Daridorexant, a New Dual Orexin Receptor Antagonist to Treat Insomnia Disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the dose-response relationship of daridorexant, a new dual orexin receptor antagonist, on sleep variables in subjects with insomnia disorder. METHODS: Adults (≤64 years) with insomnia disorder were randomized (1:1:1:1:1:1) to receive daily oral placebo, daridorexant (5, 10, 25, or 50mg), or 10mg zolpidem for 30 days. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in wake time after sleep onset from baseline to days 1 and 2. Secondary outcome measures were change in latency to persistent sleep from baseline to days 1 and 2, change in subjective wake time after sleep onset, and subjective latency to sleep onset from baseline to week 4. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: Of 1,005 subjects screened, 359 (64% female) were randomized and received ≥1 dose. A significant dose-response relationship (multiple comparison procedure-modeling, 2-sided p < 0.001) was found in the reduction of wake after sleep onset and latency to persistent sleep from baseline to days 1 and 2 with daridorexant. These reductions were sustained through to days 28 and 29 (p = 0.050 and p = 0.042, respectively). Similar dose-dependent relationships were observed for subjective wake after sleep onset and subjective latency to sleep onset. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 35%, 38%, 38%, and 34% in subjects treated with 5, 10, 25, and 50mg daridorexant, respectively, compared with 30% for placebo, and 40% for 10mg zolpidem. There were no clinically relevant treatment-related serious adverse events. Four subjects withdrew due to adverse events. INTERPRETATION: Daridorexant induced a dose-dependent reduction in wake time after sleep onset in subjects with insomnia disorder (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02839200). Ann Neurol 2020;87:347-356.

Efavirenz modulation of sleep spindles and sleep spectral profile.

Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are important antiretroviral agents for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus. Some non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, in particular efavirenz, have prominent effects on sleep, cognition and psychiatric variables that limit their tolerability. To avoid confounds due to drug-drug and drug-disease interactions, we assessed the effects of efavirenz in healthy volunteers on sleep, cognition and psychological endpoints during the first week of treatment. Forty healthy male subjects were randomized to receive placebo or efavirenz 600 mg nightly for 7 days after completion of a 3-day placebo run-in period. Treatment with efavirenz was associated with reduced time to sleep onset in the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test, an increase in non-rapid eye movement sleep, a large exposure-related decrease in sigma band spectral density and sleep spindle density during non-rapid eye movement sleep, and reduced performance on an attention switching task. Because efavirenz has been shown to have serotonin 2A receptor partial-agonist properties, we reasoned that antagonism of serotonin 2A receptor signalling in the thalamic reticular nucleus, which generates sleep spindles and promotes attention, may be responsible. Consistent with predictions, treatment of healthy volunteers with a single dose of a serotonin 2A receptor antagonist was found to significantly suppress sigma band spectral density in an exposure-related manner and modulated the overall spectral profile in a manner highly similar to that observed with efavirenz, consistent with the notion that efavirenz exhibits serotonin 2A receptor partial-agonist pharmacology in humans.

Safety and efficacy of daridorexant in patients with insomnia disorder: results from two multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials.

BACKGROUND: Daytime functioning is impaired in people with insomnia disorder. Currently available dual orexin receptor antagonists have shown efficacy in insomnia disorder, but do not address all aspects of this disease. We aimed to assess safety and efficacy of daridorexant, a novel orexin receptor antagonist, on night-time and daytime symptoms of insomnia. METHODS: We did two multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials at 156 sites in 17 countries. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with insomnia disorder were randomly assigned using interactive response technology (1:1:1) to receive daridorexant 50 mg, 25 mg, or placebo (study 1) or daridorexant 25 mg, 10 mg, or placebo (study 2) every evening for 3 months. Participants, investigators, and site personnel were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoints were change from baseline in wake time after sleep onset (WASO) and latency to persistent sleep (LPS), measured by polysomnography, at months 1 and 3. The secondary endpoints were change from baseline in self-reported total sleep time and the sleepiness domain score of the Insomnia Daytime Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire (IDSIQ) at months 1 and 3. Study-wise type I error rate (5%) was controlled for all pairwise comparisons. Efficacy was analysed in all randomly assigned participants, and safety in all participants who received at least one dose of treatment. The studies are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03545191 (study 1) and NCT03575104 (study 2). FINDINGS: Between June 4, 2018 and Feb 25, 2020, 930 participants were randomly assigned to receive daridorexant 50 mg (n=310), daridorexant 25 mg (n=310), or placebo (n=310) in study 1. Between May 29, 2018, and May 14, 2020, 924 participants were randomly assigned to receive daridorexant 25 mg (n=309), daridorexant 10 mg (n=307), or placebo (n=308) in study 2. In study 1, WASO and LPS were significantly reduced among participants in the daridorexant 50 mg group compared with participants in the placebo group at month 1 (least squares mean [LSM] difference -22·8 min [95% CI -28·0 to -17·6], p<0·0001 for WASO; -11·4 min [-16·0 to -6·7], p<0·0001 for LPS) and month 3 (-18·3 min [-23·9 to -12·7], p<0·0001 for WASO; -11·7 min [-16·3 to -7·0], p<0·0001 for LPS). WASO and LPS were significantly reduced among participants in the daridorexant 25 mg group compared with the placebo group at month 1 (LSM difference -12·2 min [-17·4 to -7·0], p<0·0001 for WASO; -8·3 min [-13·0 to -3·6], p=0·0005 for LPS) and month 3 (-11·9 min [-17·5 to -6·2], p<0·0001 for WASO; -7·6 min [-12·3 to -2·9], p=0·0015 for LPS). Compared with placebo, participants in the daridorexant 50 mg group had significantly improved self-reported total sleep time at month 1 (LSM difference 22·1 min [14·4 to 29·7], p<0·0001) and month 3 (19·8 min [10·6 to 28·9], p<0·0001), and IDSIQ sleepiness domain scores at month 1 (-1·8 [-2·5 to -1·0], p<0·0001) and month 3 (-1·9 [-2·9 to -0·9], p=0·0002). Compared with the placebo group, participants in the daridorexant 25 mg group had significantly improved self-reported total sleep time at month 1 (LSM difference 12·6 min [5·0 to 20·3], p=0·0013) and month 3 (9·9 min [0·8 to 19·1], p=0·033), but not IDSIQ sleepiness domain scores (-0·8 [-1·5 to 0·01], p=0·055 at month 1; -1·0 [-2·0 to 0·01], p=0·053 at month 3). In study 2, WASO was significantly reduced among participants in the daridorexant 25 mg group compared with participants in the placebo group at month 1 (LSM difference -11·6 min [-17·6 to -5·6], p=0·0001) and month 3 (-10·3 min [-17·0 to -3·5], p=0·0028), whereas no significant differences in LPS were observed at month 1 (-6·5 min [-12·3 to -0·6], p=0·030) or month 3 (-9·0 [-15·3 to -2·7], p=0·0053). Compared with the placebo group, participants in the daridorexant 25 mg group had significant improvement in self-reported total sleep time at month 1 (LSM difference 16·1 min [8·2 to 24·0], p<0·0001) and month 3 (19·1 [10·1 to 28·0], p<0·0001), but not in IDSIQ sleepiness domain scores (-0·8 [-1·6 to 0·1], p=0·073 at month 1; -1·3 [-2·2 to -0·3], p=0·012 at month 3). Compared with the placebo group, no significant differences were observed among participants in the daridorexant 10 mg group for WASO (LSM difference -2·7 min [-8·7 to 3·2], p=0·37 at month 1; -2·0 [-8·7 to 4·8], p=0·57 at month 3), LPS (-2·6 min [-8·4 to 3·2], p=0·38 at month 1; -3·2 min [-9·5 to 3·1], p=0·32 at month 3), self-reported total sleep time (13·4 min [5·5 to 21·2], p=0·0009 at month 1; 13·6 min [4·7 to 22·5], p=0·0028 at month 3), nor IDSIQ sleepiness domain scores (-0·4 [-1·3 to 0·4], p=0·30 at month 1; -0·7 [-1·7 to 0·2], p=0·14 at month 3). Overall incidence of adverse events was comparable between treatment groups (116 [38%] of 308 participants in the daridorexant 50 mg group, 117 [38%] of 310 in the daridorexant 25 mg group, and 105 [34%] of 309 in the placebo group in study 1; 121 [39%] of 308 participants in the daridorexant 25 mg group, 117 [38%] of 306 in the daridorexant 10 mg group, and 100 [33%] of 306 in the placebo group). Nasopharyngitis and headache were the most common adverse events in all groups. One death (cardiac arrest) occurred in the daridorexant 25 mg group in study 1, which was not deemed to be treatment-related. INTERPRETATION: Daridorexant 25 mg and 50 mg improved sleep outcomes, and daridorexant 50 mg also improved daytime functioning, in people with insomnia disorder, with a favourable safety profile. FUNDING: Idorsia Pharmaceuticals.

