Point-of-care coagulation testing for assessment of the pharmacodynamic anticoagulant effect of direct oral anticoagulant.

BACKGROUND: This investigation was carried out with already available point-of-care testing (POCT) systems for coagulation parameters to evaluate the qualitative and semiquantitative determination of the time- and concentration-dependent anticoagulant effects of the direct oral anticoagulants rivaroxaban and dabigatran. METHODS: The whole blood prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and activated clotting time (ACT) were determined using the GEM PCL Plus coagulation system. Whole blood PT was also measured on the CoaguCheck XS instrument. In addition, PT and aPTT values were obtained in citrated plasma using the PT reagent Neoplastin Plus and the STA APTT reagent. Drug concentrations of rivaroxaban and dabigatran were determined with a chromogenic anti-Xa assay and the hemoclot assay, which are reported to have good agreement with liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry measurements. POCT was performed in 27 consecutive patients who received rivaroxaban 10, 15, or 20 mg once daily and in 15 patients receiving dabigatran 110 or 150 mg twice daily. Blood samples were collected predose and 2 hours after observed drug intake at steady state. RESULTS: Two hours after observed rivaroxaban administration, the whole blood PT measured on the GEM PCL Plus was prolonged by an average of 64.5% in comparison with predose levels. Less differentiation was observed for rivaroxaban when the PT was measured on the CoaguCheck XS instrument or in plasma (prolongation of 24.1% and 36.8%, respectively). After 2 hours observed dabigatran administration, the whole blood aPTT was comparable with plasma values and was prolonged by 23.5% in comparison with trough values. Significant concentration-dependent prolongations of the activated clotting time were observed to different extents for both direct anticoagulants. CONCLUSIONS: Direct oral anticoagulants display variable ex vivo effects on different POCT-assays. POCT for aPTT is sensitive to increased concentrations of dabigatran, whereas the PT-POCT assessed with test systems such as the GEM PCL Plus may be helpful to measure the pharmacodynamic anticoagulant effects of rivaroxaban in emergency clinical situations.

Main considerable factors for correct laboratory test interpretation under DOA treatment.

SUMMARY: To avoid misinterpretation and mismanagement clinicians should be aware of the interference of new direct oral anticoagulants (DOA) on coagulation assays. A variety of oral anticoagulants targeting specific coagulation factors has already entered the market, and new indications for DOA will be released each year over the next few years. Due to their heterogeneous mode of action and different pharmacokinetic profile each DOA will vary in its effects on coagulations assays, and it is of current importance to recognize these variable effects.In this summary the main considerable factors for correct laboratory test interpretation under DOA treatment are described.

Measuring the anticoagulant effects of target specific oral anticoagulants-reasons, methods and current limitations.

To simplify and optimize oral anticoagulation, new target-specific oral anticoagulants (TSOAs) have been developed. The direct thrombin-inhibitor dabigatran and the direct factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban are the first such compounds to receive approval in certain countries for various indications. Due to the predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of these drugs, routine monitoring of patients receiving TSOA therapy has not been considered necessary. However, it has now been realized that in routine clinical settings, there are several situations where it may be prudent to assess the level of TSOA anticoagulation. Several studies evaluating the influence of TSOAs on various coagulation assays have been performed to identify systems that can be used to monitor these drugs. With a particular focus on dabigatran and rivaroxaban, we will describe and discuss the potential of several methods for measuring the anticoagulant effect of TSOAs, as well as their methodological limitations and the restrictions in transferring their results into clinical context.

Platelet function testing in hirudin and BAPA anticoagulated blood.

