Change in Albuminuria and GFR Slope as Joint Surrogate End Points for Kidney Failure: Implications for Phase 2 Clinical Trials in CKD.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Changes in albuminuria and GFR slope are individually used as surrogate end points in clinical trials of CKD progression, and studies have demonstrated that each is associated with treatment effects on clinical end points. In this study, the authors sought to develop a conceptual framework that combines both surrogate end points to better predict treatment effects on clinical end points in Phase 2 trials. The results demonstrate that information from the combined treatment effects on albuminuria and GFR slope improves the prediction of treatment effects on the clinical end point for Phase 2 trials with sample sizes between 100 and 200 patients and duration of follow-up ranging from 1 to 2 years. These findings may help inform design of clinical trials for interventions aimed at slowing CKD progression. BACKGROUND: Changes in log urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) and GFR slope are individually used as surrogate end points in clinical trials of CKD progression. Whether combining these surrogate end points might strengthen inferences about clinical benefit is unknown. METHODS: Using Bayesian meta-regressions across 41 randomized trials of CKD progression, we characterized the combined relationship between the treatment effects on the clinical end point (sustained doubling of serum creatinine, GFR <15 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 , or kidney failure) and treatment effects on UACR change and chronic GFR slope after 3 months. We applied the results to the design of Phase 2 trials on the basis of UACR change and chronic GFR slope in combination. RESULTS: Treatment effects on the clinical end point were strongly associated with the combination of treatment effects on UACR change and chronic slope. The posterior median meta-regression coefficients for treatment effects were -0.41 (95% Bayesian Credible Interval, -0.64 to -0.17) per 1 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 per year for the treatment effect on GFR slope and -0.06 (95% Bayesian Credible Interval, -0.90 to 0.77) for the treatment effect on UACR change. The predicted probability of clinical benefit when considering both surrogates was determined primarily by estimated treatment effects on UACR when sample size was small (approximately 60 patients per treatment arm) and follow-up brief (approximately 1 year), with the importance of GFR slope increasing for larger sample sizes and longer follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In Phase 2 trials of CKD with sample sizes of 100-200 patients per arm and follow-up between 1 and 2 years, combining information from treatment effects on UACR change and GFR slope improved the prediction of treatment effects on clinical end points.

Acute Treatment Effects on GFR in Randomized Clinical Trials of Kidney Disease Progression.

BACKGROUND: Acute changes in GFR can occur after initiation of interventions targeting progression of CKD. These acute changes complicate the interpretation of long-term treatment effects. METHODS: To assess the magnitude and consistency of acute effects in randomized clinical trials and explore factors that might affect them, we performed a meta-analysis of 53 randomized clinical trials for CKD progression, enrolling 56,413 participants with at least one estimated GFR measurement by 6 months after randomization. We defined acute treatment effects as the mean difference in GFR slope from baseline to 3 months between randomized groups. We performed univariable and multivariable metaregression to assess the effect of intervention type, disease state, baseline GFR, and albuminuria on the magnitude of acute effects. RESULTS: The mean acute effect across all studies was -0.21 ml/min per 1.73 m2 (95% confidence interval, -0.63 to 0.22) over 3 months, with substantial heterogeneity across interventions (95% coverage interval across studies, -2.50 to +2.08 ml/min per 1.73 m2). We observed negative average acute effects in renin angiotensin system blockade, BP lowering, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor trials, and positive acute effects in trials of immunosuppressive agents. Larger negative acute effects were observed in trials with a higher mean baseline GFR. CONCLUSION: The magnitude and consistency of acute GFR effects vary across different interventions, and are larger at higher baseline GFR. Understanding the nature and magnitude of acute effects can help inform the optimal design of randomized clinical trials evaluating disease progression in CKD.