Efficacy and Safety of Daridorexant in Older and Younger Adults with Insomnia Disorder: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomised Placebo-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The dual orexin receptor antagonist daridorexant, studied in two phase III trials, dose-dependently improved objective and subjective sleep variables and daytime functioning in adults with insomnia. Because treatment of insomnia in older adults is challenging and has limited options, the purpose of the current analysis was to further analyse the phase III trial studying the higher doses of daridorexant, those that showed efficacy (daridorexant 50 mg, daridorexant 25 mg and placebo, nightly for 3 months), and compare the safety and efficacy of daridorexant in patients aged ≥ 65 ('older adults') to those aged < 65 years ('younger adults'). METHODS: Analyses by age (≥ 65 years, n = 364; < 65 years, n = 566) were performed on data from the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled Trial 1 in adult patients with insomnia (NCT03545191). Efficacy endpoints included a change from baseline at month 1 and month 3 in polysomnography-measured wake after sleep onset (WASO) and latency to persistent sleep (LPS), self-reported total sleep time (sTST) and daytime functioning assessed using the validated Insomnia Daytime Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire (IDSIQ). Safety endpoints included adverse events and the Visual Analog Scale for morning sleepiness. RESULTS: At baseline, mean [standard deviation] WASO was numerically greater (110 [39] vs 92 [38] min) in older than younger adults, while LPS was comparable (~ 65 min). Mean baseline IDSIQ total and all domain scores were numerically lower (i.e. better) in older adults. Daridorexant caused similar reductions in WASO and LPS, and similar increases in sTST, from baseline, in both age groups; improvements were numerically greater with daridorexant 50 mg than 25 mg. At month 3, daridorexant 50 mg, compared with placebo, decreased WASO by a least-squares mean of 19.6 (95% confidence interval 9.7, 29.5) in older patients versus 17.4 min (10.7, 24.0) in younger patients and decreased LPS by a least-squares mean of 14.9 (7.5, 22.3) in older patients versus 9.7 min (3.7, 15.7) in younger patients. Daridorexant 50 mg increased sTST from baseline to month 3 by a least-squares mean of 59.9 (49.6, 70.3) in older patients versus 57.1 min (48.9, 65.3) in younger patients. Daridorexant 50 mg progressively improved IDSIQ total and domain scores from week 1 onwards similarly in both groups; daridorexant 25 mg improved IDSIQ scores, but only in younger adults. In both age groups, in comparison with placebo, the overall incidence of adverse events was comparable, and there were fewer falls on daridorexant. Daridorexant improved Visual Analog Scale morning sleepiness in both groups; daridorexant 50 mg increased the mean (standard deviation) Visual Analog Scale morning sleepiness score by 15.9 (20.7) in older adults and by 14.9 (18.7) in younger adults from baseline to month 3. In older adults, there was one case of sleep paralysis, and no cases of narcolepsy, cataplexy, or complex sleep behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: In older patients with insomnia, as in younger patients, the efficacy of daridorexant is maximal on night-time and daytime variables at the higher dose of 50 mg. Older patients particularly require this dose to improve daytime functioning. Older patients are not at an increased risk of adverse events or residual effects the next morning after night-time administration of daridorexant, even at 50 mg. The dose of daridorexant does not need to be decreased for older patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03545191) [first posted: 4 June, 4 2018], https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03545191 .

The burden of chronic insomnia (difficulty in falling/staying asleep or not getting enough sleep) increases with age yet treatment options in older patients are limited. In older patients, because of a risk of side effects, guidelines suggest caution when prescribing sleep medications and, for some drugs, recommend starting at a lower dose. Daridorexant was approved in 2022 for the treatment of insomnia in adults following positive results in two trials that showed daridorexant significantly improved night-time sleep and daytime functioning over 3 months of treatment in adults with insomnia. Approximately 40% of patients taking part in these trials were aged 65 years or older. This current analysis compared the safety and benefits of daridorexant in older adults (aged at least 65 years) and younger adults (aged less than 65 years) in the trial that administered the highest two doses of daridorexant, 25 and 50 mg. The results showed that the benefits of daridorexant were comparable in both age groups over 3 months; compared with placebo, daridorexant improved night-time sleep (reduced time awake during the night, reduced time to fall asleep and increased total sleep time) and daytime functioning­patients had less daytime sleepiness and a better mood and feeling of alertness. In older patients, the benefits, particularly for daytime functioning, were greatest at the higher 50-mg dose, without any increase in side effects. Both doses of daridorexant were equally well tolerated in the two age groups, indicating that treatment with daridorexant at 50 mg can be safely started in older patients.

Assessment of morning sleep propensity with lemborexant in adults with insomnia disorder in a randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study.