BACKGROUND: Sodium citrate is the most commonly used anticoagulant for platelet function testing. However, the use of citrated blood for platelet function analysis has been criticized due to creation of a non-physiological milieu. Moreover, platelet function measurements performed with citrated blood need to be completed within 4 h after blood collection. Alternatively, hirudin and recently, a dual thrombin/factor Xa inhibitor benzylsulfonyl-D-Arg-Pro-4-amidinobenzylamide (BAPA), can be used to improve the reactivity after prolonged storage of platelets. The present study investigated platelet function tests using hirudin and BAPA anticoagulated blood. METHODS: Blood was obtained from 30 healthy individuals and 20 patients on aspirin or clopidogrel therapy, and stored for 2, 12, 24 or 48 h. Light transmission aggregometry and impedance platelet aggregometry were performed using adenosine 5-diphosphate (ADP) and arachidonic acid as agonists. The vasodilator stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation assay was evaluated. RESULTS: Platelet aggregation measurements of healthy individuals and patients showed stable platelet aggregation values induced by arachidonic acid, after 24 h, when hirudin or BAPA anticoagulated blood was used. However, citrated blood resulted in significantly reduced platelet response after 12 h. ADP-induced light transmission aggregation of healthy individuals and patients exhibited unchanged platelet aggregation after 12 h using hirudin or BAPA anticoagulated blood, while significantly reduced platelet response was observed after 12 h when using citrated blood. In contrast, measurement of ADP-induced aggregation by use of impedance aggregometry resulted in reduced stability over 12 h using hirudin or BAPA anticoagulated blood. The VASP assay exhibited no significant changes in results over a storage period of 48 h, independent of the anticoagulants used. CONCLUSIONS: Use of hirudin or BAPA anticoagulated blood resulted in improvement of stability of platelet function measurements.

Assessment of clopidogrel non-response by the PFA-100 system using the new test cartridge INNOVANCE PFA P2Y.

Until now, the PFA-100 system has been considered unsuitable for monitoring clopidogrel efficacy. The authors evaluated platelet function in peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) patients using a new PFA-100(R) test cartridge (product name: INNOVANCE PFA P2Y*) specifically designed for this purpose. Twenty-two stable PAOD patients on antithrombotic therapy with clopidogrel alone (n = 22) and 18 patients undergoing a peripheral catheter intervention, preliminarily treated with 100 mg/day of aspirin followed by co-administration of clopidogrel (loading dose 300 mg, maintenance dose 75 mg/day), were enrolled in this study. Defining non-responsiveness to clopidogrel as an aggregation response within the reference range (90% central interval), four (18.2%) non-responders using light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) induced by 5 microM adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and six (27.3%) non-responders using LTA induced by 2 microM ADP (LateAggr >72.1% and >42.9%, respectively) were identified. INNOVANCE PFA P2Y* determined six (27.3%) non-responders (CT < 87 s). Agreement between the two aggregometry assays and INNOVANCE PFA P2Y* on the definition of clopidogrel response and non-response exceeded 70%. Only three patients were uniformly identified as clopidogrel non-responders by all three assays. When clopidogrel was co-administered with aspirin, two (11.1%) non-responders to clopidogrel were detected with INNOVANCE PFA P2Y*, whereas ADP-induced LTA found all patients to be responsive. INNOVANCE PFA P2Y* appears to be suitable for monitoring the effect of clopidogrel on platelet function. Its sensitivity in detecting responsiveness or non-responsiveness to clopidogrel is comparable to ADP-induced LTA. Additional prospective studies are needed to clarify the clinical relevance of the test results and classification obtained with INNOVANCE PFA P2Y*.

Variability of non-response to aspirin in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease during long-term follow-up.

Non-responsiveness to aspirin as detected by laboratory tests may identify patients at high risk for future vascular events. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate whether non-responsiveness to aspirin is stable over time. Ninety-eight patients with stable peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) treated with 100 mg/d aspirin were followed over a median timeframe of 17 months. Platelet function tests were performed initially and at follow-up using arachidonic acid-induced light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) in native platelet-rich plasma with the Behring Coagulation Timer and by measuring the collagen-epinephrine closure time (CT) on a Platelet Function Analyzer (PFA-100). When determining platelet function using LTA, four patients (4.1%) had residual platelet function (i.e., MaxAggr > or =78%) despite aspirin treatment, whereas, according to the PFA-100 results, 12 patients (12.2%) were identified as non-responders (i.e., CT <192 s). Fifty-seven patients who were still under treatment with 100 mg/d aspirin at the time of follow-up provided a second blood sample. Further platelet function tests with the PFA-100 system identified a persistent non-responsiveness to aspirin over time in three patients (5.3%) whereas four (7.0%) and 15 (26.3%) patients had changes in response status when platelet function was assessed by LTA and on the PFA-100(R), respectively. We conclude that true non-responsiveness to aspirin is a rare phenomenon in stable PAOD patients. Furthermore, we conclude that in a number of patients, aspirin non-responsiveness is not stable over time.