Association of Treatment Effects on Early Change in Urine Protein and Treatment Effects on GFR Slope in IgA Nephropathy: An Individual Participant Meta-analysis.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: An early change in proteinuria is considered a reasonably likely surrogate end point in immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) and can be used as a basis for accelerated approval of therapies, with verification in a postmarketing confirmatory trial. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) slope is a recently validated surrogate end point for chronic kidney disease progression and may be considered as the end point used for verification. We undertook a meta-analysis of clinical trials in IgAN to compare treatment effects on change in proteinuria versus change in estimated GFR (eGFR) slope. STUDY DESIGN: Individual patient-level meta-analysis. SETTING & STUDY POPULATIONS: Individual data of 1,037 patients from 12 randomized trials. SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES: Randomized trials of IgAN with proteinuria measurements at baseline and 6 (range, 2.5-14) months and at least a further 1 year of follow-up for the clinical outcome. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: For each trial, we estimated the treatment effects on proteinuria and on the eGFR slope, computed as the total slope starting at baseline or the chronic slope starting 3 months after randomization. We used a Bayesian mixed-effects analysis to relate the treatment effects on proteinuria to effects on GFR slope across these studies and developed a prediction model for the treatment effect on the GFR slope based on the effect on proteinuria. RESULTS: Across all studies, treatment effects on proteinuria accurately predicted treatment effects on the total slope at 3 years (median R2 = 0.88; 95% Bayesian credible interval [BCI], 0.06-1) and on the chronic slope (R2 = 0.98; 95% BCI, 0.29-1). For future trials, an observed treatment effect of approximately 30% reduction in proteinuria would confer probabilities of at least 90% for nonzero treatment benefits on the total and chronic slopes of eGFR. We obtained similar results for proteinuria at 9 and 12 months and total slope at 2 years. LIMITATIONS: Study population restricted to 12 trials of small sample size, leading to wide BCIs. There was heterogeneity among trials with respect to study design and interventions. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide new evidence supporting that early reduction in proteinuria can be used as a surrogate end point for studies of chronic kidney disease progression in IgAN.

Observational study on the incidence of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with renal impairment following gadoterate meglumine administration: the NSsaFe study.

BACKGROUND: Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) is a rare life-threatening condition strongly associated with the administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents in patients with severe or endstage renal impairment. PURPOSE: To prospectively determine the incidence of NSF in patients with renal impairment after administration of gadoterate meglumine. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: In all, 540 patients with moderate, severe, or endstage renal impairment, scheduled to undergo a routine contrast-enhanced MRI with gadoterate meglumine. Mean age was 69.7 ± 12.7 years (range: 21-95) with 58.4% of males. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5T or 3.0T, sequence according to each site practice. ASSESSMENT: Medical history, indication(s) for current MRI and adverse events were recorded for each patient. Patients were followed up over 2 years after administration with three visits separated by at least 3 months to detect any signs/symptoms suggestive of NSF. STATISTICAL TESTS: Descriptive. RESULTS: Renal impairment was graded as moderate for 69.4% of patients, severe for 16.0% and endstage for 12.1%; 2.6% had undergone a kidney transplant. Estimated glomerular filtration rate ranged from 4 to 59 mL/min/1.73 m2 except one value of 74 mL/min/1.73 m2 in a patient with kidney transplant. Central nervous system exploration was the main MRI indication (34.7%) and mean dose injected was 0.22 ± 0.09 mL/kg. Overall, 446 patients (82.6%) attended at least one follow-up visit and completed the NSF questionnaire and 329 (60.9%) attended the 2-year visit. No suspicion of NSF was reported in all 446 patients, including 119 patients with severe or endstage renal impairment. No deaths and no adverse events were reported during the MRI examination and the usual period of follow-up after gadoterate meglumine administration. DATA CONCLUSION: No cases of NSF were observed in the 446 patients with moderate to endstage renal impairment followed up over a maximum of 2 years after injection of gadoterate meglumine. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy Stage: 4 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:607-614.

Performance of GFR Slope as a Surrogate End Point for Kidney Disease Progression in Clinical Trials: A Statistical Simulation.

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials of CKD treatments traditionally use clinical events late in CKD progression as end points. This requires costly studies with large sample sizes and long follow-up. Surrogate end points like GFR slope may speed up the evaluation of new therapies by enabling smaller studies with shorter follow-up. METHODS: We used statistical simulations to identify trial situations where GFR slope provides increased statistical power compared with the clinical end point of doubling of serum creatinine or kidney failure. We simulated GFR trajectories based on data from 47 randomized treatment comparisons. We evaluated the sample size required for adequate statistical power based on GFR slopes calculated from baseline and from 3 months follow-up. RESULTS: In most scenarios where the treatment has no acute effect, analyses of GFR slope provided similar or improved statistical power compared with the clinical end point, often allowing investigators to shorten follow-up by at least half while simultaneously reducing sample size. When patients' GFRs are higher, the power advantages of GFR slope increase. However, acute treatment effects within several months of randomization can increase the risk of false conclusions about therapies based on GFR slope. Care is needed in study design and analysis to avoid such false conclusions. CONCLUSIONS: Use of GFR slope can substantially increase statistical power compared with the clinical end point, particularly when baseline GFR is high and there is no acute effect. The optimum GFR-based end point depends on multiple factors including the rate of GFR decline, type of treatment effect and study design.

