Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Resuscitation ; 122: 69-75, 2018 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29183830

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest (CA) without return of spontaneous circulation can be treated with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vaECMO) implemented surgically or percutaneously. We performed a study assessing time for vaECMO percutaneous cannulation in the catheterization laboratory. METHODS: Single-centre retrospective study in a University hospital without on-site cardiovascular surgery, including patients aged >18 receiving vaECMO for out- or in-hospital refractory CA of presumed cardiac cause between 2010 and 2016, cannulated by interventional cardiologists. Cannulation time using anatomic landmarks vessel puncture and conventional wires (first period) was compared with ultrasound guidance puncture and stiff wires (second period). Data are expressed as medians (interquartile range) and percentages. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were included, age 56 (49-62), 34 in the first period. Shockable initial rhythm occurred in 29 (63%), 36 (78%) had ischemic heart disease and 26 (57%) acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Out-of-hospital refractory CA occurred in 27 (59%) patients. Time from out-of-hospital refractory CA to admission was 100 (80-118) min. Cannulation was successful in 42 (91%) patients. Cannulation time was 14 (10-21) min, 17 (12-26) (first) and 8 (6-12) min (second period), p<0.001. Survival to discharge was 9%. In out-of-hospital versus in-hospital, time from CA to vaECMO was 120 (115-140) versus 82 (58-102) min, p=0.011, survival was 7% (two patients) versus 11% (two patients), p=0.35 respectively. All survivors had shockable initial rhythm. CONCLUSION: In these refractory CA patients with high prevalence of AMI and good feasibility of percutaneous vaECMO in the catheterization laboratory, cannulation time was shorter using ultrasound guidance and stiff wires.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Reanimação Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Cateterismo , Angiografia Coronária , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/complicações , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/diagnóstico por imagem , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tempo para o Tratamento , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção
2.
Acute Card Care ; 18(2): 42-44, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28328285

RESUMO

AIM: To examine whether pulmonary artery balloon pulsation (PABP) could improve circulatory function in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in pigs. METHODS/RESULTS: Ten downsize pigs were sedated and ventilated. AMI was induced by inserting a plug into the left anterior descending artery. A pulsation balloon was placed in the pulmonary artery in all animals. In the treatment group (TG), pulsations began when life-threatening arrhythmia or > 30% drop in mean blood pressure (MBP) or > 40% decrease in cardiac output compared to baseline occurred. Pulsation rate was 120/min, independent of the heartbeat, maintained for 10 min. The control group (CG) received no pulsation. In the TG (n = 5), mean BP after the AMI improved by 7 ± 12 mmHg after 150 min while in the CG, MBP decreased by 17 ± 25 mmHg, P < 0.05; coronary perfusion pressure improved by 8 ± 7 mmHg in the TG but decreased by 15 ± 12 in the CG (P < 0.05). In the CG, cardiac output did not change but in the TG it improved from 3.5 ± 0.9 after the AMI to 4.2 ± 1.1 l/min 150 min after AMI (P < 0.05). The TG required 1.8 ± 0.4 electric shocks for ventricular fibrillation versus 0.8 ± 0.4 in the pulsation group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: PABP could be useful in the management of AMI due to improved mean arterial BP, coronary perfusion pressure, cardiac output and electrical stability. The mechanism of this effect remains to be determined.


Assuntos
Arritmias Cardíacas/prevenção & controle , Circulação Assistida , Insuficiência Cardíaca/prevenção & controle , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Artéria Pulmonar/fisiologia , Animais , Arritmias Cardíacas/fisiopatologia , Pressão Arterial , Circulação Assistida/instrumentação , Circulação Assistida/métodos , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Coração Auxiliar , Infarto do Miocárdio/fisiopatologia , Suínos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care ; 3(2): 183-91, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24569450

RESUMO

AIMS: On-admission coronary angiogram (CA) with angioplasty (percutaneous coronary intervention, PCI) may improve survival in patients resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), but long-term survival data are scarce. We assessed long-term survival in OHCA patients managed with on-admission CA and PCI if indicated and compared survival rates in patients with/without acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: Retrospective single-centre study including patients aged ≥18 years resuscitated from an OHCA without noncardiac cause, with sustained return of spontaneous circulation, undergoing on-admission CA with PCI if indicated. ACS was diagnosed angiographically. Survival was recorded at hospital discharge and at 5-year follow up. Survival probability was estimated by Kaplan-Meier survival curves. RESULTS: A total of 300 comatose patients aged 56 years (IQR 48-67 years) were included, 36% with ST-segment elevation. All had on-admission CA; 31% had ACS. PCI was attempted in 91% of ACS patients and was successful in 93%. Hypothermia was performed in 84%. Survival to discharge was 32.3%. After discharge, 5-year survival was 81.7 ± 5.4%. Survival from admission to 5 years was 26.2 ± 2.8%. ACS patients had better survival to discharge (40.8%) compared with non-ACS patients (28.5%, p=0.047). After discharge, 5-year survival was 92.2 ± 5.4% for patients with ACS and 73.4 ± 8.6% without ACS (hazard ratio, HR, 2.7, 95% CI 0.8-8.9, p=0.1). Survival from admission to 5 years was 37.4 ± 5.2% for ACS patients, 20.7 ± 3.0%, for non-ACS patients (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.12-2.0, p=0.0067). CONCLUSIONS: OHCA patients undergoing on-admission CA had a very favourable postdischarge survival. Patients with OHCA due to ACS had better survival to discharge at 5-year follow up than patients with OHCA due to other causes.


Assuntos
Coma/terapia , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/terapia , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico por imagem , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Idoso , Reanimação Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Coma/diagnóstico por imagem , Coma/mortalidade , Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Angiografia Coronária/mortalidade , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/diagnóstico por imagem , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/mortalidade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tempo para o Tratamento , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA