Home hospitalization for palliative cancer care: factors associated with unplanned hospital admissions and death in hospital.

BACKGROUND: Home hospitalization at the end of life can sometimes be perturbed by unplanned hospital admissions (UHAs, defined as any admission that is not part of a preplanned care procedure), which increase the likelihood of death in hospital. The objectives were to describe the occurrence and causes of UHAs in cancer patients receiving end-of-life care at home, and to identify factors associated with UHAs and death in hospital. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center study (performed at a regional cancer center in the city of Lille, northern France) of advanced cancer patients discharged to home hospitalization between January 2014 and December 2017. We estimated the incidence of UHA over time using Kaplan-Meier method and Kalbfleish and Prentice method. We investigated factors associated with the risk UHA in cause-specific Cox models. We evaluated factors associated with death in hospital in logistic regressions. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-two patients were included in the study. Eighty-two patients (57.7 %) experienced one or more UHAs, a high proportion of which occurred within 1 month after discharge to home. Most UHAs were related to physical symptoms and were initiated by the patient's family physician. A post-discharge palliative care consultation was associated with a significantly lower incidence of UHAs. Sixty-five patients (47.8 % of the deaths) died in hospital. In a multivariate analysis, living alone and the presence of one or more children at home were associated with death in hospital. CONCLUSIONS: More than 40 % of cancer patients receiving end of life home hospitalization were not readmitted to hospital, reflecting the effectiveness of this type of palliative care setting. However, over half of the UHAs were due to an acute intercurrent event. Our results suggest that more efforts should be focused on anticipating these events at home - primarily via better upstream coordination between hospital physicians and family physicians.

Reducing the seroma volume by quilting suture after breast reconstruction with a latissimus dorsi flap: Single institutional experience.

INTRODUCTION: After breast reconstruction (BR) with latissimus dorsi flap (LDF) postoperative seroma is a frequent source of functional discomfort. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quilting suture on reducing the seroma volume by reducing the dead space created by LDF harvest for BR. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective monocenter study was designed to compare patients who underwent BR using LDF with or without quilting suture. The primary endpoint was the seroma volume drained during hospitalization and percutaneous puncture. Complications and painful or functional sequelae were also evaluated in both groups. RESULTS: One hundred eight patients were included in the study. The mean (standard deviation, SD) age of our population was 49.7 years (9.3) and the mean body mass index (BMI) 26.9kg/m2 (4.1). Sixty-nine patients (63%) underwent quilting suturing in the latissimus dorsi compartment, 41% with overedge and 59% with simple stitches. The mean total volume of fluid drainage was 1238mL (1111). In multivariate analysis, the use of quilting suture was associated with a significant reduction in the total volume of drainage (-502mL, P=0.03); reduction was greater using overedge stitches than simple stitches (P=0.02). The beneficial effect of quilting suture appears to be more important in patients with a BMI greater than 30kg/m2 (interaction test, P=0.01). CONCLUSION: This study shows the efficacy of quilting suture in reducing postoperative seroma formation in BR using LDF. Efficacy was greater when overedge stitches were used. Obese patients benefited more from quilting suture than patients with BMI<25.

Usefulness of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Treatment of Adrenal Gland Metastases.

Purpose: This study aimed to describe our institutional experience in the use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the management of adrenal gland metastases from multiple primary cancers. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 31 patients who underwent SBRT as treatment for 33 adrenal gland lesions in the academic radiotherapy department of Oscar Lambret cancer center between May 2011 and September 2018. The primary study endpoints were 1- and 2-year local control rates, defined as the absence of progression at the treatment site based on the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST). Toxicities were graded in accordance with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03. Results: The average tumor volume was 33.5 cm3 (standard deviation: 51.7 cm3), and the prescribed dose ranged from 30 to 55 Gy given in 3-9 fractions. The median biological effective dose was 112.5 Gy (range: 45-115.5 Gy), assuming α/ß = 10. Considering progression at distant sites or death as competing events, the 1- and 2-year actuarial local control rates were 96.5% (95% confidence interval: 84.9-99.7) and 92.6% (95% confidence interval: 79.2-98.7), respectively. According to RECIST, a complete response was achieved in 10 (32.3%) lesions, a partial response in 10 (32.3%) lesions, and stability in 8 (25.8%) lesions. Three patients presented with local relapse at 8.8, 14, and 49.4 months. After a median follow-up of 18 months (range: 4.4-66.4), the median overall survival was 33.5 months (95% confidence interval: 17-not reached), while the median progression-free survival was 7.4 months (95% confidence interval: 3.8-14.1). Treatment-related toxicity was grade 1 or 2 in 42.4% of patients, including nausea (27.3%), abdominal pain (18.2%), vomiting (15.2%), and asthenia (9.1%). None of the patients developed acute grade ≥3 or late toxicity. Conclusion: SBRT seems to be a safe and effective treatment for adrenal gland metastases in patients whose primary tumor and metastatic spread are controlled by systemic treatment. With a 2-year local control rate of 92.6%, SBRT may be considered as one of the first-line treatments in oligometastatic patients with adrenal metastases.