Clinical Interest and Economic Impact of Preoperative SMS Reminders before Ambulatory Surgery: A Propensity Score Analysis.

Patient contact by telephone the day before ambulatory surgery is considered as a best practice. The Short Message Service (SMS) could be a suitable alternative. The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the interest of preoperative instruction (PI) reminders by SMS compared to telephone calls. This was a prospective single center before-and-after study. Patients scheduled in ambulatory surgery were included during 2 consecutive periods of 10 weeks. The "Call" group received a telephone call for preoperative instructions (PI) and the "SMS" group received an automated protocol SMS reminder. The primary endpoint was patient compliance with PI and time of convocation. The two populations were compared with a non-inferiority hypothesis and the impact of the contact modality on compliance with the PI was assessed using a propensity score. The analysis concerned 301 patients in the Call group and 298 in the SMS group. The absence of dysfunction was observed in 75% of patients in the SMS group compared with 61% in the Call group (Risk difference: 14% [95%CI: 7-21]). The use of SMS was associated with a significant improvement in compliance with the PI (Odds ratio: 1.90 [1.48-2.42]; p < 0.0001). Patient satisfaction was similar regardless of the method of PI reminders. The automation of preoperative SMS reminders is associated with a better respect of the PI compared to the conventional calling method. This PI reminder method satisfies the majority of patients and may have a favorable financial impact.

Accuracy of patient's turnover time prediction using RFID technology in an academic ambulatory surgery center.

Patients flow in outpatient surgical unit is a major issue with regards to resource utilization, overall case load and patient satisfaction. An electronic Radio Frequency Identification Device (RFID) was used to document the overall time spent by the patients between their admission and discharge from the unit. The objective of this study was to evaluate how a RFID-based data collection system could provide an accurate prediction of the actual time for the patient to be discharged from the ambulatory surgical unit after surgery. This is an observational prospective evaluation carried out in an academic ambulatory surgery center (ASC). Data on length of stay at each step of the patient care, from admission to discharge, were recorded by a RFID device and analyzed according to the type of surgical procedure, the surgeon and the anesthetic technique. Based on these initial data (n = 1520), patients were scheduled in a sequential manner according to the expected duration of the previous case. The primary endpoint was the difference between actual and predicted time of discharge from the unit. A total of 414 consecutive patients were prospectively evaluated. One hundred seventy four patients (42%) were discharged at the predicted time ± 30 min. Only 24% were discharged behind predicted schedule. Using an automatic record of patient's length of stay would allow an accurate prediction of the discharge time according to the type of surgery, the surgeon and the anesthetic procedure.

Organizational aspects to optimize patient's ambulatory pathway.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Successful ambulatory care implementation should combine both medical and organizational features. These two components are closely interrelated. Only optimal organization, part of a quality management program, will allow us to perform safe medical procedures and provide good patient satisfaction. This review is intended to update organizational concepts that could improve ambulatory surgery center efficiency. RECENT FINDINGS: Current organizational concepts are based on the implementation of a dedicated pathway that could be divided into sequential steps, wherein the concepts of flow time and throughput should be applied. Wasted times have to be evaluated and suppressed, so patients have to spend only the minimum required time at each step. A 'forward pathway' would allow maintaining unidirectional patients' flow to avoid any blockade and to build sequential surgical program planning. These processes are easier to implement in dedicated facilities, managed by a dedicated staff, after extensive patient preoperative information, and with the use of numeric information systems. SUMMARY: Organizational feature in ambulatory surgery center is a major determinant of patient flow, activity, resource utilization, safety, and patient satisfaction. Most of these basic principles may contribute to improve the quality of care that can also be of benefit to conventional surgical activity.

