Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Med (Lond) ; 20(6): e229-e233, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32962974

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 has had a profound effect on the NHS. Little information has been published as to how the unselected medical take has been affected. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who were referred to general medicine during March 2020. We compared clinical outcomes of patients with and without COVID-19. RESULTS: 814 patients were included, comprising 777 unique patients. On average, 26 patients were admitted per day. 38% of admitted patients were suspected of COVID-19, with greater numbers of COVID-19 patients in the second half compared to the first half of the month (p<0.001). Logistic regression analyses showed suspected COVID-19 was an independent predictor for inpatient mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 6.09, p<0.001) and 30-day mortality (OR = 4.66, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 patients had worse clinical outcomes and increased healthcare use compared to non-COVID-19 patients. Our study highlights some of the challenges in healthcare provision faced during this pandemic.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Pandemias , Admissão do Paciente , Pneumonia Viral , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19 , Feminino , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Admissão do Paciente/tendências , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Reino Unido
2.
JRSM Open ; 8(9): 2054270417720408, 2017 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28904806

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We investigate whether physicians in secondary care in the English NHS receive adequate training to recognise and appropriately refer for services those persons suspected to be victims of human trafficking. DESIGN: Freedom of Information requests were sent to the 105 England's NHS Trusts delivering acute care in England. SETTING: NHS Trusts providing secondary care in England. PARTICIPANTS: English NHS Trusts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We requested data about the training provided on human trafficking to clinicians, including the nature, delivery, and format of any education, and any planned training. RESULTS: A total of 89.5% of the 105 Trusts responded. Of these Trusts, 69% provide education to physicians on human trafficking, and a further 6% provide training but did not specify who received it. The majority of Trusts providing training did so within wider safeguarding provision (91%). Only one trust reported that it provides stand-alone training on trafficking to all its staff, including physicians. Within training offered by Trusts, 54% observed best practice providing training on the clinical indicators of trafficking, while 16% referenced the National Referral Mechanism. Amongst those not providing training, 39% of Trusts report provision is in development. CONCLUSIONS: Our results find that 25% of NHS Foundation Trusts appear to lack training for physicians around human trafficking. It is also of concern that of the Trusts who currently do not provide training, only 39% are developing training or planning to do so. There is an urgent need to review and update the scope of available training and bring it into alignment with current legislation.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA