Obesity-related complications, healthcare resource use and weight loss strategies in six European countries: the RESOURCE survey.

BACKGROUND: Obesity-related complications (ORCs), such as type 2 diabetes (T2D) and cardiovascular disease, contribute considerably to the clinical and economic impacts of obesity. To obtain a holistic overview of health and weight management attempts for people with obesity in Europe, we designed the cross-sectional RESOURCE survey to collect data on comorbidities, healthcare resource use (HCRU) and weight loss strategies from people with obesity in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden and the UK. METHODS: Adults (≥18 years old) with self-reported body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 who reported interacting with primary or secondary healthcare services in the past 12 months, but had not been pregnant during this time, were recruited from an existing consumer research panel. All data were self-reported via an online survey (May-June 2021). Weight changes over the past year were calculated from participants' estimated weights. RESULTS: Of the 1850 participants in the survey, 26.3% reported that they had ≥3 ORCs from a set of 15 conditions of interest. The most frequently reported ORCs were hypertension (39.3% of participants), dyslipidaemia (22.8%) and T2D (17.5%). Participants in obesity class III (BMI 40 to <70 kg/m2) were more likely to report multiple ORCs than those in lower obesity classes. The presence of multiple ORCs was linked to various types of HCRU, including a significantly increased chance of reporting hospitalization in the past year. Most participants (78.6%) had attempted to lose weight in the past year, but of those who also reported estimated weight changes, 73.4% had not experienced clinically meaningful weight loss of ≥5%. CONCLUSIONS: ORCs are common in people with obesity, and are linked to increased HCRU. Together with the low reported success rate of weight loss attempts, this highlights an unmet need in Europe for enhanced weight management support for people with obesity.

Healthcare costs and hospitalizations in US patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease: A retrospective database study (OFFSET).

AIM: To investigate the budget implications of treatment with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) versus other glucose-lowering treatment (here termed 'standard of care' [SoC]) during 2012-2019. MATERIALS AND METHODS: GLP-1 RA-naïve adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in the IBM MarketScan database with at least one glucose-lowering medication claim within 6 months after their first cardiovascular disease (CVD) hospitalization were included (index date was the date of first claim for a GLP-1 RA for the GLP-1 RA group, and the date of the first claim, independent of medication type, for the SoC group). Monthly healthcare costs and hospitalization risk over 12 months postindex date were compared for those who initiated a GLP-1 RA posthospitalization versus those with a claim for any other glucose-lowering medication. RESULTS: Postindex date, mean observed total costs were lower for patients receiving a GLP-1 RA compared with SoC ($3853 vs. $4288). In adjusted analysis, both groups had similar total healthcare costs (P = .56). This was driven by significantly lower inpatient and outpatient costs and higher drug costs in the GLP-1 RA group compared with SoC (P < .001). Risks of all-cause (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.85) and CVD-related hospitalization (0.76) were significantly lower in the GLP-1 RA group compared with SoC (P < .001). Similar results were observed in a subgroup with atherosclerotic CVD. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that, in US patients with T2D and a CVD-related hospitalization, the added medical cost of treatment with GLP-1 RAs is offset by lower inpatient and outpatient care costs, resulting in budget neutrality against SoC.

Nationwide cardiovascular risk categorization: applying the European Society of Cardiology guidelines to the Swedish National Diabetes Register.

AIMS: The 2021 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines recommend that patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) with a very high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk receive cardiovascular (CV)-protective glucose-lowering medication (glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists or sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors). This analysis compared previous prescribing practices with the ESC recommendations. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients in the Swedish National Diabetes Register (NDR) with T2D, aged 18-90 years, not receiving CV-protective glucose-lowering medication in 2017 were identified, and the ESC criteria for very high CVD risk were applied. The composite outcome of major adverse CV events (MACEs; defined as CV death, non-fatal stroke or non-fatal myocardial infarction) during 2017 was calculated, and the number of MACE avoided with semaglutide, an example of a CV-protective glucose-lowering medication, was estimated for patients with a certain CV risk score. Of the 320 028 patients in the NDR with T2D who were not receiving CV-protective glucose-lowering medication, 129 512 patients had a very high CVD risk. Patients with a very high CVD risk had a high incidence of MACE (75.4 events/1000 person-years), which was higher in those with atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) with and without elevated glycated haemoglobin (>9%; 136.5 and 90.8 events/1000 person-years, respectively). If patients with a very high CVD risk, according to the ESC, and ASCVD received semaglutide, 803 MACE may have been avoided in 2017. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis highlights differences between previous prescribing practices in Sweden and the 2021 ESC guidelines and offers strategies to prioritize CV-protective glucose-lowering medication for patients who would benefit most.

Type 2 diabetes, or T2D, causes blood sugar levels to get too high. Nearly one-third of people with T2D also have diseases of the heart and blood vessels, such as heart attacks and strokes. These are known as cardiovascular diseases or events. Some T2D medications can also lower the risk of cardiovascular disease. Using data from national healthcare registries, we looked at how many people with T2D in Sweden had a very high cardiovascular disease risk. Healthcare systems often have limited budgets and may not treat all people with a very high cardiovascular disease risk. So, we looked at ways to identify which patients with T2D would benefit most from treatment. We also estimated how many cardiovascular events may be prevented by giving these patients cardiovascular risk-lowering T2D medication, using a medication called semaglutide as an example.The registry included 348 857 people with T2D, and 91.7% (320 028) were not given cardiovascular risk-lowering T2D medications. Of the people not given medications, 40.5% (129 512) had a very high cardiovascular disease risk. On average, we found that people with a very high cardiovascular disease risk and previous cardiovascular events ended up having more cardiovascular events than those without previous events. People who also regularly had high average blood sugar levels, measured using a marker in the blood called glycated haemoglobin, or HbA1c, had even more cardiovascular events.Giving semaglutide to people with a very high cardiovascular disease risk who have already had a cardiovascular event may prevent around 803 cardiovascular events each year.

Estimated Life-Years Gained Free of New or Recurrent Major Cardiovascular Events With the Addition of Semaglutide to Standard of Care in People With Type 2 Diabetes and High Cardiovascular Risk.

OBJECTIVE: Semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist, reduced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in a post hoc analysis of pooled data from Trial to Evaluate Cardiovascular and Other Long-term Outcomes with Semaglutide in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN) 6 and Peptide Innovation for Early Diabetes Treatment (PIONEER) 6. We estimated the benefit of adding semaglutide to standard of care (SoC) on life-years free of new/recurrent CVD events in people with T2D at high risk of CVD. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The Diabetes Lifetime-perspective prediction (DIAL) competing risk-adjusted lifetime CVD risk model for people with T2D was developed previously. Baseline characteristics of the pooled cohort from SUSTAIN 6 and PIONEER 6 (POOLED cohort) (N = 6,480) were used to estimate individual life expectancy free of CVD for patients in the POOLED cohort. The hazard ratio of MACE from adding semaglutide to SoC was derived from the POOLED cohort (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76 [95% CI 0.62-0.92]) and combined with an individual's risk to estimate their CVD benefit. RESULTS: Adding semaglutide to SoC was associated with a wide distribution in life-years free of CVD gained, with a mean increase of 1.7 (95% CI 0.5-2.9) life-years. Estimated life-years free of CVD gained with semaglutide was dependent on baseline risk (life-years free of CVD gained in individuals with established CVD vs. those with cardiovascular risk factors only: 2.0 vs. 0.2) and age at treatment initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Adding semaglutide to SoC was associated with a gain in life-years free of CVD events that was dependent on baseline CVD risk and age at treatment initiation. This study helps contextualize the results of semaglutide clinical trials.