Objective: To evaluate effects of lemborexant (LEM), a dual orexin receptor antagonist, on next-morning sleep propensity assessed by a modified Multiple Sleep Latency Test (M-MSLT) in adults with insomnia disorder. Methods: Study 107 (E2006-A001-107) was a phase 1, randomized, double-blind, four-period crossover study. Subjects (n = 69) received oral single-dose placebo, LEM 5 mg (LEM5), and LEM 10 mg (LEM10) at bedtime in periods 1-3 in a randomized crossover and open-label flurazepam 30 mg in period 4. After an 8-hour overnight sleep opportunity, the M-MSLT measured average sleep onset latency (SOL). Mean change from baseline in average SOL versus placebo of -6.0 min or more was considered clinically meaningful. Other sleep propensity assessments included the proportion of subjects with average SOL >6 min shorter than placebo. LEM plasma concentrations, safety, and tolerability were also assessed. Results: M-MSLT assay sensitivity was confirmed by a clinically meaningful decrease in average SOL with flurazepam versus placebo (least squares mean [LSM] difference -6.06 min; 1-sided p < 0.0001). In contrast, decreases in average SOL with LEM5 (LSM difference vs. placebo -1.15 min; 1-sided p = 0.0262) and LEM10 (-3.48 min; p < 0.0001) did not meet the predefined threshold for a clinically meaningful effect (LEM5, -2.12; LEM10, -4.46). Some individuals did experience higher sleep propensity (average SOL >6.0 min shorter than placebo), particularly with LEM10 (LEM10, 29.4%; LEM5, 13.2%). Conclusions: In contrast to flurazepam, LEM5 and LEM10 did not show clinically meaningful mean increases in next-morning sleep propensity versus placebo. The possibility that some subjects may experience residual morning effects cannot be excluded. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02350309.

Comparison of the effect of lemborexant with placebo and zolpidem tartrate extended release on sleep architecture in older adults with insomnia disorder.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Changes to sleep architecture that occur as a result of the normal aging process may also exacerbate insomnia in older individuals. Therefore, this study assessed the impact of lemborexant compared with placebo and zolpidem tartrate extended release on objective sleep architecture parameters, as measured by polysomnography, in older adults (ages ≥ 55 years) with insomnia disorder from a phase 3 study. METHODS: Study E2006-G000-304 (SUNRISE 1; NCT02783729) was a global, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, active comparator (zolpidem)-controlled, parallel-group study comparing 2 dose levels of lemborexant (5 mg and 10 mg). Sleep architecture was measured using polysomnography. Assessments were collected at baseline during a single-blind placebo run-in and during the first 2 nights and last 2 nights of treatment. Mean values for each sleep stage were based on the 2 consecutive polysomnograms. RESULTS: Treatment with lemborexant resulted in significantly greater increases from baseline in total sleep time compared with both placebo and zolpidem. Significant increases from baseline in rapid eye movement sleep and significant decreases from baseline in latency to rapid eye movement sleep were also observed with lemborexant compared with placebo and zolpidem. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that treatment with lemborexant may address some of the alterations in sleep architecture normally observed in older individuals with insomnia. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Lemborexant in Subjects 55 Years and Older With Insomnia Disorder (SUNRISE 1); URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02783729; Identifier: NCT02783729.

Nonrestorative sleep as a distinct component of insomnia.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Explore characteristics of nonrestorative sleep (NRS) in prospectively defined subgroups of individuals with NRS symptoms, investigate whether NRS can occur independently of difficulties initiating and maintaining sleep (DIS/DMS), and determine its effect on waking function. DESIGN: Cross-sectional and longitudinal population-based study comparing patterns of daytime symptoms, and their persistence, in cohorts of subjects with NRS symptoms grouped according to presence or absence of DIS and DMS. SETTING: 28 sleep centers in the US. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects reporting awakening unrestored or unrefreshed at least 3 times weekly over the previous 3 months were classified, based on self-reported sleep problems, to DIS (n = 138), DMS (n = 44), DIS+DMS (n = 125), and NRS-only (no DIS or DMS; n = 192) cohorts. Eighty healthy volunteers formed a control group. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Polysomnography confirmed DIS and/or DMS in 56/138 (41%), 18/44 (41%), and 37/125 (30%) subjects in DIS, DMS, and DIS+DMS cohorts, respectively; and absence of DIS or DMS in 115/192 (60%) NRS-only subjects and 52/80 (65%) healthy volunteers. Multiple subject-reported endpoints including the Endicott Work Productivity Scale, Pittsburgh Insomnia Rating Scale, Restorative Sleep Questionnaire, and SF-36, showed that NRS-only subjects had significantly impaired daytime function relative to healthy volunteers, comparable to impairment affecting subjects with DIS and/or DMS. Symptoms persisted over 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that NRS can occur independently of other components of insomnia. Daytime symptoms were as severe in individuals with NRS-only as those whose NRS symptoms were combined with DIS or DMS.

Comparison of Lemborexant With Placebo and Zolpidem Tartrate Extended Release for the Treatment of Older Adults With Insomnia Disorder: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Insomnia disorder is prevalent and associated with health risks in older adults; however, efficacy and safety issues with existing treatments create significant unmet needs in this patient population. Objective: To compare treatment with the orexin receptor antagonist lemborexant with placebo and zolpidem tartrate extended release in participants with insomnia disorder. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Lemborexant in Subjects 55 Years and Older With Insomnia Disorder (SUNRISE 1) clinical trial was a global randomized double-blind parallel-group placebo-controlled active-comparator phase 3 study conducted at 67 sites in North America and Europe from May 31, 2016, to January 30, 2018. Data analyses were conducted from January 31, 2018, to September 10, 2018. Participants were 55 years and older with insomnia disorder characterized by reported sleep maintenance difficulties and confirmed by sleep history, sleep diary, and polysomnography. Participants could have also had sleep onset difficulties. Interventions: Participants received placebo, zolpidem tartrate extended release (6.25 mg), or lemborexant (5 mg or 10 mg) for 1 month at bedtime. Main Outcomes and Measures: Paired polysomnograms were collected at baseline, the first 2 nights, and the last 2 nights of treatment. The primary end point was the change from baseline in latency to persistent sleep for lemborexant therapy vs placebo. Key secondary end points were changes from baseline in sleep efficiency and wake-after-sleep onset compared with placebo, and wake-after-sleep onset in the second half of the night compared with zolpidem therapy. Results: Among 1006 participants randomized (placebo, n = 208; zolpidem, n = 263; lemborexant 5 mg, n = 266; and lemborexant 10 mg, n = 269), 869 (86.4%) were women and the median age was 63 years (range, 55-88 years). Both doses of lemborexant therapy demonstrated statistically significant greater changes from baseline on objective sleep onset as assessed by latency to persistent sleep (log transformed) that was measured using polysomnography at the end of 1 month of treatment (nights 29 and 30) compared with placebo (primary end point for least squares geometric means treatment ratio vs placebo: for lemborexant 5 mg, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.67-0.89; P < .001; for lemborexant 10 mg, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.63-0.83; P < .001). For nights 29 and 30, as measured using polysomnography, the mean change from baseline in sleep efficiency (LSM treatment difference vs placebo for lemborexant 5 mg, 7.1%; 95% CI, 5.6%-8.5%; P < .001 and for lemborexant 10 mg, 8.0%; 95% CI, 6.6%-9.5%; P < .001) and wake-after-sleep onset (least squares mean treatment ratio vs placebo for lemborexant 5 mg, -24.0 min; 95% CI, -30.0 to -18.0 min; P < .001 and for lemborexant 10 mg, -25.4 min; 95% CI, -31.4 to -19.3 min; P < .001) were significantly greater for both doses of lemborexant therapy compared with placebo. Also, for nights 29 and 30, wake-after-sleep onset in the second half of the night (least squares mean treatment difference vs zolpidem for lemborexant 5 mg, -6.7 min; 95% CI, -11.2 to -2.2 min; P = .004 and for lemborexant 10 mg, -8.0 min; 95% CI, -12.5 to -3.5 min; P < .001) was significantly greater for both doses of lemborexant therapy compared with zolpidem therapy measured using polysomnography. Six participants (4 in the zolpidem group and 2 in the lemborexant 5 mg group) reported serious adverse events; none were treatment-related. Other adverse events were mostly mild or moderate in severity. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, lemborexant therapy significantly improved both sleep onset and sleep maintenance, including in the second half of the night, compared with both placebo and zolpidem measured objectively using polysomnography. Lemborexant therapy was well tolerated. Trial Registrations: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02783729; EudraCT identifier: 2015-001463-39.

Efficacy of the selective extrasynaptic GABA A agonist, gaboxadol, in a model of transient insomnia: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: The hypnotic efficacy of gaboxadol, a selective extrasynaptic GABA A agonist (SEGA), was evaluated in a phase-advance model of transient insomnia. METHODS: Healthy subjects (18-64 years) completed a randomized, double-blind, parallel group study in which the sleep period was advanced 4h from habitual sleep time. Polysomnographic (PSG) and self-reported sleep measures were used to compare gaboxadol 10mg (N =271) and 15 mg (N =274) versus placebo (N =277). RESULTS: In the placebo group, the phase-advance procedure disrupted sleep maintenance as measured by PSG wakefulness after sleep onset (WASO) and self-reported WASO (sWASO), and also, to a lesser extent, disrupted sleep onset as measured by PSG latency to persistent sleep (LPS) and self-reported time to sleep onset (sTSO). Both doses of gaboxadol decreased WASO and sWASO versus placebo (p

Daytime pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic evaluation of low-dose sublingual transmucosal zolpidem hemitartrate.

OBJECTIVES: Buffered low-dose sublingual transmucosal zolpidem lozenge hemitartrate (ST zolpidem) is being developed for the treatment of middle-of-the-night insomnia. The objective of this double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over study (n = 24) was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and daytime-sedative profile of 1.0, 1.75, and 3.5 mg dose of the formulation. METHODS: Daytime sedation was measured pre-dose and up to 5 h post-dose objectively by the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) and subjectively using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Blood samples for PK assessment was collected pre-dose and up to 12 h post-dose. RESULTS: The 1.75 and 3.5 mg, but not the 1 mg, ST zolpidem produced significant sedation versus placebo within 20 min of dosing which lasted for up to 3 h. Zolpidem from the formulation was rapidly absorbed and reached maximum plasma concentrations within 38 min of dosing, however the half-life was independent of the dose and side effects were consistent with the known pharmacology of the drug. CONCLUSIONS: ST zolpidem produced rapid, short duration of sedation and the effect was consistent with its PK profile. This novel low-dose formulation of zolpidem may provide clinicians and patients with a prn option for the management of sleep maintenance insomnia.

