Gut mycobiome as a potential non-invasive tool in early detection of lung adenocarcinoma: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The gut mycobiome of patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remains unexplored. This study aimed to characterize the gut mycobiome in patients with LUAD and evaluate the potential of gut fungi as non-invasive biomarkers for early diagnosis. METHODS: In total, 299 fecal samples from Beijing, Suzhou, and Hainan were collected prospectively. Using internal transcribed spacer 2 sequencing, we profiled the gut mycobiome. Five supervised machine learning algorithms were trained on fungal signatures to build an optimized prediction model for LUAD in a discovery cohort comprising 105 patients with LUAD and 61 healthy controls (HCs) from Beijing. Validation cohorts from Beijing, Suzhou, and Hainan comprising 44, 17, and 15 patients with LUAD and 26, 19, and 12 HCs, respectively, were used to evaluate efficacy. RESULTS: Fungal biodiversity and richness increased in patients with LUAD. At the phylum level, the abundance of Ascomycota decreased, while that of Basidiomycota increased in patients with LUAD. Candida and Saccharomyces were the dominant genera, with a reduction in Candida and an increase in Saccharomyces, Aspergillus, and Apiotrichum in patients with LUAD. Nineteen operational taxonomic unit markers were selected, and excellent performance in predicting LUAD was achieved (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.9350) using a random forest model with outcomes superior to those of four other algorithms. The AUCs of the Beijing, Suzhou, and Hainan validation cohorts were 0.9538, 0.9628, and 0.8833, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, the gut fungal profiles of patients with LUAD were shown to represent potential non-invasive biomarkers for early-stage diagnosis.

Comparison of efficacy and safety between PD-1 inhibitors and PD-L1 inhibitors plus platinum-etoposide as first-line treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a multicenter, real-world analysis.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy in combination with platinum-etoposide (EP) chemotherapy has been approved as a first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, real-world (RW) data regarding the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in ES-SCLC are lacking. We aimed to assess the differences between programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors, both in conjunction with EP chemotherapy, as first-line treatment for ES SCLC. METHODS: We conducted a real-world, multicenter, retrospective cohort, controlled study to compare the prognosis, efficacy, and safety of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in ES-SCLC patients when used along with chemotherapy. Each patient received up to six cycles of etoposide, carboplatin, or cisplatin combined with ICI drugs, including PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors. The primary endpoints were investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were the investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST, version 1.1). RESULTS: Between January 2017 and December 2021, 194 patients with ES-SCLC from three clinical centers in a PLA general hospital were included in our study, including 93 patients in the PD-1 group and 101 patients in the PD-L1 group. At the time of data cutoff, progression-free survival in the PD-1 group (median PFS, 6.8 months; 95% CI, 5.3-8.1) was similar to that in the PD-L1 group (median PFS, 6.4 months; 95% CI, 5.5-7.5); the stratified hazard ratio for PFS was 1.12 (95% CI, 0.83-1.53; P = 0.452). The median OS was similar in the PD-1 and PD-L1 groups (15.8 m vs. 17.7 m, P = 0.566); the hazard ratio was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.62-1.30, P = 0.566). The two groups had comparable investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rates (ORR) (76.3% vs. 76.2%). Adverse effect (AE)-related discontinuation occurred in 4 (4.3%) patients in the PD-1 group and 2 (2.0%) patients in the PD-L1 group. Deaths due to AEs of any cause occurred in 2 (2.2%) patients in the PD-1 inhibitor group and 1 (1.0%) patient in the PD-L1 inhibitor group. CONCLUSIONS: Our research revealed that there were no significant differences in efficacy or prognosis between PD-1 inhibitor + EP chemotherapy and PD-L1 inhibitor + EP chemotherapy. The two groups seemed to have comparable safety profiles, but the number of discontinuation or death events was too small to draw a firm conclusion.