Non-VKA Oral Anticoagulants: Accurate Measurement of Plasma Drug Concentrations.

Non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have now widely reached the lucrative market of anticoagulation. While the marketing authorization holders claimed that no routine monitoring is required and that these compounds can be given at fixed doses, several evidences arisen from the literature tend to demonstrate the opposite. New data suggests that an assessment of the response at the individual level could improve the benefit-risk ratio of at least dabigatran. Information regarding the association of rivaroxaban and apixaban exposure and the bleeding risk is available in the drug approval package on the FDA website. These reviews suggest that accumulation of these compounds increases the risk of experiencing a bleeding complication. Therefore, in certain patient populations such as patients with acute or chronic renal impairment or with multiple drug interactions, measurement of drug exposure may be useful to ensure an optimal treatment response. More specific circumstances such as patients experiencing a haemorrhagic or thromboembolic event during the treatment duration, patients who require urgent surgery or an invasive procedure, or patient with a suspected overdose could benefit from such a measurement. This paper aims at providing guidance on how to best estimate the intensity of anticoagulation using laboratory assays in daily practice.

New oral anticoagulants in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a review of pharmacokinetics, safety, efficacy, quality of life, and cost effectiveness.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) continues to be a leading cause of cerebrovascular morbidity and mortality resulting from cardioembolic stroke. Oral anticoagulation therapy has been shown to decrease the incidence of cardioembolic stroke in patients with AF by more than 50%. Appropriate use of anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists requires precise adherence and monitoring. A number of factors that potentially induce patients' dissatisfaction reduce quality of patient life. New direct oral anticoagulants, such as the direct factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, were developed to overcome the limitations of the conventional anticoagulant drugs. However, models to optimize the benefit of therapy and to ensure that therapy can be safely continued are missing for the new oral anticoagulants. This review will briefly describe the new oral anticoagulants dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban with focus on their use for prevention of embolic events in AF. Moreover, it will discuss the safety, efficacy, cost data, and benefit for patients' quality of life and adherence.

Ex vivo effects of low-dose rivaroxaban on specific coagulation assays and coagulation factor activities in patients under real life conditions.

Global coagulation assays display variable effects at different concentrations of rivaroxaban. The aim of this study is to quantify the ex vivo effects of low-dose rivaroxaban on thrombophilia screening assays and coagulation factor activities based on the administration time, and to show how to mask possible interferences. Plasma samples from 40 patients receiving rivaroxaban 10 mg daily were investigated to measure activities of clotting factor II, V, VII, VIII, IX, XI, XII and XIII; protein C- and protein S-levels; lupus anticoagulants; anticardiolipin IgG and IgM; D-dimer, heparin-platelet factor 4 (HPF4) antibodies and screening tests for von Willebrand disease (VWD). Two hours after rivaroxaban administration, the activities of clotting factors were significantly decreased to different extents, except for factor XIII. Dilution of plasma samples resulted in neutralisation of these interferences. The chromogenic protein C activity assay was not affected by rivaroxaban. Depending on the timing of tablet intake in relation to blood sampling protein S activity was measured falsely high when a clotting assay was used. False-positive results for lupus anticoagulants were observed depending on the assay system used and the administration time of rivaroxaban. ELISA-based assays such as anticardiolipin IgG and IgM, D-dimer, HPF4-antibodies and the turbidimetric assays for VWD were not affected by rivaroxaban. Specific haemostasis clotting tests should be performed directly prior to rivaroxaban intake. Assay optimisation in the presence of rivaroxaban can be achieved by plasma dilution. Immunologic assays are not influenced by rivaroxaban, while chromogenic assays can be used, when they do not depend on factor Xa.

