Are Oral Mucosal Changes a Sign of COVID-19? A Cross-Sectional Study at a Field Hospital. / ¿Son las alteraciones en la mucosa oral un signo de COVID-19? Estudio transversal en un Hospital de Campaña.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) has many manifestations, including respiratory, thrombotic, neurologic, digestive, and cutaneous ones. Cutaneous manifestations have been classified into 5 clinical patterns: acro-ischemic (pseudo-chilblain), vesicular, urticarial, maculopapular, and livedoid. Oral manifestations have also been reported, but much less frequently. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study in which we examined the oral mucosa of 666 patients with COVID-19 at the IFEMA field hospital in Madrid in April 2020. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients (11.7%) had changes involving the oral mucosa. The most common were transient anterior U-shaped lingual papillitis (11.5%) accompanied or not by tongue swelling (6.6%), aphthous stomatitis (6.9%), a burning sensation in the mouth (5.3%), mucositis (3.9%), glossitis with patchy depapillation (3.9%), white tongue (1.6%), and enanthema (0.5%). Most of the patients also reported taste disturbances. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 also manifests in the oral cavity. The most common manifestations are transient U-shaped lingual papillitis, glossitis with patchy depapillation, and burning mouth syndrome. Mucositis with or without aphthous ulcers or enanthema may also be observed. Any these findings may be key clues to a diagnosis of COVID-19.

¿Son las alteraciones en la mucosa oral un signo de COVID-19? Estudio transversal en un Hospital de Campaña / Are Oral Mucosal Changes a Sign of COVID-19? A Cross-Sectional Study at a Field Hospital

Introducción La enfermedad por coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) se ha relacionado con múltiples síntomas: respiratorios, trombóticos, neurológicos, digestivos o cutáneos. Estos últimos se han clasificado en 5 tipos: lesiones acroisquémicas, lesiones vesiculares, erupción urticarial, exantema maculopapular o lesiones livedoides. Sin embargo, se han descrito mucho menos las alteraciones orales asociadas a la COVID-19. Pacientes y métodos Presentamos un estudio transversal realizado durante abril del 2020 en el Hospital de Campaña de IFEMA examinando la mucosa oral de 666 pacientes con COVID-19. Resultados En total, 78 pacientes (11,7%) presentaron alteraciones en la mucosa oral. La más frecuente fue papilitis lingual transitoria anterior en forma de U (11,5%) asociada o no a edema lingual (6,6%); estomatitis aftosa (6,9%), mucositis (3,9%) glositis con depapilación en parches (3,9%), boca urente (5,3%), lengua saburral (1,6%) y enantema (0,5%). La mayoría refería disgeusia asociada. Conclusión La cavidad oral se puede alterar por la enfermedad COVID-19, el edema lingual con papilitis lingual transitoria en forma de U o la glositis con depapilación en parches son los signos encontrados con mayor frecuencia, al igual que la sensación de ardor en la cavidad oral o boca urente. Otras manifestaciones orales que se pueden asociar a la COVID-19 son mucositis con o sin aftas o el enantema. Todos pueden ser signos clave para un diagnóstico de esta enfermedad (AU)

Background Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) has many manifestations, including respiratory, thrombotic, neurologic, digestive, and cutaneous ones. Cutaneous manifestations have been classified into 5 clinical patterns: acro-ischemic (pseudo-chilblain), vesicular, urticarial, maculopapular, and livedoid. Oral manifestations have also been reported, but much less frequently. Patients and methods We performed a cross-sectional study in which we examined the oral mucosa of 666 patients with COVID-19 at the IFEMA field hospital in Madrid in April 2020. Results Seventy-eight patients (11.7%) had changes involving the oral mucosa. The most common were transient anterior U-shaped lingual papillitis (11.5%) accompanied or not by tongue swelling (6.6%), aphthous stomatitis (6.9%), a burning sensation in the mouth (5.3%), mucositis (3.9%), glossitis with patchy depapillation (3.9%), white tongue (1.6%), and enanthema (0.5%). Most of the patients also reported taste disturbances. Conclusion COVID-19 also manifests in the oral cavity. The most common manifestations are transient U-shaped lingual papillitis, glossitis with patchy depapillation, and burning mouth syndrome. Mucositis with or without aphthous ulcers or enanthema may also be observed. Any these findings may be key clues to a diagnosis of COVID-19 (AU)

[Opinions of health professionals on the impact of the Preventive Activities and Health Promotion Program (PAPPS)]. / Opiniones de los profesionales sanitarios sobre la influencia del Programa de Actividades Preventivas y de Promoción de la Salud (PAPPS) en atención primaria.

