Prevalence and Predictors of Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms Among Ambulatory Cancer Patients with Urinary Tract Infections.

Purpose: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common community-acquired infections in patients with cancer. Though the prevalence of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs) has increased, there are limited studies on MDROs among ambulatory cancer patients with UTIs. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence and predictors of MDROs in this patient population. Patients and Methods: A retrospective study of adult cancer patients treated for bacterial UTIs in the ambulatory setting at King Hussein Cancer Center. The medical laboratory's system was used to identify positive urine cultures taken in the ambulatory setting, between Aug 2020 and March 2021. UTIs were defined as a positive urine culture along with the initiation of antibiotics empirically or as definitive therapy. Patient characteristics, as well as the type and sensitivity of the bacterial organisms, were recorded. MDROs were defined as intrinsic or acquired non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors that were independently associated with MDROs. Results: A total of 376 patients had UTIs that met the inclusion criteria; mean age 60.5±15.1 (SD) years and 330 (87.8%) had solid tumors. Gram-negative bacteria was recorded in the majority of UTIs (n = 368, 97.9%), the most common being Escherichia-coli (n = 220, 59.8%) and Klebsiella-pneumonia (n = 68, 18.5%). MDROs were recorded in 226 (60.1%) of urine cultures, with the majority being extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase producing organisms (n = 142, 62.8%). The only significant predictor was having had a UTI with MDRO within the past 6 months (OR 5.6, 95% CI 2.1-15.2). Conclusion: More than half of the positive urine cultures of cancer patients treated for UTIs in the ambulatory setting were MDROs. A subsequent UTI due to MDROs is more likely to occur in patients who had a UTI with an MDRO within the past 6 months.

Validation of the CSRFENCE score for prediction of febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy cycles 2-6.

PURPOSE: Though febrile neutropenia (FN) risk prediction models are important in clinical practice, their external validation is limited. In this study, we validated the Cycle-Specific Risk of FEbrile Neutropenia after ChEmotherapy (CSRFENCE) score for predicting FN. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of patients with solid malignancies and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma during chemotherapy cycles 2-6 and recorded if patients developed FN, defined as absolute neutrophil counts less than 500 cells/microL with fever more than or equal to 38.2 â„ƒ. The CSRFENCE score was determined by adding the risk factors' coefficients described by the original study; subsequently, the score was used to classify chemotherapy cycles into the following risk groups for developing FN: low, intermediate, high, and very high risk. The discriminatory ability of the score was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROCC) and incidence rate ratios (IRR) within each CSRFENCE risk group. RESULTS: We analyzed 2870 chemotherapy cycles, of which 42 (1.5%) were associated with FN. Among those, 3 (7.1%), 14 (33.3%), 5 (12%), and 20 (47.6%) were classified as low, intermediate, high, and very high risk for developing FN, respectively. The AUROCC was 0.72 (95% CI 0.64-0.81). Compared with the low risk group (n = 666), the IRR of developing FN was 1.01 (95% CI 0.15-43.37), 0.69 (95% CI 0.08-32.46) and 1.17 (95% CI 0.17-49.49) in the intermediate (n = 1431), high (n = 498) and very high (n = 275) risk groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: The CSRFENCE model can moderately stratify patients into four risk groups for predicting FN prior to chemotherapy cycles 2-6.

Validation of the FENCE Risk Groups for Prediction of Febrile Neutropenia With First-Cycle Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The FEbrile Neutropenia after ChEmotherapy (FENCE) score was developed to estimate the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) at first cycle of chemotherapy but has not been externally validated. We aimed to validate the FENCE score based on its risk groups in patients treated at a comprehensive cancer center. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of treatment-naïve adult patients with solid tumors and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who received first-cycle chemotherapy between January and November 2019. Patients were followed until the second cycle of chemotherapy to identify any FN events (neutrophil count <0.5 × 109/L with fever ≥38.2°C). The FENCE score was determined and patients classified as low, intermediate, high, and very high risk. The discriminatory ability of classifying patients into FENCE risk groups was calculated as the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve and incidence rate ratios within each FENCE risk group. RESULTS: FN was documented during the first cycle of chemotherapy in 45 of the 918 patients included (5%). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.66 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58 to 0.73). Compared with the low-risk group (n = 285), the incidence rate ratio of developing FN was 1.58 (95% CI = 0.54 to 5.21), 3.16 (95% CI = 1.09 to 10.25), and 3.93 (95% CI = 1.46 to 12.27) in the intermediate (n = 293), high (n = 162), and very high (n = 178) risk groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, classifying patients into FENCE risk groups demonstrated moderate discriminatory ability for predicting FN. Further validation in multicenter studies is necessary to determine its generalizability.