RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Anecdotal reports suggest fewer patients with stroke symptoms are presenting to hospitals during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We quantify trends in stroke code calls and treatments at 3 Connecticut hospitals during the local emergence of COVID-19 and examine patient characteristics and stroke process measures at a Comprehensive Stroke Center (CSC) before and during the pandemic. METHODS: Stroke code activity was analyzed from January 1 to April 28, 2020, and corresponding dates in 2019. Piecewise linear regression and spline models identified when stroke codes in 2020 began to decline and when they fell below 2019 levels. Patient-level data were analyzed in February versus March and April 2020 at the CSC to identify differences in patient characteristics during the pandemic. RESULTS: A total of 822 stroke codes were activated at 3 hospitals from January 1 to April 28, 2020. The number of stroke codes/wk decreased by 12.8/wk from February 18 to March 16 (P=0.0360) with nadir of 39.6% of expected stroke codes called from March 10 to 16 (30% decrease in total stroke codes during the pandemic weeks in 2020 versus 2019). There was no commensurate increase in within-network telestroke utilization. Compared with before the pandemic (n=167), pandemic-epoch stroke code patients at the CSC (n=211) were more likely to have histories of hypertension, dyslipidemia, coronary artery disease, and substance abuse; no or public health insurance; lower median household income; and to live in the CSC city (P<0.05). There was no difference in age, sex, race/ethnicity, stroke severity, time to presentation, door-to-needle/door-to-reperfusion times, or discharge modified Rankin Scale. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital presentation for stroke-like symptoms decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic, without differences in stroke severity or early outcomes. Individuals living outside of the CSC city were less likely to present for stroke codes at the CSC during the pandemic. Public health initiatives to increase awareness of presenting for non-COVID-19 medical emergencies such as stroke during the pandemic are critical.
Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiologia , Hemorragias Intracranianas/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Betacoronavirus , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Encefálica/fisiopatologia , Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , COVID-19 , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Connecticut/epidemiologia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Dislipidemias/epidemiologia , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Etnicidade , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Renda , Seguro Saúde , Hemorragias Intracranianas/diagnóstico , Hemorragias Intracranianas/fisiopatologia , Hemorragias Intracranianas/terapia , Masculino , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/fisiopatologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Telemedicina , Trombectomia , Terapia TrombolíticaAssuntos
Doenças do Nervo Abducente , Fístula Carótido-Cavernosa , Embolização Terapêutica , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Doenças do Nervo Abducente/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças do Nervo Abducente/terapia , Idoso , Fístula Carótido-Cavernosa/diagnóstico por imagem , Fístula Carótido-Cavernosa/terapia , Feminino , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Delivery of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) therapies is contingent on the duration from last known well (LKW) to emergency department arrival time (EDAT). One reason for treatment ineligibility is delay in presentation to the hospital. We evaluate patient and neighborhood characteristics associated with time from LKW to EDAT. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study of patients presenting to the Yale New Haven Hospital in the AIS code pathway from 2010 to 2020. Patients presenting within 4.5 hours from LKW who were recorded in the institutional Get With the Guidelines Stroke registry were classified as early while those presenting beyond 4.5 hours were designated as late. Temporal trends in late presentation were explored by univariate logistic regression. Using variables significant in univariate analysis at p < 0.05, we developed a mixed-effect logistic regression model to estimate the probability of late presentation as a function of patient-level and neighborhood (ZIP)-level characteristics (area deprivation index [ADI] derived from the Health Resources and Services Administration), adjusted for calendar year and geographic distance from the centroid of the ZIP code to the hospital. RESULTS: A total of 2,643 patients with AIS from 2010 to 2020 were included (63.4% presented late and 36.6% presented early). The frequency of late presentation increased significantly from 68% in 2010 to 71% in 2020 (p = 0.002) and only among non-White patients. Patients presenting late were more likely to be non-White (37.1% vs 26.9%, p < 0.0001), arrive by means other than emergency medical services (EMS) (32.7% vs 16.1%, p < 0.0001), have an NIHSS <6 (68.7% vs 55.2%, p < 0.0001), and present from a neighborhood with a higher ADI category (p = 0.0001) that was nearer to the hospital (median 5.8 vs 7.7 miles, p = 0.0032). In the mixed model, the ADI by units of 10 (odds ratio [OR] 1.022, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.020-1.024), non-White race (OR 1.083, 95% CI 1.039-1.127), arrival by means other than EMS (OR 1.193, 95% CI 1.145-1.124), and an NIHSS <6 (OR 1.085, 95% CI 1.041-1.129) were associated with late presentation. DISCUSSION: In addition to patient-level factors, socioeconomic deprivation of neighborhood of residence contributes to delays in hospital presentation for AIS. These findings may provide opportunities for targeted interventions to improve presentation times in at-risk communities.
Assuntos
Serviços Médicos de Emergência , AVC Isquêmico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Hospitais , Fatores SocioeconômicosAssuntos
Iodofendilato , Humanos , Mielografia , Meios de Contraste , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , CabeçaRESUMO
Emergency department visits for a headache are relatively common, and in most cases, the etiologies of the headache are typically benign. We present a case of a patient who presented to the emergency room for new onset of unremitting unilateral headache. She subsequently had two hospital visits and three separate imaging modalities to identify vein of Labbe thrombosis. The vein of Labbe is a relatively smaller vein which runs superficially and laterally. In our patient, a cerebral venous thrombosis (CTV) was unable to identify vein of Labbe thrombosis, requiring eventually a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with and without contrast to identify the culprit etiology. CTV is frequently used in the acute setting due to its speed of acquisition and shorter wait times in the hospital. For patients that fit criteria for venous sinus thrombosis, we caution the use of CTV in identifying the causative etiology, and would consider the MRI as a better imaging modality for these patients.