Targeted-release budesonide versus placebo in patients with IgA nephropathy (NEFIGAN): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial.

BACKGROUND: IgA nephropathy is thought to be associated with mucosal immune system dysfunction, which manifests as renal IgA deposition that leads to impairment and end-stage renal disease in 20-40% of patients within 10-20 years. In this trial (NEFIGAN) we aimed to assess safety and efficacy of a novel targeted-release formulation of budesonide (TRF-budesonide), designed to deliver the drug to the distal ileum in patients with IgA nephropathy. METHODS: We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial, comprised of 6-month run-in, 9-month treatment, and 3-month follow-up phases at 62 nephrology clinics across ten European countries. We recruited patients aged at least 18 years with biopsy-confirmed primary IgA nephropathy and persistent proteinuria despite optimised renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade. We randomly allocated patients with a computer algorithm, with a fixed block size of three, in a 1:1:1 ratio to 16 mg/day TRF-budesonide, 8 mg/day TRF-budesonide, or placebo, stratified by baseline urine protein creatinine ratio (UPCR). Patients self-administered masked capsules, once daily, 1 h before breakfast during the treatment phase. All patients continued optimised RAS blockade treatment throughout the trial. Our primary outcome was mean change from baseline in UPCR for the 9-month treatment phase, which was assessed in the full analysis set, defined as all randomised patients who took at least one dose of trial medication and had at least one post-dose efficacy measurement. Safety was assessed in all patients who received the intervention. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01738035. FINDINGS: Between Dec 11, 2012, and June 25, 2015, 150 randomised patients were treated (safety set) and 149 patients were eligible for the full analysis set. Overall, at 9 months TRF-budesonide (16 mg/day plus 8 mg/day) was associated with a 24·4% (SEM 7·7%) decrease from baseline in mean UPCR (change in UPCR vs placebo 0·74; 95% CI 0·59-0·94; p=0·0066). At 9 months, mean UPCR had decreased by 27·3% in 48 patients who received 16 mg/day (0·71; 0·53-0·94; p=0·0092) and 21·5% in the 51 patients who received 8 mg/day (0·76; 0·58-1·01; p=0·0290); 50 patients who received placebo had an increase in mean UPCR of 2·7%. The effect was sustained throughout followup. Incidence of adverse events was similar in all groups (43 [88%] of 49 in the TRF-budesonide 16 mg/day group, 48 [94%] of 51 in the TRF-budesonide 8 mg/day, and 42 [84%] of 50 controls). Two of 13 serious adverse events were possibly associated with TRF-budesonide-deep vein thrombosis (16 mg/day) and unexplained deterioration in renal function in follow-up (patients were tapered from 16 mg/day to 8 mg/day over 2 weeks and follow-up was assessed 4 weeks later). INTERPRETATION: TRF-budesonide 16 mg/day, added to optimised RAS blockade, reduced proteinuria in patients with IgA nephropathy. This effect is indicative of a reduced risk of future progression to end-stage renal disease. TRF-budesonide could become the first specific treatment for IgA nephropathy targeting intestinal mucosal immunity upstream of disease manifestation. FUNDING: Pharmalink AB.