OBJECTIVE: To find out the opinion of Primary Health Care (PHC) professionals on the impact of the Preventive Activities and Health Promotion Program (PAPPS). DESIGN: Descriptive qualitative-quantitative study. In a first phase the SWOT technique was used. In a second phase a 47 item questionnaire was designed using an ordinal scale. PARTICIPANTS: Professionals of PAPPS health centre, PAPPS managers and PHC management, using the Autonomous Community, and the time of ascribing or knowledge of PAPPS as segmentation criteria. In the qualitative study 62 participants were selected by theoretical sampling. In the quantitative study, 198 professionals took part in the survey. PRINCIPAL MEASUREMENTS: The assessment of the results has taken into account the responses to the questions formulated and by performing a crossed analysis between strengths/threats and weaknesses/opportunities. A descriptive statistical analysis of the questions in the questionnaire. RESULTS: There is agreement in that PAPPS has greatly influenced the development of PHC, contributing to improving the quality of care, but it is also fundamental to try revitalise the programme, as the limited involvement by the professionals in the postulated preventive recommendations is its main weakness, due to lack of motivation and professional burn-out.. CONCLUSIONS: According to the participants PAPPS has contributed significantly to the development of PHC in our country and has had an influence on professional practice by instilling a prevention culture that hardly existed before.

Opiniones de los profesionales sanitarios sobre la influencia del Programa de Actividades Preventivas y de Promoción de la Salud (PAPPS) en atención primaria / Opinions of health professionals on the impact of the preventive activities and health promotion program (PAPPS)

Objetivo: conocer la opinión de los profesionales de Atención Primaria (APS) sobre el impacto y el papel del Programa de Actividades Preventivas y de Promoción de la Salud (PAPPS). Diseño: estudio descriptivo cuali-cuantitativo. En una primera fase se empleó la técnica DAFO. En una segunda fase se diseñó un cuestionario de 47 ítems con respuestas mediante una escala ordinal. Ámbito: nivel de Atención Primaria de Salud. Participantes: profesionales de centros de salud PAPPS, responsables del PAPPS y gestores de APS, usando como criterios de segmentación la Comunidad Autónoma, y el tiempo de adscripción o conocimiento del PAPPS. En el estudio cualitativo se hizo una selección por muestreo teorético de 62 participantes; en el estudio cuantitativo, 198 profesionales respondieron a la encuesta. Mediciones principales: la valoración de los resultados se hizo teniendo en cuenta las respuestas a las preguntas formuladas y realizando un análisis cruzado entre fortalezas/amenazas y debilidades/oportunidades. Análisis estadístico descriptivo de las preguntas del cuestionario. Resultados: existe acuerdo en que el PAPPS ha tenido una gran influencia en el desarrollo de la APS, contribuyendo a mejorar la calidad asistencial, pero también en que es fundamental tratar de dinamizar el programa, siendo la principal debilidad la escasa implicación de los profesionales con las recomendaciones preventivas postuladas por falta de motivación y por el desgaste profesional. Conclusiones: Según los participantes el PAPPS ha contribuido de manera significativa al desarrollo de la APS en nuestro país y ha influido sobre la práctica profesional inculcando una cultura de prevención que antes apenas existía (AU)

Objective: to find out the opinion of Primary Health Care (PHC) professionals on the impact of the Preventive Activities and Health Promotion Program (PAPPS). Design: descriptive qualitative-quantitative study. In a first phase the SWOT technique was used. In a second phase a 47 items questionnaire was designed using an ordinal scale. Participants: professionals of PAPPS health centre, PAPPS managers and PHC management, using the Autonomous Community, and the time of ascribing or knowledge of PAPPS as segmentation criteria. In the qualitative study 62 participants were selected by theoretical sampling. In the quantitative study, 198 professionals took part in the survey. Principal measurements: the assessment of the results has taken into account the responses to the questions formulated and by performing a crossed analysis between strengths/threats and weaknesses/opportunities. A descriptive statistical analysis of the questions in the questionnaire. Results: there is agreement in that PAPPS has greatly influenced the development of PHC, contributing to improving the quality of care, but it is also fundamental to try revitalise the programme, as the limited involvement by the professionals in the postulated preventive recommendations is its main weakness, due to lack of motivation and professional burn-out. Conclusions: according to the participants PAPPS has contributed significantly to the development of PHC in our country and has had an influence on professional practice by instilling a prevention culture that hardly existed before (AU)

Guía terapéutica en atención primaria basada en la evidencia, 2. ª edición: una obra honesta y práctica / Therapeutic guide to Primary Care based on the evidence, 2nd edition: an honest and practical work

No disponible