Bis(4-cyano-phenolato)[hydro-tris-(3,5-dimethyl-pyrazol-yl)borato]nitro-syl-molybdenum(II)-4-hydroxy-benzonitrile-dichloro-methane (1/1/1).

In the title compound, [Mo(C(15)H(22)BN(6))(C(7)H(4)NO)(2)(NO)]·C(7)H(5)NO·CH(2)Cl(2), the central Mo(II) atom adopts a distorted cis-MoO(2)N(4) octa-hedral geometry with the hydro-tris-(3,5-dimethyl-pyrazolylborate) anion attached to the metal in an N,N',N''-tridentate tripodal coordination mode. Two O-bonded 4-cyano-phenolate anions and a nitrosyl cation complete the coodination of the Mo(II) atom. Two intra-molecular C-H⋯O and one C-H⋯N hydrogen bonds help to establish the configuration of the complex mol-ecule. The crystal structure is stabilized by inter-molecular C-H⋯N and C-H⋯O hydrogen bonds.

(4-tert-Butyl-pyridine)-chlorido[hydro-tris-(3,5-dimethyl-pyrazol-1-yl)borato]nitro-sylmolybdenum(I) dichloro-methane monosolvate.

In the title compound, [Mo(C(15)H(22)BN(6))Cl(NO)(C(9)H(13)N)]·CH(2)Cl(2), the Mo(I) atom adopts a distorted MoClN(5) octa-hedral geometry with the hydro-tris-(3,5-dimethyl-pyrazol-yl)borate anion in an N,N',N''-tridentate tripodal (facial) coordination mode. A 4-tert-butyl-pyrine ligand, chloride anion and a nitrosyl cation complement the coodination of the Mo(I) atom and an intra-molecular C-H⋯Cl hydrogen bond helps to stabilize the configuration of the complex mol-ecule. The packing is stabilized by an inter-molecular C-H⋯Cl hydrogen bond involving the complex mol-ecule and the CH(2)Cl(2) solvent mol-ecule.

Solvatochromism of Mono- and Dimolybdenum Coordination Compounds of Dipyridyloctatetraene and Linear Solvation Energy Relationship Models Based on the Kamlet-Taft and Drago Scales of Solvent Polarity.

The heteroleptic molybdenum complexes [{Mo(NO)TpX}(n)()(L-L)] [Tp = HB(3,5-Me(2)C(3)HN(2))(3); X = Cl, I; L-L = 4-NC(5)H(4)(CH=CH)(4)C(5)H(4)N-4', n = 1, 2; X = Cl; L-L = {4,4'-NC(5)H(4)CH=CHC(Me)=CHCH=}(2), n = 2] have a low energy absorbance in their electronic spectra which exhibits solvatochromic shifts. These have been analyzed quantitatively by means of linear solvation energy relationships based on Kamlet-Taft solvatochromism parameters, as well as on Drago's "unified scale of solvent polarity". Each of these approaches leads to satisfactory linear models, in qualitative agreement with one another. The solvatochromism is due to a combination of increased solvent dipolarity/polarizability and solvent-to-solute hydrogen bonding, each preferentially stabilizing polar ground states compared with less polar excited states. The latter originate from metal-to-ligand charge transfer. Quantitatively, the Drago and Kamlet-Taft models differ somewhat. The former are statistically slightly better than those based on Kamlet-Taft parameters.

A Triangular Copper(I) Complex Displaying Allosteric Cooperativity in Its Electrochemical Behavior and a Mixed-Valence Cu(I)-Cu(I)-Cu(II) State with Unusual Temperature-Dependent Behavior.

