Factors Affecting Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Placement During Pediatric Trauma Resuscitation.

INTRODUCTION: Intravenous access is required for resuscitation of injured patients but may be delayed in children because of challenges associated with peripheral intravenous (PIV) catheter placement. Early identification of factors predisposing patients to difficult PIV placement can assist in deciding strategies for timely intravenous access. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, video-based review of injured children and adolescents treated between April 2018 and May 2019. Patient demographic, physiological, injury, and resuscitation characteristics were obtained from the patient record, including age, race, weight, injury type, Injury Severity Score, initial systolic blood pressure, initial Glasgow Coma Score, intubation status, activation level, and presence of prearrival notification. Video review was used to determine the time to PIV placement, the number of attempts required, the purpose for additional access, and the reason for abandonment of PIV placement. Multivariable regressions were used to determine factors associated with successful placement. RESULTS: During the study period, 154 consented patients underwent attempts at PIV placement in the trauma bay. Placement was successful in 139 (90.3%) patients. Older patients (OR [odds ratio]: 0.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.9, 0.9) and patients who required the highest level activation response (OR: 0.0, 95% CI: 0.0, 0.3) were less likely to have an attempt at PIV placement abandoned. Children with nonblunt injuries (OR: 11.6, 95% CI: 1.3, 119.2) and pre-existing access (OR: 39.6, 95% CI: 7.0, 350.6) were more likely to have an attempt at PIV placement abandoned. Among patients with successful PIV placement, the time required for establishing PIV access was faster as age increased (-0.5 s, 95% CI: -1.1, -0.0). CONCLUSIONS: Younger age was associated with abandonment of PIV attempts and, when successful, increased time to placement. Strategies to improve successful PIV placement and alternate routes of access should be considered early to prevent treatment delays in younger children.

Personal Protective Equipment Adherence of Pediatric Resuscitation Team Members During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, health care workers have had the highest risk of infection among essential workers. Although personal protective equipment (PPE) use is associated with lower infection rates, appropriate use of PPE has been variable among health care workers, even in settings with COVID-19 patients. We aimed to evaluate the patterns of PPE adherence during emergency department resuscitations that included aerosol-generating procedures. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, video-based review of pediatric resuscitations involving one or more aerosol-generating procedures during the first 3 months of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States (March to June 2020). Recommended adherence (complete, inadequate, absent) with 5 PPE items (headwear, eyewear, masks, gowns, gloves) and the duration of potential exposure were evaluated for individuals in the room after aerosol-generating procedure initiation. RESULTS: Among the 345 health care workers observed during 19 resuscitations, 306 (88.7%) were nonadherent (inadequate or absent adherence) with the recommended use of at least 1 PPE type at some time during the resuscitation, 23 (6.7%) of whom had no PPE. One hundred and forty health care workers (40.6%) altered or removed at least 1 type of PPE during the event. The aggregate time in the resuscitation room for health care workers across all events was 118.7 hours. During this time, providers had either absent or inadequate eyewear for 46.4 hours (39.1%) and absent or inadequate masks for 35.2 hours (29.7%). CONCLUSION: Full adherence with recommended PPE use was limited in a setting at increased risk for SARS-CoV-2 virus aerosolization. In addition to ensuring appropriate donning, approaches are needed for ensuring ongoing adherence with PPE recommendations during exposure.

Comparative analysis of personal protective equipment nonadherence detection: computer vision versus human observers.

OBJECTIVES: Human monitoring of personal protective equipment (PPE) adherence among healthcare providers has several limitations, including the need for additional personnel during staff shortages and decreased vigilance during prolonged tasks. To address these challenges, we developed an automated computer vision system for monitoring PPE adherence in healthcare settings. We assessed the system performance against human observers detecting nonadherence in a video surveillance experiment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The automated system was trained to detect 15 classes of eyewear, masks, gloves, and gowns using an object detector and tracker. To assess how the system performs compared to human observers in detecting nonadherence, we designed a video surveillance experiment under 2 conditions: variations in video durations (20, 40, and 60 seconds) and the number of individuals in the videos (3 versus 6). Twelve nurses participated as human observers. Performance was assessed based on the number of detections of nonadherence. RESULTS: Human observers detected fewer instances of nonadherence than the system (parameter estimate -0.3, 95% CI -0.4 to -0.2, P < .001). Human observers detected more nonadherence during longer video durations (parameter estimate 0.7, 95% CI 0.4-1.0, P < .001). The system achieved a sensitivity of 0.86, specificity of 1, and Matthew's correlation coefficient of 0.82 for detecting PPE nonadherence. DISCUSSION: An automated system simultaneously tracks multiple objects and individuals. The system performance is also independent of observation duration, an improvement over human monitoring. CONCLUSION: The automated system presents a potential solution for scalable monitoring of hospital-wide infection control practices and improving PPE usage in healthcare settings.

Factors associated with correction of personal protective equipment nonadherence in a multidisciplinary emergency department setting: A retrospective video review.

BACKGROUND: Despite local and national recommendations, health care provider adherence to personal protective equipment (PPE) varied during the COVID-19 pandemic. Previous studies have identified factors influencing initial PPE adherence but did not address factors influencing behaviors leading to correction after initial nonadherence. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective video review of 18 pediatric resuscitations involving aerosol-generating procedures from March 2020 to December 2022 to identify factors associated with nonadherence correction. We quantified adherent and nonadherent providers, instances of PPE nonadherence, and time to correction. We also analyzed correction behaviors, including provider actions and correction locations. RESULTS: Among 434 providers, 362 (83%) were nonadherent with at least 1 PPE. Only 186 of 1,832 instances of nonadherence were corrected, primarily upon room entry and during patient care. Correction time varied by PPE type and nonadherence level (incomplete vs absent). Most corrections were self-initiated, with few reminders from other providers. DISCUSSION: Potential barriers to correction include a lack of social pressure and external reminders. Solutions include optimizing PPE availability, providing real-time feedback, and educating on double gloving. CONCLUSIONS: Most providers were nonadherent to PPE requirements during high-risk infection transmission events. The low correction rate suggests challenges in promoting collective responsibility and maintaining protective behaviors during medical emergencies.

5 strategies for building a top-performing hospital.

A hospital's strategy for attaining high performance under value-based business models should focus on five key objectives: Building meaningful scale and scope; Focusing on more integrated care delivery and management; Attaining demonstrably high levels of clinical quality; Differentiating from the competition through superior customer service; Establishing a competitive cost position.

Realizing the full financial benefits of true integration.

True health system integration can produce many direct and indirect financial benefits beyond operating cost savings through functional and service centralization or consolidation. These additional benefits of a strong integration strategy include: Improved market position. Expanded continuum of care. Increased scope of services. Improved healthcare quality and organizational performance.