Pralsetinib-associated pneumonia in RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Oncogenic alternation in RET is one of the important targets of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pralsetinib has shown great efficacy in RET fusion-positive NSCLC, but a series of adverse reactions will inevitably occur in the meantime. We aimed to explore the clinical characteristics of patients with pneumonia and recognition it in early stage, so patients could longer benefit from pralsetinib. METHODS: This is a multicenter, retrospective study. RET fusion-positive advanced NSCLC patients who developed pneumonia during pralsetinib treatment from January 2020 to December 2022 were included. Clinical data, time to onset of pneumonia, methods of pneumonia diagnosis, treatment with pneumonia, prognosis of pneumonia, and the effect of pneumonia on the efficacy of pralsetinib. RESULTS: A total of 8 patients with pneumonia were included in the study, most of which were non-smoking female patients and the main fusion gene was KIF5B (87.5%), which was consistent with the general characteristics of RET fusion population. The median occurrence time of pralsetinib-associated pneumonia was 2.15 (range 1.1-6.63) months. All patients were infected by opportunistic pathogens, and the most common pathogen was human herpesviruses and pneumospora yerbii. Fever was always the first symptom, and timely anti-infective treatment including antibiotics, antiviral drugs, and antifungal drugs was effective. Until February 28, 2023, the median follow-up time was 18.7 months, the mean PFS of patients was 17.4 months, and the median PFS was not reached. Fortunately, patients who restarted pralsetinib after infection control continued to benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Opportunistic infection may be a unique adverse effect of pralsetinib. During the treatment of pralsetinib, we should be vigilant about the occurrence of pneumonia and achieve early recognition and timely treatment.

Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1-based therapy in combination with PARP inhibitors for patients with advanced solid tumors in a real-world setting.

BACKGROUND: Rationale exists for combining immune checkpoint inhibitors and PARP inhibitors (PARPi), and results of clinical trials in ovarian cancer are promising, but data in other cancers are limited. METHOD: Efficacy and safety of PARPi/anti-PD-1 in advanced solid tumors were retrospectively analyzed. The efficacy measures included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: This retrospective study included data from 40 patients. The ORR was 27.5% (95% CI, 13.0-42.0%), with a DCR of 85.0% (95% CI, 73.4-96.6%). Except four patients in first-line treatment (three with PR and one with SD), the ORR of ≥second-line treatment, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) was 22.2%, 23.1% and 28.6%, and the DCR was 83.3%, 84.6% and 71.4%, separately. The median PFS of all patients, ≥second-line treatment, NSCLC and SCLC was 4.6 m, 4.2 m, 4.5 m and 3.7 m. The median OS was 9.4 m, 11.4 m, 12.7 m and 5.4 m, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that BRCA1/2 mutation was positively correlated with ORR (P = 0.008), and LDH≥250U/L was negatively correlated with lowered DCR (P = 0.018), while lymphocyte number, ECOG and LDH significantly influenced both PFS and OS. We found that the possible resistant mechanisms were sarcomatous degeneration and secondary mutation, including BRCA2 truncation mutation, A2M, JAK1,T790M, KEAP1 and mTOR mutation. 37.5% patients had ≥grade 3 adverse events. CONCLUSION: PARPi/anti-PD-1 is an effective and tolerable method for patients with advanced solid tumors, and BRCA1/2 is a potential biomarker.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer patients.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent a major breakthrough for cancer treatment. However, evidence regarding the use of ICIs in pancreatic cancer (PC) remained scarce. To assess the efficacy and safety of ICIs plus chemotherapy, patients with advanced PC were retrospectively recruited and were treated with either chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy plus ICIs. Patients previously treated with any agents targeting T-cell co-stimulation or checkpoint pathways were excluded. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). The secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and safety. In total, 58 patients were included (combination, n = 22; chemotherapy, n = 36). The combination group showed a significantly longer OS than the chemotherapy group [median, 18.1 vs 6.1 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.46 (0.23-0.90), P = 0.021]. The median PFSs were 3.2 months in the combination group and 2.0 months in the chemotherapy group [HR 0.57 (0.32-0.99), P = 0.041]. The combination group and the chemotherapy group had similar ORRs (18.2% vs 19.4%, P = 0.906). All patients who achieved a partial response received a doublet chemotherapy regimen regardless of co-treatment with ICIs. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 31.8% of the patients in the combination group and in 16.9% of those receiving chemotherapy. Although the incidence of serious treatment-related adverse events was higher in the combination group than in the chemotherapy group, the difference was not significant (P = 0.183). Our findings suggest that the combination of ICIs with chemotherapy is both effective and tolerable for advanced PC. ICIs combined with a doublet chemotherapy regimen might be a preferable choice.