Early Change in Urine Protein as a Surrogate End Point in Studies of IgA Nephropathy: An Individual-Patient Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The role of change in proteinuria as a surrogate end point for randomized trials in immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) has previously not been thoroughly evaluated. STUDY DESIGN: Individual patient-level meta-analysis. SETTING & POPULATION: Individual-patient data for 830 patients from 11 randomized trials evaluating 4 intervention types (renin-angiotensin system [RAS] blockade, fish oil, immunosuppression, and steroids) examining associations between changes in urine protein and clinical end points at the individual and trial levels. SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES: Randomized controlled trials of IgAN with measurements of proteinuria at baseline and a median of 9 (range, 5-12) months follow-up, with at least 1 further year of follow-up for the clinical outcome. PREDICTOR: 9-month change in proteinuria. OUTCOME: Doubling of serum creatinine level, end-stage renal disease, or death. RESULTS: Early decline in proteinuria at 9 months was associated with lower risk for the clinical outcome (HR per 50% reduction in proteinuria, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.32-0.48) and was consistent across studies. Proportions of treatment effect on the clinical outcome explained by early decline in proteinuria were estimated at 11% (95% CI, -19% to 41%) for RAS blockade and 29% (95% CI, 6% to 53%) for steroid therapy. The direction of the pooled treatment effect on early change in proteinuria was in accord with the direction of the treatment effect on the clinical outcome for steroids and RAS blockade. Trial-level analyses estimated that the slope for the regression line for the association of treatment effects on the clinical end points and for the treatment effect on proteinuria was 2.15 (95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.10-4.32). LIMITATIONS: Study population restricted to 11 trials, all having fewer than 200 patients each with a limited number of clinical events. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this analysis offer novel evidence supporting the use of an early reduction in proteinuria as a surrogate end point for clinical end points in IgAN in selected settings.

Evaluation of Variation in the Performance of GFR Slope as a Surrogate End Point for Kidney Failure in Clinical Trials that Differ by Severity of CKD.

BACKGROUND: The GFR slope has been evaluated as a surrogate end point for kidney failure in meta-analyses on a broad collection of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in CKD. These analyses evaluate how accurately a treatment effect on GFR slope predicts a treatment effect on kidney failure. We sought to determine whether severity of CKD in the patient population modifies the performance of GFR slope. METHODS: We performed Bayesian meta-regression analyses on 66 CKD RCTs to evaluate associations between effects on GFR slope (the chronic slope and the total slope over 3 years, expressed as mean differences in ml/min per 1.73 m2/yr) and those of the clinical end point (doubling of serum creatinine, GFR <15 ml/min per 1.73 m2, or kidney failure, expressed as a log-hazard ratio), where models allow interaction with variables defining disease severity. We evaluated three measures (baseline GFR in 10 ml/min per 1.73 m2, baseline urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio [UACR] per doubling in mg/g, and CKD progression rate defined as the control arm chronic slope, in ml/min per 1.73 m2/yr) and defined strong evidence for modification when 95% posterior credible intervals for interaction terms excluded zero. RESULTS: There was no evidence for modification by disease severity when evaluating 3-year total slope (95% credible intervals for the interaction slope: baseline GFR [-0.05 to 0.03]; baseline UACR [-0.02 to 0.04]; CKD progression rate [-0.07 to 0.02]). There was strong evidence for modification in evaluations of chronic slope (95% credible intervals: baseline GFR [0.02 to 0.11]; baseline UACR [-0.11 to -0.02]; CKD progression rate [0.01 to 0.15]). CONCLUSIONS: These analyses indicate consistency of the performance of total slope over 3 years, which provides further evidence for its validity as a surrogate end point in RCTs representing varied CKD populations.

A meta-analysis of GFR slope as a surrogate endpoint for kidney failure.

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decline is causally associated with kidney failure and is a candidate surrogate endpoint for clinical trials of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. Analyses across a diverse spectrum of interventions and populations is required for acceptance of GFR decline as an endpoint. In an analysis of individual participant data, for each of 66 studies (total of 186,312 participants), we estimated treatment effects on the total GFR slope, computed from baseline to 3 years, and chronic slope, starting at 3 months after randomization, and on the clinical endpoint (doubling of serum creatinine, GFR < 15 ml min-1 per 1.73 m2 or kidney failure with replacement therapy). We used a Bayesian mixed-effects meta-regression model to relate treatment effects on GFR slope with those on the clinical endpoint across all studies and by disease groups (diabetes, glomerular diseases, CKD or cardiovascular diseases). Treatment effects on the clinical endpoint were strongly associated with treatment effects on total slope (median coefficient of determination (R2) = 0.97 (95% Bayesian credible interval (BCI) 0.82-1.00)) and moderately associated with those on chronic slope (R2 = 0.55 (95% BCI 0.25-0.77)). There was no evidence of heterogeneity across disease. Our results support the use of total slope as a primary endpoint for clinical trials of CKD progression.

