Examining heterogeneity: A systematic review of quantitative person-centered studies on adversity, mental health, and resilience in children and young adults with refugee backgrounds.

BACKGROUND: Child and young adult refugees are a heterogeneous group comprising both vulnerable and resilient individuals. Person-centered statistical methods could help disentangle this heterogeneity, enabling tailored interventions. This systematic review examined person-centered studies on adversity, mental health, and resilience in children and young adults with refugee backgrounds to identify subgroups and assess their theoretical and practical relevance. METHODS: The strategy included three search blocks: 1) refugee, 2) child and/or youth, and 3) person-centered method. Studies were identified through searches of PubMed, Academic Search Complete, Scopus, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ERIC, and Cochrane. The search included all published studies until December 2023. Studies were eligible for review if they used adversity, mental health or resilience variables as indicators in a person-centered analysis. The study population needed to have a refugee background with a mean age of ≤25. The reporting quality of the studies was assessed using the adapted version of the Guidelines for Reporting on Latent Trajectory Studies (GRoLTS) checklist. The results were analyzed in a narrative format and using summary tables. RESULTS: A total of 6706 studies were initially identified, of which seven were eligible for review. The studies included 2409 individuals and were conducted in refugee camps, communities, and institutional and clinical settings across Africa, the Middle East, Europe, Asia, and North America. Five of the seven studies included adversity as an indicator, and three articles mental ill-health. Only one article specifically investigated resilience. All studies identified subgroups, but the findings regarding predictors of group membership were inconclusive. Risks for adverse outcomes, such as mental health problems, also varied across subgroups. The studies generally displayed inadequate reporting of important methodological aspects of the data analysis, a lack of theoretical consideration, and an absence of reliability testing. CONCLUSIONS: The use of person-centered approaches in research on children and young adults with refugee backgrounds, focusing on adversity, mental health, and resilience, is currently limited. Nevertheless, the reviewed studies provided valuable insights into subgroups within this population, indicating that person-centered approaches can be employed when studying this group. Future research should consider theory and prior knowledge in the selection of the final number of groups, thoroughly report quality criteria, and rigorously test the reliability of classes.

Professional reinventions: Swedish psychologists, 1990-2010.

Since the early 20th century, the Swedish psychology profession has undergone several changes in its essential tasks, epistemological foundations, and social roles. These changes occurred through an ongoing "tuning" with Swedish society, in which the profession strove to appear relevant to society's concerns and problems as well as enroll others to share the profession's goals and aims. Studying the history of the profession can thus shed light on the changing definitions and contours of the psychology profession itself as well as on the organization of the society in which it acts. This article examines the history of the Swedish psychology profession from 1990 to 2010, through an analysis of the discussions and debates taking place in the Swedish Psychological Association's journal. The analytical framework used draws on work done within actor-network theory and science studies. We argue that the profession's institutional connections, defining tasks, epistemological underpinnings, and social position have changed in major ways during these 2 decades. Overall, as a result of an increasingly felt insecurity, the profession has turned outward and tried to find new ways to legitimize itself to politicians, the media, patients, and customers through means such as a more economized vocabulary and novel forms of empirical research. These changes have led to a more socialized profession, now more closely tuned to other actors in Swedish society, leading to conflicts within the profession over whether this is an opportunity to better control their own destiny or if it will lead to a loss of autonomy. (PsycINFO Database Record