Anti-PD-1 therapy combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.

BACKGROUND: Evidence for the efficacy of immunotherapy in biliary tract cancer (BTC) is limited and unsatisfactory. METHODS: Chinese BTC patients receiving a PD-1 inhibitor with chemotherapy, PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy or chemotherapy alone were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). The key secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Patients previously treated with any agent targeting T cell costimulation or immune checkpoints were excluded. RESULTS: The study included 77 patients (a PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy, n = 38; PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy, n = 20; chemotherapy alone, n = 19). The median OS was 14.9 months with a PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy, significantly longer than the 4.1 months with PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.17-0.80, P = 0.001) and the 6.0 months with chemotherapy alone (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.42-0.94, P = 0.011). The median PFS was 5.1 months with a PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy, significantly longer than the 2.2 months with PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.31-1.10, P = 0.014) and the 2.4 months with chemotherapy alone (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45-0.83, P = 0.003). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were similar between the anti-PD-1 combination group and the chemotherapy alone group (34.2% and 36.8%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Anti-PD-1 therapy plus chemotherapy is an effective and tolerable approach for advanced BTC.

XRCC2 Polymorphisms and Environmental Factors Predict High Risk of Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND This case-control study aimed to analyze the association of [i]XRCC2[/i] polymorphisms (rs3218408 and rs3218384) with colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. The interaction of [i]XRCC2[/i] polymorphisms with environmental factors was investigated as well. MATERIAL AND METHODS We enrolled 147 CRC patients and 114 healthy individuals into the study. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-sequencing method was performed to detect rs3218408 and rs3218384 polymorphisms. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was checked in the control group. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) represented the risk of CRC. Cross-table method was used in analyzing the interaction effects. RESULTS Compared to the control group, the frequency of smokers was much higher in the case group ([i]P[/i]<0.001). A similar result was observed in drinkers (55.8% [i]vs.[/i] 40.4%, [i]P[/i]=0.013). Dietary habits of all subjects were investigated as well, showing that CRC patients ate fewer vegetables than did healthy controls (P<0.001). In the analysis of polymorphisms, rs3218408 appeared to be an independent risk factor of CRC (GG: OR=2.048, 95%CI=1.032-4.061; G allele: OR=1.445, 95%CI=1.019-2.049). There were 68 (76.4%) C allele carriers (rs3218384) among smokers, which was higher than the number of G allele carriers ([i]P[/i]<0.001). A similar outcome was observed for alcohol drinkers ([i]P[/i]=0.048), which suggests a relationship of rs3218384 with smoking and drinking. Further analysis indicated that interaction of rs3218384 with smoking increased the risk of CRC (GG and smoking: OR=3.250, 95%CI=1.235-8.556; GC+CC and smoking: OR=2.167, 95%CI=1.175-3.996). CONCLUSIONS We found that rs3218408 was related with increased risk of CRC, and the interaction of rs3218384 with smoking increased the risk of CRC.

Curcumin inhibits lung cancer progression and metastasis through induction of FOXO1.

Recent population studies provide clues that the use of curcumin may be associated with reduced incidence and improved prognosis of certain cancers. In the present study, we demonstrated that curcumin acted as a growth inhibitor for lung cancer cells. Our results found that curcumin inhibited cell proliferation, which was associated with upregulation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, p27 and p21, and downregulation of cyclin D1. In addition, we showed that curcumin induced the expression of forkhead box protein O1 (FOXO1) through activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 signaling. These findings provide evidence for a mechanism that may contribute to the antineoplastic effects of curcumin and justify further work to explore potential roles for activators of FOXO1 in the prevention and treatment of lung cancer.