A novel forehead temperature-regulating device for insomnia: a randomized clinical trial.

Study Objectives: Insomnia is one of the most common disorders in the general population. Hypnotic medications are efficacious, but their use is limited by adverse events (AEs). This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a novel forehead temperature-regulating device that delivers frontal cerebral thermal therapy (maintained at 14-16°C, equivalent to 57-61°F) for the treatment of insomnia. Methods: This was a prospective, randomized controlled trial involving two nights of therapy in 106 adults diagnosed with insomnia. The main outcome measures included latency to persistent sleep and sleep efficiency derived from polysomnographic (PSG) recordings and frequency and severity of AEs. Results: The safety profile was comparable to sham treatment. Statistically significant differences were not found in the two a priori co-primary endpoint measures absolute latency to persistent sleep (p = 0.092) or absolute sleep efficiency. Frontal cerebral thermal therapy produced improvements over sham in other convergent measures of sleep latency including relative changes from baseline in latency to persistent sleep (p = 0.013), the latency to stage 1 NREM sleep (p = 0.006), the latency to stage 2 NREM sleep (p = 0.002), a trend for the latency to stage 3 NREM sleep (p = 0.055), and an increase in the minutes of sleep during the first hour of the night (p = 0.024). Conclusions: Two-night frontal cerebral thermal therapy produced improvements in PSG measures of insomnia patients' ability to fall asleep and had a benign safety profile. Further studies are warranted to determine the role of this therapy in the longer-term management of insomnia. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01966211.

Lemborexant, A Dual Orexin Receptor Antagonist (DORA) for the Treatment of Insomnia Disorder: Results From a Bayesian, Adaptive, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To identify dose(s) of lemborexant that maximize insomnia treatment efficacy while minimizing next-morning residual sleepiness and evaluate lemborexant effects on polysomnography (PSG) measures (sleep efficiency [SE], latency to persistent sleep [LPS], and wake after sleep onset [WASO]) at the beginning and end of treatment. METHODS: Adults and elderly subjects with insomnia disorder per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition were enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Bayesian, adaptive, parallel-group study, receiving lemborexant (1, 2.5, 5, 10, 15, 25 mg) or placebo for 15 nights. Efficacy assessments included a utility function that combined efficacy (SE) and safety (residual morning sleepiness as measured by Karolinska Sleepiness Scale [KSS]), PSG measures, and sleep diary. Safety assessments included KSS, Digit Symbol Substitution Test, computerized reaction time tests, and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: A total of 616 subjects were screened; 291 were randomized. Baseline characteristics were similar between lemborexant groups and placebo (∼63% female, median age: 49.0 years). The study was stopped for early success after the fifth interim analysis when the 15-mg dose met utility index/KSS criteria for success; 3 other doses also met the criteria. Compared with placebo, subjects showed significant improvements in SE, subjective SE, LPS, and subjective sleep onset latency at the beginning and end of treatment for lemborexant doses ≥ 5 mg (P < .05). WASO and subjective WASO showed numerically greater improvements for doses > 1 mg. AEs, mostly mild to moderate, included dose-related somnolence. CONCLUSIONS: Lemborexant doses ranging from 2.5-10 mg provided efficacy for the treatment of insomnia while minimizing next-morning residual sleepiness. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Bayesian Adaptive Randomization Design, Dose Response Study of the Efficacy of E2006 in Adults and Elderly Subjects With Chronic Insomnia; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01995838; Identifier: NCT01995838.

Pharmacodynamic effects of suvorexant and zolpidem on EEG during sleep in healthy subjects.

The objective of this study was to evaluate sleep electrophysiology in healthy subjects after bedtime administration of therapeutic doses of two insomnia treatments - the orexin receptor antagonist suvorexant or the GABAergic agonist zolpidem. Eighteen healthy men received single bedtime doses of suvorexant 20mg, zolpidem 10mg, or placebo in a double-blinded, randomized, balanced 3-period crossover study. EEG power spectral densities during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep were recorded in a polysomnography (PSG) laboratory using a 19-lead EEG recording array. Spectral density was analyzed for each lead for frequencies between 1-32Hz. During NREM and REM sleep, zolpidem treatment reduced spectral density across theta and alpha frequency bands in all leads. In contrast, suvorexant had no significant effects on spectral density in any frequency band during NREM sleep, and modestly increased spectral density in the theta frequency band during REM sleep. Although the study was not designed to detect effects on PSG sleep endpoints in healthy subjects, both suvorexant and zolpidem increased mean total sleep time and sleep efficiency. Zolpidem reduced latency to persistent sleep whereas suvorexant did not. Suvorexant decreased wake after sleep onset, whereas zolpidem did not. These findings suggest that EEG power spectral density profile after administration of suvorexant in healthy subjects more closely approximates placebo sleep physiology than after zolpidem treatment.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of CEP-26401, a high-affinity histamine-3 receptor antagonist, following single and multiple dosing in healthy subjects.

