Severity of sialorrhea and tracheal secretions in infants and toddlers with a tracheostomy with a focus on quality of life.

OBJECTIVE: Sialorrhea and tracheal secretions can be present in patients with a tracheostomy. The current study seeks to survey the severity of sialorrhea and tracheal secretions in infants and toddlers with a tracheostomy, and to correlate this severity with quality of life. METHODS: Prospective cross-sectional survey pilot study: 26 patients (ages 0.33 years - 4.09 years) were given the Infant/Toddler Quality of Life Questionnaire Short Form 47, the Drooling Impact Scale and assessed for severity of tracheal secretions with a Tracheostomy Secretion Severity Scale. Spearman's correlation and Mann Whitney U tests were used to assess correlation between and contributors to quality of life, drooling severity, and tracheostomy secretion severity, number of outpatient visits, and respiratory related hospitalizations. RESULTS: Average health perception quality of life was 46.7 and average parental impact quality of life was 58.85. The average for the Drooling Impact Scale overall was 19.7, for frequency 4.16, for severity 3.12 and for the Tracheostomy Secretion Severity Scale 2.4. There was strong correlation between the Drooling Impact Scale and the Tracheostomy Secretion Severity Scale (R = 0.432 p = 0.03) overall, and moderate correlation between Drooling Impact Scale and Tracheostomy Secretion Severity Scale (R = 0.39956 p = 0.047) frequency. There was no correlation between health perception quality of life or parental impact quality of life and Drooling Impact Scale or Tracheostomy Secretion Severity Scale. CONCLUSION: Drooling severity does not have significant impacts on health perception and parental impact quality of life for infants and toddlers who have a tracheostomy. Overall drooling impact scores and drooling frequency are related to tracheostomy secretion severity.

Comparing Outcomes Between Standard Mepilex and Mepilex Silver for Tracheotomy Dressings.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study is to compare the incidence of early postoperative tracheotomy stoma wound complications in pediatric patients using a silver-impregnated barrier dressing (Mepilex Ag) versus a standard absorbent foam dressing (standard Mepilex). METHODS: This is a prospective, non-blinded, randomized trial of pediatric patients undergoing tracheotomy at a tertiary care children's hospital. Patients were randomized to receive Mepilex Ag versus standard Mepilex tracheostoma dressings following tracheotomy. All patients received standard postoperative wound care and daily stomal examination. Wound related complications, breakdown, granulation, and infection were recorded for the first 7 days after surgery. A non-inferiority study design was used to test the hypothesis that the Mepilex group had a non-inferior wound complication rate (within 10% margin) compared to the Mepilex Ag group. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were enrolled; 52 received Mepilex Ag, and 30 received standard Mepilex. There was no difference between the groups with respect to age, sex, race, surgical indication, or postoperative length of stay. Non-inferiority testing demonstrated that the Mepilex standard cohort had no more than 10% greater stomal wound complication rate than that of Mepilex Ag dressing group (p = 0.0108). CONCLUSION: Standard Mepilex was found to be non-inferior to Mepilex Ag in the prevention of tracheotomy stomal wound complications. Standard Mepilex may be used effectively in the postoperative period, potentially reducing costs to caregivers and the institution. Further work is needed to analyze additional factors that could contribute to poor postoperative stoma healing such as bacterial colonization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Randomized Controlled Trial, Level 2 Laryngoscope, 2024.

Development and implementation of a pre-tracheostomy multidisciplinary conference: An initiative to improve patient selection.