Expression of HSPA2 in human hepatocellular carcinoma and its clinical significance.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains one of the most common cancers worldwide. HSPA2 has been highlighted as an important marker in many types of cancers. However, little is known about the role of HSPA2 in HCC. The objective of the current study was to investigate the expression pattern and clinicopathological significance of HSPA2 in patients with HCC. Quantitative reverse-transcriptase ploymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was applied to examine HSPA2 messenger RNA (mRNA) expression in 52 pairs of HCC tissues and adjacent noncancerous tissues. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed to examine HSPA2 protein expression in paraffin-embedded tissues from 119 HCC patients. Statistical analyses were applied to evaluate the diagnostic value and associations of HSPA2 expression with clinicopathological characteristics. We identified abnormally elevated mRNA expression of HSPA2 in HCC tissues compared to paired adjacent noncancerous tissues (P < 0.001). Clinicopathological analysis showed that HSPA2 expression was significantly correlated with tumor size (P = 0.013), histological differentiation (P = 0.04), and tumor stage (P = 0.001). Patients with higher HSPA2 expression had shorter overall survival time, whereas those with lower HSPA2 expression had longer survival time. Furthermore, Cox regression analyses showed that HSPA2 expression was an independent predictor of overall survival. In conclusion, our findings provide evidences that positive expression of HSPA2 in HCC may be important in the acquisition of an aggressive phenotype and it is an independent biomarker for poor prognosis of patients with HCC.

Influence of intensive insulin therapy on vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with severe trauma.

The influence of early-stage intensive insulin therapy on the plasma levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and the related parameters in patients with severe trauma and the clinical implication were investigated. Sixty-four cases of severe trauma (injury severity score ≥20) with stress hyperglycemia (blood glucose >9 mmol/L) were randomly divided into intensive insulin therapy group and conventional therapy group. ELISA method, radioimmunoassay and density gradient gradation one-step process were used to determine plasma VEGF, endothelin-1 (ET-1), and the number of circulating endothelial cells (CECs) at the day of 0, 2, 3, 5 and 7 after admission. Simultaneously, the changes of CRP concentration in plasma were monitored to evaluate inflammatory response. The results showed that plasma levels of observational indexes in patients receiving early-stage intensive insulin therapy were all significantly lower than those in conventional therapy groups 2, 3, 5 and 7 days after admission [for VEGF (ng/L), 122.2±23.8 vs. 135.9±26.5, 109.6±27.3 vs. 129.0±18.4, 88.7±18.2 vs. 102.6±27.3, 54.2±26.4 vs. 85.7±35.2, P<0.05, 0.01, 0.05, 0.05 respectively; for ET-1 (ng/L), 162.8±23.5 vs. 173.7±13.2, 128.6±17.5 vs. 148.8±22.4, 96.5±14.8 vs. 125.7±14.8, 90.7±16.9 vs. 104.9±22.5, P<0.05, 0.01, 0.01, 0.01 respectively; for CRP (mg/L), 23.2±13.8 vs. 31.9±16.5, 13.6±17.3 vs. 23.5±18.4, 8.7±10.2 vs. 15.6±13.3, 5.2±9.4 vs. 10.7±11.2, all P<0.05; for CECs (/0.9 µL), 10.9±5.6 vs. 13.9±6.2, 8.5±4.9 vs. 11.3±5.3, 6.3±6.4 vs. 9.4±5.7, 4.8±7.1 vs. 7.8±4.8, all P<0.05]. It was concluded that intensive insulin therapy could antagonize the endothelium injury after trauma and reduce inflammation response quickly, which was one of important mechanisms by which intensive insulin therapy improves the prognosis of trauma patients.

Deciphering pathogenic cellular module at single-cell resolution in checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis.

Checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) is the most common fatal immune-related adverse event; however, its pathophysiology remains largely unknown. Comprehensively dissecting the key cellular players and molecular pathways associated with CIP pathobiology is critical for precision diagnosis and develop novel therapy strategy of CIP. Herein, we performed a comprehensive single-cell transcriptome analysis to dissect the complexity of the immunological response in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) microenvironment. CIP was characterized by a dramatic accumulation of CXCL13+ T cells and hyperinflammatory CXCL9+ monocytes. T-cell receptor (TCR) analysis revealed that CXCL13+ T cells exhibited hyperexpanded- TCR clonotypes, and pseudotime analysis revealed a potential differentiation trajectory from naïve to cytotoxic effector status. Monocyte trajectories showed that LAMP3+ DCs derived from CXCL9+ monocytes possessed the potential to migrate from tumors to the BALF, whereas the differentiation trajectory to anti-inflammatory macrophages was blocked. Intercellular crosstalk analysis revealed the signaling pathways such as CXCL9/10/11-CXCR3, FASLG-FAS, and IFNGR1/2-IFNG were activated in CIP+ samples. We also proposed a novel immune signature with high diagnostic power to distinguish CIP+ from CIP- samples (AUC = 0.755). Our data highlighted key cellular players, signatures, and interactions involved in CIP pathogenesis.

Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab versus sintilimab treatment in patients with advanced squamous lung cancer: A real-world study in China.

Importance: Both pembrolizumab and sintilimab have been approved by the Chinese State Drug Administration (NMPA) for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced squamous lung cancer. The differences of the two drugs in efficacy and safety are unclear. Objectives: To compare the real-world efficacy and safety of first-line treatments in patients with advanced squamous lung cancer. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective review of patients with advanced squamous carcinoma who received sintilimab or pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy between June 2018 and April 2022 in the Chinese PLA Hospital. The primary objective was to compare the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) between the two groups. Secondary objectives were to compare the disease control rate (DCR) and to analyze adverse events (AEs) between the two groups. Results: A total of 164 patients were enrolled, including 63 patients (38.4%) in the sintilimab-combined chemotherapy group and 101 patients (61.6%) in the pembrolizumab-combined chemotherapy group. The ORR was 65.10% in the sintilimab group and 61.40% in the pembrolizumab group (P=0.634). The DCR was 92.10% and 92.10% in the sintilimab and pembrolizumab groups, respectively (P=0.991). The median PFS was 22.2 months for patients treated with sintilimab group compared with 16.5 months for patients treated with pembrolizumab group[hazard ratio (HR) = 0.743; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.479-1.152; P = 0.599]. Patients treated with pembrolizumab did not achieve a median OS, and patients treated with sintilimab had a median OS of 30.7 months. In the sintilimab group, the incidence of all treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was 92.1% (58/63), and the incidence of grade 3-4 TRAEs of 42.9% (27/63). In the pembrolizumab group, the incidence of all TRAEs was 90.1% (91/101), and the incidence of grade 3-4 TRAEs was 37.6% (38/101). Conclusion: In the clinical treatment of Chinese patients with advanced squamous lung cancer, first-line treatment with sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy provided similar efficacy to pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy, and the treatment-related adverse effect profiles were comparable between the two groups, including similar rates of grade 3-4 and all adverse events.

Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 Inhibitor-Mediated Peripheral Neuropathy.

The discovery of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the model of antitumor therapy. With the continuous deepening of the research on the mechanism of immunotherapy, ICIs, such as programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 inhibitors, have been widely used in a variety of tumors. Nevertheless, the use of ICI can also lead to a series of immune-related adverse events. Common immune-related adverse events include gastrointestinal toxicity, pulmonary toxicity, endocrine system toxicity, and skin toxicity. Neurologic adverse events are relatively rare, but they seriously affect the quality of life and shorten the survival time of patients. This article reports cases of peripheral neuropathy mediated by PD-1 inhibitors and retrieves the relevant literatures at home and abroad to summarize the neurotoxicity caused by PD-1 inhibitors, so as to strengthen the awareness of clinicians and patients on neurologic adverse reactions and mitigate potential adverse effects of implemented therapies.

