Management of acute radiation syndrome.

Acute radiation syndrome encompasses a spectrum of pathological manifestations resulting from exposure to high doses of ionizing radiation. This syndrome typically progresses through three stages with a prodromal phase, a latency phase and a critical phase. Each of them varies in intensity and duration depending on the absorbed dose of radiation. Predominantly affecting the bone marrow, skin, and gastrointestinal tract, its clinical implications are profound and multiorgan failure must be considered. Radiation doses below 2 Gray generally result in insignificant clinical consequences, while exposures surpassing 12 Gray exceeds current therapeutic capacities. Survival outcomes for patients within this therapeutic range depend on their ability to withstand radiation-induced aplasia, compounded by an increased risk of bleeding and infection due to skin, gastrointestinal, and potentially combined radiation injuries. Assessing the degree of radiation exposure plays a pivotal role in tailoring patient management strategies and is based on a combination of clinical, biological, and physical parameters. Treatment approaches primarily include intensive hematologic support to manage symptomatic manifestations and etiologic treatment is now based on the administration of growth factors. The role of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) will be carefully considered on an individual basis, especially for patients who do not respond following 3 weeks of cytokine therapy. This review highlights the pathophysiological mechanisms, assessment modalities, and therapeutic interventions crucial for managing acute radiation syndrome aiming to optimize patient outcomes and guide clinical practice.

Diagnostic Splenectomy: Characteristics, Pre-Operative Investigations, and Identified Pathologies for 20 Patients.

Splenectomy is indicated in cases of trauma to the spleen or hematological and immunological diseases (hereditary spherocytosis, autoimmune cytopenia). Less frequently, splenectomy is performed for diagnostic purposes to complement unsuccessful prior etiological investigations. The splenectomy remains a surgery at risk of complications and should be considered as a last-resort procedure to make the diagnosis and to be able to treat patients. We studied the medical files of 142 patients who underwent a splenectomy for any reason over a 10-year period and identified 20 diagnostic splenectomies. Diagnostic splenectomies were mainly performed to explore unexplained splenomegaly for 13 patients and fever of unknown origin for 10. The other patients had surgery for other causes (cytopenia, abdominal symptoms, suspicion of relapsing malignant hemopathies). Splenectomy contributed to the final diagnosis in 19 of 20 cases, corresponding mostly to lymphoid hemopathies (14/20). The most frequent disease was diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (8/20). Splenectomy did not reveal any infectious disease. The most relevant pre-operative procedures to aid the diagnosis were 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) and immuno-hematological examinations. Diagnostic splenectomy is useful and necessary in certain difficult diagnostic situations. Highlights: Diagnostic splenectomy is still useful in 2020 to diagnose unexplained splenomegaly or fever of unknown origin. Lymphoma was the most common final diagnosis. FDG PET/CT was the most useful tool to aid in the diagnosis.