Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Oral Rehabil ; 51(6): 947-953, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38379383

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Dental medicine should expand its scope to properly assess medical and psychosocial factors that might have an impact on patients' oral health. Based on previous literature and clinical experience, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and psychostimulant medications might represent factors associated with orofacial pain symptoms. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess whether common orofacial pain complaints such as jaw pain, jaw clicking, teeth clenching and headaches are more prevalent in dental patients who have an ADHD diagnosis and/or use psychostimulant medications. METHODS: Orofacial pain symptoms prevalence was compared among four groups from a sample of new patients seeking dental care at Tufts University School of Dental Medicine (n = 11 699) based on ADHD diagnosis and psychostimulants intake: G1: no ADHD, no stimulants; G2: yes ADHD, yes stimulants; G3: yes ADHD, no stimulants; G4: no ADHD, yes stimulants. RESULTS: In multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for age, gender, tobacco use, and alcohol consumption, significant differences were found for clenching (p < .0001), jaw pain (p < .0001), and headache (p < .0001). Compared to G1, two groups (G2 and G4) exhibited significantly higher odds of clenching and headaches, whereas only G2 exhibited significantly higher odds of jaw pain. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with patients without ADHD and not taking psychostimulants medications, dental patients using psychostimulants with and without ADHD diagnosis report headaches and teeth clenching more frequently, while jaw pain is reported more frequently only by those taking psychostimulants with an ADHD diagnosis. Further research is necessary to assess the nature of these associations and their clinical relevance.


Assuntos
Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central , Dor Facial , Humanos , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Feminino , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Prevalência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Assistência Odontológica , Cefaleia
2.
J Oral Rehabil ; 49(1): 1-9, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34592005

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Social media is frequently used to discuss health topics among users. Reddit is a popular social media platform particularly suit for discussion about chronic illness because of its anonymity that allow users to express uninhibited feelings. Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) represent a chronic painful disorder which has been rarely studied in terms of social media discussion. OBJECTIVES: By exploring how Reddit is used to discuss about TMD, we aim to raise awareness to clinicians involved in TMD management about the online discussion on this topic. METHODS: A quantitative content analysis was performed on a pool of most relevant threads and comments about the topic "TMJ" on Reddit. Following a codebook, two independent coders assessed multiple clinically relevant variables. A third subject resolved eventual discrepancies. RESULTS: Reddit is mostly used by subjects with TMD asking for advice to other users about symptoms and treatment modalities. The most discussed causes of TMD were bruxism and dental occlusion, and the most discussed treatments were oral appliance therapy and complementary and alternative treatments. The most favourable opinions about treatment modalities were for self-care and behavioural therapy while the least favourable opinions were for surgery and irreversible dental treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Reddit represents an excellent data-mining platform to retrieve valuable information about health-related discussion by the community. Our findings suggest an overall alignment of such discussion with evidence-based science about TMD; however, to further increase this trend, we encourage healthcare provider to take an active role in the digital spread of scientifically valid information.


Assuntos
Bruxismo , Mídias Sociais , Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular , Emoções , Humanos , Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular/terapia
3.
Complement Ther Med ; 49: 102297, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32147064

RESUMO

Persistent head and neck myofascial pain is among the most frequently reported pain complaints featuring major variability in treatment approaches and perception of improvement. Acupuncture is one of the least invasive complimentary modalities that can optimize conventional treatment. The aim of this review was to determine the evidence for the effectiveness of acupuncture in the management of localized persistent myofascial head and neck pain. Only randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) were included. The search was conducted in PubMed, Ovid Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library in addition to manual search. The main outcome measure was the comparison of the mean pain intensity score on VAS between acupuncture and sham-needling/no intervention groups. Safety data and adherence rate were also investigated. Six RCTs were identified with variable risk of bias. All included studies reported reduction in VAS pain intensity scores in the groups receiving acupuncture when compared to sham needling/no intervention. Meta-analysis, using a weighted mean difference as the effect estimate, included only 4 RCTs, revealed a 19.04 point difference in pain intensity between acupuncture and sham-needling/no intervention (95 %CI: -29.13 to -8.95). High levels of safety were demonstrated by the low rates of side effects/withdrawal. Inconsistency in reporting of outcomes was a major limitation. In conclusion, moderate-quality evidence suggests that acupuncture may be an effective and safe method in relieving persistent head and neck myofascial pain. Optimizing study designs and standardizing outcome measures are needed for future RCTs.


Assuntos
Terapia por Acupuntura , Síndromes da Dor Miofascial/terapia , Cervicalgia/terapia , Avaliação da Deficiência , Agulhamento Seco , Humanos , Medição da Dor , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
4.
J Pain Res ; 12: 179-189, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30655687

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The importance of improved physical function as a primary outcome in the treatment of chronic pain is widely accepted. There have been limited attempts to assess the effects mindfulness skills training (MST) has on objective outcomes in chronic pain care. METHODS: This systematic review evaluated published reports of original randomized controlled trials that described physical function outcomes after MST in the chronic pain population and met methodological quality according to a list of predefined criteria. PRISMA criteria were used to identify and select studies, and assess their eligibility for inclusion. The established guidelines for best practice of systematic reviews were followed to report the results. RESULTS: Of the 2,818 articles identified from the original search of four electronic databases, inclusionary criteria were met by 15 studies published as of August 10, 2015, totaling 1,199 patients. All included studies used self-report measures of physical function, and only two studies also employed performance-based measures of function. There were wide variations in how physical function was conceptualized and measured. Although the quality of the studies was rated as high, there was inconclusive evidence for improvement in physical function assessed by self-report due to contradiction in individual study findings and the measures used to assess function. Strong evidence for lack of improvement in physical function assessed via performance-based measures was found. CONCLUSION: This review draws attention to the importance of having a unified approach to how physical function is conceptualized and assessed, as well as the importance of using quality performance-based measures in addition to subjective self-reports that appropriately assess the physical function construct within MSTs for chronic pain.

5.
J Endod ; 44(2): 206-211, 2018 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29174443

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Persistent dentoalveolar pain of idiopathic origin represents a diagnostic challenge for the dentist and physician alike. Disagreement on taxonomy and diagnostic criteria presents a significant limit to the advancement of research in the field. Patients struggle with a lack of knowledge by dental and medical professionals, diagnostic delays, and unnecessary treatments. METHODS: A PubMed search was performed as of January 1, 2017 by using the terms atypical odontalgia, phantom tooth pain, persistent idiopathic facial pain, painful posttraumatic trigeminal neuropathy, idiopathic toothache, persistent dentoalveolar pain disorder, nonodontogenic tooth pain, and continuous neuropathic orofacial pain. Three hundred forty-five abstracts were screened, and 128 articles that were pertinent to the topic went through full-text reading. RESULTS: Case reports and narrative reviews constitute the majority of available literature. Several retrospective case-control studies investigated the clinical characteristics, pathophysiology, and diagnostic processes. Treatment strategies were evaluated in only 7 open-label and 2 randomized controlled trials. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent dentoalveolar pain disorder is likely neuropathic in origin, but pathophysiological mechanisms to explain the onset and persistence of the pain are still far from understood. A correct diagnosis should be established before treatments are performed. Researchers should reach an agreement on the diagnostic criteria to enable a coherent research path to better understand the condition and reduce patient suffering.


Assuntos
Odontalgia/etiologia , Processo Alveolar/fisiopatologia , Doença Crônica , Humanos , Dente/fisiopatologia , Odontalgia/diagnóstico , Odontalgia/fisiopatologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA