: The median [interquartile range] time required to perform IV cannulation in the final encounter was significantly different between the VM+VF group vs VM alone group (126 [93-226] sec vs 345 [131-537] sec, respectively; median difference, 111 sec; 95% confidence interval, 8 to 391; P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in IV cannulation success between VM alone and VM+VF in the final encounter (75% vs 85% respectively; P = 0.65). For the VM+VF group, the time to perform IV cannulation was reduced after the final encounter compared with the baseline encounter (P = 0.002), which was not true of the VM alone group (P = 0.35). CONCLUSION: Video modeling and feedback shortened time to IV skill completion, reduced complications, and improved satisfaction in novice medical students.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: La combinaison d'une vidéo de démonstration (VD) et d'une vidéo de rétroaction (VR) pourrait être plus efficace que la rétroaction traditionnelle pour l'enseignement des habiletés nécessaires pour des procédures. Cette étude a cherché à savoir si la répétition d'une VD et d'une VR réduisait davantage le temps nécessaire à des étudiants en médecine pour effectuer une canulation intraveineuse périphérique (IV) par rapport à la seule VD. MéTHODES: Vingt-cinq étudiants en médecine novices ont été assignés par randomisation à des groupes d'une étude utilisant différentes méthodes intégrées d'apprentissage avec insu unilatéral pour la réalisation d'une canulation IV. Les participants ont reçu un enseignement standardisé et ont réalisé une canulation IV sur un autre participant tout en étant filmés (audio-vidéo). Selon leur groupe, ils devaient visionner la vidéo d'un expert effectuant une canulation IV (groupe VD uniquement) ou voir la vidéo de l'expert et une vidéo de leur plus récente canulation IV (groupe VD + VR) avant d'effectuer une autre canulation IV. La procédure a été répétée (total de 4 tentatives de canulations et 3 séances de vidéos). Un entretien post test a été également mené et analysé du point de vue qualitatif au moyen d'une analyse thématique du contenu. RéSULTATS: Le temps médian [plage interquartile] nécessaire pour effectuer la canulation IV au cours de la dernière tentative a été significativement différent entre le groupe VD+VR et le groupe VD seule (respectivement, 126 secondes [93 à 226 s] contre 345 s [131 à 537 s]; différence des médianes, 111 s; intervalle de confiance à 95 % : 8 à 391; P = 0,02). Il n'y a pas eu de différence significative entre le taux de réussite des canulations entre le groupe VD seule et le groupe VD+VR (respectivement, 75 % contre 85 %; P = 0,65). Pour le groupe VD+VR, le temps nécessaire à la canulation IV au moment de la dernière tentative a été plus court par rapport au temps mis au cours de la première tentative (P = 0,002), ce qui n'a pas été le cas pour le groupe VD seule (P = 0,35). CONCLUSION: La vidéo de démonstration et la vidéo de rétroaction ont permis de raccourcir le temps de réalisation des habiletés d'une canulation IV, ont réduit les complications et amélioré la satisfaction des étudiants en médecine novices.

Artificial ventilation during transport: A randomized crossover study of manual resuscitators with comparison to mechanical ventilators in a simulation model.

BACKGROUND: Positive-pressure ventilation in critically ill patients is commonly administered via a manual resuscitation device or a mechanical ventilator during transport. Our group previously compared delivered ventilation parameters between a self-inflating resuscitator and a flow-inflating resuscitator during simulated in-hospital pediatric transport. However, unequal group access to inline pressure manometry may have biased our results. In this study, we examined the performance of the self-inflating resuscitator and the flow-inflating resuscitator, both equipped with inline manometry, and several mechanical ventilators to deliver prescribed ventilation parameters during simulated pediatric transport. METHODS: Thirty anesthesia providers were randomized to initial resuscitator device used to hand ventilate a test lung. The resuscitators studied were a Jackson-Rees circuit (flow-inflating resuscitator) or a Laerdal pediatric silicone resuscitator (self-inflating resuscitator), both employing manometers. The scenario was repeated using several mechanical transport ventilators (Hamilton-T1, LTV® 1000, and LTV® 1200). The primary outcome was the proportion of total breaths delivered within the predefined target PIP/PEEP range (30 ± 3, 10 ± 3 cm H2 O). RESULTS: The Hamilton-T1 outperformed the other ventilators for breaths in the recommended range (χ2  = 2284, df = 2, P < .001) and with no breaths in the unacceptable range (χ2  = 2333, df = 2, P < .001). Hamilton-T1 also outperformed all human providers in proportion of delivered acceptable and unacceptable breaths (χ2  = 4540, df = 3, P < .001 and χ2  = 639, df = 3, P < .001, respectively). Compared with the flow-inflating resuscitator, the self-inflating resuscitator was associated with greater odds of breaths falling outside the recommended range (Odds ratio (95% CI): 1.81 (1.51-2.17)) or unacceptable (Odds ratio (95% CI): 1.63 (1.48-1.81)). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that a majority of breaths delivered by manual resuscitation device fall outside of target range regardless of provider experience or device type. The mechanical ventilator (Hamilton-T1) outperforms the other positive-pressure ventilation methods with respect to delivery of important ventilation parameters. In contrast, 100% of breaths delivered by the LTV 1200 were deemed unacceptable.