Complications associated with 27 031 ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blocks: a web-based survey of 36 French centres.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound guidance improves the efficacy of peripheral nerve blocks, reducing performance time and local anaesthetic doses. It should also reduce the risk of systemic toxicity of local anaesthetic and nerve injuries. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this prospective study was to estimate the incidence of immediate complications related to ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blocks in a multicentre observational cohort. DESIGN: Prospective multicentre observational study. SETTING: Thirty-six French centres participated in the study between 2009 and 2012. PATIENTS: A total of 27 031 axillary brachial plexus blocks were recorded. INTERVENTIONS: The study objective, the incidence of immediate complications related to ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blocks (intravascular injection of local anaesthetic and neurological deficit at hospital discharge), was based on data collected by anaesthesiologists through a web-based case report form. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Incidence of immediate complications related to ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blocks. RESULTS: Of 27 031 blocks performed, the incidence of systemic toxicity of local anaesthetic was very low at 1.5 per 10 000, and the overall incidence of postoperative neurological symptoms was 0.37 per 10 000. CONCLUSION: We have reported a large series of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blocks in a multicentre study. Our results confirm the low incidence of local anaesthetic systemic toxicity and postoperative neurological complications as previously described.

Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided distal blocks for analgesia without motor blockade after ambulatory hand surgery.

PURPOSE: To assess the suitability of ultrasound-guided (USG), single-injection distal block(s) for pain management after outpatient hand and wrist bone surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 125 of 198 consecutive ambulatory surgery patients who underwent hand and wrist bone surgery between June 2010 and January 2012. All patients received a USG axillary block using a short-acting local anesthetic (lidocaine) and secondary 1, 2, or 3 (median, radial, or ulnar) USG distal analgesic block(s) using a long-acting local anesthetic (ropivacaine). All patients were contacted by phone on the first postoperative day. All patients received a concomitant prescription of acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with opioids as a rescue treatment. Effectiveness and duration of the distal nerve blocks, compliance with analgesic treatment and rescue opioids requirement, opioid-related side effects, prolonged upper limb motor block, quality of sleep on first postoperative night, and patient satisfaction were evaluated. RESULTS: Most distal analgesic blocks were effective (120 of 125; 96%), with an average duration of nearly 12 hours On the first day after surgery, 28 patients (23%) had a numeric verbal scale greater than 3, although 14 of them had taken the rescue opioids. No patient reported prolonged motor blockade or insensate limb. Opioid-related side effects occurred in 23% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: After hand and wrist bone surgery, USG selective distal blocks using a long-acting local anesthetic, combined with oral analgesics, were effective in a large majority of patients. However, pain control was suboptimal for some especially painful procedures such as wrist surgery, trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis, and finger amputation. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Assessment of a Standardized Pre-Operative Telephone Checklist Designed to Avoid Late Cancellation of Ambulatory Surgery: The AMBUPROG Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of a standardized pre-operative telephone checklist on the rate of late cancellations of ambulatory surgery (AMBUPROG trial). DESIGN: Multicenter, two-arm, parallel-group, open-label randomized controlled trial. SETTING: 11 university hospital ambulatory surgery units in Paris, France. PARTICIPANTS: Patients scheduled for ambulatory surgery and able to be reached by telephone. INTERVENTION: A 7-item checklist designed to prevent late cancellation, available in five languages and two versions (for children and adults), was administered between 7 and 3 days before the planned date of surgery, by an automated phone system or a research assistant. The control group received standard management alone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rate of cancellation on the day of surgery or the day before. RESULTS: The study population comprised 3900 patients enrolled between November 2012 and September 2013: 1950 patients were randomized to the checklist arm and 1950 patients to the control arm. The checklist was administered to 68.8% of patients in the intervention arm, 1002 by the automated phone system and 340 by a research assistant. The rate of late cancellation did not differ significantly between the checklist and control arms (109 (5.6%) vs. 113 (5.8%), adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 0.91 [0.65-1.29], (p = 0.57)). Checklist administration revealed that 355 patients (28.0%) had not undergone tests ordered by the surgeon or anesthetist, and that 254 patients (20.0%) still had questions concerning the fasting state. CONCLUSIONS: A standardized pre-operative telephone checklist did not avoid late cancellations of ambulatory surgery but enabled us to identify several frequent causes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01732159.