Erosive enterocolitis in mycophenolate mofetil-treated renal-transplant recipients with persistent afebrile diarrhea.

BACKGROUND: Diarrhea is the most frequently reported adverse event in mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)-treated transplant patients. The aim of this study was to explore the gastrointestinal tract in MMF-treated renal transplant recipients with persistent afebrile diarrhea to characterize its nature and etiology. METHODS: Renal transplant recipients with persistent afebrile diarrhea (daily fecal output >200 g) were prospectively investigated for infections, morphologic, and functional (gastrointestinal motility and intestinal absorptive capacity) integrity of the gastrointestinal tract; 26 patients met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: All but one patient had an erosive enterocolitis. Seventy percent of the patients had malabsorption of nutrients, contributing to the diarrhea. In +/-60%, an infectious origin was demonstrated and successfully treated with antimicrobial agents without changes in immunosuppressive regimen. In +/-40%, no infection occurred, but a Crohn's disease-like pattern of inflammation was noted. These patients also had a less pronounced bile-acid malabsorption but a significant faster colonic transit time, correlating with the trough level of mycophenolic acid (MPA). Cessation of MMF, however, was associated with allograft rejection in one third of these patients. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent afebrile diarrhea in renal transplant recipients is characterized by erosive enterocolitis, which is of infectious origin in +/-60%. In +/-40%, a Crohn's disease-like (entero-)colitis was present. Because reduction or cessation of MMF was the only effective therapy, MPA or one of its metabolites may be suggested as a possible cause. However, reduction or cessation of MMF was associated with an increased risk for rejection.

Comparison of peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis after renal transplant failure.

BACKGROUND: A growing number of patients are returning to dialysis after renal transplant failure. The aim of this study is to determine whether peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a safe and good treatment option for these patients. METHODS: All patients returning to PD or haemodialysis (HD) after renal transplant failure before 1 October 2002 at the University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium, were evaluated. Data were collected until death, retransplantation (reTx), transfer to HD or PD or until 1 January 2003. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients starting PD (PDpostTx-group) and 39 patients starting HD (HDpostTx-group) after renal transplant failure were included in the study. There were no significant differences in age, sex, serum albumin- and CRP-levels at baseline. The total time on renal replacement therapy at transplant failure and time to transplant failure did not differ between the two groups either. Furthermore, the baseline comorbidity was similar in both groups. During follow-up, the outcome did not differ significantly between the two groups. However, there was a tendency towards higher patient survival and reTx tended to be more frequent in the PDpostTx-group. Moreover, patients in the HDpostTx-group tended to accrue more new comorbidity. The incidence of peritonitis and the evolution of dialysis adequacy (renal and peritoneal Kt/V and creatinine clearances) with time in the PDpostTx-group was similar to that seen in our centre's PD patients who had never undergone transplantation before. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the outcome in patients starting PD after renal transplant failure is at least as good as the outcome in those starting HD. Although these observational findings warrant further confirmation, PD therefore can be regarded as a safe and good treatment option for patients returning to dialysis after renal transplant failure.

Impact of gastric acid suppressants on cytochrome P450 3A4 and P-glycoprotein: consequences for FK506 assimilation.

BACKGROUND: Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) and P-glycoprotein (PGP) are important determinants of the oral bioavailability and clearance of tacrolimus. Cimetidine and omeprazole are known modulators of several CYPs in vitro. In the present study, the impact of cimetidine and omeprazole on tacrolimus exposure and on CYP3A4/PGP activity in vivo was examined. METHODS: In a cohort of 48 renal transplant recipients who switched standard ulcer prophylaxis with 400 mg of cimetidine daily to 20 mg of omeprazole, dose/weight normalized trough levels of tacrolimus during a 5-day interval before and after switch were compared and further studied using multivariate analysis. In a cohort of 6 healthy volunteers, the effect of a 5-day course of ranitidine, cimetidine, and omeprazole on overall CYP, CYP3A4, and PGP activity in vivo was assessed with the (13)C-aminopyrin breath test and the combined per oral and intravenous (14)C-erythromycin breath and urine test. RESULTS: Dose/weight normalized trough levels of tacrolimus decreased significantly (-15%) after switch from cimetidine to omeprazole. In healthy volunteers, a significant increase of intestinal CYP3A4 activity was observed after omeprazole, whereas no change was noted after cimetidine/ranitidine. Overall CYP activity was significantly decreased after cimetidine and remained unchanged after omeprazole/ranitidine. No effects on PGP or hepatic CYP3A4 were seen. CONCLUSION: Switching treatment with cimetidine to omeprazole in renal transplant recipients is associated with a decrease of dose/weight normalized trough levels of tacrolimus. Studies in healthy volunteers suggest that this may be explained by an increase of intestinal CYP3A4 activity.