Reaction of the tris-chelating hexadentate podand ligand tris[3-(2-pyridyl)pyrazol-1-yl]hydroborate (Tp(Py)) with [Cu(MeCN)(4)][PF(6)] affords [Cu(I)(3)(Tp(Py))(2)][PF(6)] (1), which was crystallographically characterized. 1.(MeCN)(2): C(52)H(44)B(2)Cu(3)F(6)N(20)P, orthorhombic, Pna2(1); a = 24.592(7), b = 16.392(5), c = 13.365(5) Å; Z = 4. Each Cu(I) ion is four coordinated by one N,N '-bidentate arm from each ligand; each ligand therefore donates each bidentate arm to a different Cu(I) ion. The isosceles triangular arrangement of Cu(I) ions with N-donor ligands is reminiscent of the tricopper(I) site of ascorbate oxidase. One-electron oxidation of 1 affords the Cu(I)(2)Cu(II) complex [Cu(3)(Tp(Py))(2)][PF(6)](2) (2). The potentials of the Cu(I)/Cu(II) redox couples are affected by the ease with which the accompanying geometric rearrangement can occur. Thus, the first oxidation of 1 is facile (-0.52 V vs the ferrocene/ferrocenium couple, Fc/Fc(+)), but as a result of the concomitant structural rearrangement the second oxidation is rendered much more difficult (+0.12 V vsFc/Fc(+)) and results in slow decomposition of the product. A third oxidation does not occur at accessible potentials. This complex therefore exhibits negative cooperative behavior, in which the geometric change accompanying one metal-based redox change hinders further redox changes at other sites via an allosteric effect. EPR studies on the mixed-valence complex 2 show that in frozen glasses below 120 K the unpaired electron is delocalized over two metal centers (7-line spectrum), but above 160 K the electron becomes localized and gives a simple axial spectrum. The electronic spectrum of 2 in solution shows an intense band at 910 nm (epsilon 2100 dm(3) mol(-)(1) cm(-)(1)) which we believe to be an IVCT band. The combination of EPR and electronic spectral studies show that 2 is class III (fully delocalized over 2 centers) below 120 K but class II (localized but strongly interacting) at higher temperatures.

Roles of Bridging Ligand Topology and Conformation in Controlling Exchange Interactions between Paramagnetic Molybdenum Fragments in Dinuclear and Trinuclear Complexes.

The magnetic properties of two series of dinuclear complexes, and one trinuclear complex, have been examined as a function of the bridging pathway between the metal centers. The first series of dinuclear complexes is [{Mo(V)(O)(Tp)Cl}(2)(&mgr;-OO)], where "OO" is [1,4-O(C(6)H(4))(n)O](2)(-) (n = 1, 1; n = 2, 3), [4,4'-O(C(6)H(3)-2-Me)(2)O](2)(-) (4), or [1,3-OC(6)H(4)O](2)(-) (2) [Tp = tris(3,5-dimethylpyrazolyl)hydroborate]. The second series of dinuclear complexes is [{Mo(I)(NO)(Tp)Cl}(2)(&mgr;-NN)], where "NN" is 4,4'-bipyridyl (5), 3,3'-dimethyl-4,4'-bipyridine (6), 3,8-phenanthroline (7), or 2,7-diazapyrene (8). The trinuclear complex is [{Mo(V)(O)(Tp)Cl}(3)(1,3,5-C(6)H(3)O(3))] (9), whose crystal structure was determined [9.5CH(2)Cl(2): C(56)H(81)B(3)Cl(13)Mo(3)N(18)O(6); monoclinic, P2(1)/n; a = 13.443, b = 41.46(2), c = 14.314(6) Å; beta = 93.21(3) degrees; V = 7995(5) Å(3); Z = 4; R(1) = 0.106]. In these complexes, the sign and magnitude of the exchange coupling constant J is clearly related to both the topology and the conformation of the bridging ligand [where J is derived from H = -JS(1)().S(2)() for 1-8 and H = -J(S(1)().S(2)() + S(2)().S(3)() + S(1)().S(3)()) for 9]. The values are as follows: 1, -80 cm(-)(1); 2, +9.8 cm(-)(1); 3, -13.2 cm(-)(1); 4, -2.8 cm(-)(1); 5, -33 cm(-)(1); 6, -3.5 cm(-)(1); 7, -35.6 cm(-)(1); 8, -35.0 cm(-)(1); 9, +14.4 cm(-)(1). In particular the following holds: (1) J is negative (antiferromagnetic exchange) across the para-substituted bridges ligands of 1 and 3-8 but positive (ferromagnetic exchange) across the meta-substituted bridging ligands of 2 and 9. (2) J decreases in magnitude dramatically as the bridging ligand conformation changes from planar to twisted (compare 3 and 4, or 6 and 8). These observations are consistent with a spin-polarization mechanism for the exchange interaction, propagated across the pi-system of the bridging ligand by via overlap of bridging ligand p(pi) orbitals with the d(pi) magnetic orbitals of the metals. The EPR spectrum of 9 is characteristic of a quartet species and shows weak Deltam(s) = 2 and Deltam(s) = 3 transitions at one-half and one-third, respectively, of the field strength of the principal Deltam(s) = 1 component.

