All-cause mortality among males living with and without HIV initiating long-term opioid therapy, and its association with opioid dose, opioid interruption and other factors.

BACKGROUND: While the relationship between long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) dose and overdose is well-established, LTOT's association with all-cause mortality is less understood, especially among people living with HIV (PLWH). There is also limited information regarding the association of LTOT cessation or interruption with mortality. METHODS: Among PLWH and matched uninfected male veterans in care, we identified those who initiated LTOT. Using time-updated cox regression, we examined the association between all-cause mortality, unnatural death, and overdose, and opioid use categorized as 1-20 (reference group), 21-50, 51-90, and ≥ 91 mg morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD). RESULTS: There were 22,996 patients on LTOT, 6,578 (29 %) PLWH and 16,418 (71 %) uninfected. Among 5,222 (23 %) deaths, 12 % were unnatural deaths and 6 % overdoses. MEDD was associated with risk of all 3 outcomes; compared to patients on 1-20 mg MEDD, adjusted risk for all-cause mortality monotonically increased (Hazard Ratios (HR) [95 % CI] for 21-50 mg MEDD = 1.36 [1.21, 1.52], 51-90 mg MEDD = 2.06 [1.82, 2.35], and ≥ 91 mg MEDD = 3.03 [2.71, 3.39]). Similar results were seen in models stratified by HIV. LTOT interruption was also associated with all-cause, unnatural, and overdose mortality (HR [95 % CI] 2.30 [2.09, 2.53], 1.47 [1.13, 1.91] and 1.52 [1.04, 2.23], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Among PLWH and uninfected patients on LTOT we observed a strong dose-response relationship with all 3 mortality outcomes. Opioid risk mitigation approaches should be expanded to address the potential effects of higher dose on all-cause mortality in addition to unnatural and overdose fatalities.

Underutilization of reperfusion therapy in eligible African Americans with acute myocardial infarction: Role of presentation and evaluation characteristics.

BACKGROUND: Immediate reperfusion therapy to restore coronary blood flow is recommended for all eligible patients with acute myocardial infarction. However, reperfusion therapy is reportedly underutilized among African Americans, even when they are eligible. Reasons for the lack of use have not been fully explored. METHODS: We examined the demographic, clinical, and treatment data of 10,469 African Americans with acute myocardial infarction who were eligible for reperfusion therapy, enrolled in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-2 from June 1994 through March 1998. RESULTS: The mean age was 62.58 (+/-14.4) years, and 44.7% were female. Although eligible, 47% of the African Americans in this study did not receive reperfusion therapy. In a multivariate analysis, the absence of chest pain at presentation (odds ratio [OR] 0.31, 95% CI 0.26-0.37) and initial admission diagnoses other than definite myocardial infarction (OR for receipt of reperfusion <0.12) were the strongest predictors of lack of early reperfusion therapy. Progressive delays in hospital arrival and hospital evaluation predicted a lower likelihood of early reperfusion. Prior stroke (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.50-0.78), myocardial infarction (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.65-0.86), and congestive heart failure (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.40-0.60) were all associated with lack of reperfusion therapy. CONCLUSION: Almost half of eligible African American patients with myocardial infarction did not receive reperfusion therapy. Potential reasons may include atypical presentation, patient and institutional delay, and underappreciation of myocardial infarction by care providers. Strategies to address these factors may improve the rate of use of reperfusion therapy.

Electrocardiographic presentation of blacks with first myocardial infarction does not explain race differences in thrombolysis administration.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that thrombolysis is used less often in blacks than in whites. However, whether the greater prevalence of contraindications or less specific electrocardiographic manifestations of myocardial infarction (MI) account for this difference is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 498 consecutive patients (32% blacks) with first MI. Initial electrocardiograms were analyzed, blinded to race and outcome, for ST-segment deviation and bundle branch block to determine eligibility for thrombolysis. The relation of electrocardiographic eligibility for thrombolysis and actual use of thrombolysis in both races was explored. Among blacks, 45% received thrombolysis compared with 66% of whites (P <.001). A similar proportion of blacks and whites were eligible for thrombolysis (59% and 66% respectively, P =. 116), but 62% of electrocardiography-eligible blacks were treated with thrombolysis compared with 75% of whites (P =.016). After accounting for eligibility for electrocardiography and other clinical variables likely to affect the decision to administer thrombolysis by means of conditional logistic regression, blacks were still less likely to receive thrombolysis (relative risk 0.73; 95% confidence interval 0.55 to 0.97). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the differences in thrombolysis administration to blacks and whites are not accounted for by differences in electrocardiographic presentation or other measured variables. Unmeasured differences in clinical presentation of MI may explain racial differences in thrombolysis and merits further study.