Effect of early intensive insulin therapy on immune function of aged patients with severe trauma.

This study examined the effect of intensive insulin therapy on immune function and inflammatory factors at the early phase after severe trauma. At day 1, 3, 5, 7 after admission, subsets of CD4(+) helper T lymphocytes (Th1/Th2) and human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR expression on CD14(+) monocytes were flow cytometrically measured. Levels of cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-10 (IL-10) and other immunity markers, such as IgA, IgG, IgM, C3, C4 and C reaction protein (CRP) were examined in two groups. The results showed that TNF-α, IL-6 and CRP levels in the intensive insulin therapy group were significantly lower than those in the conventional therapy group, whereas IL-10 levels were substantially increased after intensive insulin therapy. C3 level at day 3, 5, 7 and C4 levels at day 5, 7 were lower in the intensive therapy group than in the conventional therapy group. Th1/Th2 ratios decreased gradually over time in both groups, and were much lower at day 3, 5, 7 in intensive therapy group. There were significant differences among day 3 to day 7 after admission in HLA-DR expression in CD14(+) monocytes. It was concluded that the intensive insulin therapy could decrease pro-inflammatory cytokines and increase anti-inflammatory cytokines in the elderly suffering from severe trauma, at the same time, with complement recovery being delayed. Moreover, intensive insulin therapy promoted immune suppression and, therefore, measures need be taken to address the issue.

The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced EGFR-Mutated non-small cell lung cancer after resistance to EGFR-TKIs: Real-World evidence from a multicenter retrospective study.

Background: The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in pretreated EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is controversial. We conducted this multicenter retrospective study to examine the efficacy of ICIs in a real world setting. Patients and methods: We collected 116 consecutive NSCLC patients with sensitive EGFR mutations who received ICIs alone or in combination after failure to respond to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), and 99 patients were included for final analysis. The impacts of ICIs on the patients' objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed. The relationships between outcomes and clinical characteristics were analyzed. Results: The ORR in patients with target lesions was 31.25% (95% CI: 22.18-41.52), and the DCR in all patients was 65.66% (95% CI: 55.44-74.91). The overall median PFS was 5.0 months (95% CI: 3.0-6.6), and the median OS was 15.9 months (95% CI: 10.8-23.8). The outcomes were better in patients receiving combination therapy with ECOG scores of 0-1 and no more than 2 lines of prior therapy, with a median PFS of 7.4 months (95% CI: 3.0-13.3) and a median OS of 29.0 months (95% CI: 11.7-NE). Primary EGFR mutation type and treatment mode were found to have a notable impact on clinical outcomes. Both median PFS and OS in patients with EGFR L858R mutation were significantly shorter than those in patients with EGFR exon 19 deletion (19del) (PFS: 2.5 versus 6.7 months, HR: 1.80, log-rank P=0.011; OS: 9.8 versus 26.9 months, HR: 2.48, log-rank P=0.002). Patients receiving combination therapy had notably longer median PFS and OS than those receiving monotherapy (PFS: 5.2 versus 3.0 months, HR: 0.54, log-rank P=0.020; OS: 19.0 versus 7.4 months, HR: 0.46, log-rank P=0.009). Conclusions: Our study suggests that ICI-based combination therapy is a potential strategy for EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients after EGFR-TKI failure. The efficacy may differ according to EGFR subtypes.

[Effect of early intensive insulin therapy on high mobility group box 1 protein levels and prognosis of patients with severe trauma].