Anion-Templated Assembly of a Supramolecular Cage Complex.

The templating effect of the tetrafluoroborate ion leads to assembly of four CoII ions and six bridging ligands around this anion to give a tetrahedral complex with a bridging ligand along each edge and the anion trapped in the central cavity (shown below). Surprisingly under identical conditions but with NiII a simpler dinuclear complex forms.

Electronic structure of nitric oxide adducts of bis(diaryl-1,2-dithiolene)iron compounds: four-membered electron-transfer series [Fe(NO)(L)2]z (z = 1+, 0, 1-, 2-).

Four members of the electron-transfer series [Fe(NO)(S(2)C(2)R(2))2]z (z = 1+, 0, 1-, 2-) have been isolated as solid materials (R = p-tolyl): [1a](BF4), [1a]0, [Co(Cp)2][1a], and [Co(Cp)2]2[1a]. In addition, complexes [2a]0 (R = 4,4-diphenyl), [3a]0 (R = p-methoxyphenyl), [Et(4)N][4a] (R = phenyl), and [PPh(4)][5a] (R = -CN) have been synthesized and the members of each of their electron-transfer series electrochemically generated in CH(2)Cl(2) solution. All species have been characterized electro- and magnetochemically. Their electronic, Mössbauer, and electron paramagnetic resonance spectra as well as their infrared spectra have been recorded in order to elucidate the electronic structure of each member of the electron-transfer series. It is shown that the monocationic, neutral, and monoanionic species possess an {FeNO}6 (S = 0) moiety where the redox chemistry is sulfur ligand-based, (L)2-(L*)1-: [Fe(NO)(L*)2]+ (S = 0), [Fe(NO)(L*)(L)]0 <--> [Fe(NO)(L)(L*)]0 (S = 1/2), [Fe(NO)(L)2]- (S = 0). Further one-electron reduction generates a dianion with an {FeNO}7 (S = 1/2) unit and two fully reduced, diamagnetic dianions L2-: [Fe(NO)(L)2]2- (S = 1/2).

Dinuclear Bis(1,2-diaryl-1,2-ethylenedithiolato)iron complexes: [FeIII2(L)4]n (n = 2-, 1-, 0, 1+).

The electronic structures of four members of the electron-transfer series [Fe2(1L)4]n (n = 2-, 1-, 0, 1+) have been elucidated in some detail by electronic absorption, IR, X-band electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), and Mössbauer spectroscopies where (1L)(2-) represents the ligand 1,2-bis(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1,2-ethylenedithiolate(2-) and (1L*)- is its pi-radical monoanion. It is conclusively shown that all redox processes are ligand-centered and that high-valent iron(IV) is not accessible. The following complexes have been synthesized: [FeIII2(1L*)2(1L)2]0 (1), [FeIII2(2L*)2(2L)2].2CH2Cl2 (1') where (2L)(2-) is 1,2-bis(p-tolyl)-1,2-ethylenedithiolate(2-) and (2L*)- represents its pi-radical monoanion, [Cp2Co][FeIII2(1L*))(1L)3].4(toluene).0.5Et2O (2), and [Cp2Co]2[FeIII2(1L)4].2(toluene) (3). The crystal structures of 1' and 2 have been determined by single-crystal X-ray crystallography at 100 K. The ground states of complexes have been determined by temperature-dependent magnetic susceptibility measurements and EPR spectroscopy: 1' and 1 are diamagnetic (S(t) = 0); 2 (S(t) = 1/2); 3 (S(t) = 0); the monocation [Fe(III)2(1L*)3(1L)]+ possesses an S(t) = 1/2 ground state (S(t) = total spin ground state of dinuclear species). All species contain pairs of intermediate-spin ferric ions (S(Fe) = 3/2), which are strongly antiferromagnetically coupled (H = -2JS(1).S(2), where S1 = S2 = 3/2 and J = approximately -250 cm(-1)).

Electronic structure of mononuclear bis(1,2-diaryl-1,2-ethylenedithiolato)iron complexes containing a fifth cyanide or phosphite ligand: a combined experimental and computational study.

A series of mononuclear square-based pyramidal complexes of iron containing two 1,2-diaryl-ethylene-1,2-dithiolate ligands in various oxidation levels has been synthesized. The reaction of the dinuclear species [Fe(III)2(1L*)2(1L)2]0, where (1L)2- is the closed shell di-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1,2-ethylenedithiolate dianion and (1L*)1- is its one-electron-oxidized pi-radical monoanion, with [N(n-Bu)4]CN in toluene yields dark green crystals of mononuclear [N(n-Bu)4][Fe(II)(1L*)2(CN)] (1). The oxidation of 1 with ferrocenium hexafluorophosphate yields blue [Fe(III)(1L*)2(CN)] (1ox), and analogously, a reduction with [Cp2Co] yields [Cp2Co][N(n-Bu)4][Fe(II)(1L*)(1L)(CN)] (1red); oxidation of the neutral dimer with iodine gives [Fe(III)(1L*)2I] (2). The dimer reacts with the phosphite P(OCH3)3 to yield [Fe(II)(1L*)2{P(OCH3)3}] (3), and [Fe(III)2(3L*)2(3L)2] reacts with P(OC6H5)3 to give [Fe(II)(3L*)2{P(OC6H5)3}] (4), where (3L)2- represents 1,2-diphenyl-1,2-ethylenedithiolate(2-). Both 3 and 4 were electrochemically one-electron oxidized to the monocations 3ox and 4ox and reduced to the monoanions 3red and 4red. The structures of 1 and 4 have been determined by X-ray crystallography. All compounds have been studied by magnetic susceptibility measurements, X-band EPR, UV-vis, IR, and Mössbauer spectroscopies. The following five-coordinate chromophores have been identified: (a) [Fe(III)(L*)2X]n, X = CN-, I- (n = 0) (1ox, 2); X = P(OR)3 (n = 1+) )3ox, 4ox) with St = 1/2, SFe = 3/2; (b) [Fe(II)(L*)2X]n, X = CN-, (n = 1-) (1); X = P(OR)3 (n = 0) (3, 4) with St = SFe = 0; (c) [Fe(II)(L*)(L)X]n <--> [Fe(II)(L)(L*)X]n, X = CN- (n = 2-) (1red); X = P(OR)3 (n = 1-) (3red, 4red) with St = 1/2, SFe = 0 (or 1). Complex 1ox displays spin crossover behavior: St = 1/2 <--> St = 3/2 with intrinsic spin-state change SFe = 3/2 <--> SFe = 5/2. The electronic structures of 1 and 1(ox) have been established by density functional theoretical calculations: [Fe(II)(1L*)2(CN)]1- (SFe = 0, St = 0) and [Fe(III)(1L*)2(CN)]0 (SFe = 3/2, St = 1/2).

Anion-templated self-assembly of tetrahedral cage complexes of cobalt(II) with bridging ligands containing two bidentate pyrazolyl-pyridine binding sites.

The bridging ligands L(1) and L(2) contain two N,N-bidentate pyrazolyl-pyridine units linked to a central aromatic spacer unit (1,2-phenyl or 2,3-naphthyl, respectively). Reaction with Ni(II) salts and treatment with the anions tetrafluoroborate or perchlorate result in formation of dinuclear complexes having a 2:3 metal:ligand ratio, with one bridging and two terminal tetradentate ligands. In contrast, reaction of L(1) and L(2) with Co(II) salts, followed by treatment with tetrafluoroborate or perchlorate, results in assembly of cage complexes having a 4:6 metal:ligand ratio; these complexes have a metal ion at each corner of an approximate tetrahedron, and a bis-bidentate bridging ligand spanning each edge. The central cavity is occupied by a tetrahedral counterion that forms multiple hydrogen-bonding interactions with the methylene protons of the bridging ligands. The anionic guest fits tightly into the central cavity of the cage to which it is ideally complementary in terms of shape, size, and charge. Solution NMR experiments show that the central anion acts as a template for cage formation, with a mixture of Co(II) and the appropriate bridging ligand alone giving no assembly into a cage until the tetrahedral anion is added, at which point cage assembly is fast and quantitative. The difference between the structures of the complexes with Ni(II) and Co(II) illustrate how the uncoordinated anions can exert a profound influence on the course of the assembly process.