RESUMO
This study examined the feasibility, acceptability, and initial impact of bridges to better health and wellness (B2BHW), a culturally-adapted health care manager intervention for Hispanics with serious mental illness (SMI). Thirty-four Hispanics with SMI and at risk for cardiovascular disease were enrolled. Mixed-linear models were used to examine changes over 12-months on patient activation, self-efficacy, patient-rated quality of care, receipt of preventive primary care services, and quality of life. The majority of participants completed the intervention (85%) with high satisfaction. Significant improvements were found for patient activation, self-efficacy, patients' ratings of quality of care, and receipt of preventive primary care.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Hispânico ou Latino , Transtornos Mentais , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Autoeficácia , Adulto , Idoso , Administração de Caso , Assistência à Saúde Culturalmente Competente , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Participação do Paciente , Satisfação do Paciente , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Qualidade de VidaRESUMO
Latinos with serious mental illness (SMI) experience health and health care disparities and may benefit from interventions that improve access to, coordination of, and receipt of primary care services. The aim of this qualitative study was to examine the experiences of Latinos with SMI and at risk for cardiovascular disease participating in Bridges to Better Health and Wellness (B2BHW), a culturally-adapted health care manager intervention delivered in a public outpatient mental health clinic. A total of 29 Latino participants completed a post-intervention survey that included an open-ended question about the three things they liked most about B2BHW; a subset of 16 participants participated in one of three post-intervention focus groups. Results indicate that what mattered most to participants was the health education they received, the positive relationships they formed with their health care managers, the care coordination assistance they obtained, and the motivation and activation they gained from this intervention. Study findings suggest that key elements of the health care manager intervention (e.g., care coordination, and patient activation) shaped participants' experiences with B2BHW and were perceived as beneficial.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Hispânico ou Latino , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Adulto , Idoso , Administração de Caso , Assistência à Saúde Culturalmente Competente , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Participação do Paciente , Satisfação do Paciente , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Qualidade de VidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Health-care manager interventions improve the physical health of people with serious mental illness (SMI) and could be widely implemented in public mental health clinics. Local adaptations and customization may be needed to increase the reach of these interventions in the public mental health system and across different racial and ethnic communities. In this study, we describe how we used the collaborative intervention planning framework to customize an existing health-care manager intervention to a new patient population (Hispanics with SMI) and provider group (social workers) to increase its fit with our local community. METHODS: The study was conducted in partnership with a public mental health clinic that serves predominantly Hispanic clients. A community advisory board (CAB) composed of researchers and potential implementers (e.g., social workers, primary care physicians) used the collaborative intervention planning framework, an approach that combines community-based participatory research principles and intervention mapping (IM) procedures, to inform intervention adaptations. RESULTS: The adaptation process included four steps: fostering collaborations between CAB members; understanding the needs of the local population through a mixed-methods needs assessment, literature reviews, and group discussions; reviewing intervention objectives to identify targets for adaptation; and developing the adapted intervention. The application of this approach enabled the CAB to identify a series of cultural and provider level-adaptations without compromising the core elements of the original health-care manager intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing health disparities in people with SMI requires community engagement, particularly when preparing existing interventions to be used with new communities, provider groups, and practice settings. Our study illustrates one approach that can be used to involve community stakeholders in the intervention adaptation process from the very beginning to enhance the transportability of a health-care manager intervention in order to improve the health of people with SMI.