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of intensive insulin therapy on serum high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) levels and its relationship with the prognosis in early phase of severe trauma. METHODS: Eighty severe trauma patients [injury severity score (ISS)≥ 16] were divided into groups according to injury to matched anatomical regions. Forty patients of intensive therapy group were given early intensive insulin therapy, while another 40 patients of the conventional treatment group received routine treatment based on clinical experience with insulin treatment. The insulin dose and the blood glucose levels were recorded within 72 hours after treatment. The relationship between HMGB1 levels and prognosis was analyzed by testing serum HMGB1 levels at 24, 36, 48, 60 or 72 hours after treatment, and clinical terminal events such as multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and death rate within 1 week were recorded. Results The insulin dose of intensive therapy group was significantly greater than that of conventional treatment group following the blood glucose levels were significantly lower than those of the conventional treatment group after treatment for 72 hours. The levels of HMGB1 (µg/L) lowered after intensive insulin therapy for 36 hours , and were significantly lower than those of conventional treatment group at 36, 48, 60 and 72 hours after intensive treatment (36 hours: 41.3 ± 9.5 vs. 52.7 ± 11.5, 48 hours: 48.6 ± 17.6 vs. 124.1 ± 22.9, 60 hours: 47.7 ± 23.3 vs. 132.9 ± 33.4, 72 hours: 54.3 ± 26.3 vs. 140.6 ± 16.5, P <0.05 or P <0.01). The incidence of MODS and mortality in intensive therapy group was respectively significantly lower than that of the conventional treatment group (20.0% vs. 55.0%, 10.0% vs. 30.0%, both P <0.05). In conventional treatment group the patients with HMGB1 ≥ 132.26 µg/L ( n =22) occurred MODS, and those with HMGB1<132.26 µg/L ( n =18) did not occur MODS. The HMGB1 levels in death patients ( n =12) were ≥ 132.26 µg/L. CONCLUSION: Early intensive insulin treatment could probably reduce MODS and mortality by inhibiting stress hyperglycemia and serum HMGB1 levels effectively. Serum HMGB1 of severe trauma patients can be used for the clinical indicator of prognosis.

Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index and Changes of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio as Prognostic Biomarkers for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer Treated With Immune Checkpoint Blockade.

The efficacy of current treatment regimens for pancreatic cancer (PC) remains unsatisfactory. In recent years, immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy has shown promising anti-tumor outcomes in many malignancies, including PC. Inexpensive and readily available biomarkers which predict therapeutic responses and prognosis are in critical need. Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are emerging predictors for prognosis of various tumors. We aim to investigate the prognostic significance of baseline SII, NLR, and their changes in PC patients treated with ICB. Our retrospective analysis included PC patients treated with ICB therapy in the Chinese PLA General Hospital. All demographic, biological, and clinical data were extracted from medical records. Relative changes of SII after two doses of ICB were defined as ΔSII% and calculated as (SIIafter 2 doses-SIIbaseline)/SIIbaseline, and so was the case for ΔNLR%. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves. The prognostic significance of baseline SII, NLR, and their changes was assessed in univariate and multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional hazard regression model. In total, 122 patients with PC treated with ICB were included in the present analysis. Elevated baseline SII (HR=3.28; 95% CI:1.98-5.27; P=0.03) and ΔNLR% (HR=2.21; 95% CI:1.03-4.74; P=0.04) were significantly correlated with an increased risk of death. For PC patients receiving ICB combined with chemotherapies or radiotherapies as the first-line treatment, increased baseline SII was a negative predictor for both OS (HR=8.06; 95% CI:1.71-37.86; P=0.01) and PFS (HR=2.84; 95%CI:1.37-10.38; P=0.04). Our study reveals the prognostic value of baseline SII and NLR changes in PC patients receiving ICB therapy. The clinical utility of these prognostic biomarkers needs to be further studied in prospective studies.