Influence of SDZ RAD vs. MMF on gastric emptying in renal transplant recipients.

SDZ RAD and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are increasingly used in the prevention of renal allograft rejection. SDZ RAD, having a macrolide structure, and MMF, known with gastrointestinal side-effects, may have gastric motility modifying properties. Gastric emptying was examined 1 yr after renal transplantation in eight patients taking corticosteroids (CS), cyclosporin A (CsA) and SDZ RAD and six patients treated with CS, CsA and MMF. Comparing the two groups, no significant differences in gastric emptying of solids and liquids were noted. Compared with normal volunteers, solid gastric emptying was faster in the SDZ RAD group and similar in the MMF group. It is concluded that in stable renal transplant recipients treated with MMF, gastric emptying was normal. Because of the impact on drug absorption and gastrointestinal symptoms, further studies are indicated to corroborate the potential prokinetic properties of SDZ RAD.

Alterations of CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein activity in vivo with time in renal graft recipients.

BACKGROUND: Catabolism by intestinal and hepatic cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4), and excretion by P-glycoprotein (PGP), has a major influence on oral bioavailability of calcineurin inhibitors. In this study, the activity of intestinal and hepatic CYP3A4 and PGP in vivo was assessed in renal transplant recipients during the first year after transplantation (Tx). METHODS: Stable Caucasian renal transplant patients were tested at 1 week, 3 months, and 1 year after Tx, and compared with the results obtained in drug-free healthy volunteers. Intestinal and hepatic CYP3A4 and PGP activity were determined by measurement of (14)C-excretion dynamics in breath and urine after oral and intravenous administration of [N-methyl-(14)C]-erythromycin. RESULTS: Compared with 1 week after Tx, intestinal and hepatic CYP3A4 activity significantly decreased at 3 months and 1 year after Tx (-33% and -45%; -7% and -33%, respectively). Compared with the healthy volunteers, intestinal and hepatic CYP3A4 activity of the patients was significantly increased at 1 week after Tx, but normalized at 1 year after Tx. A similar pattern, though not significant, was seen for intestinal PGP activity. CONCLUSION: Phenotypic expression of hepatic and intestinal CYP3A4 was increased immediately after Tx, but gradually decreased to basal levels toward the end of the first year after Tx. The most plausible explanation for this evolution was the tapering of corticosteroid (CS) doses. These findings may also explain the increasing bioavailability of tacrolimus with time after Tx.

Cessation of steroids in stable renal transplant patients: the Leuven experience.

Because of the major long-term impact of steroids on the quality of life of renal allograft recipients, physicians are attempting to avoid, reduce or eliminate steroids from the immunosuppressive regimen after renal transplantation. In 311 stable renal transplant recipients, transplanted more than one year and with low immunological risk for rejection, an attempt was made to stop steroids. A permanent cessation of steroids succeeded in 274. Cessation of steroids in stable renal transplant patients resulted in a transient rise of serum creatinine over 3 months. This was reflected in a decreased GFR in the first month. A concomitant change in potassium and weight suggested a minor mineralocorticoid deficiency as plausible explanation. After 4 years, serum creatinine again rose slightly; however, this was not reflected in a decreased GFR. This might reflect a metabolic phenomenon rather than immunological one because patients with acute rejection were excluded from this group and also because there was a small rise in weight and blood pressure noted after the second year following cessation of steroids. Only a mild and transient drop in lipids was present after cessation of steroids. Steroid withdrawal was unsuccessful in 12% of patients, and was twice as high in female patients as in males. Adrenal cortical deficiency was the most prominent reason (3%); acute rejection developed in only 5 patients (1.6%) and chronic rejection was documented in only 4 (1.3%). A better graft and patient survival rate and similar renal function, degree of proteinuria and blood pressure 10 years after renal transplantation (and 6 years after cessation of steroids) compared with patients in whom steroids were never stopped, are very promising despite the selection bias. Although longer follow-up is needed to determine whether stopping steroids will result in altered long-term transplant function, these results are reassuring that steroids can be withdrawn in stable renal transplant patients with a low immunological risk in order to diminish the long-term morbidity associated with corticosteroid therapy.