Accurate determination of rivaroxaban levels requires different calibrator sets but not addition of antithrombin.

Rivaroxaban is a direct factor Xa inhibitor, which can be monitored by anti-factor Xa chromogenic assays. This ex vivo study evaluated different assays for accurate determination of rivaroxaban levels. Eighty plasma samples from patients receiving rivaroxaban (Xarelto) 10 mg once daily and 20 plasma samples from healthy volunteers were investigated using one anti-factor Xa assay with the addition of exogenous antithrombin and two assays without the addition of antithrombin. Two different lyophilised rivaroxaban calibration sets were used for each assay (low concentration set: 0, 14.5, 59.6 and 97.1 ng/ml; high concentration set: 0, 48.3, 101.3, 194.2 and 433.3 ng/ml). Using a blinded study design, the rivaroxaban concentrations determined by the assays were compared with concentrations measured by HPLC-MS/MS. All assays showed a linear relationship between the rivaroxaban concentrations measured by HPLC-MS/MS and the optical density of the anti-FXa assays. However, the assay with the addition of exogenous antithrombin detected falsely high concentrations of rivaroxaban even in plasma samples from controls who had not taken rivaroxaban (intercept values using the high calibrator set and the low calibrator set: +26.49 ng/ml and +13.71 ng/ml, respectively). Plasma samples, initially determined by the high calibrator setting and containing rivaroxaban concentrations <25 ng/ml, had to be re-run using the low calibrator setting for precise measurement. In conclusion, anti-factor Xa chromogenic assays that use rivaroxaban calibrators at different concentration levels can be used to measure accurately a wide range of rivaroxaban concentrations ex vivo. Assays including exogenous antithrombin are unsuitable for measurement of rivaroxaban.

Rivaroxaban differentially influences ex vivo global coagulation assays based on the administration time.

It was the objective of this study to quantify the effects of rivaroxaban administration on global coagulation parameters associated with routine clinical procedures, we collected plasma samples from patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery receiving rivaroxaban at various time points after drug administration. Forty-seven patients received rivaroxaban (10 mg daily) for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Blood samples were collected at four different time points: A) before surgery; B) before drug administration at day 4-5 after surgery (steady state of rivaroxaban); C) 2 hours (h) after drug administration and D) 12 h after drug administration. The prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), thrombin time (TT), antithrombin (AT) level, fibrinogen level by Clauss method (FibC), and derived fibrinogen (dFIB) level were assessed with various reagents. At 2 h after rivaroxaban administration, the PT and aPTT clotting times were significantly prolonged to different extents up to 1.4 fold, whereas 12 h after drug administration, no significant effect was observed. Rivaroxaban administration had no influence on the TT or the FibC concentration. The dFIB assay was differentially affected by rivaroxaban when different reagents were tested. The AT assay dependent on thrombin activity was not influenced by rivaroxaban, whereas the AT levels dependent on factor Xa activity were significantly increased by rivaroxaban. Clinicians should be aware of the time-dependent influence of rivaroxaban on factor Xa-dependent routine coagulation assays. Therefore, routine coagulation parameters should be assessed directly before drug administration to keep the interaction of rivaroxaban low.

Variability of residual platelet function despite clopidogrel treatment in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease.

Residual platelet function despite treatment with clopidogrel may predict an unfavourable cardiovascular outcome. The majority of studies have investigated the effects of clopidogrel administration in conjunction with aspirin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary objective of the present study was to assess the platelet response to clopidogrel in the absence of aspirin in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) and to investigate whether non-responsiveness to clopidogrel is reproducible during long-term follow-up. Fifty-four clinically stable PAOD patients on a maintenance dose of 75 mg/d clopidogrel were enrolled in this study. Platelet function was assessed at baseline and after a median follow-up of 18 months using light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) with 2 microM ADP as an agonist. HPLC-coupled mass spectrometry was used to detect clopidogrel and clopidogrel carboxylic acid, the main metabolite of clopidogrel. Residual platelet function, as defined by late aggregation values within the reference range (i.e., >43%), was observed in 35.2% of patients at baseline and 17.6% during follow-up. During the observation period, 26.5% had switched from responder to non-responder status or vice versa. Among non-responders, either clopidogrel or its metabolite was detected in 89.5% and 83.3% of patients at baseline and at follow-up, respectively. We conclude that non-responsiveness to clopidogrel as determined by ADP-induced LTA is not stable over time. This phenomenon cannot be attributed to non-compliance alone.