Response Efficacy of PD-1 and PD-L1 Inhibitors in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway have demonstrated promise in treating a variety of advanced cancers; however, little is known regarding their efficacy under various clinical situations, including different cancer types, treatment lines, drug combinations, and therapeutic regimens. METHODS: Published articles and conference abstracts (in English) in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register, and Web of Science were searched up to February 10, 2020. The data were analyzed by the meta-analysis program in Stata. RESULTS: A total of 16,400 patients from 91 clinical trials were included in this meta-analysis. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors had a mean ORR of 19.56% (95% CI: 15.09-24.03), a median TTR of 2.05 months (m) (95%CI: 1.85-2.26), and a median DOR of 10.65 m (95%CI: 7.78-13.52). First-line treatment had a higher ORR (36.57% vs. 13.18%) but a shorter DOR (9.00 m vs. 13.42 m) compared to the second-line or subsequent treatment. Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (I+C) (46.81% [95%CI: 36.02-57.60]) had a statistically significant higher ORR compared to immunotherapy (I) (17.75% [95%CI: 14.47-21.03]) or immunotherapy combined with immunotherapy (I+O) (12.25% [95%CI: 1.56-22.94]), while I+C (8.09 m [95%CI: 6.86-9.32]) appeared to reduce the DOR compared to I (12.39 m [95%CI: 7.60-17.18]). PD-1 inhibitors were associated with better ORR (21.65% vs. 17.60%) and DOR (11.26 m vs. 10.03 m) compared to PD-L1 inhibitors. There were no significant differences in TTR under different situations. CONCLUSIONS: PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were promising immunotherapeutic agents to achieve satisfactory response efficacies with different cancer types, treatment lines, drug combinations, and therapeutic regimens. This comprehensive summary of the response efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors serves as a reference for clinicians to make evidence-based decisions.

The Synergistic Effect of PARP Inhibitors and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have demonstrated great promise for treating cancers with homologous recombination (HR) defects, such as germline BRCA1/2 mutation. Further studies suggest that PARP inhibitors (PARPi) can also exhibit efficacy in HR-competent cancers, by amplifying the DNA damage and inducing immunogenic cell death, and PARPi lead to increasing tumor neoantigen, upregulation of interferons and PD-L1, and modulation of the tumor microenvironment, which may facilitate a more profound antitumor immune response. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting PD-1/PD-L1 or CTLA-4 have achieved impressive success in the treatment of different malignancies. However, only a subset of populations derive clinical benefit, and the biomarkers and resistance mechanisms are not fully understood. Therefore, given that PARPi could potentiate the therapeutic effect of ICIs, PARPi combined with ICIs are becoming an alternative for patients who cannot benefit from ICI monotherapy. In this review, we focus on the mechanisms and immune role of PARPi and discuss the rationale and clinical studies of this combined regimen.

Prognostic value of baseline and change in neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with poor performance status receiving PD-1 inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with poor performance status (PS) are likely to receive programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors, despite limited evidence. The aim of the present study was to report the clinical outcomes and potential prognostic biomarkers in advanced NSCLC patients with poor PS receiving PD-1 inhibitors. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study enrolling 101 advanced NSCLC patients from our hospital. Data of patients with poor PS 2-4 receiving PD-1 inhibitors were retrieved from medical records. Patients were stratified based on dichotomized baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), change in NLR (ΔNLR; 6 weeks post-treatment NLR minus baseline NLR), and their combination. The receiver-operating characteristic curve was used to assess the best cutoff for NLR. Multivariate Cox analysis was used to evaluate the prognostic value of NLR and ΔNLR for patients' survival. RESULTS: The optimal cutoff for NLR was 4.5. The median follow-up was 25.7 months, baseline NLR ≥4.5, and ΔNLR ≥0, which were independently and significantly associated with shorter overall survival (both P=0.002) and progression-free survival (P=0.004 for NLR and P<0.001 for ΔNLR). Furthermore, simultaneous elevation of the 2 factors was associated with worsened prognosis; patients with both NLR ≥4.5 and ΔNLR ≥0 had significantly increased risk of death [hazards ratio (HR): 10.79, 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.30-27.10] and disease progression (HR: 10.49, 95% CI: 4.39-25.09), compared with both low NLR and ΔNLR patients. Patients with either NLR ≥4.5 or ΔNLR ≥0 showed an intermediate risk for death (HR: 3.12, 95% CI: 1.35-7.21) and progression (HR: 3.45, 95% CI: 1.62-7.36). CONCLUSIONS: High baseline NLR and increased post-treatment NLR might aid in the stratification of high progression and death risk groups in advanced NSCLC patients with poor PS receiving PD-1 inhibitors.