Differential effect of diarrhea on FK506 versus cyclosporine A trough levels and resultant prevention of allograft rejection in renal transplant recipients.

Diarrhea is the most frequently reported adverse event in patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil. Twenty-six renal transplant patients on a mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppressive regime with persistent afebrile diarrhea were examined. Diarrhea caused a significant rise in FK-506 trough levels despite intake of stable doses, necessitating FK-506 dose reductions of 30% to obtain pre-diarrhea trough levels. In contrast, trough levels of cyclosporine A remained stable without dose adjustments. This suggests that absorption and/or metabolism is differentially altered for FK506 compared with cyclosporine A in patients with diarrhea. In nine patients mycophenolate mofetil was reduced or stopped because of persistent diarrhea without identifiable cause. This resulted in end-stage renal disease because of chronic rejection in two patients, and in acute rejection in two patients, all taking FK506 and steroids. Therefore, dose adjustments of FK506 in patients with diarrhea must be carefully monitored, especially when doses of mycophenolate mofetil are also reduced.

Mycophenolate mofetil in IgA nephropathy: results of a 3-year prospective placebo-controlled randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Because humoral immunity is believed to play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy (IgAN), a prospective placebo-controlled randomized study was started in patients with IgAN using mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). METHODS: A total of 34 patients with IgAN were treated with salt intake restriction, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition and MMF 2 g per day (N= 21) or placebo (N= 13). After 36 months of follow-up clinical, biochemical, and radiologic data were analyzed using linear mixed models for longitudinal data and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS: Therapy had to be stopped prematurely in five patients. Two patients (MMF group) evolved to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). There was no difference between groups in the percentage of patients with a decrease of 25% or more in the inulin clearance or with a serum creatinine increase of 50% or more over 3 years. There was also no significant difference between groups in annualized rate of change of serum creatinine, computed by linear regression analysis. No significant difference was noted between groups for inulin clearance, serum creatinine, proteinuria, blood pressure, or other parameters of renal function. Hemoglobin and C-reactive protein were significantly lower in the MMF group compared with the placebo group. As a function of time, a significant decline in both groups was noted of proteinuria, parenchymal thickness of the kidneys and C3d. CONCLUSION: In patients with IgAN at risk for progressive disease, no beneficial effect of 3-year treatment with MMF 2 g per day could be demonstrated on renal function/outcome or proteinuria. However, larger randomized studies are needed to confirm or reject these results.

The value of tuberculin skin testing in haemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Chronic haemodialysis patients are at increased risk for developing tuberculosis (TB). Appropriate screening methods to detect latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection are required. The aim of this prospective multi-centre study was to evaluate the tuberculin skin test (TST) as a screening method for detection of M.tuberculosis infection in haemodialysis patients. METHODS: A total of 224 patients in two haemodialysis centres were prospectively tested, using 2 units of tuberculin PPD RT23. Up to three booster injections were given with a 7 day interval to patients not responding to the previous test. The results were compared with clinical and radiological data. RESULTS: The cumulative prevalence of a positive TST was 14.7% for the first test, 27.8% for the second test and 32.6% for the fourth test. There was no influence of age, gender, haemodialysis centre, dialysis efficiency, nutritional state, levels of zinc, vitamin D therapy, primary renal disease, (previous or active) immunosuppressive therapy or response to hepatitis B vaccination. There was a significant, but weak, correlation between TST positivity and a history of positive TST or TB. Chest radiography and positive TST were not correlated, yet a positive chest X-ray increased the detection of patients with latent M.tuberculosis infection up to 47.8%. CONCLUSIONS: In haemodialysis patients, a positive response of >30% to repeated TST was obtained. Two consecutive TSTs were sufficient to recruit most of the booster reactions. Since only a weak correlation was found with anamnestic data, regular TST evaluation in combination with a chest X-ray, is a useful tool to detect infection with M.tuberculosis in haemodialysis patients.