Determination of clopidogrel main metabolite in plasma: a useful tool for monitoring therapy?

This study was performed to determine whether analysis of clopidogrel and its main carboxylic acid metabolite in plasma provides additional information about the wide variability of platelet aggregation inhibition in clopidogrel-treated patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Consecutive outpatients (n = 56) with stable peripheral arterial occlusive disease treated with 75 mg clopidogrel daily, without co-administration of aspirin, were investigated. With use of a standardized questionnaire, the time of drug intake was documented. Blood sampling was performed within 24 hours after the most recent drug intake. Platelet function was measured by optical aggregometry using adenosine diphosphate (ADP) (2 mumol/L) as the agonist. Plasma concentrations of clopidogrel and its main metabolite, clopidogrel carboxylic acid, were quantitated using high-performance liquid chromatography analysis coupled to mass spectrometry. In 95% (53/56) of patients, clopidogrel carboxylic acid was detected. In 40% (22/56) of patients, the ADP-induced aggregation response was within the normal range despite clopidogrel treatment. In 14% (3/22) of these patients, neither clopidogrel nor its main metabolite could be detected. Two of these patients agreed to ingest 75 mg/d clopidogrel under observation and to undergo blood sampling after 2, 12, and 24 hours. Clopidogrel carboxylic acid and a significant inhibition of platelet aggregation were detected even after 24 hours in both patients, confirming noncompliance as the reason for the lack of inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation observed in the initial measurements. In the subgroup of patients who had taken clopidogrel within 4 hours before blood sampling, a large range of carboxylic acid concentrations was detected, indicating a high variability of drug metabolism among patients. In conclusion, determining clopidogrel metabolite plasma concentrations could be a useful tool for identifying poor compliance and variable metabolism in clopidogrel-treated patients. Nevertheless, in the majority of clopidogrel-treated patients, the variability of platelet response is not caused by noncompliance.

Response to aspirin and clopidogrel monitored with different platelet function methods.

Laboratory non-response to aspirin or clopidogrel is defined as an inability to cause in vitro detectable platelet function inhibition. It would be beneficial to monitor response to aspirin or clopidogrel with widely available and routinely used platelet function methods, like the platelet function analyzer (PFA-100) or the fully automated coagulation analyzer BCT. The aim of this study was to assess the potential of the coagulation analyzer BCT and the platelet function analyzer PFA-100 in monitoring the response of aspirin and clopidogrel. A group of 125 consecutive patients with arterial occlusive disease treated either with aspirin 100 mg/day (82 patients) or clopidogrel 75 mg/day (43 patients) as only antiplatelet drug were investigated. For the first time platelet-enriched plasma (PRP), not adjusted to a fixed predetermined concentration of platelets, was used for aggregation studies and the effect of clopidogrel alone without combination of aspirin treatment on platelet function was investigated. Response to aspirin was observed in 85% (70/82) of patients using PFA-100, while performing the arachidonic acid-induced aggregation on the BCT showed an inhibitory effect to aspirin in 91% (75/82) of patients. Non-response to aspirin was assessed with both platelet function methods in 7% (6/82) of patients. Clopidogrel response was observed in 58% (25/43) of patients when performing ADP-induced aggregation on the BCT. On the PFA-100 the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel could not be detected. In conclusion, measurement of platelet aggregation on the BCT using native platelet-enriched plasma allows the quantification of individual inhibitory effects to aspirin as well as to clopidogrel, while the PFA-100 seems only suitable to investigate the degree of platelet inhibition induced by aspirin but not by clopidogrel.