Validation of the Hemifacial Spasm Grading Scale: a clinical tool for hemifacial spasm.

BACKGROUND: To create an objective rating tool for hemifacial spasm (HFS) and validate it on a cohort of patients. METHODS: A panel of movement disorders specialists elaborated, through the Delphi method, the Hemifacial Spasm Grading Scale (HSGS). The validity of the scale was tested in a longitudinal, prospective observational study, with standardized video recording protocol before and after botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) treatment. The video recordings obtained from each patient were then independently assessed with HSGS by three blinded raters. The scale was compared to patient-reported HFS-7 scale and to the clinical grading of spasm intensity scale. RESULTS: Intra-rater reproducibility ranged between ICC 0.73 (95% CI = 0.54-0.86) and 0.83 (0.68-0.92) and inter-rater reproducibility between 0.62 (95% CI = 0.44-0.77) and 0.82 (0.69-0.90). HSGS scores correlated with clinical grading of spasm intensity scale scores, but not with HFS-7. HSGS confirmed BoNT efficacy, with scores lowering at 1 month from treatment. CONCLUSIONS: HSGS represents an objective, quick and reliable scale for the assessment of HFS, and might be useful to monitor BoNT treatment efficacy over time.

The validation of an Italian version of the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire.

Freezing of gait (FOG) is a common and disabling symptom in Parkinson's disease (PD) and its staging is complex because of its episodic nature. Patient-reported assessments are essential in evaluating this disabling symptom. The Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FOG-Q) is considered a valid and reliable tool for the assessment of FOG severity. The aim of our study was to validate the Italian version of FOG-Q and to investigate for its association with several clinical aspects of PD. Fifty-one PD patients were administered the FOG-Q and the timed up and go test. Moreover, patients were evaluated for the unified PD rating scale (UPDRS), the Hoehn and Yahr Scale (H&Y) and the falls-efficacy scale [FES(S)]. Mean (SD) FOG-Q item scores ranged between 1.5 and 2.7 (1.0-1.4); corrected item-total correlations ranged between 0.63 and 0.86. The total FOG-Q score ranged between 0 and 24, with a mean + SD of 12.6 (6.2) and a median (q1-q3) of 12 (9-17). Reliability was 0.91. FOG-Q correlated with H&Y (0.36, p = 0.0091), UPDRS part III (rS = 0.27, p = 0.054), PD duration (rS = 0.35, p < 0.01), FES(S) (rS = 0.58, p < 0.001) and the timed up and go test (rS = 0.51, p = 0.001). Non-significant positive correlations were observed for dyskinesia and motor fluctuations. Our study validates the Italian version of the FOG-Q, in that it results being a reliable instrument for assessing FOG in PD patients.

Clinical aspects and management of levodopa-induced dyskinesia.

In Parkinson's disease, one of the most troublesome dilemmas is the treatment of levodopa-induced dyskinesia. After a few years, chronic treatment with levodopa is associated with the development of dyskinesias. Strategies to delay or to reduce dyskinesias are based on the change of levodopa dosing or the early use of dopamine agonists. Dopamine agonists with different pharmacological profile are available. Our paper was aimed to analyse the clinical impact and the management of dyskinesias with dopamine agonists.