Positive-pressure ventilation during transport: a randomized crossover study of self-inflating and flow-inflating resuscitators in a simulation model.

BACKGROUND: Positive-pressure ventilation during transport of intubated patients is generally delivered via a hand-pressurized device. Of these devices, self-inflating resuscitators (SIR) and flow-inflating resuscitators (FIR) constitute the two major types used. Selection of a particular device for transport, however, remains largely an institutional practice. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the hypothesis that transport ventilation goals of intubated pediatric patients are better achieved using an FIR compared to an SIR. METHODS: This randomized crossover simulation study compared the performance of SIR and FIR among anesthesia providers in a pediatric transport scenario. Subjects hand-ventilated a test lung while simultaneously maneuvering a stretcher bed to simulate patient transport. Hand ventilation was carried out using a Jackson-Rees circuit (FIR) and a Laerdal pediatric silicone resuscitator (SIR). The primary outcome was the proportion of total breaths delivered within the predefined target PIP/PEEP range (30+/- 3, 10+/- 3 cm H2O). Secondary outcomes included proportion of total breaths delivered with operationally defined unacceptable breath variables (PIP > 35 cm H2O or PEEP < 5 cm H2O). RESULTS: Overall, participants were four times more likely to deliver target breaths and one-third less likely to deliver unacceptable breaths using the FIR compared to the SIR. When comparing device performance, a 44% increase in the proportions of target breaths and a 40.4% decrease in unacceptable breaths using the FIR were observed (P < 0.0001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Hand ventilation during patient transport is superior using the FIR compared to the SIR to achieve target ventilatory goals and avoid unacceptable ventilatory cycles.

Mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis of urine in acute kidney injury following cardiopulmonary bypass: a nested case-control study.

BACKGROUND: The early evolution of acute kidney injury (AKI) in humans is difficult to study noninvasively. We hypothesized that urine proteomics could provide insight into the early pathophysiology of human AKI. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective nested case-control study (n = 250) compared serial urinary proteomes of 22 patients with AKI and 22 patients without AKI before, during, and after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. OUTCOMES: AKI was defined as a greater than 50% increase in serum creatinine level, and non-AKI, as less than 10% increase from baseline. MEASUREMENTS: Serum creatinine, urine protein-creatinine ratio, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), alpha1-microglobulin, interferon-inducible protein-10 (IP-10), monokine induced by interferon gamma (Mig), interferon-inducible T cell alpha chemoatractant (I-TAC), interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-1beta, and IL-10. Urine protein profiling by means of surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF-MS). RESULTS: SELDI-TOF-MS showed intraoperative tubular stress in both groups on arrival to the intensive care unit, evidenced by beta2-microglobulinuria. Non-AKI proteomes returned toward baseline postoperatively. In contrast, AKI proteomes showed a second phase of tubular injury/stress with the reappearance of beta2-microglobulin and multiple unidentified peaks (3 to 5 and 6 to 8 kDa) and the appearance of established tubular injury markers: urinary protein, alpha1-microglobulin, and NGAL. Furthermore, 2 novel peaks (2.43 and 2.78 kDa) were found to be dominant in postoperative non-AKI urine samples. The 2.78-kDa protein was identified as the active 25-amino acid form of hepcidin (hepcidin-25), a key regulator of iron homeostasis. Finally, an inflammatory component of reperfusion injury was evaluated by means of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay analysis of candidate chemokines (IP-10, I-TAC, and Mig) and cytokines (IL-6, IL-1beta, and IL-10). Of these, IP-10 was upregulated in patients with versus without AKI postoperatively. LIMITATIONS: This is an observational study. SELDI-TOF-MS is a semiquantitative technique. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of human AKI revealed early intraoperative tubular stress in all patients. A second phase of injury observed in patients with AKI may involve IP-10 recruitment of inflammatory cells. The enhancement of hepcidin-25 in patients without AKI may suggest a novel role for iron sequestration in modulating AKI.