Objective assessment of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in knee osteoarthritis patients - beyond daily steps and total sedentary time.

BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis patients may become physically inactive due to pain and functional limitations. Whether physical activity exerts a protective or harmful effect depends on the frequency, intensity, time and type (F.I.T.T.). The F.I.T.T. dimensions should therefore be assessed during daily life, which so far has hardly been feasible. Furthermore, physical activity should be assessed within subgroups of patients, as they might experience different activity limitations. Therefore, this study aimed to objectively describe physical activity, by assessing the F.I.T.T. dimensions, and sedentary behaviour of knee osteoarthritis patients during daily life. An additional goal was to determine whether activity events, based on different types and durations of physical activity, were able to discriminate between subgroups of KOA patients based on risk factors. METHODS: Clinically diagnosed knee osteoarthritis patients (according to American College of Rheumatology criteria) were monitored for 1 week with a tri-axial accelerometer. Furthermore, they performed three functional tests and completed the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Physical activity levels were described for knee osteoarthritis patients and compared between subgroups. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients performed 7303 mean level steps, 319 ascending and 312 descending steps and 601 bicycle crank revolutions per day. Most waking hours were spent sedentary (61%), with 4.6 bouts of long duration (> 30 min). Specific events, particularly ascending and descending stairs/slopes, brief walking and sedentary bouts and prolonged walking bouts, varied between subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: From this sample of KOA patients, the most common form of activity was level walking, although cycling and stair climbing activities occurred frequently, highlighting the relevance of distinguishing between these types of PA. The total active time encompassed a small portion of their waking hours, as they spent most of their time sedentary, which was exacerbated by frequently occurring prolonged bouts. In this study, event-based parameters, such as stair climbing or short bouts of walking or sedentary time, were found more capable of discriminating between subgroups of KOA patients compared to overall levels of PA and sedentary time. Thereby, subtle limitations in physical behaviour of KOA-subgroups were revealed, which might ultimately be targeted in rehabilitation programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Registry under ' DRKS00008735 ' at 02.12.2015.

Acute and mid-term (six-week) effects of an ankle-foot-orthosis on biomechanical parameters, clinical outcomes and physical activity in knee osteoarthritis patients with varus malalignment.

BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a painful disease commonly caused by high loads on the articular cartilage. Orthotic interventions aim to reduce mechanical loading, thereby alleviating pain. Traditional orthotics appear effective, but high drop-out rates have been reported over prolonged periods. RESEARCH QUESTION: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of a novel ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) on gait parameters, physical function and activity of KOA patients. METHODS: 29 clinically diagnosed KOA patients with varus malalignment wore an AFO for 6 weeks. Prior to and after the intervention period, 3D gait analysis, physical function tests and the KOOS questionnaire were administered. Physical activity was objectively assessed with accelerometers. RESULTS: The AFO immediately reduced the first peak of the knee adduction moment (KAM) and the KAM impulse by 41% and 19%. The knee flexion moment (KFM) was increased by 48%. After six weeks, the first KAM peak and KAM impulse were decreased by 27% and 19% while using the AFO. The KFM was increased by 71%. Furthermore, patients completed the functional tests faster (1.4-2.6%). The KOOS scores decreased significantly. No significant differences were found in physical activity parameters. SIGNIFICANCE: The six-week AFO application significantly reduced the KAM. The patients' physical function appeared improved; yet these improvements were only minor and therefore arguably clinically irrelevant. The KFM appeared to be negatively affected after six weeks, as were the scores on the KOOS subscales. In summary, even though the AFO reduced the KAM and improved physical function, the clinical benefit for KOA patients with varus malalignment after the 6-week AFO application is debatable.

Acute effects of different orthotic interventions on knee loading parameters in knee osteoarthritis patients with varus malalignment.

BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is the most common form of arthritis with an estimated lifetime prevalence of 45%. The use of orthotic devices is a generally accepted conservative therapy in KOA. A new conservative treatment is an ankle-foot orthosis (AFO); however, studies on the biomechanical effects are limited. The aim of this study was to examine the acute effects of different orthotic devices (AFO, knee brace and wedged shoes) on (un)loading parameters in subjects with KOA. METHODS: Fifty-two medial KOA patients (mean age 59 (standard deviation (SD) 10) years and mean body mass index 27.5 (SD 4.9) kg/m2) were recruited. Three-dimensional gait analysis was undertaken with different interventions in a randomized order: control (own shoes), new AFO, conventional unloader brace and laterally wedged shoes (six degrees). RESULTS: Significant decreases of 27% and nine percent in first peak knee adduction moment (KAM) were observed for the AFO and wedged shoes, respectively, in comparison with the control. Significant decreases of 21%, seven percent and 18% in the KAM impulse were observed for the AFO, brace and wedged shoes, respectively, compared to the control. The knee flexion moment (KFM) increased compared to the control for all conditions, but only significantly while using the AFO, showing an increase of 26% as compared to the control. CONCLUSIONS: The AFO and wedged shoes were more effective in unloading the medial compartment of the knee compared to the unloader brace. However, the effect of an increased KFM on KOA remains unclear and requires further investigation.