FOLFOX alternated with FOLFIRI as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), irinotecan, and oxaliplatin are the most active drugs in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC), and survival is improved with patient exposure to all of them. The efficacy and safety of an alternating schedule of continuous-infusion 5-FU with leucovorin (LV) plus oxaliplatin (ie, FOLFOX regimen) or irinotecan (ie, FOLFIRI regimen) was assessed in the first-line setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-nine patients with previously untreated, unresectable CRC were included. Treatment consisted of 5-FU/LV (de Gramont schedule) plus oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) alternated biweekly with the same 5-FU/LV regimen plus irinotecan (180 mg/m2). Treatment was maintained until tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity was noted. RESULTS: Median age was 62 years. Performance status was 0/1 in 91% of patients, 63% had 1 organ involved, and 80% had liver metastases. A median of 6 courses per patient (range, 1-9) and a total of 952 infusions were given. The most frequent grade 3/4 toxic events were neutropenia (32%), diarrhea (26%), and asthenia (7%). Grade 1/2 neurotoxicity was seen in 59% of cases, but no grade 3/4 neurotoxicity was observed. There were no toxic deaths. An objective response rate of 54% (4 complete responses plus 39 partial responses) was attained. Median time to progression and overall survival were 13 months and 18 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: This alternating schedule is active, with efficacy results similar to those seen with sequential protocols, the advantages of less toxicity, and 100% patient exposure to irinotecan and oxaliplatin.

Prospective randomized phase III trial of etoposide/cisplatin versus high-dose epirubicin/cisplatin in small-cell lung cancer.

High-dose epirubicin plus cisplatin was compared with the reference regimen of etoposide/cisplatin in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Four hundred two previously untreated patients with SCLC were randomized to receive etoposide 100 mg/m(2) on days 1-3 and cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 or epirubicin 100 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 21 days for a total of 6 cycles. Patients were stratified according to treatment center and extent of disease (limited disease, n = 207; extensive disease, n = 195). Patients with limited disease were treated with thoracic radiation therapy after completion of chemotherapy, and those who exhibited a complete response were advised to receive prophylactic cranial irradiation. The primary endpoint was survival, and secondary endpoints were time to progression (TTP), response, toxicity, and costs. Patient characteristics were generally well balanced in the 2 arms, even though more patients in the epirubicin/cisplatin arm had > 5% weight loss and poor Karnofsky performance index compared with the etoposide/cisplatin arm. One hundred thirty-four patients (66.3%) in the etoposide/cisplatin arm and 126 (63.0%) in the epirubicin/cisplatin arm received all 6 planned cycles of chemotherapy. Response rate, TTP, and survival did not differ significantly between the 2 arms. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and toxic deaths occurred more frequently in the etoposide/cisplatin arm. Epirubicin/cisplatin showed a similar activity with a slightly lower toxicity profile than the reference regimen of etoposide/cisplatin. The epirubicin/cisplatin regimen may be recommended in the treatment of SCLC.