CEP-26401 is a novel orally active, brain-penetrant, high-affinity histamine H3 receptor (H3R) antagonist, with potential therapeutic utility in cognition enhancement. Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose escalation studies with single (0.02 to 5 mg) or multiple administration (0.02 to 0.5 mg once daily) of CEP-26401 were conducted in healthy subjects. Plasma and urine samples were collected to investigate CEP-26401 pharmacokinetics. Pharmacodynamic endpoints included a subset of tasks from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) and nocturnal polysomnography. Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling was conducted on one CANTAB and one polysomnography parameter of interest. CEP-26401 was slowly absorbed (median tmax range 3-6 hours) and the mean terminal elimination half-life ranged from 24-60 hours. Steady-state plasma concentrations were achieved within six days of dosing. CEP-26401 exhibits dose- and time-independent pharmacokinetics, and renal excretion is a major elimination pathway. CEP-26401 had a dose-dependent negative effect on sleep, with some positive effects on certain CANTAB cognitive parameters seen at lower concentrations. The derived three compartment population pharmacokinetic model, with first-order absorption and elimination, accurately described the available pharmacokinetic data. CEP-26401 was generally well tolerated up to 0.5 mg/day with most common treatment related adverse events being headache and insomnia. Further clinical studies are required to establish the potential of low-dose CEP-26401 in cognition enhancement.

The efficacy and safety of the melatonin agonist beta-methyl-6-chloromelatonin in primary insomnia: a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: While melatonin agonists are known to regulate circadian sleep rhythms, it is not clear whether melatonin agonists have a direct soporific effect. It has been suggested that melatonin's soporific effect is secondary to its ability to induce hypothermia. beta-Methyl-6-chloromelatonin is a high-affinity melatonin receptor agonist that is not associated with hypothermia. The purpose of the present study was to determine if the melatonin agonist beta-methyl-6-chloromelatonin has a direct soporific effect in subjects with primary insomnia. METHOD: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover safety and efficacy study of 20 mg, 50 mg, and 100 mg of beta-methyl-6-chloromelatonin and placebo was conducted in subjects with DSM-IV-TR primary insomnia. Of 84 subjects screened, 40 progressed to randomly receive each of 3 beta-methyl-6-chloromelatonin doses or placebo on each of 2 consecutive nights with 5-day washout periods between treatments. The effect of treatment on both polysomnographic and subjectively measured sleep parameters, next-morning psychomotor performance, and safety measures was determined. The primary outcome measure was latency to persistent sleep measured by polysomnography. RESULTS: A significant effect of beta-methyl-6-chloromelatonin on the primary efficacy variable, latency to persistent sleep, was observed (p = .0003). The 20-mg dose resulted in a significant 31% improvement in sleep latency compared with placebo, while significant 32% and 41% improvements were observed at the 50-mg and 100-mg doses, respectively (20 mg, p = .0082; 50 mg, p = .0062; 100 mg, p < .0001). Similarly, a significant effect of beta-methyl-6-chloromelatonin on subjective measures of time to fall asleep occurred (p = .0050), with significant improvement observed at both the 50-mg and 100-mg doses (p = .0350 and .0198, respectively) and a trend toward improvement observed at the 20-mg dose (p = .0582). Adverse events were mild to moderate in severity and did not differ in frequency between beta-methyl-6-chloromelatonin and placebo treatments. CONCLUSION: beta-Methyl-6-chloromelatonin significantly decreases both objective and subjective measures of sleep latency in subjects with primary insomnia. Thus, these data suggest that mel-atonin agonists may exert a direct soporific effect, as previous research indicates that beta-methyl-6-chloromelatonin is not associated with changes in body temperature, heart rate, or blood pressure.

