RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Long-duration exploration missions (LDEMs), such as voyages to Mars, will present unique medical challenges for astronaut crews, including communication delays and the inability to return to Earth early. Medical events threaten crewmember lives and increase the risk of mission failure. Managing a range of potential medical events will require excellent technical and nontechnical skills (NTSs). We sought to identify medical events with potential for rescue, range them according to the potential impact on crew health and mission success during LDEMs, and develop a list of NTSs to train for management of in-flight medical events. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight subject matter experts with specializations in surgery, medicine, trauma, spaceflight operations, NTS training, simulation, human factors, and organizational psychology completed online surveys followed by a 2-d in-person workshop. They identified and rated medical events for survivability, mission impact, and impact of crewmember NTSs on outcomes in space. RESULTS: Sudden cardiac arrest, smoke inhalation, toxic exposure, seizure, and penetrating eye injury emerged as events with the highest potential mission impact, greatest potential for survival, and that required excellent NTS for successful management. Key NTS identified to target in training included information exchange, supporting behavior, communication delivery, and team leadership/followership. CONCLUSIONS: With a planned Mars mission on the horizon, training countermeasures need to be developed in the next 3-5 y. These results may inform policy, selection, medical system design, and training scenarios for astronauts to manage in-flight medical events on LDEMs. Findings may extend to surgical and medical care in any rural and remote location.
Assuntos
Astronautas/educação , Marte , Voo Espacial/métodos , Sobrevivência , Astronautas/psicologia , Consenso , Morte Súbita Cardíaca , Ferimentos Oculares Penetrantes/terapia , Humanos , Liderança , Convulsões/terapia , Lesão por Inalação de Fumaça/terapia , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Changes in the lumbar and sacral spine occur with exposure to microgravity in astronauts; monitoring these alterations without radiographic capabilities on the International Space Station (ISS) requires novel diagnostic solutions to be developed. STUDY OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the ability of point-of-care ultrasound, performed by nonexpert-operator astronauts, to provide accurate anatomic information about the spine in long-duration crewmembers in space. METHODS: Astronauts received brief ultrasound instruction on the ground and performed in-flight cervical and lumbosacral ultrasound examinations using just-in-time training and remote expert tele-ultrasound guidance. Ultrasound examinations on the ISS used a portable ultrasound device with real-time communication/guidance with ground experts in Mission Control. RESULTS: The crewmembers were able to obtain diagnostic-quality examinations of the cervical and lumbar spine that would provide essential information about acute or chronic changes to the spine. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal ultrasound provides essential anatomic information in the cervical and lumbosacral spine; this technique may be extensible to point-of-care situations in emergency departments or resource-challenged areas without direct access to additional radiologic capabilities.
Assuntos
Vértebras Cervicais/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Sacro/diagnóstico por imagem , Voo Espacial , Ausência de Peso/efeitos adversos , Educação não Profissionalizante , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Consulta Remota , Ultrassonografia/métodosRESUMO
Manned spaceflight is inherently risky and results in unique problems from a trauma and medical perspective. Emergency care under these special physiologic and environmental conditions calls for novel techniques for diagnosis and therapy.
Assuntos
Emergências , Voo Espacial , Medicina Aeroespacial/métodos , Emergências/epidemiologia , Medicina de Emergência/métodos , Humanos , Voo Espacial/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Several neuroimaging studies have demonstrated compensatory cerebral responses consequent to sleep deprivation (SD), but all have focused on simple tasks with limited behavioral response options. We assessed the cerebral effects associated with SD during the performance of a complex, open-ended, dual-joystick, 3D navigation task (simulated orbital docking) in a cross-over protocol, with counterbalanced orders of normal sleep (NS) and a single night of total SD (approximately 27 h). Behavioral performance on multiple measures was comparable in the two sleep conditions. Functional magnetic resonance imaging revealed multiple compensatory SD > NS cerebral responses, including the posterior superior temporal sulcus [Brodmann area (BA) 39/22/37], prefrontal cortex (BA 9), lateral temporal cortex (BA 22/21), and right substantia nigra. Right posterior cingulate cortex (BA 31) exhibited NS > SD activity. Our findings extend the compensatory cerebral response hypothesis to complex, open-ended tasks.
Assuntos
Encéfalo/metabolismo , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Privação do Sono/diagnóstico , Adulto , Estudos Cross-Over , Feminino , Lobo Frontal/metabolismo , Giro do Cíngulo/metabolismo , Humanos , Masculino , Lobo Occipital/metabolismo , Lobo Parietal/metabolismo , Substância Negra/metabolismo , Lobo Temporal/metabolismo , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: New portable ultrasound (US) systems are capable of detecting fractures in the remote setting. However, the accuracy of ultrasound by physicians with minimal ultrasound training is unknown. METHODS: After one hour of standardized training, physicians with minimal US experience clinically evaluated patients presenting with pain and trauma to the upper arm or leg. The investigators then performed a long-bone US evaluation, recording their impression of fracture presence or absence. Results of the examination were compared with routine plain or computer aided radiography (CT). RESULTS: 58 patients were examined. The sensitivity and specificity of US were 92.9% and 83.3%, and of the physical examination were 78.6% and 90.0%, respectively. US provided improved sensitivity with less specificity compared with physical examination in the detection of fractures in long bones. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound scans by minimally trained clinicians may be used to rule out a long-bone fracture in patients with a medium to low probability of fracture.
Assuntos
Fraturas do Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Úmero/diagnóstico por imagem , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito/normas , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Competência Clínica/normas , Educação Médica Continuada/normas , Medicina de Emergência/educação , Medicina de Emergência/normas , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Reações Falso-Negativas , Reações Falso-Positivas , Hospitais de Ensino , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento/normas , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/educação , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/normas , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seleção de Pacientes , Exame Físico/normas , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/normas , Ultrassonografia/instrumentação , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Ultrassonografia/normasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Ultrasound is of proven accuracy in abdominal and thoracic trauma and may be useful for diagnosing extremity injury in situations where radiography is not available such as military and space applications. We prospectively evaluated the utility of extremity ultrasound performed by trained, nonphysician personnel in patients with extremity trauma to simulate remote aerospace or military applications. METHODS: Patients with extremity trauma were identified by history, physical examination, and radiographic studies. Ultrasound examination was performed bilaterally by nonphysician personnel, blinded to radiographic results, with a portable ultrasound device using a 10- to 5-MHz linear probe. Images were videorecorded for later analysis against radiography by Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: There were 158 examinations performed in 95 patients. The average time of examination was 4 minutes. Ultrasound accurately diagnosed extremity injury in 94% of patients with no false-positive examinations; accuracy was greater in midshaft locations and least in the metacarpal/metatarsals. Soft tissue/tendon injury was readily visualized. CONCLUSION: Extremity ultrasound can be performed quickly and accurately by nonphysician personnel with excellent accuracy. Pulmonary ultrasound appears promising; blinded verification of the utility of ultrasound in patients with extremity injury should be performed to determine whether extremity and respiratory evaluation should be added to the FAST examination (the FASTER examination) and to verify the technique in remote locations such as military and aerospace applications.