Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection.

Review of the recently published data on Helicobacter pylori management highlights various interesting aspects. Current H. pylori eradication guidelines generally suggest a noninvasive 'test and treat' strategy for all dyspeptic patients with certain age limits depending on the local gastric neoplasia risk. According to the 'Maastricht 2-2000 Consensus Report' treatment should be thought of as a 'package' considering first- and second-line eradication therapies together. Various centres have published their results using novel antimicrobial formulations and 'rescue' and 'sequential' therapies. Review suggests that care at the specialist level remains a challenge and guidelines are deficient particularly as regards the selection and duration of eradication therapies. Results indicate that differences for CYP2C19 genotype and the selection of proton pump inhibitors have no significant role in determining eradication rates whereas antibiotic resistance and socio-economic factors play a variable role according to different geographical areas. Compliance remains an important factor in determining clinical outcome at the primary and secondary levels worldwide.

Salvage therapy after two or more prior Helicobacter pylori treatment failures: the super salvage regimen.

BACKGROUND: Although effective therapies are available for curing Helicobacter pylori infection, the problem persists about what to do for patients who fail two or more treatment courses despite a good compliance. AIM: To test a twice a day midday quadruple therapy as salvage therapy. METHODS: Dyspeptic H. pylori-infected patients who failed two or more courses of anti-H. pylori therapy received omeprazole 20 mg, tetracycline 500 mg, metronidazole 500 mg, and bismuth subcitrate caplets 240 mg twice a day (with the midday and evening meals) for 14 days. H. pylori status was evaluated by 13C-urea breath test and histology 4-6 weeks after therapy. Eradication was defined as no positive test. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were enrolled and 68 completed the full 14 days of therapy (mean age 46 years; 28 men). Thirty-three patients had failed prior treatment twice, 19 had failed three times, and 16 had failed four or more times. The cure rates were: intention to treat=93% (66/71); (95% CI=84% to 98%), per protocol=97% (66/68); (95% CI=89%- 100%). Success was excellent irrespective of diagnosis, age, prior treatment protocols, or smoking status. Moderate side-effects were experienced by only two patients. CONCLUSION: Midday bismuth subcitrate based twice a day quadruple therapy was an excellent salvage therapy. BID midday quadruple regimen should be considered as the therapy of choice.

Novel monoclonal antibody-based Helicobacter pylori stool antigen test.

BACKGROUND: A number of noninvasive tests have been developed to establish the presence of Helicobacter pylori infection. Although polyclonal antibody-based stool antigen testing has a good sensitivity and specificity, it is less accurate than urea breath testing. Recently, a monoclonal antibody-based stool antigen test demonstrated an excellent performance in diagnosing H. pylori infection in adults and in pediatric populations. AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a novel stool test based on monoclonal antibodies to detect H. pylori antigens in frozen human stool in the pretreatment setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Stool specimens were prospectively collected from 78 patients undergoing gastroscopy and stored at -20 degrees C until tested. Helicobacter pylori infection was evaluated by histology, rapid urease testing and urea breath tests ((13)C-UBT). Positivity of the three tests was considered the gold standard for H. pylori active infection. Patients with no positive test were considered negative. The gold standard was compare to the results of the monoclonal antibody stool antigen test. Frozen stool specimens were tested using a novel monoclonal-antibody-based enzyme immunoassay (HePy-Stool, Biolife-Italiana, Milan, Italy). RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the monoclonal stool antigen test were 97%[95% confidence interval, (CI) 86-100] and 94% (95% CI: 81-99), respectively. Negative and positive predictive values were 97% (95% CI: 85-99), and 95% (95% CI: 83-99), respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was 96% (95% CI: 88-99). The likelihood ratio for a positive test was 17 and for a negative test was 0. CONCLUSIONS: Although the (13)C-UBT is the most accurate among the available noninvasive tests, our results show that an H. pylori stool test using monoclonal antibody might be an excellent alternative.

Detection of Chlamydiae pneumoniae but not Helicobacter pylori DNA in atherosclerosis plaques.

Chronic infections have been associated with cardiovascular disease. We used bacterial culture, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and immunohistochemical staining with anti-vacA and anticagA antibodies to search for Helicobacter pylori and Chlamydiae pneumoniae in atherosclerotic plaques obtained at endarterectomy. Serum IgG antibodies to H. pylori and C. pneumoniae were also determined. Thirty-two patients were enrolled. Anti-H. pylori and anti-C. pneumoniae IgG were present in 72% and 81%, respectively. Culture and PCR for H. pylori of vessel walls and plaques were negative. Atherosclerotic plaque and normal vessel sections from H. pylori-negative and- positive patients showed reactivity with anti-vacA and anti-cagA antibodies. C. pneumoniae DNA was amplified in three atherosclerotic lesions. These findings suggest that the association between H. pylori infection and atherosclerosis does not result from continuing direct effects of H. pylori antigens in the vessel walls. Antigens within vessel atherosclerotic plaques cross-react with H. pylori virulence factors and could act as cofactors in determining instability for the atherosclerotic plaques.