A randomized, double-blind, single-dose, placebo-controlled, multicenter, polysomnographic study of gabapentin in transient insomnia induced by sleep phase advance.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of single doses of gabapentin 250 and 500 mg on polysomnographic (PSG) and participant-reported sleep measures in a 5-h phase advance insomnia model. METHODS: Adults reporting occasional disturbed sleep received gabapentin 500 mg (n = 125), 250 mg (n = 125), or placebo (n = 127) 30 min prior to bedtime and were in bed from 17:00 to 01:00, ∼5 h before their habitual bedtime. Sleep was assessed by PSG, post-sleep questionnaire, and the Karolinska Sleep Diary (KSD). Next-day residual effects (Digit Symbol Substitution Test [DSST] and Stanford Sleepiness Scale [SSS]) and tolerability were assessed. RESULTS: Demographics were comparable among groups. Among PSG endpoints, wake after sleep onset (primary endpoint) (135.7 [placebo], 100.7 [250 mg], and 73.2 [500 mg] min) was significantly lower and total sleep time (TST) (311.4, 356.5, and 378.7 min) significantly greater in both gabapentin groups versus placebo. Latency to persistent sleep was not significantly different among groups. Percent slow wave sleep (12.6%, 15.4%, and 17.0%, respectively) was significantly greater and percent stage 1 (15.1%, 11.8%, and 10.8%, respectively) significantly lower relative to placebo. Gabapentin was associated with significantly higher values of KSD Sleep Quality Index and reported TST versus placebo; no other reported outcomes were significant. Neither gabapentin dose produced evidence of next-day residual effects as measured by DSST and SSS. Adverse events were infrequent (< 5%). CONCLUSION: Participants with occasional disturbed sleep treated with gabapentin showed significantly longer sleep duration and greater depth (versus placebo) in response to a phase advance manipulation known to disrupt sleep maintenance.

Efficacy and safety of doxepin 1 mg, 3 mg, and 6 mg in elderly patients with primary insomnia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate efficacy and safety of the histamine-H1 antagonist doxepin at doses of 1 mg, 3 mg, and 6 mg in elderly adults with primary insomnia. DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design was used in this population of elderly adults with primary insomnia (DSM-IV). Each treatment period consisted of 2 polysomnographic (PSG) assessment nights with a 5- or 12-day drug-free interval between periods. The study was conducted from September 2004 to January 2005. SETTING: Sleep laboratories in 11 sleep centers in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Elderly adults with primary insomnia. INTERVENTION: Doxepin 1 mg, 3 mg, and 6 mg. MEASUREMENTS: Efficacy was assessed using PSG and patient-reported measures. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were randomly assigned. All 3 doxepin doses produced dose-related significant improvements in PSG-determined wake time during sleep (p < .0001), wake time after sleep onset (p < .0001), total sleep time (p < .0001), and overall sleep efficiency (p < .0001) versus placebo. At the 3-mg and 6-mg doses, sleep efficiency was significantly improved during all thirds of the night (p < .05). There was a dose-related decrease in patient-reported sleep latency, with the 6-mg dose achieving statistical significance in latency to sleep onset (p = .0181). The pattern of the remaining subjective efficacy results was consistent with PSG. All 3 doxepin doses had side effect profiles comparable to placebo, with no spontaneously reported anticholinergic effects, no memory impairment, and no significant next-day residual effects. CONCLUSIONS: In this 2-night study of elderly adults with primary insomnia, doxepin doses of 1 mg, 3 mg, and 6 mg were well tolerated and produced significant improvement in objective and subjective sleep maintenance and duration endpoints that persisted into the final hour of the night. Positive effects on patient-reported sleep onset were observed at the highest dose. All 3 doxepin doses had a safety profile comparable to placebo. These data demonstrate that doxepin was efficacious in improving sleep in elderly adults.

Evaluation of an ambulatory system for the quantification of cough frequency in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: To date, methods used to assess cough have been primarily subjective, and only broadly reflect the impact of chronic cough and/or chronic cough therapies on quality of life. Objective assessment of cough has been attempted, but early techniques were neither ambulatory nor feasible for long-term data collection. We evaluated a novel ambulatory cardio-respiratory monitoring system with an integrated unidirectional, contact microphone, and report here the results from a study of patients with COPD who were videotaped in a quasi-controlled environment for 24 continuous hours while wearing the ambulatory system. METHODS: Eight patients with a documented history of COPD with ten or more years of smoking (6 women; age 57.4 +/- 11.8 yrs.; percent predicted FEV1 49.6 +/- 13.7%) who complained of cough were evaluated in a clinical research unit equipped with video and sound recording capabilities. All patients wore the LifeShirt system (LS) while undergoing simultaneous video (with sound) surveillance. Video data were visually inspected and annotated to indicate all cough events. Raw physiologic data records were visually inspected by technicians who remained blinded to the video data. Cough events from LS were analyzed quantitatively with a specialized software algorithm to identify cough. The output of the software algorithm was compared to video records on a per event basis in order to determine the validity of the LS system to detect cough in COPD patients. RESULTS: Video surveillance identified a total of 3,645 coughs, while LS identified 3,363 coughs during the same period. The median cough rate per patient was 21.3 coughs.hr-1 (Range: 10.1 cghs.hr(-1) - 59.9 cghs.hr(-1)). The overall accuracy of the LS system was 99.0%. Overall sensitivity and specificity of LS, when compared to video surveillance, were 0.781 and 0.996, respectively, while positive- and negative-predictive values were 0.846 and 0.994. There was very good agreement between the LS system and video (kappa = 0.807). CONCLUSION: The LS system demonstrated a high level of accuracy and agreement when compared to video surveillance for the measurement of cough in patients with COPD.