Pheochromocytoma of the urinary bladder--A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Pheochromocytoma of the urinary bladder is a rare tumor and presents less than 0.06% of all urinary bladder tumors. CASE REPORT: We presented a 49-year-old female patient with a history of daily paroxysmal hypertension accompanied with flushing of the face and upper chest, palpitations and excessive sweating prior to micturition. Ultrasonography reported a 3 cm bladder wall tumor. The 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (131I-MIBG) scan showed a pathological isotope accumulation in the projection of the bladder. The patient underwent a partial cystectomy. One year following the operation the patient was normotensive and without recurrence. CONCLUSION: The most efficient treatment option for bladder pheochromocytoma is surgical resection. The most important fact in the diagnostics is suspicion on this rare condition.

Difference in recurrence frequencies of non-muscle-invasive-bladder tumors depending on optimal usage of intravesical immunotherapy of bacillus Calmette-Guérin.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The therapy with intravesical instillation of bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) after transurethral resection (ITJR) of the tumor is the gold standard of treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). The aim of this study was to compare the frequencies of reccurence between a group of patients submitted to TUR + BCG therapy (group I) and a group of patients submitted only to TUR (group II). METHODS: The patients with NMIBC, a total of 899, treated in our Institution from January 1, 2007 to March, 2013, were included in this study and divided into two groups: group I and group II. These two groups were divided into three subgroups: solitary first diagnosed tumor ≤ 3 cm (SFDGT), solitary first diagnosed tumor > 3 cm and multiple first diagnosed tumors (MFDGT), and recedive tumors (RCT). Statistical analysis was performed by using χ2-test and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. RESULTS: In the group I a total of 133 cases had reccurence contrary to 75 in the group II, making a statistically highly significant difference. Analysis of recurrences through the subgroups revealed: in the group I SFDGT recurrence occured in 27 of the cases vs 9 cases in the group II; in the group I MFDGT recurrence occured in 49 of the cases vs 31 in the group II (p < 0.001), and finally, in the group I RCT recurrence occured in 57 cases vs 35 cases in the group II (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The obtained results indicate no difference in the frequency of reccurence between the group I and group II regarding SFDGT, but a very high significant difference regarding those with MFDGT and RCT. These results should be taken into consideration in everyday clinical practise.

Combined spinal-epidural technique: single-space vs double distant space technique.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Several combined spinal-epidural (CSE) anesthesia techniques have been described. This study was designed to compare the single space ("needle-through-needle") technique (SST) and the double distant space technique (DDS) with regards to the time needed for the procedure, patient discomfort during the procedure and patient's preference technique. METHODS: This prospective, randomized single-blind study included 156 patients undergoing colorectal surgery under general anesthesia and CSE. All neuraxial blocks were performed before general anesthesia induction. DDS group of patients had thoracic epidural catheter placed at T6-7 or T7-8, followed by subarachnoid injection at the L2-3 interspace. The SST group of patients had a single injection using the needle-through-needle technique (Espocan needle) at L2-3. The epidural catheter was used for postoperative analgesia for 72 hours. Body habitus, spinal anatomy and spinal landmarks were assessed preoperatively. The number of epidural and spinal punctures, the feeling that the dura is perforated (dural perforation click) and the time needed to perform CSE were also recorded. Complications during epidural catheter placement and perioperative and postoperative epidural catheter function and patient preference for the anesthetic procedure were recorded. RESULTS: Epidural and subarachnoid spaces were successfully identified in all the patients. Duration of CSE procedure, the number of spinal punctures, dural click feeling and the effects of test dose did not differ between the groups. The patients in both groups (90% of DDS and 87% of SST) would choose CSE as preferred method in the future. The CSE procedure was painful for 16% of DDS vs 20% of SST patients. A significant correlation between time needed for CSE technique performance and body habitus (r = 0.338, p < 0.01), spinal landmarks (r = 0.452, p < 0.001) and anatomy (r = 0.265, p < 0.05) was found in the SST group. There was no correlation between the number of epidural/spinal punctures and epidural bacteriological findings. There was no correlation between the patients' choice of the CSE technique and the number of spinal punctures, duration of CSE procedure and epidural catheter stay. CONCLUSION: The two CSE techniques did not differ with regards to the procedure time and patient's preference. Procedure time correlated with body habitus, spinal landmarks and the anatomy in the SST group.