OBJECTIVE: To describe our institutional experience in implementing a pre-tracheostomy multidisciplinary conference and assess its effects on patient selection and communication between team members and with families. METHODS: Descriptive study and retrospective review of patient outcomes in a period prior to (4/2016-1/2018) and following (2/2018-11/2019) implementation of the conference and conference participant survey. RESULTS: In the 21 months prior to the conference, 53 patients out of 67 consults (79%) went on to have a tracheostomy. After implementation, 96 patients, 42 females and 54 males, between 2 weeks and 22 years of age were discussed. 58 (60%) of patients referred for tracheostomy ultimately underwent surgery. Of those managed without tracheostomy, 16% were extubated, 11% were managed with noninvasive respiratory support, and 13% of families chose to redirect care. There was no difference in time between consultation and surgery (p = 0.9), or post-surgical length of stay after the conference was implemented (p = 0.9). Survey responses were gathered from 34 conference participants. Respondents agreed that the conference was useful in facilitating communication among the care team (91%), promoting understanding of the patient's treatment options (85%), promoting understanding about long-term outcomes and progression of underlying disease process (79%), clarifying risks, benefits, and alternatives of treatment options (82%), and informing discussions with the family (70%). DISCUSSION: Potential benefits of a multidisciplinary pre-tracheostomy conference include improved provider communication and shared decision making between the medical team and family. We found a reduction in the proportion of patients who ultimately underwent tracheostomy as a result of a formal multidisciplinary discussion, but did not find either any delays in care, or reduction in post-operative length of stay. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: A multidisciplinary team approach to patient selection can foster communication between team members, identify barriers to discharge and quality care at home, and provide caregivers with information necessary to make an informed decision about their child's care.

An Analysis of Tracheostomy Complications in Pediatric Patients With Scoliosis.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To analyze tracheostomy-related complications in pediatric patients with scoliosis. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients with tracheostomy and scoliosis was performed at a single institution. The charts were reviewed for variables including difficulties with tracheostomy tube changes, poor positioning of tube, abnormal appearance of trachea, and emergency room visits and admissions for complications. Decannulation rates were also identified. RESULTS: About 102 patients met inclusion criteria, 96 (94.1%) had scoliosis involving the thoracic spine, and 4 had scoliosis involving the cervical spine; 13 (12.8%) patients had documented poor positioning on tracheoscopy; 31 patients (30.3%) had at least one emergency room visit or admission for complications, such as accidental decannulation or bleeding from the tracheostomy; 19 (18.6%) patients required at least one tube change due to poor positioning, with 7 (6.9%) requiring multiple changes; 18 (17.7%) had reported difficulties with home tube changes. Custom length tubes were required in 9 patients (8.8%). The level of scoliosis was not associated with any of these complications. Abnormalities of the trachea, such as tortuosity, obstructive granulomas, or tracheomalacia, were seen in 35 patients (34.3%) on bronchoscopy. Scoliosis repair was performed in 18 patients (17.65%), of which two achieved decannulation. Ten patients (9.8%) overall were decannulated. CONCLUSION: A portion of patients with scoliosis who are tracheostomy-dependent have anatomical abnormalities of the trachea and poor positioning of the tracheostomy tube. Decannulation rates are also lower in this population compared to the literature. Further work is required to elucidate if scoliosis predisposes patients toward tracheostomy-related complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 132:944-948, 2022.

Implementation of auricular malformation screenings in the newborn population.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Research has shown that it is important to initiate ear molding early for children with auricular malformations in order to achieve the best results. Currently our institute relies on the traditional primary care physician (PCP) referral system, which does not recognize the time sensitivity of the visit in patients with auricular malformations. The purpose of the current research is to implement a new screening protocol for identifying auricular malformations in the newborn population and thus expedite the clinic visit and necessary intervention. METHODS: The hearing screen technicians (HSTs) were trained to identify some of the most common auricular malformations. A picture guide of 11 types of auricular malformations were given to the HSTs to use as a reference. At the time of the newborn hearing screen, the HSTs examined the pinnas of each baby. When an auricular malformation was identified, the auricular malformation team was immediately alerted and a bedside consultation with ENT occurred. RESULTS: Comparison was made of the referral rate between pre- and post-implementation of the protocol which showed an increased rate of identification (five referrals in the 12-month period pre-implementation versus eighteen referrals in the 15-month period post-implementation). CONCLUSION: We successfully implemented an auricular malformation screening protocol that was linked to newborn hearing screenings. The frequency of identification has increased with the implementation of the new screening protocol and has resulted in earlier initial ENT consultations for ear molding with the goal of improving patient satisfaction and results.